|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEAT SCIENCE AND MUSCLE BIOLOGY |




* Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409;
and
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; and
Intervet Schering Plough Animal Health, DeSoto, KS 66018
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.04). Carcass fat was decreased, whereas carcass protein and moisture were increased due to ZH (P < 0.01). Lengthening the ZH feeding period did not result in additive gains in subprimal yield or chemical composition (P > 0.05). Warner-Bratzler shear force analysis of the LM indicated that ZH caused a toughening effect (P < 0.01) regardless of the length of the aging period (7, 14, or 21 d). Extending the ZH dose duration caused a linear increase in Warner-Bratzler shear force at 7 (P = 0.06) and 21 d (P < 0.01) of aging. Within 10 min postmortem, samples (n = 48) were collected from the semimembranosus muscle for RNA isolation from 4 randomly selected steers from each treatment within the 157, 177, and 198 d slaughter groups. Feeding ZH did not alter β1- or β2-adrenergic receptor (AR), calpastatin (CAL), IGF-I, or myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform I mRNA abundance (P > 0.10). There was a ZH duration x DOF interaction (P < 0.01) for the expression of MHC-IIa and -IIx. Expression of MHC-IIa was decreased in every ZH treatment within the 177 and 198 DOF groups (P < 0.02). Expression of MHC-IIx was increased in the 20-d ZH group in the 157 DOF group (P = 0.03), and the 40-d ZH group in the 177 (P = 0.10) and 198 (P = 0.03) DOF groups. There was a tendency for a linear decrease in CAL mRNA abundance as ZH duration increased (P = 0.07), and there was a linear increase in β2-AR (P = 0.03) and CAL (P < 0.01) mRNA abundance as DOF increased. Collectively, the data indicate that ZH may influence net protein turnover by decreasing MHC-IIa mRNA transcription and possibly increasing MHC-IIx. Furthermore, a ZH feeding duration of 20 d appeared to be adequate for capturing lean yield benefits while limiting tenderness losses.
Key Words: β-adrenergic agonist carcass cutout days on feed myosin steer zilpaterol hydrochloride
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chung and Johnson (2007)
theorize that β-AA do not promote additional recruitment of DNA from satellite cells lying adjacent to muscle cells, but cause the existing nuclei to improve their efficiency through transcriptional activity to increase protein accretion. In swine fed RAC, most evidence points toward a shift in protein synthesis due to the increased expression of specific myosin isoforms, which favor the larger, glycolytic muscle fiber phenotype (Depreux et al., 2002
; Gunawan et al., 2007
). Current models in cattle explaining ZH gains in protein accretion have yet to be fully elucidated. The objectives of the current study were to determine the effect of ZH feeding duration and days on the finishing diet (DOF) on 1) carcass cutout yield and composition, 2) tenderness, and 3) skeletal muscle gene factors that could be responsible for altering protein turnover, attenuating the ZH growth response with prolonged exposure, or both.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methodology outlining cattle management procedures, design of the experiment, and general feedlot and carcass performance results were described in detail by Vasconcelos et al. (2008)
. Briefly, 560 steers (British and British x Continental) were randomized across 16 treatments (5 steers/pen; 7 pens/treatment) in a 4 x 4 factorial completely randomized design. The factors were duration of ZH (8.33 mg/kg; Zilmax, Intervet Schering Plough Animal Health, DeSoto, KS) feeding (0, 20, 30, and 40 d) and DOF (137, 157, 177, and 198 d).
Carcass Analyses
Carcass Sampling.
Seven steers per treatment (n = 112; one steer per pen) were preselected before duration of ZH treatment application for further carcass cutout analyses from the original 560 steers. Black-hided steers were preselected based upon carcass ultrasound measurements taken by personnel from Cargill Cattle Feeders (Lockney, TX) 1 wk before the initiation of treatment diets for each slaughter group. Within each slaughter group, steers were preselected to be as homogenous as possible for BW, LM area, 12th-rib fat, and percent intramuscular fat across all treatment groups to reduce the initial inherent variation across treatments for carcass composition before initiation of ZH feeding treatments. Following conventional slaughter procedures at the Cargill facility in Friona, TX, the right side of each carcass from each of the preselected cutout steers (n = 112) was transported under refrigeration to the Texas Tech University Gordon W. Davis Meat Science Laboratory, Lubbock, for further carcass cutout fabrication analyses. At 48 h postmortem, the left side of each carcass was followed through the plant fabrication floor. The whole rib section (Institutional Meat Purchase Specifications; IMPS # 107; USDA, 1990
) and boneless strip loin (IMPS #180) was obtained, vacuum sealed, and sent to the Texas Tech University Gordon W. Davis Meat Science Laboratory for storage at 2 to 4°C until proximate analyses, and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) analyses were performed.
