|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL NUTRITION |
University of Aarhus, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health, Welfare and Nutrition, PO Box 50, Research Centre Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: coproduct carbohydrate digestibility luminal environment morphology sow
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In an accompanying paper (Serena et al., 2008
), we have studied the digestion of carbohydrates and energy utilization in sows fed diets with contrasting levels and physiochemical properties of dietary fiber. The cereals wheat and barley of a low-fiber (LF) diet were substituted with coproducts characterized to be high in either soluble DF (sugar beet pulp, potato pulp, or pectin residue) or insoluble DF (obtained by substitution of approximately two-thirds of the former coproducts with pea hull, seed residues, and brewers spent grain), and the digestion of carbohydrates and energy utilization was studied. It was evident that the DF level affected the ileal flow of nutrients, in particular carbohydrates that increased from 190 g/d when feeding the LF diet to 538 to 539 g/d when feeding the 2 high-fiber (HF) diets. We hypothesized that the contrasting properties of DF would result in different fermentation patterns of NSP and physical properties, thereby inducing changes in the morphological characteristics of the gastrointestinal tract.
The aim of this particular study was to investigate the effect of the 3 particular diets on the luminal environment and the morphological characteristics in the small and large intestine of sows.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twelve nonpregnant sows with an initial average BW = 232 ± 26 kg were selected after weaning of their first or second litter (Danish Landrace x Yorkshire; Faculty of Agricultural Sciences Swineherd, Foulum, Denmark). The sows were fed 3 experimental diets, a LF control diet and 2 generic HF diets: high fiber 1 (HF1) or high fiber 2 (HF2), with different proportions between soluble and insoluble DF. The LF diet was based on wheat and barley, and the 2 HF diets were supplemented with different coproducts (residues from the industrial production: potato pulp, KMC, Kartoffelmelcentralen Amba, Brande, Denmark; sugar beet pulp, Danisco Sugar A/S, Assens, Denmark; pectin residue, CP Kelco ApS, Lille Skensved, Denmark; brewers spent grain, Carlsberg A/S, Fredericia delivered by Agro-Korn A/S, Videbæk, Denmark; pea hull, Prodana Seeds A/S, Odense, Denmark; and seed residues, DLF Trifolium A/S, Roskilde, Denmark; Table 1
). Wet coproducts (sugar beet pulp, potato pulp, pectin residue, and brewers spent grain) were all dried to DM content above 87.5%. The diets were formulated to contain different types and levels of DF. The LF diet contained 15% DF, and the 2 HF diets contained approximately 40% DF. The HF1 diet had a high content of soluble DF provided from sugar beet pulp, potato pulp, and pectin residue, and HF2 had a high content of insoluble DF obtained by substitution with the coproducts pea hull, seed residue, and brewers spent grain. The diets were formulated to meet the Danish minimum recommendations for essential macro- and micronutrients (Jørgensen and Tybirk, 2005
). The diets were milled to pass through a 2-mm screen, and chromic oxide (2.0 g/kg of feed) was added as a solid-phase marker.
|
Analytical Methods
Diets were analyzed in triplicate for physicochemical properties (water-binding capacity, swelling, and viscosity), as described by Serena (2005)
.
All chemical analyses were performed in duplicate. Chromic oxide, lactic acid (LA), and SCFA were measured in wet material; all other analysis was done in freeze-dried materials. Diets and gut material were analyzed for DM by drying to a constant weight at 103°C, ash according to the AOAC (1990)
, and for nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method using Kjeltech 1035 tecator (Foss Tecator AB, Höganäs, Sweden; AOAC, 1990
). Fat was determined by extraction with diethyl ether after acid hydrolysis and analyzed as described by Stoldt (1952)
and chromic oxide by the method of Schürch et al. (1950)
. Starch was analyzed by an enzymatic-colorimetric method according to Bach Knudsen (1997)
and sugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) and fructan by the enzymatic-calorimetric method of Larsson and Bengtsson (1983)
. Total NSP and their constituent sugars were determined by gas-liquid chromatography for neutral sugars and by a colorimetric method for uronic acids using a modification of the methods described by Theander and Åman (1979)
and Englyst et al. (1982)
, as described by Bach Knudsen (1997)
.
Content of cellulose was calculated as

