HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2007-0233v1 86/2/451    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, J. L. Articles by Funston, R. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martin, J. L. Articles by Funston, R. N.

Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season¹

J. L. Martin^*, K. W. Creighton^*, J. A. Musgrave^*, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. T. Clark, D. C. Adams^* and R. N. Funston^*,2

^* University of Nebraska West Central Research and Extension Center, North Platte 69101; and Department of Animal Science, and Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583

² Corresponding author: rfunston2{at}unl.edu

Two experiments evaluated prebreeding target BW or progestin exposure for heifers developed lighter than traditional recommendations. Experiment 1 evaluated the effects of the system on heifer performance through subsequent calving and rebreeding over 3 yr. Heifers (229 kg) were assigned randomly to be developed to 55% of mature BW (299 kg) before a 45-d breeding season (intensive, INT; n = 119) or 50% of mature BW (272 kg) before a 60-d breeding season (relaxed, RLX; n = 142). Prebreeding and pregnancy diagnosis BW were greater (P 0.006) for INT than RLX heifers. Overall pregnancy rate did not differ (88.4%; P = 0.51), but RLX heifers had later calving dates (7 d; P < 0.001) and lighter calf weaning weights (194 ± 4 vs. 199 ± 4 kg; P < 0.07) compared with INT heifers. Calf birth weight, calving difficulty, second-calf conception rates, and 2-yr-old retention rate did not differ (P > 0.15) between systems. Cost per pregnant 2-yr-old cow was less for the RLX than the INT heifer development system. Of heifers that failed to become pregnant, a greater proportion (P = 0.07) of heifers in the RLX than in the INT system were prepubertal when the breeding season began. Therefore, a second 2-yr experiment evaluated melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg/d) as a means of hastening puberty in heifers developed to 50% of mature BW. Heifers were assigned randomly to the control (n = 103) or MGA (n = 81) treatment for 14 d and were placed with bulls 13 d later for 45 d. Prebreeding and pregnancy diagnosis BW were similar (280 and 380 kg, respectively; P > 0.10) for heifers in the control and MGA treatments. The proportion of heifers pubertal before breeding (74%), pregnancy rate (90%), calving date, calf weaning weight, and second breeding season pregnancy rate (92%) were similar (P > 0.10) between treatments. Developing heifers to 50 or 55% of mature BW resulted in similar overall pregnancy rates, and supplementing the diets of heifers developed to 50% of mature BW with MGA before breeding did not improve reproductive performance.

Key Words: beef heifer • heifer development • progestin • target body weight

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Roberts, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil Reproductive performance of heifers offered ad libitum or restricted access to feed for a one hundred forty-day period after weaning J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 3043 - 3052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]