Carcass Cutout.
On the given production day, scales (model CW-11, Ohaus Corp., Pine Brook, NJ) were calibrated by weighing known weights to ensure accuracy. Cold carcass weight for each side was determined as they entered the fabrication floor. Carcasses were grouped by fours with one carcass from each duration of ZH treatment representing each group. The fabrication order of each carcass was chosen at random within a group to eliminate any potential confounding results based on carcass fabrication order. Each primal was fabricated into subprimal cuts according to the IMPS as outlined by the North American Meat Processors guidelines (NAMP, 2007
) and trimmed to fat levels mimicking boxed beef (approximately 7 mm). Fabricated subprimals collected from the chuck and brisket included the shoulder clod (IMPS # 114C), shoulder tender (IMPS # 114F), pectoral meat (IMPS # 115D), chuck roll (IMPS # 116A), chuck tender (IMPS # 116B), boneless whole brisket (IMPS # 120), and boneless short ribs (IMPS # 130). Fabricated subprimals collected from the rib and plate included the blade meat (IMPS # 109B), lip-on ribeye roll (IMPS # 112A), outside skirt (IMPS # 121C), inside skirt (IMPS # 121D), back ribs (IMPS # 124), and deep pectoral. Fabricated subprimals collected from the loin and flank included the boneless strip loin (IMPS #180), flank steak (IMPS # 193), defatted full tenderloin (IMPS # 189A), and cutaneous omobrachialis. Fabricated subprimals collected from the round included the peeled knuckle (IMPS # 167A), top inside round (IMPS # 169), flat outside round (IMPS # 171B), eye of round (IMPS # 171C), heel bottom round (IMPS # 171F), boneless top sirloin butt (IMPS # 184), boneless bottom sirloin flap (IMPS # 185A), boneless bottom sirloin ball tip (IMPS # 185B), boneless bottom sirloin tri-tip (185C), and hind shank meat. Additionally, kidney knob fat, total fat, and total bone, and 90/10, 80/20, and 50/50 trimmings were collected and weighed. Ground beef trim ratios were visually assessed by fabricators simulating industry practices. Subprimal weights were divided by the carcass side weight and multiplied by 100 for expression as a percentage of the cold carcass weight. For validation purposes, the weight of every subprimal and trim was cumulatively added to ensure that weighing errors had not occurred. Total cutout yield ranged from 99.15 to 100.2% for the 112 measured carcasses.
Purge. After carcass cutout data were obtained from the right side of each carcass, the boneless strip loin (IMPS # 180) was labeled, vacuum packaged, and aged for 6 or 7 d at 4°C. Fabrication of carcasses from each slaughter group required 2 consecutive production days; thus, boneless strip loins were vacuum packaged and aged for 6 or 7 d before purge analysis. No bias existed in purge analysis due to aging length because treatment representation was proportional due to the fabrication order described previously. On d 7 postmortem (based on the first fabrication production day), each strip loin was removed from the refrigerator and weighed while still in the package. Each strip loin was removed from the vacuum package, blotted with a towel to remove surface moisture, and weighed to acquire the actual boneless strip loin weight. Each vacuum package was dried in an oven at 90°C for 2 h after which the bag was weighed. Percent purge was calculated as the weight of the boneless strip loin in the vacuum packaging minus the total weight of the dried bag and boneless strip loin divided by the weight of the boneless strip loin in the vacuum packaging and multiplied by 100.
Proximate Analyses.
