J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on June 12, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0141
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0141v1
85/10/2740    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by MacNeil, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by MacNeil, M. D.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0141
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Effects of restricted feeding of beef heifers during the postweaning period on growth, efficiency, and ultrasound carcass characteristics

A. J. Roberts 1*, S. I. Paisley 2, T. W. Geary 1, E. E. Grings 1, R. C. Waterman 1, M. D. MacNeil 1

1 USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301
2 University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andy.roberts{at}ars.usda.gov.


   Abstract

Traits used for identification of replacement beef heifers and feeding levels provided during postweaning development may have major financial implications due to effects on maintenance requirements and level of lifetime production. The present study evaluated effects of 2 levels of feeding during the postweaning period on growth, feed efficiency, and ultrasound carcass measurements of heifers, and associations among these traits. Heifers (composite: 1/2 Red Angus, 1/4 Charolais, 1/4 Tarentaise) born in 3 different years were randomly assigned to either control (fed to appetite; n = 205) or restricted (fed at 80% of that consumed by controls adjusted to a common BW basis; n = 192) feeding during a 140-d postweaning period. Heifers were individually fed a diet of 68% corn silage, 18% alfalfa, and protein-mineral supplement (DM basis) in pens equipped with Calan gates. Ultrasound measurements of LM area, intramuscular fat (IMF), and subcutaneous fat thickness over the LM (FT) were made on d 140 (382 ± 0.8 d of age). Average daily DMI was 4.1 and 5.6 kg/d for restricted and control heifers, respectively (P < 0.001). Feed restriction decreased (P < 0.001) BW (291 vs. 314 kg), ADG (0.52 vs. 0.65 kg/d), LM area (55 vs. 59 cm2), IMF (3.2 vs. 3.5%) and FT (3.2 vs. 3.9 mm), but increased G:F (0.12 vs. 0.11) when compared to control at the end of the 140-d study, Magnitude of associations of DMI with ADG (r = 0.32 vs. 0.21), 140-d BW (r = 0.78 vs. 0.36), hip height (r = 0.57 vs. 0.17), LMA (r = 0.30 vs. 0.18) and BCS (r = 0.17 vs. 0.11) were greater in restricted than control-fed heifers. Variance of residual feed intake (RFI) calculated within each treatment, was greater (P < 0.01) in control (0.088) than restricted (0.004) heifers, and magnitude of association between RFI and average DMI was greater in control (r = 0.88) than restricted (r = 0.41) heifers. Pregnancy rate tended (P = 0.11) to be reduced in heifers that had been developed on restricted feed (86.3 ± 2.3 vs. 91.5 ± 2.3%). However, ADG was greater (P < 0.001) in restricted than control heifers (0.51 vs. 0.46 kg/d) while grazing native range in the 7 mo after restriction. In summary, restricted heifers consumed 22% less feed on a per pregnant heifer basis during the development period and had greater magnitude of association between DMI and several growth related traits at the end of the140-d post weaning feeding period which is indicative of improved efficiency.

Key Words: carcass, cattle, feed efficiency, feed level, growth, heifer development




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. J. Roberts, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil
Reproductive performance of heifers offered ad libitum or restricted access to feed for a one hundred forty-day period after weaning
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 3043 - 3052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.