total noncellulosic polysaccharides were calculated as

soluble noncellulosic polysaccharides were calculated as

and DF was calculated as

Klason lignin was measured gravimetrically as the residue resistant to hydrolysis by 12 mol/L of H2SO4 (Theander and Åman, 1979
). The gut content was analyzed for total LA and SCFA by GC, as described in detail by Jensen et al. (1995)
.
Tissue samples for morphological and histological analysis were placed for 24 h in 10% neutral-buffered formaldehyde, cleaned of remaining digesta using deionized water, and dehydrated and infiltrated with paraffin wax. Three slides were prepared from each sample, and each slide contained a minimum of 4 sections that were 4-µm thick and were made at least 50-µm apart.
The slides were processed for carbohydrate histochemistry using either the periodic acid-Schiffs (which stains neutral mucins) reaction or the Alcian blue reaction at either pH 2.5 (which stains carboxylated or sulfated types of acidic mucins) or pH 1.0 (which stains sulfomucins; Kiernan, 1990
). Carbohydrate histochemistry on the periodic acid-Schiffs- and Alcian blue-stained samples was evaluated as described previously by Brunsgaard (1997)
.
The slides processed for neutral mucins were further used to determine the area, the height, and the density of the intestinal villi and the crypts and the thickness of the muscularis externa using an image analyses system (Quantimet 500MC, Leica, Cambridge, UK; Hedemann et al., 2006
). All measures were done using a light microscope at 10x magnification.
Samples for mitotic counts were stained with the Feulgen reaction, and the mitotic counts in the crypts were performed as described by Goodlad (1994)
.
Calculations and Statistical Analysis
The content of polysaccharide residues was calculated as anhydro sugars, and all apparent digestibilities were calculated relative to the Cr2O3 concentration:
The digestibility was calculated as

where X = the concentration of specific nutrients in the diet and the digesta. When calculating starch digestibility at the ileum, it is generally assumed that free glucose in ileum digesta derives from starch.
Mean transit time in the segments was calculated as:

where Cr2O3(GI) = the amount of Cr2O3 in the segment of gastrointestinal tract and Cr2O3(day) = the daily intake of Cr2O3.
The correlation between pH and SCFA concentrations in the gut segments was done using PROC CORR (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC).
Comparison of treatment effects (i.e., diets) in a given intestinal segment was accomplished by a simple ANOVA based on the model