The collected whole rib sections (IMPS # 107) from the left side of the carcass were dissected into 9-10-11th rib sections to estimate carcass chemical composition according to procedures outlined by Hankins and Howe (1946)
. The 9-10-11th rib sections were homogenized using a Robocoupe Blixer 6V (Robot Coupe USA Inc., Ridgeland, MS). Random subsamples were then exposed to liquid nitrogen and blended into a powder. Each powdered sampled was analyzed in triplicate for collagen, protein, fat, and moisture content according to AOAC (1990)
techniques. Moisture content was determined by drying a 4-g sample at 100°C for 16 h in a drying oven. Protein content was determined from a 1-g sample using a Leco (model FP-2000, St. Joseph, MO). Fat content was determined by ether extraction on a 4-g sample.
Warner-Bratzler Shear Force. At d 7 postmortem, each collected boneless strip loin (IMPS # 180) from the left side of the carcass was cut into 2.54-cm-thick steaks. Three steaks from each boneless strip loin (IMPS # 180) were randomly allotted to be aged for 7 (frozen that day), 14, or 21 d at 2 to 4°C and then frozen at –20°C. At a later date, steaks were thawed for 24 h at 4°C and then cooked on a belt grill to a medium degree of doneness (internal temperature of 68 to 71°C). Steaks were cooled at 4°C for 24 h before shearing. Six 1.3-cm diameter cores were taken from each steak parallel to the orientation of the muscle fibers. Each core was sheared perpendicular to the muscle fiber using a WBSF instrument (GR Electric Mfg., Manhattan, KS). The 6 subsample WBSF values were then averaged for statistical analysis.
Gene Expression Analyses
Muscle sample collection, RNA isolation, determination of RNA integrity, reverse transcription, and real-time quantitative PCR techniques were applied according to procedures outlined by Winterholler et al. (2007)
.
Muscle Sample Collection. Within 10 min postmortem, 10-g muscle samples (n = 48) were collected from the semimembranosus from 4 steers selected randomly per treatment (not carcasses selected for cutout analyses). Samples were not available from the initial slaughter group (137 DOF). Each muscle sample was immediately snap frozen in liquid N and transported to the Texas Tech University Gordon W. Davis Meat Laboratory at Texas Tech University on dry ice and then stored at –80°C. At a later date, samples were shipped to Kansas State University, Manhattan, on dry ice and again placed in storage at –80°C.
RNA Isolation. Isolation of RNA was completed through several steps. A 200-mg subsample from each sample was placed in a steel mortar bowl with liquid nitrogen and physically crushed using a pestle. After the liquid nitrogen evaporated, 2 mL of TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, #93289, St. Louis, MO) was added to solubilize cellular membranes and thus release intracellular components. After each substance had melted, the aqueous fluid was pipetted off in 1-mL aliquots into two 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes and allowed to stand at room temperature for 5 min. Each tube was then combined with 200 µL of chloroform, vortexed for 15 s, and held at room temperature for 5 min. Each tube was centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 x g at room temperature. Centrifugation isolated the RNA to the upper, clear, aqueous phase of the fluid. This portion was pipetted off into a new microcentrifuge tube and combined with 500 µL of isopropanol. After standing for 5 min at room temperature, each tube was centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min to precipitate the RNA into a pellet. The isopropanol was poured off, 1 mL of 70% ethanol was added, each tube vortexed, and then placed in storage at –80°C until analyzed.
Determination of RNA Integrity. To verify the integrity of the isolated RNA, a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel was prepared. One microcentrifuge tube per sample containing the isolated RNA was removed from the freezer and centrifuged, placing the RNA pellet at the bottom of the microcentrifuge tube. The supernatant was removed, and the remaining ethanol was allowed to air dry. The RNA pellet was then diluted with 30 µL of nuclease-free water, and a 3-µL subsample was pipetted into a separate 0.5-mL microcentrifuge tube. Two microliters of ethidium bromide was added to the RNA subsample and incubated at 65°C for 10 min to dissolve the RNA pellet. Underneath a hood, the prepared 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel was placed in an electrophoresis tray, and a running buffer consisting of 480 mL of deionized water, 60 mL of 3-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid (10x), and 60 mL of formaldehyde were applied to the tray. Finally, 5 µL of sample was loaded into each well, and the gel was run for 1 h at 100 V. Upon completion, 18S and 28S rRNA bands were visualized to validate the integrity of total RNA.
Reverse Transcription. Total RNA concentration for each sample was determined at an absorbance of 260 nm using a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, LLC, Wilmington, DE). Total RNA concentration (1 µg) was standardized across all samples before reverse transcription procedures. Total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Taqman Reverse Transcription Reagents and MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) was set at 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 60 min, and 95.5°C for 5 min. Random hexamers were used as the primer during cDNA synthesis.
