HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2008-1297v1 87/2/770    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Weary, D. M. Articles by von Keyserlingk, M. A.G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weary, D. M. Articles by von Keyserlingk, M. A.G.

BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Using behavior to predict and identify ill health in animals

Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

marina.vonkeyserlingk{at}ubc.ca

Abstract

We review recent research in one of the oldest and most important applications of ethology; evaluating animal health. Traditionally, such evaluations have been based on subjective assessments of debilitative signs; animals are judged ill when they appear ‘depressed’ or ‘off feed’. Such assessments are prone to error, but can be dramatically improved with training using well-defined clinical criteria. The availability of new technology to automatically record behaviors allows for increased use of objective measures; automated measures of feeding behavior and intake are increasingly available in commercial agriculture and recent work has shown these to be valuable indicators of illness. Research has also identified behaviors indicative of risk of disease or injury. For example, the time spent standing on wet, concrete surfaces can be used to predict susceptibility to hoof injuries in dairy cattle, and time spent nuzzling the sow’s udder can predict the risk of crushing in piglets. One conceptual advance has been to view decreased exploration, feeding, social, sexual and other behaviors, as a coordinated response that helps afflicted individuals recover from illness. We argue that the ‘sickness behaviors’ most likely to decline are those that provide longer-term fitness benefits (such as play), as animals divert resources to those functions of critical short-term value such as maintaining body temperature. We urge future research assessing the strength of motivation to express sickness behaviors, allowing for quantitative estimates of how sick an animal feels. Finally, we call for new theoretical and empirical work on behaviors that may act to signal health status, including behaviors that have evolved as honest (i.e. reliable) signals of condition for offspring-parent, inter- and intra-sexual and predator-prey communication.

Key Words: behavior • illness • sickness behavior • motivational testing • signaling • pain

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. J. DeVries, K. A. Beauchemin, F. Dohme, and K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: Feeding, ruminating, and lying behavior J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2009; 92(10): 5067 - 5078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, J. Rushen, A. M. de Passille, and D. M. Weary Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle--Key concepts and the role of science J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4101 - 4111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Borderas, J. Rushen, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and A. M. B. de Passille Automated measurement of changes in feeding behavior of milk-fed calves associated with illness J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4549 - 4554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]