J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on December 11, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0491
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0491v1
86/4/916    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Salinas-Chavira, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Salinas-Chavira, J.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0491
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Influence of dry rolling and tempering agent addition during the steam-flaking of sorghum grain on the feeding value for feedlot cattle

R. A. Zinn 1*, E. G. Alverez 1, M. Montano 1, J. Salinas-Chavira 1

1 Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: razinn{at}ucdavis.edu.


   Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of dry rolling (DRS) and tempering agent (TA) addition during the steam-flaking of grain sorghum (SFS) for feedlot cattle. Five dietary treatments were compared: 1) DRS; 2) SFS, no TA; 3) SFS, 0.275 mg/kg TA (SarTemp; SarTec, Anoka, MN); 4) SFS, 1.375 mg/kg TA; and 5) SFS, 2.750 mg/kg TA. Bulk densities of DRS and SFS were 0.48 and 0.36 kg/L, respectively. Diets contained 70.6% grain sorghum (DM basis). One hundred fifty crossbred steers (336 kg) were used in a 115-d finishing experiment to evaluate treatment effects on feedlot performance. Weight gain averaged 1.49 kg/d, and was not affected (P = 0.47) by treatments. The SFS reduced (P < 0.01) DMI (9%) and enhanced (P < 0.01) G:F (13%) and the NEm and NEg value of the diet (9 and 11%, respectively). Use of a tempering agent prior to flaking sorghum did not influence (P > 0.20) cattle growth performance or NEm and NEg value of the diet. Given that the NEm and NEg values of DRS are 2.00 and 1.35 Mcal/kg, respectively (NRC, 1996), the corresponding values for SFS were 2.28 and 1.59 Mcal/kg. Five steers (397 kg) with ruminal and duodenal cannulas were used in a 5 x 5 Latin square design to evaluate treatment effects on digestive function. Ruminal digestion of OM and starch were greater (14 and 16%, respectively; P < 0.01) for SFS versus DRS. Steam flaking sorghum increased (P < 0.01) post-ruminal digestion of OM (11%), N (10%), and starch (25%), and total tract digestion (P < 0.01) of OM (8.3%), N (8.2%), and starch (8.9%). Grain processing did not affect (P > 0.20) ruminal pH or VFA molar proportions. There was a cubic component (P < 0.10) to level of tempering agent on ruminal pH, and VFA molar proportions, with values being optimal at 1.375 mg/kg tempering agent. It is concluded that steam flaking grain sorghum will increase its NE value for maintenance and gain (14 and 18%, respectively) and enhance the MP value of the diet due to greater intestinal N digestion. The use of a tempering agent to enhance the mechanical efficiency of the flaking process may not otherwise benefit the feeding value of sorghum.

Key Words: sorghum, tempering, steam flake, performance, digestion







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.