J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on October 23, 2006
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-465
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-465v1
85/3/658    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. K.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-465
©Copyright, 2006, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Renewed selection for heat loss in mice: Direct responses and correlated responses in feed intake, body weight, litter size, and conception rate

J. M. McDonald 1 M. K. Nielsen 1*

1 Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0908

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mnielsen1{at}unl.edu.


   Abstract

Divergent selection in mice was renewed in three independent replicates for high (MH) and low (ML) heat loss. An unselected control (MC) was maintained in all replicates. Heat loss was measured for individual male mice for 15 h overnight in direct calorimeters. After 16 initial generations of selection followed by 26 generations of relaxed selection, divergent selection resumed for 9 generations. Realized selection applied was very close to maximum possible selection according to the criteria and protocol. Selection differentials were greater for high selection than for low due to greater variation in the MH line. When corrected for standard deviations, standardized selection differentials were very similar for MH and ML selection. Unintended selection in MC was negligible. Realized heritability for divergence was 0.14 ± 0.01, which was considerably less than that realized during the initial generations of selection (0.28 ± 0.03). Realized heritabilities for MH selection (0.16 ± 0.05) and for ML selection (0.07 ± 0.06) were much less, especially for ML selection, than was observed in the earlier generations. Difference in heat loss between MH and ML males was 55.7% of the MC mean at Generation 51, compared with a difference of 53.6% in Generation 15; this difference had decreased to 34.4% at the end of the relaxed selection (Generation 42). For feed intake between 8 and 11 wk, MH and ML males differed by 34.0% of the MC mean by the end of the selection process. Body weight at 12 wk for both MH and ML males was less than for MC males. Litter size response was positively related to heat loss response. Conception rate was poorer in MH matings than in MC and ML matings.

Key Words: conception rate, feed intake, heat loss, litter size, mice, renewed selection







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.