J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on March 30, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-836
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-836v1
85/8/1940    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schafer, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schafer, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, D. J.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-836
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation before fixed-time artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows

D. J. Schafer 1, J. F. Bader 1, J. P. Meyer 1, J. K. Haden 2, M. R. Ellersieck 3, M. C. Lucy 1, M. F. Smith 1, D. J. Patterson 1*

1 Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211
2 MFA, Inc., Columbia 65202
3 Agriculture Experiment Station, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pattersond{at}missouri.edu.


   Abstract

This experiment was designed to compare pregnancy rates in postpartum beef cows resulting from fixed-time AI (FTAI) after treatment with one of two protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation. Crossbred, suckled beef cows (n = 650) at four locations (n = 210; n = 158; n = 88; n = 194) were assigned within a location to one of two protocols within age group by days postpartum and BCS. Cows assigned to the MGA Select treatment (MGA Select; n = 327) were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5 mg·hd-1·d-1) for 14 d, GnRH (100 µg i.m. Cystorelin) was injected on d 26, and PGF2{alpha} (PG; 25 mg i.m. Lutalyse) was injected on d 33. Cows assigned to the CO-Synch + CIDR protocol (CO-Synch + CIDR; n = 323) were fed carrier for 14 d, were injected with GnRH and equipped with an EAZI-BREED Controlled Internal Drug Release insert (CIDR; 1.38 g progesterone) 12 d after carrier removal, and PG (25 mg i.m. Lutalyse) was injected and CIDR were removed on d 33. Fixed-time AI was performed at 72 or 66 h after PG for MGA Select and CO-Synch + CIDR groups, respectively. All cows were injected with GnRH (100 µg i.m. Cystorelin) at the time of insemination. Blood samples were collected 8 and 1 d before the start of MGA or carrier to determine estrous cyclicity status of cows (estrous cycling versus anestrus) before treatment [progesterone ≥ 0.5 ng/mL; (MGA Select, 185/327, 57%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 177/323, 55%); P = 0.65]. There was no difference (P = 0.20) between treatments associated with pregnancy rate to FTAI (MGA Select, 201/327, 61%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 214/323, 66%). There was also no difference (P = 0.25) between treatments in final pregnancy rate at the end of the breeding period (MGA Select, 305/327, 93%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 308/323, 95%). These data indicate that pregnancy rates were comparable after FTAI, following administration of the MGA Select or CO-Synch + CIDR protocols. Both protocols provide opportunities for beef producers to utilize AI and potentially eliminate the need to detect estrus.

Key Words: Beef cow, controlled internal drug release insert, estrus synchronization, fixed-time artificial insemination, progestin, melengestrol acetate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. R. Leitman, D. C. Busch, J. F. Bader, D. A. Mallory, D. J. Wilson, M. C. Lucy, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson
Comparison of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in estrous-cycling and prepubertal beef heifers
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1808 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. C. Busch, D. J. Schafer, D. J. Wilson, D. A. Mallory, N. R. Leitman, J. K. Haden, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson
Timing of artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows following administration of the CO-Synch + controlled internal drug-release protocol
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1519 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. C. Busch, J. A. Atkins, J. F. Bader, D. J. Schafer, D. J. Patterson, T. W. Geary, and M. F. Smith
Effect of ovulatory follicle size and expression of estrus on progesterone secretion in beef cows
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 553 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.