J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on November 27, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0373
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0373v1
86/2/384    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christophersen, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vercoe, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christophersen, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Vercoe, P. E.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0373
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

In vitro methane emission and acetate/propionate ratio are decreased when artificial stimulation of the rumen wall is combined with increasing grain diets in sheep

C. T. Christophersen 1*, A. -D.G. Wright 2, P. E. Vercoe 3

1 University of Western Australia, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Crawley, WA. 6009, Australia; CSIRO Livestock Industries, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA. 6913, Australia
2 CSIRO Livestock Industries, Centre for Environment and Life Sciences, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA. 6913, Australia
3 University of Western Australia, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Crawley, WA. 6009, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.christophersen{at}csiro.au.


   Abstract

The interaction of retention time in the rumen and concentrate diet on methane production in vitro and acetate/propionate ratio was examined. Twenty-four fistulated sheep were used in a complete factorial design with the sheep randomly divided into 4 groups. The sheep had a 5-wk acclimatization period on an oaten-chaff diet, followed by two 3-wk diet phases. Two of the 4 groups were maintained on the oaten-chaff diet for the duration of the experiment with pot scrubbers added to the rumen of 1 of the 2 groups. The remaining 2 groups were offered a low grain diet (35% grain) in the first diet phase followed by a high grain diet (70% grain) in the second diet phase. Pot scrubbers were also added to the rumen of 1 of these 2 groups of grain-fed sheep. Pot scrubbers in combination with a low grain diet decreased the amount of methane produced in vitro from 4.25 to 3.71 mmol/mL digesta when compared to oaten-chaff-fed sheep without pot scrubbers (P < 0.05). The acetate/propionate ratio was 1.6 in sheep fed a high grain diet with pot scrubbers compared to 2.4 in sheep fed a high grain diet without pot scrubbers in their rumen (P < 0.05). At high levels of grain, when employing a multivariate statistical analysis including all data, sheep given the combined treatment of grain and pot scrubbers were different from all other sheep groups in this experiment (P < 0.05). Furthermore, sheep fed a high grain diet were different from sheep receiving the oaten-chaff diets with and without pot scrubbers (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, pot scrubbers combined with grain alter the rumen fermentation, and introducing pot scrubbers into the rumens of livestock consuming low levels of grain may be a way to lower methane emissions.

Key Words: acetate/propionate ratio, methane, methanogens, pH, sheep, VFA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.