Real-Time Quantitative PCR. The relative abundance of mRNA for each gene of interest was determined using real-time quantitative PCR techniques. The genes evaluated included β1-adrenergic receptor (AR), β2-AR, IGF-I, calpastatin, and myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform I, IIa, and IIx. The custom forward and reverse primers and probes utilized for the gene of interest and ribosomal protein S9 are outlined in Table 1. Commercially available eukaryotic 18S RNA (Applied Biosystems; GenBank, X03205) served as an endogenous control for β1-AR, β2-AR, calpastatin, IGF-I, and MHC-IIa. Ribosomal protein S9 served as an endogenous control for MHC-I and –IIx. TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 900 nM of the appropriate forward and reverse primers, 200 nM of the appropriate detection probe, and 1 µL of cDNA mixture were combined in triplicate on a 96-well plate. Complementary DNA was amplified using an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) set at 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. The threshold line was manually set within the geometric phase of the logarithmic chart to determine the cycle threshold value of each targeted gene. Each gene of interest was normalized against the endogenous control listed above, and relative mRNA abundance was reported as an arbitrary value.
|
All data were initially evaluated for satisfaction of model assumptions. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistic was used to evaluate whether the residuals originated from a normally distributed population. If the normality assumption was violated, then a histogram was plotted. If the histogram also appeared to be skewed, then the data were submitted to a log-transformation. If the variances between treatments were heterogeneous, the Repeated/Group option (group = duration of ZH x DOF) within the MIXED procedure (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) was utilized to evaluate data. Percentage subprimal yield data, percentage purge, chemical composition, and gene expression data were analyzed as a 4 x 4 (4 x 3 for gene expression factors) completely random design with the MIXED procedure. Frequency distributions of carcasses within WBSF tenderness categories (<3.0,
4.3, and >4.9 kg) were analyzed as binomial proportions using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. One steer was subsampled per pen so that in every analysis, animal was treated as the experimental unit. The duration of ZH, DOF, and the ZH x DOF interaction were treated as fixed effects. Specific orthogonal contrasts were constructed to test (1) control vs. the mean of the 3 ZH-fed groups; (2) linear effects of duration of ZH and DOF; and (3) quadratic effects of duration of ZH and DOF. If appropriate, the LSMEANS/PDIFF option of SAS was used to separate means between simple effects.
Warner-Bratzler shear force data were analyzed as a split-plot with duration of ZH and DOF serving as the factors of interest in the main-plot, and days postmortem was treated as the sub-plot. Initially, the error term in each plot was a summation of the error term for each factor in the plot and their associated interactions. If a Levenes test indicated that heteroskedasticity existed, then adjustments were made by implementing procedures outlined by Brown and Forsythe (1974)
to test model significance. A duration of ZH x days postmortem and a DOF x days postmortem interaction existed in the sub-plot. Consequently, duration of ZH and DOF were each held constant to test the aging effect. When the simple-effect test for each factor level proved significant, then linear and quadratic contrasts were constructed as described above to evaluate the trend of the aging curve. Evaluation of the main-plot factors was performed by holding days postmortem constant and calculating separate error terms for each specific contrast of interest (those described above) using SPSS (Chicago, IL).
