J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on November 3, 2006
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-538
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-538v1
85/13_suppl/E81    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salak-Johnson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGlone, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salak-Johnson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGlone, J. J.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-538
©Copyright, 2006, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Making sense of apparently conflicting data: Stress and immunity in swine and cattle

J. L. Salak-Johnson 1* J. J. McGlone 2

1 University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
2 Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: johnso17{at}uiuc.edu.


   Abstract

Stress is generally considered to suppress the immune system and may lead to an increase in disease occurrence in the presence of a pathogen. The immune system is ordinarily brought back to a baseline response level after immune challenge through homeostatic processes in part regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-axis. Often, findings reported from various studies investigating the effects of stress on the immune system are conflicting and difficult to reconcile into a cohesive and comprehensible set of universally applicable theories. These discrepancies may be partly explained by the types and durations of the stressors, aspect of immune system measured, genetics, and social status. A particular stressor may enhance cell-mediated immune responses while suppressing humoral responses or vice versa, thus disrupting the balance between these components of the immune system. How farm animals perceive their environment depends not only on traditional environmental stressors (e.g., heat, cold, humidity, pollutants), but also on aspects of their social environment. Dominant animals may have enhanced immune activation while subordinates have suppression of the same immune component in response to the same stressor. This could explain why individual animals within a group respond differently to stressors and disease challenges. A better understanding of the consequences and complex interactions between social and environmental stressors for both innate and adaptive immune traits must be developed so we can more fully understand stress effects on immunity in livestock. Once these complex relationships are better understood, more effective interventions can be designed to improve animal health and well being.

Key Words: Immune system, Stress, T helper Cells, Social status




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Lippolis and T. A. Reinhardt
CENTENNIAL PAPER: Proteomics in animal science
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2430 - 2441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.