J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on November 12, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0250
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0250v1
86/2/370    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freetly, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brown-Brandl, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freetly, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Brown-Brandl, T.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0250
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Partitioning of energy in pregnant beef cows during nutritionally-induced weight fluctuation

H. C. Freetly 1*, J. A. Nienaber 1, T. Brown-Brandl 1

1 USDA, ARS, US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Harvey.Freetly{at}ars.usda.gov.


   Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if the efficiency of energy retention in pregnant cows was dependent on the time during the pregnancy that feed was offered. Our hypothesis was that restricting feed intake during the second trimester of gestation and providing the saved feed during the third trimester was less energetically efficient than providing the feed during the second trimester. Twenty cows (4 breed composite: 1/4 Hereford, 1/4 Angus, 1/4 Red Poll, and 1/4 Pinzgauer) that had produced 1 calf before the study were fed a diet that consisted of (DM basis) 67.3% chopped corn silage, 27.0% alfalfa hay, 5.5% corn, and 0.2% NaCl. When cows were 87 ± 0.6 d pregnant, the first nutrient balance measurement was conducted. Six subsequent nutrient balance measurements were taken on d 122 ± 0.6, 143 ± 0.6, 171 ± 0.6, 206 ± 0.6, 241 ± 0.6, and 262 ± 0.6. Each nutrient balance measurement consisted of a 96-h total collection of feces and urine and a 24-h indirect calorimetry measurement. Ten cows were fed for moderate weight gain during the entire pregnancy, and 10 cows (Low-High) were feed restricted in the second trimester and realimented during the third trimester (L-H). Cows' BW at parturition (559 ± 14 kg) did not differ between treatments (P = 0.20). There was a general trend for the proportion of ME intake retained to decrease in moderate cows as pregnancy progressed. The proportion of ME intake retained in L-H cows decreased during the first 49 d of feed restriction, but the proportion of ME retained after 77 d of restriction was greater than that retained at 49 d of restriction. During realimentation, there were no time effects for efficiency of ME conversion to retained energy, but efficiency was greater for L-H cows than moderate cows (P < 0.001). The cow's ability to adapt her energy metabolism during periods of moderate feed restriction and realimentation allows development of management strategies that alter the time interval of the production cycle during which supplemental feed is offered. Total savings in feed offered during the production year are minimal, but management strategies can be developed that shift what feed resources are being used.

Key Words: cow, energy, heat production







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.