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With the exception of #171F heel meat (P = 0.01), there were no days on ZH x DOF interactions detected (P > 0.05) for any of the subprimals evaluated for yield. Evaluation of the #171F heel meat simple-effect means indicated that the interaction was based upon the magnitude of LS mean differences and not the direction. Therefore, main-effect LS means and differences were reported for all subprimals including #171F heel meat. Overall, ZH could be characterized as having a strong response on carcass cutout because 22 of the 33 subprimal yields evaluated displayed a positive difference (P < 0.05) between the control group and the ZH treatment groups combined (Table 2). Although ZH manifested its effect within every whole primal region in the carcass, the most consistent ZH effect was seen in the round where ZH increased the percentage yield of every subprimal recorded. More specifically, ZH increased the cutout yield of #167A peeled knuckle, #169 top inside round, #171B bottom round flat, #171C eye of the round, #171F heel meat (P < 0.01), #184 top sirloin butt (P = 0.02), #185A bottom sirloin butt flap (P = 0.04), #185B bottom sirloin butt ball tip (P = 0.02), #185C bottom sirloin butt tri-tip (P < 0.01), and hind shank meat (P = 0.01). Our results are in agreement with Hilton et al. (2009)
and Kellermeier et al. (2009)
in that carcass cutout yield was most pronounced in the hindquarter of ZH-supplemented cattle. Similar to the current report, ZH increased the yield of #167A knuckle, #169 top round, #171B outside round, #171C eye of the round, #184 top sirloin butt (Hilton et al., 2009
; Kellermeier et al., 2009
), and #185B bottom sirloin butt (Hilton et al., 2009
). In the current study, the chuck recorded yield increases in #114C chuck shoulder clod (P < 0.01), #114F chuck shoulder tender (P = 0.02), #116A chuck roll (P = 0.03), and #116B chuck mock tender (P < 0.01). In comparison, Hilton et al. (2009)
and Kellermeier et al. (2009)
only observed a ZH yield effect on the #114C chuck shoulder clod and #116B chuck mock tender. Within the rib and plate region, ZH increased the yield of #109B rib blade meat, #121D inside skirt, and pastrami (P < 0.01). Hilton et al. (2009)
also observed a yield increase in #109B rib blade meat. Although no change in #112A ribeye roll (P = 0.29) was reported in the current experiment, there was an observed numerical increase in yield and a documented tendency for increased yield by Kellermeier et al. (2009)
and Hilton et al. (2009)
, respectively. Within the loin and flank region, ZH increased the yield of #193 flank steak and #189A defatted full tenderloin (P < 0.01). In agreement with our results, Hilton et al. (2009)
saw a ZH increase in #193 flank steak, and Hilton et al. (2009)
and Kellermeier et al. (2009)
noted an increase in #189A defatted full tenderloin. In contrast to the current study, these authors did see a ZH increase in yield of #180 strip loin. As expected, there was a ZH decrease in the percentage of kidney fat, fat, and bone (P < 0.01). No differences were found in the proportion of 90/10, 80/20, and 50/50 trimmings (P
0.09). Conflicting reports by Hilton et al. (2009)
and Kellermeier et al. (2009)
show an increase in 90/10 trimmings. In agreement, these authors also detected a decline in total trimmable fat (Hilton et al., 2009
; Kellermeier et al., 2009
) and bone (Kellermeier et al., 2009
).
|
Table 3 presents the DOF main effect upon percentage subprimal yield. The DOF strongly influenced carcass cutout yields; 24 of the 33 cuts measured had a linear or quadratic response. Unlike the ZH treatment effect in which the round was most consistently affected, DOF affected every whole primal region relatively equally. Within the round, yield decreased linearly as DOF increased in #169 top inside round (P < 0.01), #171C eye of the round (P = 0.01), #184 top sirloin butt, #185A sirloin butt flap, and #185C sirloin butt tri-tip (P < 0.01). Advancing DOF caused a quadratic response in #171F heel meat in that yield was greatest in the 157-d group and shank meat in that yield was greatest in the 136-d group, least in the 177-d group, and intermediate in the final 198-d group (P < 0.01). In the chuck, as DOF increased there was a linear decrease in yield of #115D pectoral meat, #116A chuck roll (P < 0.01), and #116B chuck mock tender (P = 0.01) and a linear increase in #114F chuck shoulder tender (P < 0.01). In the rib, as DOF increased there was a linear decrease in #121C outside skirt and #121D inside skirt (P < 0.01) and a linear increase in #109B rib blade meat. Number 112A ribeye roll responded quadratically (P < 0.01) in that yield was elevated in the 157 and 177-d groups and reduced in the 136 and 198-d groups. Within the loin, #180 strip loin yield decreased linearly with increasing DOF. A quadratic response (P = 0.04) was noted in #193 flank steak, in which yield greatest in the 136-d group and then remained constant. A quadratic response was also seen in #189A full tenderloin (P < 0.01) and in cutaneous omobrachialis (P = 0.04) in which yields remained constant until the 198-d group in which yields were reduced. A linear increase occurred (P = 0.04) in kidney fat as DOF increased. A quadratic response was seen in 90/10 (P = 0.05) and 80/20 (P = 0.03) trimmings, total trimmable fat (P = 0.04), and bone (P < 0.01). In general, 80/20 trimmings and total trimmable fat were increased and 90/10 trimmings were decreased with increasing DOF. Total bone yield was greatest in the 136-d group, least in the 177-d group, and intermediate in the 157- and 198-d group. Collectively, these compositional findings are consistent with those from Vasconcelos et al. (2008)
in that numerically USDA yield grade increased with increased DOF. Van Koevering et al. (1995)
noted a linear increase in numerical USDA yield grade brought about by a linear increase in 12th-rib fat thickness and HCW with no statistical increase in LM area as DOF increased. All together, it is logical that in general subprimal yield was continually diminished with increasing DOF.
