J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on January 15, 2007
J. Anim Sci. 1990. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-723
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2005-723v1
85/5/1340    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuedemann, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stuedemann, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
J. Anim Sci., doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-723
©Copyright, 2007, The American Society of Animal Science


ARTICLE

Cattle performance and production when grazing bermudagrass at two forage mass levels in the Southern Piedmont

J. A. Stuedemann 1 A. J. Franzluebbers 1*

1 USDA-Agricultural Research Service, J. Phil Campbell Sr. Natural Resource Conservation Center, Watkinsville, GA 30677

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: afranz{at}uga.edu.


   Abstract

Performance and production of growing cattle (Bos taurus) on 'Coastal' bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] pasture are affected by forage allowance, but possible interactions with fertilizer nutrient source (i.e., inorganic vs. organic) and time have not been well described. We evaluated 3 nutrient sources with equivalent N rates [inorganic, crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) cover crop plus inorganic, and chicken (Gallus gallus) broiler litter] factorially arranged with 2 residual forage mass levels [grazing to maintain high (4,528 ± 1,803 kg/ha) and low (2,538 ± 1,264 kg/ha) forage mass] on cattle stocking density, ADG, and BW gain during 5 consecutive summer grazing seasons. Across grazing seasons, residual forage mass and nutrient source both affected response variables, but interactions between these variables were rarely significant (P < 0.10). Across grazing seasons and nutrient sources, increasing grazing pressure to maintain lower forage mass reduced ADG (0.67 vs. 0.88 kg/d; P < 0.001), but increased BW gain/ha (726 vs. 578 kg/ha; P < 0.001) due to higher stocking density (8.7 vs. 5.8 steers/ha; P < 0.001; mean BW of growing Angus steers of 212 kg). Inorganic fertilization led to greater stocking density than other nutrient sources (8.2 vs. 6.8 steers/ha; P < 0.001), because of greater forage production. Stocking density to achieve the 2 targeted forage mass levels was widely different during initial grazing seasons of the study, but nearly similar at the end of 5 yr. Cattle performance tended to decline with time during each grazing season under both residual forage mass levels, perhaps as a result of declining forage quality, because performance was positively associated with grazing season precipitation under high forage mass. Steer BW gain/ha was greater (P < 0.05) with lower forage mass early in the grazing season of all years, but not necessarily later in the grazing season. Steer BW gain/ha was also greater (P < 0.05) with lower forage mass during early years of the study, but similar during later years of the study. Significant variations in cattle performance and production with time confirmed short-term seasonal effects, but suggested that long-term effects may also be of importance in maintaining productivity and environmental quality of grazed pastures.

Key Words: broiler litter, cattle production, daily gain, grazing pressure, inorganic fertilizer, stocking density







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.