J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on August 8, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0080
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0080v1
85/11/3033    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Middelbos, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Middelbos, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fahey, G. C., Jr.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0080
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Evaluation of fermentable oligosaccharides in diets fed to dogs in comparison to fiber standards

I. S. Middelbos 1, N. D. Fastinger 1, G. C. Fahey Jr.1*

1 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gcfahey{at}uiuc.edu.


   Abstract

Blends of fermentable oligosaccharides in combination with the non-fermentable fiber, cellulose, were evaluated for their ability to serve as dietary fibers in dog foods. Using a 6 x 6 Latin square design, six diets were evaluated that contained either no supplemental fiber, beet pulp, cellulose, or blends of cellulose, fructooligosaccharides (FOS), and yeast cell wall (YCW) added at 2.5% of the diet. Six ileal cannulated dogs were fed 175 g of their assigned diet twice daily. Chromic oxide served as a digestibility marker. Nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial populations, fermentative end-products, and immunological indices were measured. Total tract DM and OM digestibilities were lowest (P < 0.05) for the cellulose treatment. Crude protein digestibility was lower (P < 0.05) for the treatments containing carbohydrate blends. The cellulose treatment had the lowest (P < 0.05) concentration of bacteria and all diets containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal bifidobacteria concentrations compared to the diets without supplemental fermentable fiber. Lactobacilli concentrations tended to be greater (P < 0.08) in treatments containing fermentable fiber compared to the cellulose treatment. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli concentrations were similar for the beet pulp treatment compared to the fermentable oligosaccharide blends. Total fecal short-chain fatty acid concentration was greater for the beet pulp treatment (P < 0.05) compared to the control and cellulose treatments. The treatments containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal butyrate concentrations compared to cellulose and control treatments. Immune indices were not affected by treatment. Our results suggest that dog foods containing blends of fermentable and non-fermentable carbohydrates produce similar physiological results as dog food containing beet pulp as a fiber source. Therefore, blends of these carbohydrates could be useful substitutes for beet pulp in dog foods.

Key Words: beet pulp, dietary fiber, dog, intestinal microbiota, oligosaccharides







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.