J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on August 1, 2008
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1083
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-1083v1
86/11/2862    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lancaster, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, T. H., Jr.

Effects of divergent selection for serum IGF-I concentration on performance, feed efficiency and ultrasound measures of carcass composition traits in Angus bulls and heifers

P. A. Lancaster*, G. E. Carstens*, F. R. B. Ribeiro*, M. E. Davis{dagger}, J. G. Lyons* and T. H. Welsh, Jr.*

* Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843 {dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210

g-carstens{at}tamu.edu

Abstract

Angus bulls and heifers from lines divergently selected for serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentration were used to evaluate the effects of IGF-I selection line on growth performance and feed efficiency in 2 studies. In study 1, bulls (low line n = 9; high line n = 8; initial BW = 367.1 ± 22.9 kg) and heifers (low line n = 9; high line n = 13; initial BW = 286.4 ± 28.6 kg) were adapted to a roughage-based diet (ME = 1.95 Mcal/kg DM) for 24 d and fed individually for 77 d using Calan gate feeders. In study 2, bulls (low line n = 15; high line n = 12; initial BW = 297.5 ± 34.4 kg) and heifers (low line n = 9; high line n = 20; initial BW = 256.0 ± 25.1 kg) were adapted to a grain-based diet (ME = 2.85 Mcal/kg DM) for 32 d and fed individually for 70 d using Calan gate feeders. Blood samples were collected at weaning and at the start and end of each study and serum IGF-I concentration was determined. Residual feed intake (RFI) was calculated, within study, as the residual from the linear regression of DMI on mid-test BW0.75 (MBW), ADG, gender, gender by MBW and gender by ADG. In study 1, calves from the low IGF-I selection line had similar initial and final BW and ADG, compared to calves from the high IGF-I selection line. In addition, DMI and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were similar between IGF-I selection lines, however, calves from the low IGF-I selection line tended (P < 0.10) to have lower RFI than calves from the high IGF-I selection line (-0.26 vs. 0.24 ± 0.31 kg/d). In study 2, IGF-I selection line had no influence on performance or feed efficiency traits. However, there was a tendency (P = 0.15) for an IGF-I selection line by gender interaction for RFI. Bulls from the low IGF-I selection line had numerically lower RFI than those from the high IGF-I selection line, whereas, in heifers IGF-I selection line had no effect on RFI. In studies 1 and 2, weaning and initial IGF-I concentrations were not correlated with either FCR or RFI. However, regression analysis revealed a gender by IGF-I concentration interaction for initial IGF-I concentration in study 1 and weaning IGF-I concentration in study 2 such that the regression coefficient was positive for bulls and negative for heifers. These data suggest that genetic selection for postweaning serum IGF-I concentration had minimal effect on RFI in beef cattle.

Key Words: beef cattle • carcass composition • divergent selection • IGF-I • residual feed intake




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. S. Moore, F. D. Mujibi, and E. L. Sherman
Molecular basis for residual feed intake in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E41 - E47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Animal Science.