J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on October 24, 2008
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0677
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0677v1
87/2/729    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cerisuelo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sala, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cerisuelo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sala, R.

Increased sow nutrition during mid-gestation affects muscle fiber development and meat quality with no consequences on growth performance

A. Cerisuelo*, M. D. Baucells*, J. Gasa*, J. Coma{dagger}, D. Carrión{ddagger}, N. Chapinal* and R. Sala*

* Animal Nutrition, Management and Welfare Research Group, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain , {dagger} Vall Companys Group, 25191 Lleida, Spain {ddagger} Pig Improvement Company, S.A., 08190 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain

roser.sala@uab.cat

Abstract

Pregnant sow nutrition has potential effects on the progeny muscle fibers development in utero. A total of 199 Landrace x Large White sows from parities 0 to 6 and their offspring were used to evaluate the effects of increasing feeding level during mid-pregnancy on muscle tissue, growth performance and meat quality of the progeny. The experiment was divided into 2 study replicates and in each replicate sows were assigned to 1 of the 2 treatments: 1) control group (C-sows) was fed 2.5 to 3.0 kg/d (feed: 12.1 MJ ME/kg and 0.62% lysine) throughout gestation; 2) high group (H-sows) received an extra feed allowance of 1.5 kg/d for gilts and 2.0 kg/d for multiparous sows above the C level from d 45 to 85 of gestation (period of secondary muscle fibers formation). Sow backfat was recorded on d 40 and 85 of gestation. Sow performance (litter size and piglet weight) at farrowing and on d 18 of lactation was measured. At weaning, pigs were divided into 5 weight groups/treatment and progeny growth performance was measured during the nursery (n = 958) and the growing-finishing (n = 636) periods. At slaughter, carcass and meat quality traits (lean content, main cut weight, pH, Minolta color and drip loss) were recorded from the second lightest group at weaning (weight group 4; n = 90) and samples from the Longissimus thoracis muscle were taken to study muscle fiber characteristics (n = 70). Extra nutrition from d 45 to d 85 of gestation did not lead to differences in litter size nor in piglet weight at farrowing and on d 18 of lactation. Pigs born from H mothers had fewer muscle fibers and fewer estimated primary and secondary fibers than in C pigs (P < 0.05). However, postnatal growth performance was not consistently affected by the maternal treatment. Fewer muscle fibers found in the H group of pigs was associated with a fewer type IIB fibers (P < 0.05) with greater cross-sectional areas (P < 0.10), which might be connected with the significantly higher meat pH at 24 h postmortem and the lower L* values recorded in the H group of pigs. Results from the present study confirm the existence of effects of maternal nutrition on fetal development at least in terms of muscle tissue development and meat quality, although with no beneficial effects on the postnatal growth performance of the progeny.

Key Words: growth performance • meat quality • muscle fibers • pregnancy feeding • sow







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Animal Science.