where Xi = the dependent variable; µ = the mean of the variable;
i = treatment (diet LF, HF1, and HF2); and
i accounts for unexplained variation. The GLM procedure in SAS with a level of significance of P < 0.05 was used in this case.
Investigation of the effect of diets over a range of intestinal segments was carried out using the following general model:
![]()
where Xijk = the dependent variable; µ = the mean of the variable,
i = the effect of diets (LF, HF1, and HF2); βj = the effect of segment (cecum and Co1 to 4);
ij = the interaction between diet and segment; and k = an individual sow. The variance component, µk ~N(0,t2), accounts for the repeated measurements made on the same individual, thereby rendering these observations correlated. The error term,
ijk ~N (0,
2), represents unexplained variation. The variance interaction between segment and diet was described as random by using
ij
N (0,
2) [Type = arh (1)]. The MIXED procedure in SAS with a level of significance of P < 0.05 was used in this case.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Feeding the HF diets resulted in significantly greater amounts of wet material in the small intestine, whereas only pigs fed the HF2 diet had a greater (P < 0.05) amount of wet material in the colon compared with the LF-fed pigs (Table 2
). Tissue weights of the stomach, small intestine, and cecum were not affected by diet, whereas the colon of HF1-fed pigs was heavier (P < 0.05) compared with LF-fed pigs (Table 2
).
|
|
|
|
|
The variation in the SCFA profile of cecal and colonic content among diets was approximately as follows: acetate, 65 ± 6.2%, propionate, 21 ± 3.1%; butyrate, 11 ± 4.0%; and BCFA, 3 ± 1.8% (Table 5
).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To track changes in the apparent digestibility of carbohydrates from ileum and along the large intestine, we used chromic oxide, which is a widely used solid-phase marker for this purpose (Warner, 1981
; Mroz et al., 1996
). Although the digestibility of starch and NSP progressed as expected in all segments of the colon, the digestibility of starch (diets HF1 and HF2) and NSP (all diets) was decreased in the cecum compared with the ileum presumably because the sudden movement of digesta in connection with the slaughtering process (the consequence is underestimation of the digestibility in the cecum but not in the colon).
The digestibility of starch from the LF diet was generally greater compared with the HF diets in spite of the fact that the bulk of starch in all diets was derived from cereals. Starch in cereals has an open structure, which enables an easy access for the salivary and pancreatic
-amylases in the small intestine (Englyst et al., 1992
). The explanation for why the digestibility of starch is lower at ileum and at all sites of the large intestine when feeding the HF diets is unknown; however, the HF content causing a more bulky environment could be a reason.
Solubility and lignification are 2 important parameters influencing the fermentability of NSP (Bach Knudsen and Hansen, 1991
; Bach Knudsen et al., 1993
; Glitsø et al., 1998
): solubility by enhancing the surface area available for bacterial enzymes and lignification by cementing together cell wall polysaccharides and hindering the accessibility of bacterial enzymes to cell wall polysaccharides (Bach Knudsen and Hansen, 1991
; Cherbut et al., 1991
; Glitsø et al., 1998
). In agreement with these observations, the digestibility of NSP was greatest for diet HF1, intermediate for diet HF2, and least for diet LF. It should be noted that the degradation profile of the NSP along the large intestine reached a plateau at different sites, which to a large extent reflected the amount and solubility of NSP that reached the large intestine and the type of NSP degraded.
Fermentation in the large intestine produces SCFA as the major energy-containing end product, whereas LA is primarily formed in the stomach and small intestine (Argenzio and Southworth, 1975
). The concentrations of LA and SCFA in the distal small intestine were similar to studies with growing pigs (Bach Knudsen and Hansen, 1991
; Bach Knudsen et al., 1993
), as were the concentration of SCFA throughout the various segments of the large intestine (Argenzio and Southworth, 1975
; Bach Knudsen et al., 1993
). In the present study, the greater concentration of SCFA in Co1 and Co2 is consistent with the observation that in growing pigs the cecum and proximal colon are the sites with the greatest saccharolytic activity (Bach Knudsen et al., 1991
). This is also the case in the present study, which demonstrated greater concentration of SCFA in Co1 and Co2 than in other segments of the large intestine. Branched-chain fatty acids are primarily formed in regions with low saccharolytic activity (Macfarlane and Cummings, 1991
), and generally, there is a greater overall concentration when feeding a diet providing low amounts of fermentable carbohydrates (Macfarlane et al., 1992
; Bach Knudsen et al., 1993
; Macfarlane and Macfarlane, 2003
). Accordingly, BCFA were present in cecum and Co1–Co2 in a greater proportion when feeding diet LF compared with the HF diets. The explanation is likely due to a shortage of fermentable carbohydrates leading to a shift to protein fermentation when feeding LF compared with the HF diets.
Studies showing the effect of SCFA concentration on pH in the intestinal tract are in disagreement with each other (Argenzio and Southworth, 1975
; Fleming et al., 1985
; Partanen and Mroz, 1999
). We showed no significant difference in the pH in colonic material among the diets, although a greater concentration of SCFA in segment Co2 to Co4 was observed when feeding the HF diets compared with LF. We observed a general decrease in pH with an increased SCFA concentration throughout all segments of the large intestine.