|
There was not a days on ZH x DOF interaction (P
0.29) for collagen, protein, fat, and moisture content. Total carcass chemical composition results are displayed in Table 4. Carcasses from cattle fed ZH had a lesser percentage of fat and a greater percentage of protein and moisture (P < 0.01). No linear or quadratic responses were detected as days on ZH increased (P
0.29). Results from Hilton et al. (2009)
and Kellermeier et al. (2009)
are in agreement with the current study in that ZH caused the estimated percentage of carcass fat to increase and the percentage of protein and moisture to decrease in steers. In contrast, Leheska et al. (2009)
reported that dissection of the entire right side of ZH steer and heifer carcasses showed the carcasses were not different in carcass fat but did contain a greater percentage of protein. Zilpaterol hydrochloride heifers also exhibited an increase in carcass moisture, but steers did not. Dose duration (20 or 40 d on ZH) did not interact with any chemical composition variable (Leheska et al., 2009
). Nevertheless, the current study confirms the potency of ZH to increase muscle accretion and consequently to reduce the percentage of carcass fat. Plus, no additional improvements in carcass chemical composition are derived through extending the feeding period of ZH beyond 20 d. Furthermore, the degree of the ZH repartitioning effect is independent of the maturity status of the animal.
|
Warner-Bratzler Shear Force
There was not a days on ZH x DOF interaction (P
0.50) for WBSF. As shown in Table 4, the control group (0 d) had less WBSF values at all aging periods (7, 14, and 21 d) than cattle fed ZH (P < 0.01). The toughening effect corresponds with the majority of reports with the feeding of β-AA to cattle (Vestergaard et al., 1994
; Avendaño-Reyes et al., 2006
; Gruber et al., 2008
; Hilton et al., 2009
; Kellermeier et al., 2009
; Leheska et al., 2009
). Among the ZH fed treatments, the 20-d group had a numerically less WBSF value at every postmortem period. At 7-d postmortem, there was a tendency (P = 0.06) for WBSF to linearly increase as ZH dose duration was extended. At 14-d postmortem, no linear (P = 0.71) or quadratic (P = 0.13) responses were observed dependent upon ZH dose length. At 21-d postmortem, there was a linear increase (P < 0.01) in WBSF as ZH dose duration increased. Collectively, the results strongly suggest that ZH causes a toughening effect and that 20 d was the most favorable ZH dosage length for minimizing WBSF increases. Leheska et al. (2009)
evaluated LM WBSF values in steers and heifers fed ZH for 20 or 40 d. Zilpaterol hydrochloride did have a negative impact upon tenderness, but the 20-d ZH duration treatment did not prove more favorable than the 40-d ZH duration treatment as seen in the current study. In general, Leheska et al. (2009)
observed less WBSF ZH values and a smaller range between control and ZH treatments, but they imposed a 28-d aging period.
The impact of postmortem aging upon WBSF, given differences in ZH dose duration, is presented in Figure 1 based upon a repeated measures analysis. A days on ZH x days postmortem aging interaction occurred (P < 0.01). A linear aging response was detected for the 0 (P = 0.03), 20, and 30-d ZH treatments (P < 0.01). A quadratic aging response was detected in the 40-d ZH treatment (P = 0.01), in which WBSF was decreased by 1.0 kg from 7 to 14 d of aging and then by only 0.15 kg from 14 to 21 d of aging. The results would indicate that an aging curve exists (a decrease in WBSF as days postmortem increases) for ZH-treated carcasses. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the decrease in WBSF varied across treatments. From 7 to 21 d postmortem, there was a decrease in WBSF in the control steers by only 0.42 kg, whereas the ZH treatments (20, 30, and 40 d) recorded decreases of 0.89, 1.06, and 1.15 kg, respectively. Although the ZH treatments exhibited accelerated decreases in WBSF with aging vs. the control, as already established, they were still not able to return to control WBSF levels by 21 d of aging.
