J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online first on July 3, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0174
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0174v1
85/10/2682    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Apple, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Apple, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, T. A.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0174
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science

ARTICLE

Interactive Effect of Ractopamine and Dietary Fat Source on Quality Characteristics of Fresh Pork Bellies

J. K. Apple 1*, C. V. Maxwell 1, J. T. Sawyer 1, B. R. Kutz 1, L. K. Rakes 1, M. E. Davis 1, Z. B. Johnson 1, S. N. Carr 2, T. A. Armstrong 2

1 Department of Animal Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 72701
2 Elanco Animal Health, a Division of Eli Lilly and Company, Greenfield, IN 46140

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: japple{at}uark.edu.


  Abstract

Crossbred pigs (n = 216) were used to test the interactive effect, if any, of ractopamine (RAC) and dietary fat source on the characteristics of fresh pork bellies. Pigs were blocked by BW (77.6 ± 6.5 kg) and allotted randomly to pens (6 pigs/pen), and, after receiving a common diet devoid of RAC for 2 wk, pens within blocks were assigned randomly to 1 of 4 treatments arranged in a 2 x 2 factorial design with 5% fat (beef tallow vs. soybean oil) and RAC (0 vs. 10 mg/kg). At the conclusion of the 35-d feeding period, pigs were slaughtered at a commercial pork packing plant (average BW of 108.8 ± 0.6 kg), and fresh bellies were captured during carcass fabrication. Neither RAC (P = 0.362) nor fat source (P = 0.247) affected belly thickness. Subjective (bar-suspension) or objective (compression test) measures of belly firmness were not (P ≥ 0.148) affected by the inclusion of RAC in the diet; however, bellies from pigs fed soybean oil (SBO) were softer than those from pigs fed beef tallow (BT), as indicated by perpendicular (P ≤ 0.005) and parallel (P < 0.001) suspensions. Moreover, bellies from BT-fed pigs required more (P = 0.096) force to compress 50% of their thickness than bellies from SBO-fed pigs (52.29 vs. 43.51 kg). Color (L*, a*, and b* values) of the belly lean and fat was not (P ≥ 0.131) affected by RAC, and lean color was similar (P ≥ 0.262) between fat sources; however, belly fat from BT-fed pigs was lighter (P = 0.030) and redder (P = 0.013) in color than belly fat from SBO-fed pigs. Bellies of SBO-fed pigs had greater (P < 0.001) proportions of PUFA, and lower (P < 0.001) proportions of SFA and MUFA, than belly fat from pigs fed BT. Regardless of RAC inclusion level, PUFA:SFA and iodine values were lower in belly fat from pigs fed BT than SBO; however, within SBO-fed pigs, PUFA:SFA and iodine values were further increased by feeding RAC (RAC x fat source, P < 0.001). As expected, dietary fat source altered the fatty acid composition of fresh pork bellies, which subsequently impacted fresh belly firmness. Interestingly, including RAC in swine finishing diets exasperated the effect of feeding SBO on pork fat polyunsaturation.

Key Words: Belly, Color, Fatty acid composition, Firmness, Pork, Ractopamine






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.