J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on February 11, 2009
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1561
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-1561v1
87/5/1714    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puchala, R.
Right arrow Articles by Goetsch, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puchala, R.
Right arrow Articles by Goetsch, A. L.

Technical note: The relationship between heart rate and energy expenditure in growing crossbred Boer and Spanish wethers

R. Puchala*, I. Tovar-Luna*, T. Sahlu*, H. C. Freetly{dagger} and A. L. Goetsch*

* American Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, OK {dagger} USDA/ARS Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE

rpuchala{at}luresext.edu

Abstract

Eight Boer (75%) x Spanish (BS) and 8 Spanish (S) wethers (155 ± 8 d of age and 19.2 ± 2.3 kg BW initially) were used in a replicated crossover design with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to determine effects of genotype, diet quality, and time of day on energy expenditure (EE), heart rate (HR), and EE:HR with ad libitum, near maintenance, and fasting levels of feed intake. Diets were 65% concentrate or coarsely ground alfalfa hay. Energy expenditure was ranked (P < 0.05) ad libitum > maintenance > fasting (500, 390, and 270 kJ/kg BW0.75). Heart rate did not differ between genotypes when fasting and with maintenance intake, but was greater (P < 0.05) for S than for BS when intake was ad libitum (BS: 55, 71, and 92; S: 52, 72, and 100 beats/min for fasting, maintenance, and ad libitum, respectively, SEM = 2.0). There was an interaction in EE:HR (P < 0.05) between level of feed intake and genotype (BS: 5.31, 5.59, and 5.00; S: 5.07, 5.57, and 5. 22 kJ/kg BW0.75:beats/min for ad libitum, maintenance, and fasting, respectively, SEM = 0.13), without an effect of diet. The effect of time on EE, HR, and EE:HR differed among levels of intake (P < 0.05). General patterns of change in EE and HR as time of day advanced did not differ, but increases near meals followed by decreases were of slightly greater magnitude for maintenance than for ad libitum intake. The ratio of EE:HR was greater for the maintenance level of feed intake than for ad libitum intake at most times. These results indicate similar potential for use of HR to predict EE of different genotypes of growing meat goats and that establishing EE:HR with different diets or levels of intake may not be crucial. Magnitudes of difference among hours suggest that when EE:HR is used to predict EE of confined goats from full-day measurement of HR, EE:HR should be determined over an extended period of time, such as 24 h.

Key Words: energy expenditure • goats • heart rate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.