Genetic correlations between two strains of Durocs and crossbreds from differing production environments for slaughter traits

¹ Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, 30602-2771
² Smithfield Premium Genetics Group, P.O. Box 668. Rose Hill, NC 28458

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: birgit{at}uga.edu.

	Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate genetic correlations between two purebred Duroc pig populations (P1 and P2) and their terminal crossbreds (C1: P1 x [Landrace x Large White] and C2: P2 x [Landrace x Large White]), raised in different production environments. Traits analyzed were backfat (BF), muscle depth (MD), weight at slaughter (WGT), and weight per day of age (WDA). Data sets from P1, P2, C1 and C2 included 26,674, 8,266, 16,806, and 12,350 animals, respectively. Two-trait models (nucleus - commercial crossbreds) for each group included fixed (contemporary group, sex, weight, and age), random additive (animal for P1/P2 and sire for C1/C2), random litter, and random dam (C1/C2 only) effects. Heritability estimates ( ± SE) for BF were 0.46 ± 0.04, 0.38 ± 0.02, 0.32 ± 0.02, 0.33 ± 0.02 for P1, P2, C1, and C2, respectively. Heritability estimates for MD were 0.31 ± 0.01, 0.23 ± 0.02, 0.19 ± 0.01, 0.12 ± 0.01 for P1, P2, C1, and C2, respectively. The estimates for WGT and WDA were 0.31 ± 0.01, 0.21 ± 0.02, 0.16 ± 0.01, 0.18 ± 0.01 and 0.32 ± 0.01, 0.22 ± 0.02, 0.16 ± 0.01, 0.19 ± 0.01, respectively. Genetic correlations between purebreds and crossbreds (r_pc) for BF were 0.83 ± 0.09 (P1xC1) and 0.89 ± 0.05 (P2xC2), for MD 0.78 ± 0.05 (P1xC1) and 0.80 ± 0.08 (P2xC2). For WGT and WDA, correlations were 0.53 ± 0.08 (P1xC1), 0.80 ± 0.10 (P2xC2) and 0.60 ± 0.07 (P1xC1) and 0.79 ± 0.09 (P2xC2), respectively. (Co)variances in crossbreds were adjusted to a live weight scale. Compared to purebreds, the genetic variances in crossbreds were lower and the residual variances were higher. Sire variances in crossbreds were approximately 20-30% of animal variances in purebreds for BF and MD but 13-25% for WGT and WDA. The efficiency of purebred selection on crossbreds, assessed by EBV prediction weights, ranged from 0.43 to 0.91 for line 1 and 0.70 to 0.92 for line 2. When nucleus and commercial environments differ substantially, the efficiency of selection varies by line and traits, and selection strategies that include crossbred data from typical production environments may be desirable.

Key Words: variance components, genetic correlation, crossbreds, pigs, genotype by environment interaction, plasticity

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Vanderick, B. L. Harris, J. E. Pryce, and N. Gengler Estimation of test-day model (co)variance components across breeds using New Zealand dairy cattle data J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2009; 92(3): 1240 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Zumbach, I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, J. P. Sanchez, M. Azain, W. Herring, J. Holl, T. Long, and M. Culbertson Genetic components of heat stress in finishing pigs: Development of a heat load function J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2082 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Zumbach, I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, J. P. Sanchez, M. Azain, W. Herring, J. Holl, T. Long, and M. Culbertson Genetic components of heat stress in finishing pigs: Parameter estimation J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2076 - 2081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]