J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on August 8, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0169
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0169v1
85/11/3123    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schembri, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holyoake, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schembri, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Holyoake, P. K.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0169
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Lifetime traceability of weaner pigs in concrete-based and deep-litter production systems in Australia

N. A. Schembri 1*, F. Sithole 1, J. A. Toribio 1, M. Hernández-Jover 1, P. K. Holyoake 1

1 University of Sydney, Faculty of Veterinary Science, 425 Werombi Road, Camden, NSW 2570 Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nicoles{at}camden.usyd.edu.au.


   Abstract

A field study was conducted on a 2,300 sow piggery in south-western New South Wales, Australia over a 17-wk period (from weaning at 4 wk of age) to assess the suitability for lifetime traceability of weaners of 4 identification devices: 1) full duplex ear tag (FDX, Allflex), 2) half duplex ear tag designed for cattle (HDX, Leadertronic), 3) conventional ear tag (Leader), and 4) ear tattoo (Ketchum Ear tattoo 101). Visual readability, retention rate, electronic failures and adverse side effects were assessed at 8 wk after application at both sites and before slaughter at 14 or 17 wk after application at Site A and Site B, respectively. A total of 394 weaner pigs were randomly assigned after weaning to 6 treatment groups and reared either in small groups in intensive, indoor, concrete-based pens (n = 224; site A) or in a large group on deep litter (n = 170; site B). Visual readability was similar for all ear tag types before slaughter (P > 0.05); however, visual readability of the ET was lower (P < 0.05) with between 78.2% and 60.0% illegible due to ink fading. Few tags were lost in the 8-wk period after application, however tag loss increased for each tag device after this period and varied with housing system. Conventional tag loss was greater among pigs housed in Site A (29.0%) than in pigs housed in Site B (4.9%) in the 6- to 9-wk period before slaughter. The overall readability of FDX and HDX tags did not differ (P > 0.05) between sites; however, overall readability of FDX tags at 98.4% was better (P < 0.05) than 71.8% for HDX tags. Tag costs ranged from $0.73 for the CT to $2.42 for the HDX ear tag. The identification devices did not induce production limiting adverse effects after they were applied. Under conditions of this study, FDX electronic ear tags were the most efficacious for lifetime identification of weaner pigs on-farm.

Key Words: ear tag, electronic identification, pig, traceability, weaner







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.