J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on April 11, 2008
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0440
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0440v1
86/8/1996    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Foxcroft, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Foxcroft, G.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0440
©Copyright, 2008, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Responses to delayed estrus after weaning in sows using oral progestagen treatment

J. Patterson 1*, A. Wellen 1, M. Hahn 1, A. Pasternak 1, J. Lowe 2, S. DeHass 2, D. Kraus 2, N. Williams 3, G. Foxcroft 1

1 Swine Reproduction-Development Program, Dept. AFNS, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5
2 The Maschhoffs, Inc.
3 PIC USA, Inc.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jlp2{at}ualberta.ca.


   Abstract

Oral progestagen treatment extends the weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI) in weaned sows. Particularly in lower parity sows, this allows recovery from lactational catabolism and improves sow productivity. However, the optimal duration of progestagen treatment in contemporary dam-line sows is unclear. Therefore, sows (n = 749) weaned over consecutive 3-wk periods in June and July, and classified as parity 2 and 3 (P2-3) 4, 5 and 6 (P4-6) or parity 7 or higher (P7+), were organized into 2 breeding groups using 1 of 3 strategies: 1) oral progestagen for 2 d before and 12 d after weaning (M14; n = 249); 2) oral progestagen for 2 d before and 5 d after weaning (M7; n = 250); or 3) no progestagen treatment (M0; n = 250). Progestagen (altrenogest) was administered directly into the sow's mouth at a dosage of 6.8 mL (15 mg altrenogest) daily. Sows were bred using artificial insemination at first detection of estrus after weaning (M0) or altrenogest withdrawal, and every 24 h thereafter, until they no longer exhibited the standing reflex. The WEI for M0 sows was 5.1 ± 0.1 d. Estrus was recorded sooner (P < 0.001) after withdrawing treatment in M14 than in M7 sows (6.9 ± 0.1 vs 7.4 ± 0.1 d, respectively). More (P < 0.001) M14 sows (88.6 ± 2.5%) were bred within 10 d of altrenogest withdrawal than M7 (72.8 ± 2.8%) sows, or within 10 d of weaning in M0 sows (78.8 ± 2.6%). Reproductive tracts were recovered after slaughter at either d 30 or 50 of gestation. For P2-3 sows, ovulation rate (lsmean ± 95% confidence interval, CI) in M7 (23.1 ± 1.0) was greater (P < 0.001) than in M14 (20.7 ± 1.0) or M0 (19.7 ± 1.0) sows; no differences were detected in P4-6 and P7+ sows. At d 30, M7 and M14 sows had more (P < 0.01) embryos (16.4 ± 0.6 and 15.8 ± 0.4, respectively) than M0 (13.9 ± 0.5) sows. At d 50 of gestation, number of fetuses in M14 sows (13.6 ± 0.4) was greater (P < 0.001) than in M0 (11.8 ± 0.4) and M7 (12.2 ± 0.3) sows. Use of oral progestagen to delay the return to post-weaning estrus for greater than 18 d appears to have potential for improving weaned sow productivity. Given the incidence of high ovulation rates and associated evidence of intra-uterine crowding of embryos around d 30 of gestation, the changing dynamics of prenatal loss resulting from longer periods of progestagen treatment may represent an additional production advantage.

Key Words: estrus, lactation, post-weaning fertility, progestagen, sow







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Animal Science.