|
0.32) for steaks aged 7 and 14 d. A days on ZH x DOF interaction (P = 0.01) was detected for steaks aged 21 d; however, evaluation of the interactive means suggested that the nature of the interaction did not appear relevant. There was a ZH effect (P < 0.01) across every aging period, in that the control group had a significantly greater proportion of steaks with a WBSF value <3.0 kg. No linear or quadratic responses (P > 0.39) were detected as days on ZH increased. Miller et al. (2001)
4.3 kg by aging period. There was not a days on ZH x DOF interaction (P
0.11) for any aging period. There was a ZH effect (P < 0.01) across every aging period, in that the control group had a significantly greater proportion of steaks with a WBSF value
4.3 kg. The proportion of steaks aged 7 d that recorded a WBSF value
4.3 kg linearly decreased (P = 0.03) as the ZH feeding duration was extended. Miller et al. (2001)
0.30) for steaks aged 7 and 14 d. A days on ZH x DOF interaction (P = 0.03) was detected for steaks aged 21 d; however, evaluation of the interactive means suggested that the nature of the interaction did not appear relevant. There was a ZH effect (P < 0.01) across every aging period, in that the control group had a significantly less proportion of steaks with a WBSF value >4.9 kg. A quadratic response was detected (P
0.04) as days on ZH increased within the 7 and 14 d aging periods. There was a linear increase (P = 0.01) in the proportion of steaks aged 21 d that recorded a WBSF value >4.9 kg as the ZH feeding duration was extended. In general, the frequency of ZH carcasses recording less desirable WBSF classifications was not mitigated by extending the aging period, but it was improved. Shortening the ZH feeding duration (20 d) appeared advantageous in reducing the proportion of unacceptable steaks in regard to tenderness.
|
|
|
The repeated measures aspect of the experimental design allowed evaluation of the utility of aging upon WBSF given differences in DOF. There was a DOF x days postmortem interaction (P < 0.01). As shown in Figure 5, there was a linear aging response (P < 0.01) noted for every DOF group, such that increasing the aging period linearly decreased WBSF. Although variable, the trend in the range in WBSF decrease from 7 to 21 d postmortem was seemingly irrelevant.
|
No days on ZH x DOF interaction existed (P = 0.64) for percentage purge. When compared with the control, there was a tendency (P = 0.10) for increased purge in ZH-treated cattle (Table 4). There was not a linear (P = 0.98) or quadratic (P = 0.20) response noted for changes in purge loss as days on ZH increased. Percentage purge increased linearly (P < 0.01) as cattle spent a greater number of DOF. Heifers fed RAC did not show changes in purge loss after a 7-d retail case display (Quinn et al., 2008
). Carr et al. (2005)
indicated that purge loss was increased in enhanced pork loins but decreased in nonenhanced pork loins with 20 mg/kg of RAC. Kellermeier et al. (2009)
indicated that cattle fed ZH had increased purge loss vs. control cattle regardless of whether both groups had received a terminal implant or not. Given the transition in chemical composition resulting in an increased percentage of moisture, it is logical that an increase in purge loss may occur when feeding a β-AA such as ZH.
Semimembranosus Muscle Gene Expression
There was not a ZH effect (P = 0.34) or duration of ZH feeding effect (P = 0.17) upon β1-AR mRNA concentration (data not shown). No ZH effect existed (P = 0.65) upon β2-AR mRNA abundance, but it did respond quadratically (P = 0.04) to ZH dose duration in that β2-AR mRNA levels were intermediate at 20 d, least at 30 d, and greatest at 40 d. Other reports of the influence of β-AA on β-AR expression are conflicting. Sissom et al. (2006)
and Winterholler et al. (2007)
observed a tendency for the β-AA RAC to increase β2-AR mRNA and not affect β1-AR mRNA abundance in semimembranosus muscle of beef steers and heifers, respectively. In another study, Winterholler et al. (2008)
reported that RAC tended to increase β1-AR mRNA (P = 0.09) and had no effect on β2-AR mRNA in LM tissue from beef steers. Walker et al. (2007)
reported a decrease in β1- and β2-AR expression in LM tissue from Holstein steers. Baxa (2008)
reported that ZH did not change β1-AR expression but increased β2-AR expression. Cultured bovine myoblast cells exposed to ZH exhibited a decrease in β1-, β2-, and β3-AR mRNA abundance and a decrease in β2-AR protein content (Sissom et al., 2007
). Nevertheless, these pharmacological results may not be indicative of the physiological response in the animal.
