J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on April 9, 2009
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1715
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-1715v1
87/7/2255    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cassady, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cassady, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, G. C.

Body composition and estrous cyclicity responses of heifers of distinct body conditions to energy restriction and repletion

J. M. Cassady*, T. D. Maddock{dagger}, A. DiCostanzo* and G. C. Lamb{dagger}

* Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108 {dagger} North Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Marianna 32446

gclamb{at}ufl.edu

Abstract

Twenty Simmental x Angus, half-sibling, post-pubertal heifers (initial BW 443 ± 9 kg) were allotted randomly to 2 treatments to evaluate if initial BCS affects how heifers respond to energy restriction and repletion. Dependent variables of interest were changes in BW, BCS, and reproductive status (determined by concentrations of serum progesterone [P4]). Empty body composition (EBC) was calculated using equations based on BCS. During a preliminary feeding period, diets were formulated so that each heifer in the designated treatment would reach either a BCS of 5 (moderate condition; MOD) or a BCS of 7 (heavy condition; FAT). Once each heifer had reached desired BCS, diets were formulated to supply 30% of NEm requirements until each heifer became anestrous (serum concentrations of P4 < 1 ng/mL; restriction period). Following anestrus, heifers were fed a high energy diet (1.43 Mcal/kg DM) until estrous cycles resumed (serum concentrations of P4 > 1 ng/mL; repletion period). Body weight, BCS, and EBC were determined on d 1 of each period, on d 43 of restriction, and d 44 of repletion, and when heifers were confirmed to have resumed estrous cycles (2 normal estrous cycles determined by P4 > 1 ng/mL). Regression of BCS on BW determined individual BCS at anestrus and estrus. After 43 d of restriction, FAT condition heifers were heavier (P < 0.001), had greater BCS (P < 0.001), and a higher proportion of empty body fat (P < 0.001). Heifers in FAT condition remained cyclic longer (P < 0.001) than those in MOD condition (148 vs 61 d). In contrast, at the onset of anestrus, BW (P = 0.15), BCS (P = 0.54), and empty body fat were similar (P = 0.54) between treatments. At 44 d of repletion, BW (P = 0.46), BCS (P = 0.41), and empty body fat (P = 0.41) were similar between treatments. Heifers in both treatments recommenced estrous activity after similar (P = 0.43) number of days (54) of energy repletion, but near onset of estrous cycles, heifers in FAT condition were heavier (P = 0.002) and had greater BCS (P =0.03) and empty body fat (P = 0.01) than those in MOD condition. Initial BCS influenced days to anestrus, but not BCS or EBC at onset of anestrus. Initial BCS had no effect on days to recommencement of estrous cycles, but did influence the degree of fatness required to resume estrous cycles.

Key Words: body composition • energy • heifer • repletion • reproduction • restriction







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.