J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on October 24, 2008
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-0949
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-0949v1
87/2/562    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solà-Oriol, D.
Right arrow Articles by Torrallardona, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solà-Oriol, D.
Right arrow Articles by Torrallardona, D.

Feed preference in pigs: Effect of cereal sources at different inclusion rates

D. Solà-Oriol*, E. Roura{dagger} and D. Torrallardona*

* Animal Nutrition, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), E-43120 Constantí, Tarragona, Spain {dagger} R & D Feed Additives, Lucta SA, E-08170 Montornés del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain

David.Torrallardona{at}irta.es

Abstract

The palatability of different cereals was studied in 2 two-way choice (preference) experiments using pigs of 56 d of age and 17 kg BW. In Exp. 1, the effect of 24 cereals vs. a common reference diet containing white rice on feed preference in pigs was studied. Pigs were offered a free choice between the reference diet and a diet with the cereal under study for 4 d. Barley, corn (2 sources), wheat, cassava meal, biscuit meal, rye, sorghum, and one source of oats were tested at inclusion rates of 300 and 600 g·kg-1. Short grain rice (whole, brown, or extruded white), long-grain white rice (raw and cooked), extruded barley, extruded corn, extruded wheat, oats (2 sources), thick rolled oats, cooked oats, and naked oats (raw, extruded, or micronized) were tested at inclusion rates of 150, 300, and 600 g·kg-1. Relative preference of cereals (% of total feed intake) was affected by type of cereal and by rate of inclusion. The diets containing extruded rice (150 g·kg-1), extruded naked oats (150, 300, and 600 g·kg-1), or naked oats (150 and 300 g·kg-1) were preferred (P < 0.05) by pigs to the reference diet. However, the reference diet was preferred (P < 0.05) by pigs to the diets containing 150, 300, and 600 g·kg-1 of cooked long-grain rice, oats, or cooked oats, 300 and 600 g·kg-1 of extruded wheat, wheat, corn, sorghum, or unhulled short-grain rice, and 600 g·kg-1 of thick rolled oats, extruded corn, rye, extruded barley, micronized naked oats, barley, cassava, or biscuit meal. Extrusion improved (P < 0.05) preference values for corn and naked oats by pigs, but had no effect on barley, rice, or wheat. In Exp. 2, the pig's preferences for oats and barley were studied using mash and pelleted diets. Diet form did not affect preference in oats diets. However, for barley, greater preference values were obtained when measured in pelleted form compared with mash form. Additionally, direct 2-way choices were also performed between oats and barley diets and between diets presented in mash and pelleted forms. Pigs preferred barley to oats, and preferred diets presented in pelleted to those presented in mash form. In conclusion, cereal type, inclusion rate, and diet form affected feed preference in pigs. Using cereals with greater preference values may contribute to the formulation of more palatable feeds, which enhance feed intake of piglets at critical stages such as weaning time.

Key Words: cereal • palatability • pigs • preference • two-way choice







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Animal Science.