J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on April 12, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0004
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0004v1
85/8/2019    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, T. C.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0004
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Effects of heifer finishing implants on beef carcass traits and longissimus tenderness

B. A. Schneider 1, J. D. Tatum 1*, T. E. Engle 1, T. C. Bryant 2

1 Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1171
2 Five Rivers Cattle Feeding, Loveland, CO, 80538

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: J.Daryl.Tatum{at}Colostate.edu.


   Abstract

Effects of finishing implants on heifer carcass characteristics and LM Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) were investigated using commercially fed Continental x British heifers (n=500). Heifers were blocked by initial BW (Block 1: BW ≥ 340 kg; Block 2: BW < 340 kg) and assigned randomly to 12 treatments that utilized 0, 1, or 2 finishing implants to deliver cumulative dosages of trenbolone acetate (TBA) and estradiol 17-{beta} (E2) ranging from 0 to 400 mg TBA and 0 to 40 mg E2 during the finishing period. Heifers in Blocks 1 and 2 were harvested after 135 and 149 d on feed, respectively. At these endpoints, treatment groups did not differ (P > 0.05) in adjusted fat thickness or predicted percent empty body fat. Compared with a non-implanted control, implanting heifers a single time during finishing increased (P = 0.025) HCW by an average of 7.9 kg, without affecting mean marbling score, the percentage of carcasses grading Choice and Prime, or LM WBSF values. Compared with use of 1 implant, use of 2 finishing implants resulted in an additional increase (P = 0.008) in hot carcass weight of 6.0 kg. Re-implanting also increased (P < 0.001) LM area, reduced (P = 0.024) the percentage of KPH fat, and improved (P = 0.004) mean yield grade. However, re-implanted heifers produced a lower (P = 0.044) percentage of carcasses grading Choice and Prime and LM steaks with higher (P < 0.05)WBSF values at all postmortem aging times, compared with heifers that were implanted once. Among heifers receiving 2 implants, mean 14-d LM WBSF increased linearly (P < 0.05) as the cumulative, combined dosage of E2 plus TBA increased. Heifers implanted with a combination of E2 plus TBA had larger (P = 0.046) LM areas, lower (P = 0.004) mean marbling scores, and higher LM WBSF values after 3 d (P = 0.001), 7 d (P = 0.001), 14 d (P = 0.003), and 21 d (P = 0.045) of postmortem aging than did heifers implanted with TBA alone. Heifers that received combination implants containing both E2 and TBA also produced fewer (P = 0.005) carcasses with marbling scores of Modest or higher compared with heifers that received single-ingredient implants containing TBA alone. Implant treatment effects on LM WBSF gradually diminished as length of the postmortem aging period increased. Postmortem aging periods of 14 to 28 d were effective for mitigating detrimental effects of mild or moderately aggressive heifer implant programs on predicted consumer acceptability of LM steaks.

Key Words: Carcass, Grade, Growth Promoters, Heifers, Tenderness







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.