J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on August 20, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-418
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-418v1
85/12/3331    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludden, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ludden, P. A.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-418
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein on nitrogen retention, apparent digestibility, and nutrient flux across visceral tissues in lambs fed low-quality forage

R. L. Atkinson 1, C. D. Toone 1, T. J. Robinson 2, D. L. Harmon 3, P. A. Ludden 1*

1 Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071
2 Department of Statistics, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071
3 Department of Animal Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ludden{at}uwyo.edu.


   Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to determine effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein (RDP) versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein (RUP) on intake, apparent digestibility, N retention, and nutrient flux across visceral tissues in lambs fed low-quality forage. Lambs were fed a basal diet of crested wheatgrass hay (4.2% CP) for ad libitum consumption, plus 1 of 4 protein supplements: isolated soy protein (RDP source) fed to meet estimated RDP requirements (CON), or corn gluten meal (RUP source) fed at 50, 100, or 150% of the supplemental N provided by CON (C50, C100, and C150, respectively). In Exp. 1, 12 lambs (29.9 ± 2.7 kg) were used. Forage OM intake was not affected (P = 0.46) by protein degradability or by increasing RUP (P ≥ 0.31). Apparent total tract OM digestibility was not affected (P = 0.10) by protein degradability, but increased (P ≤ 0.004) with increasing RUP. Urinary N excretion was not affected (P = 0.20) by protein degradability, but increased (P ≤ 0.006) with increasing RUP. Similarly, N retention (g/d) was not affected (P = 0.69) by protein degradability, but increased (P = 0.001) as RUP increased. However, N retention (% of digested N) was not affected (P ≥ 0.40) by protein degradability or level of RUP. In Exp. 2, 16 catheterized lambs (32 ± 5 kg) were used. Net release of ammonia-N from the portal-drained viscera (PDV) was greater (P = 0.02) for CON than for C100 and increased linearly (P = 0.002) as RUP increased. Net uptake of ammonia-N by liver was not affected (P = 0.23) by protein degradability, but increased linearly (P = 0.04) as RUP increased. Net urea-N release from liver was not affected (P ≥ 0.49) by protein degradability or level of RUP. Net uptake of urea-N by PDV was greater (P = 0.02) for C100 compared with CON and increased (P = 0.04) with increasing RUP. Neither net release from PDV nor hepatic uptake of {alpha}-amino N were affected (P ≥ 0.12) by protein degradability or level of RUP. Hepatic ammonia-N uptake accounted for 82, 38, 98, and 79% of net urea-N release from the liver for CON, C50, C100, and C150, respectively. Hepatic {alpha}-amino N uptake for all treatments greatly exceeded that required for the remaining urea-N release by the liver, suggesting that {alpha}-amino N may serve as a temporary means of storing excess N by liver between supplementation events. The pattern of net release or uptake of N metabolites between supplementation events requires further investigation.

Key Words: growing lambs, nitrogen retention, nutrient flux, ruminally undegradable protein




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. L. Atkinson, C. D. Toone, and P. A. Ludden
Effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein on site and extent of digestion and ruminal characteristics in lambs fed low-quality forage
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3322 - 3330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.