HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2006-425v1 85/3/731    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Waterman, R. C. Articles by Petersen, M. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Waterman, R. C. Articles by Petersen, M. K.

Supplemental methionine and urea for gestating beef cows consuming low quality forage diets¹

Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003

² Corresponding author: richard{at}larrl.ars.usda.gov

A study was conducted to evaluate Met requirements of late-gestation beef cows consuming low quality forages on the premise that inadequate supply of metabolizable AA may limit protein accretion during pregnancy. Five ruminally cannulated, multiparous late-gestation beef cows (490 ± 27 kg), of predominantly Angus (75%) with Hereford and Simmental breeding, were used in a 5 x 5 Latin square experiment to evaluate the effects of postruminal DL-Met supplementation on N retention, serum metabolites, and plasma AA concentrations during the third trimester of pregnancy. The basal diet was fed individually, and weights of refusals were recorded for N intake determination. Treatments consisted of no urea, urea (0.053 ± 0.002 g/kg of BW daily), urea + 5 g of Met/d, urea + 10 g of Met/d, and urea + 15 g of Met/d. Cows were adapted to the experimental diet 30 d before the beginning of the study, with periods lasting for 14 d; 4 d to allow for clearance of the previous treatment effects, 4 d for adaptation to the treatments, and 6 d for total fecal and urine collection. Blood samples were collected every 4 h on d 13 of each period for analysis of serum metabolites and plasma AA. Inclusion of urea increased DM and OM intakes (urea vs. no urea; P = 0.05), but no further improvement in intake was observed with inclusion of Met. Serum urea concentrations increased with inclusion of urea (P = 0.03) and responded quadratically (P = 0.06) when Met was added, with the lowest concentration observed in the urea + 5 g of Met/d treatment. More N was retained with the inclusion of urea (P = 0.04), and N retention increased linearly (P = 0.07) with inclusion of Met. Plasma Met concentration increased linearly (P < 0.01) with inclusion of Met. These data suggest that Met was a limiting AA and that supplementation of a combination of urea and 5 g/d of rumen-protected Met to low quality, forage diets will improve N retention and promote protein accretion during late pregnancy.

Key Words: beef cow • gestation • methionine • nitrogen retention • plasma amino acid

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. Waggoner, C. A. Loest, C. P. Mathis, D. M. Hallford, and M. K. Petersen Effects of rumen-protected methionine supplementation and bacterial lipopolysaccharide infusion on nitrogen metabolism and hormonal responses of growing beef steers J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 681 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]