J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buskirk, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kaercher, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buskirk, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kaercher, M. J.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:109-115
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Large round bale feeder design affects hay utilization and beef cow behavior1,2

D. D. Buskirk*,3, A. J. Zanella*, T. M. Harrigan{dagger}, J. L. Van Lente*,4, L. M. Gnagey*,4 and M. J. Kaercher{ddagger}

* Departments of Animal Science and and {dagger} Agricultural Engineering, and {ddagger} Extension, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1225

3 Correspondence:
2265 Anthony Hall (phone: 517-432-0400; E-mail:
buskirk{at}msu.edu).

One hundred sixty beef cows (631 ± 78 kg) were used to evaluate the quantity of hay loss and feeding behaviors from different round bale feeders. Twenty cows were allotted by weight and body condition score to one of eight pens with four feeder designs: cone, ring, trailer, or cradle. All feeder types provided approximately 37 cm of linear feeder space per animal. Alfalfa and orchardgrass round bales were weighed and sampled before feeding. Hay that fell onto the concrete surrounding the feeder was considered waste and was collected and sampled daily. At the end of a 7-d period, each feeder type was assigned to a different pen for a second 7-d period. On four consecutive days in each period, animal behavior was recorded using a time-lapse video system. Data were collected from 5-min observational intervals from the video tapes every 0.5 h each day. Feeder access, occupancy rate, and occurrence of agonistic interactions were recorded. Dry matter hay waste was 3.5, 6.1, 11.4, and 14.6% for the cone, ring, trailer, and cradle feeders, respectively. Calculated dry matter intake of hay ranged from 1.8 to 2.0% of body weight and was not different among feeder type (P < 0.05). Percentage of organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and crude protein were all lower and acid detergent lignin was higher in the recovered waste compared to the hay fed (P < 0.05). Cows feeding from the cradle feeder had nearly three times the agonistic interactions and four times the frequency of entrances compared to cows feeding from the other feeder types (P < 0.05). Feed losses were positively correlated with agonistic interactions, frequency of regular and irregular entrances, and feeder occupancy rate (P < 0.05). Agonistic interactions by cows and frequency of feeder entrances differed among feeders and were correlated to feeder design induced feed losses.

Key Words: Aggressive Behavior • Beef Cows • Behavior • Feeding • Utilization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. T. Vasconcelos, L. W. Greene, N. A. Cole, M. S. Brown, F. T. McCollum III, and L. O. Tedeschi
Effects of phase feeding of protein on performance, blood urea nitrogen concentration, manure nitrogen:phosphorus ratio, and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3032 - 3038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. A. Lenehan, J. M. DeRouchey, T. T. Marston, and G. L. Marchin
Concentrations of fecal bacteria and nutrients in soil surrounding round-bale feeding sites
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2005; 83(7): 1673 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Animal Science.