Days on feed did not affect (P > 0.10) the abundance of β1-AR mRNA (data not shown). There was a linear increase (P = 0.03) in β2-AR mRNA as DOF increased (Figure 6). Similarly, Winterholler et al. (2007)
demonstrated the same effect on β2-AR mRNA with advancing days on feed and advancing time in culture in an in vitro model. In contrast to our data, β1-AR mRNA decreased with increased days on feed (Winterholler et al., 2007
). Nevertheless, the β2-AR is the most densely populated β-AR subtype on bovine skeletal muscle cells (Sillence and Matthews, 1994
). Certainly, this fact along with the observed increase in β2-AR with advancing maturity would be favorable for a β-AA with a greater affinity for the β2-AR subtype.
|
No ZH effect (P = 0.56) or duration of ZH feeding effect (P = 0.32) on IGF-I mRNA abundance was seen (data not shown). Insulin growth factor-I responded quadratically (P = 0.01) to DOF in that levels were similar at 157 and 198 d and greater at 177 d. In agreement with the ZH-related results, Parsons et al. (2007)
did not detect an influence of the β-AA RAC upon IGF-I mRNA levels in LM or circulating IGF-I plasma concentrations in feedlot cull cows. Walker et al. (2007)
observed a decrease in IGF-I mRNA in RAC-fed Holstein steers and Sissom et al. (2007)
observed a decrease in IGF-I mRNA in RAC-fed beef heifers implanted with Finaplix-H (Intervet Schering Plough Animal Health). Byrem et al. (1996)
demonstrated that the β-AA cimaterol elicited an effect on protein metabolism in the hindlimb of young steers via a close arterial infusion. Collectively, it would appear that this evidence would support the belief that β-AA mediate their effect primarily, and perhaps solely, through direct modulation of the β-AR and not via the endocrine or neural regulatory axes. The direct effect would be the opposite of the indirect effect of anabolic steroids. Pampusch et al. (2003)
reported that IGF-I mRNA levels in LM and circulating IGF-I concentrations were greater in Revalor-S (Intervet Schering Plough Animal Health) implanted steers vs. nonimplanted steers. The difference in the mechanistic action behind each of these growth enhancing compounds would aid in explanation of why when utilized together, ZH and estradiol-trenbolone acetate cause additive gains in muscle accretion compared with their use alone (Casey et al., 1997
).
There was not a ZH effect upon calpastatin mRNA abundance (P = 0.41; data not shown). However, in the current study there was a tendency for calpastatin expression to linearly decrease as days on ZH increased (P = 0.07; Figure 7). As DOF increased there was a linear increase in calpastatin mRNA levels (P < 0.01; Figure 7). In contrast to our results, increases in calpastatin, an ante- and postmortem inhibitory agent of proteases, have been shown to be partly responsible for increases in net protein turnover with some β-AA. Kretchmar et al. (1990)
and Koohmaraie et al. (1991)
reported that lambs fed L-644,969 demonstrated an increase in calpain activity, but calpastatin activity was increased at a considerably greater rate. Likewise, Killefer and Koohmaraie (1994)
reported that calpastatin pre- and posttranslational (mRNA and protein) expression was nearly twice that of the control with L-644,969 in cattle and sheep. Clenbuterol has been shown to increase total calpastatin mRNA levels by 52% in swine (Sensky et al., 2006
). In contrast with reports from these β-AA and in agreement with our results, Hilton et al. (2009)
indicated that calpastatin activity was not increased in ZH-fed cattle. Also identical to our results, Baxa (2008)
did not observe a ZH effect upon calpastatin transcription levels. In regard to calpastatin, differences appear to exist between the β-AA of choice.
|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Corresponding author: ryan.rathmann{at}ttu.edu
Received for publication January 20, 2009. Accepted for publication May 20, 2009.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |