J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2008. 86:545-552. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0175
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0175v1
86/3/545    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cañón, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martínez, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cañón, J.

ANIMAL GENETICS

Genetic variability in Colombian Creole cattle populations estimated by pedigree information1

R. A. Martínez*, D. García{dagger}, J. L. Gallego{ddagger}, G. Onofre§, J. Pérez# and J. Cañón{dagger},2

* Animal Genetic Resource Group, Research Center Tibaitatá, Km. 14 Road to Mosquera Cundinamarca, Colombia; and {dagger} Departamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain; and {ddagger} Experimental Station El Nus, San Roque, Antioquia, Colombia; and § Research Center La Libertad, Villavicencio Meta, Colombia; and and # Research Center Turipaná, Km 4 Road to Cereté, Córdoba, Corporación colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria Corpoica, Bogotá, Colombia

2 Corresponding author: jcanon{at}vet.ucm.es

The genetic structure of 4 Colombian Creole cattle breeds, namely, Costeño con Cuernos, Blanco Orejinegro (BON), Romosinuano (ROMO), and Sanmartinero (SM), was studied with an analysis of the available pedigree data. The comparison between the effective number of founders (fe) and the effective number of ancestors (fa) revealed a decrease in the genetic variation that was rather important for the ROMO and San Martinero breeds, which had the lowest fa/fe ratios (0.34 and 0.53, respectively). All breeds showed similar values for the number of equivalent generations traced, ranging from 3.1 in BON to 4.8 in ROMO. These 2 populations also had the lowest and the highest population sizes, respectively. The lowest average inbreeding coefficient considering the whole pedigree was obtained by BON (0.18%), whereas the highest was attained by ROMO (1.22%). Finally, the percentage of individuals with an inbreeding level greater than 6.25% in the reference population was high, indicating that the existing conservation management strategies could be improved to successfully maintain the genetic variability of these populations.

Key Words: Creole cattle • inbreeding • pedigree analysis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Animal Science.