| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION |
,2
* USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301; and
and
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211
3 Corresponding author: tom{at}larrl.ars.usda.gov
Previous research indicated that the size of the ovulatory follicle at the time of insemination significantly influenced pregnancy rates and embryonic/fetal mortality after fixed-timed AI in postpartum cows, but no effect on pregnancy rates was detected when cows ovulated spontaneously. Our objective was to evaluate relationships of fertility and embryonic/fetal mortality with preovulatory follicle size and circulating concentrations of estradiol after induced or spontaneous ovulation in beef heifers. Heifers were inseminated in 1 of 2 breeding groups: (1) timed insemination after an estrous synchronization and induced ovulation protocol (TAI n = 98); or (2) AI ~12 h after detection in standing estrus by electronic mount detectors during a 23-d breeding season (spontaneous ovulation; n = 110). Ovulatory follicle size at time of AI and pregnancy status 27, 41, 55, and 68 d after timed AI (d 0) were determined by transrectal ultrasonography. Only 6 heifers experienced late embryonic or early fetal mortality. Interactions between breeding groups and follicle size did not affect pregnancy rate (P = 0.13). Pooled across breeding groups, logistic regression of pregnancy rate on follicle size was curvilinear (P < 0.01) and indicated a predicted maximum pregnancy rate of 68.0 ± 4.9% at a follicle size of 12.8 mm. Ovulation of follicles < 10.7 mm or > 15.7 mm was less likely (P < 0.05) to support pregnancy than follicles that were 12.8 mm. Ovulatory follicles < 10.7 mm were more prevalent (28% of heifers) than ovulatory follicles > 15.7 mm (4%). Heifers exhibiting standing estrus within 24 h of timed AI had greater (P < 0.01) follicle diameter (12.2 ± 0.2 mm vs. 11.1 ± 0.3 mm) and concentrations of estradiol (9.9 ± 0.6 vs. 6.6 ± 0.7) and pregnancy rates (63% vs. 20%) than contemporaries that did not exhibit behavioral estrus. However, when differences in ovulatory follicle size were accounted for, pregnancy rates were independent of expression of behavioral estrus or circulating concentration of estradiol. Therefore, the effects of serum concentrations of estradiol and behavioral estrus on pregnancy rate appear to be mediated through ovulatory follicle size, and management practices that optimize ovulatory follicle size may improve fertility.
Key Words: cattle • follicle size • pregnancy rate
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. R. Leitman, D. C. Busch, D. J. Wilson, D. A. Mallory, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson Comparison of controlled internal drug release insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus in prepubertal and estrous-cycling beef heifers J Anim Sci, December 1, 2009; 87(12): 3976 - 3982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. E. Echternkamp, R. A. Cushman, and M. F. Allan Size of ovulatory follicles in cattle expressing multiple ovulations naturally and its influence on corpus luteum development and fertility J Anim Sci, November 1, 2009; 87(11): 3556 - 3568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. M. Cammack, M. G. Thomas, and R. M. Enns Review: Reproductive Traits and Their Heritabilities in Beef Cattle Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 517 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Perry and B. L. Perry Effects of standing estrus and supplemental estradiol on changes in uterine pH during a fixed-time artificial insemination protocol J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 2928 - 2935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L. Stevenson, J. C. Dalton, J. E. P. Santos, R. Sartori, A. Ahmadzadeh, and R. C. Chebel Effect of Synchronization Protocols on Follicular Development and Estradiol and Progesterone Concentrations of Dairy Heifers J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2008; 91(8): 3045 - 3056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Atkins, D. C. Busch, J. F. Bader, D. H. Keisler, D. J. Patterson, M. C. Lucy, and M. F. Smith Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced ovulation and luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers: Effect of day of the cycle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 83 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Cushman, M. F. Allan, R. M. Thallman, and L. V. Cundiff Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VII): Influence of postpartum interval and estrous cycle length on fertility J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2156 - 2162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
