J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on May 15, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-652
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-652v1
85/9/2290    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lardy, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauer, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lardy, G. P.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-652
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Influence of pressed beet pulp and concentrated separator byproduct on intake, gain, feed efficiency, and carcass composition of growing and finishing beef steers

M. L. Bauer 1*, D. E. Schimek 1, J. J. Reed 1, J. S. Caton 1, P. T. Berg 1, G. P. Lardy 1

1 Department of Animal and Range Sciences North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Marc.Bauer{at}ndsu.edu.


   Abstract

The objectives of this experiment were to determine a NE value for pressed beet pulp and the value of concentrated separator byproduct (de-sugared molasses) as a ruminal N source in growing and finishing diets for beef cattle. One hundred forty-four crossbred beef steers (282 ± 23 kg initial BW) were used in 2 experiments (growing and finishing). A randomized complete block design was used with a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement (level of pressed beet pulp and inclusion of concentrated separator byproduct) of treatments for both studies. Steers were blocked by BW and allotted randomly to 1 of 6 treatments. The growing study control diet contained 49.5% corn, 31.5% corn silage, 10.0% alfalfa hay, and 9.0% supplement (DM basis). Pressed beet pulp replaced corn at 0, 20, or 40% of dietary DM and concentrated separator byproduct replaced corn and urea at 10% of dietary DM. The growing study lasted 84 d. Initial BW was an average of 2-d BW following a 3-d restricted feeding period (1.75% of BW) of 50% alfalfa hay and 50% corn silage (DM basis). Growing study final BW was an average of 2-d BW following a 3-d restricted feeding period (1.75% of BW) of 31.5% corn silage, 10.0% alfalfa hay, 25.0% dry-rolled corn, 20.0% pressed beet pulp, 5.0% concentrated separator byproduct, and 8.5% supplement (DM basis). Following the growing study, steers were weighed (415 ± 32 kg), re-randomized, and allotted to 1 of 6 finishing diets. The control diet for the finishing study included 45% dry-rolled corn, 40% high moisture corn, 5% brome hay, 5% pressed beet pulp, and 5% supplement. Pressed beet pulp replaced high moisture corn at 5.0, 12.5, and 20.0% of the dietary DM and concentrated separator byproduct replaced high moisture corn and supplement at 10.0% of diet DM. Steers were slaughtered on d 83 or 98 of the study. In the growing study, addition of pressed beet pulp to growing diets linearly decreased (P = 0.001) DMI and ADG and inclusion of 10% concentrated separator byproduct decreased (P = 0.001) G:F. Increased levels of pressed beet pulp in finishing diets caused a linear decrease (P = 0.001) in ADG and tended (P = 0.06 and 0.07 for kg/d and % of BW, respectively) to quadratically decrease DMI. Whereas, addition of concentrated separator byproduct increased (P = 0.02 and 0.001 for kg/d and % of BW, respectively) DMI. Apparent NEg of pressed beet pulp was 94.2% that of corn in the growing study and 81.5% that of corn in the finishing study.

Key Words: pressed beet pulp, concentrated separator byproduct, cattle, feedlot







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.