The DM percentage and the amount of digesta retained throughout the different segments of the colon are in good agreement with the fermentation pattern of NSP from the different diets in the large intestine. Thus, the decreased DM percentage when feeding diet HF1 is a combined effect of high fermentability of NSP and a high microbial biomass formation, which makes the colonic material moister. At sites with the most significant degradation of NSP, Co1, and Co2, we showed a difference between DM percentage in colonic material after feeding diet HF1 and HF2, but the difference disappeared as the digesta moved more distal in the colon (Co3 and Co4). In contrast, diet HF2 (high in insoluble DF) acted as a fecal-bulking agent that holds water in the unfermented DF. This is also reflected in the amount of material in the colon being almost 2-fold greater when feeding diet HF2 compared with feeding LF diet. The amount of material in the stomach and small intestine was greater when feeding HF1 (not significantly different from HF2) in response to the greater water-binding capacity and swelling of this diet before degradation in the intestinal tract.
The total accumulated mean transit time of the large intestine was 13 h longer when feeding diet LF compared with the 2 HF diets. This is a reflection of the greater flow of digesta from the small to the large intestine when feeding HF diets (Serena, 2005
). Transit time also depends on the length of the entire gut (Jørgensen et al., 1996
), especially the length of the cecum-colon. However, our results did not indicate that the large intestinal length was affected by HF diets.
To our knowledge, it is the first time that morphological characteristics of intestinal tissue have been studied on sows, and most comparative data are from growing-finishing pigs (Brunsgaard, 1997
, 1998
; Hedemann et al., 2005
). In the present study, the weight of stomach, small intestine, and cecum did not vary significantly among diets as observed by Brunsgaard (1998)
. We showed a significantly greater weight of colon when feeding HF1 compared with LF, and these results are in agreement with studies by Jørgensen et al. (1996)
and Eastwood and Brydon (1985)
. In contrast, Jin et al. (1994)
were not able to show differences between feeding a high or low DF diet with respect to the weight of the large intestine in growing pigs. The greater tissue weight in the colon when feeding HF1 compared with LF is not caused by increased length but may be due to the greater supply of energy to the colonic epithelium when feeding HF1 as demonstrated by the greater absorption of SCFA to the portal vein Serena (2005)
.
With regards to the gut morphology, we showed a greater crypt depth in the colon when feeding the highly fermentable diet (HF1) compared with diet LF. This result was also shown by Jin et al. (1994)
in growing-finishing pigs consuming a HF compared with a low DF diet (P < 0.1). However, in the present study, there was no difference between diet HF2 and diet LF, suggesting that the effect of DF on gut morphology was more ascribed to the type rather than the level of DF.
Previous research reported that DF increases the rate of turnover of intestinal mucosal cells in growing pigs (Jin et al., 1994
; Brunsgaard, 1998
). However, in the present study with sows, there was no difference in mitotic counts among dietary treatments, and the absolute level was only 10 to 17% of that of growing pigs. These data together with the greater number of crypts especially in the small intestine of sows compared with growing pigs (Brunsgaard, 1997
) suggest a more mature gut of sows relative to growing pigs. A 1.5 to 3.0 times thicker muscularis externa in sows relative to growing pigs (Brunsgaard, 1998
) could be caused by the greater feed intake and a more coarse feed structure.
In our study, there were no differences among diets in mucins or in the crypts of the small intestine, cecum, and colon. This is in contrast to other studies in which high-DF diets compared with low-DF diets increased the number of mucin-secreting goblet cells in rats (Enss et al., 1994
; Sakata, 1997
), resulting in a possible increase in protection of the gut (Brownlee et al., 2003
). A study by Shimotoyodome et al. (2001)
showed that soluble DF increased fecal secretion, epithelial production, thickness of the mucus layer, and amount of luminal mucus. The reason why we did not observe any effect of the level or type of DF on the above-mentioned parameters could be due to the age of the animals and that feeding sows high-DF diets for 4 wk is not sufficient to change these mucin characteristics in the gut.
It is assumed that acidic and sulfo mucins can protect the gut against pathogenic bacteria (Belley et al., 1999
; Deplancke and Gaskins, 2001
). In sows, we detected a decreased area of acidic and sulfo mucins in the colon compared with the colon of growing pigs (Hedemann et al., 2002
). The reason could be that the microflora utilize mucin as energy (Forstner, 1978
; Deplancke and Gaskins, 2001
) and that the gut in sows is protected by a significant number of stable microflora (Guarner and Malagelada, 2003
). The area of mucins on the villi is 2 to 5 times greater than that observed for growing pigs (Hedemann et al., 2005
). Increased mucin-staining area in growing pigs has been associated to increased binding of Salmonella to ileal tissue. Whether this is the case in sows as well needs to be further investigated.
Although we believe that the observed differences in morphology of growing pigs compared with sows is a consequence of aging, it is also important to consider that during the lactation period sows have consumed in the order of 7 to 8 kg of feed per day. The differences introduced by the diets in the study period in this perspective may be relative small.
In conclusion, our results show that the LF diet was well digested in the small intestine and resulted in substantially less materials in all segments of the gastrointestinal tract. In the large intestine, sows fed LF were depleted of fermentable carbohydrates in the mid colon, whereas for the 2 high-DF diets, the colon contained more digesta, had a decreased DM content, and was depleted of fermentable carbohydrates at more distal locations. The various polysaccharides of NSP were broken down at different sites of the large intestine. The diets affected concentration of SCFA in the large intestine but had only a minor effect on SCFA proportions. The morphology of the intestinal tract of sows was different from that of growing pigs, and feeding sows a diet containing a high amount of soluble DF resulted in significantly morphological changes in the colon compared with the low DF diet.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Present address: Arla Foods Amba, Skanderborgvej 277, 8260 Viby J, Denmark. ![]()
3 Corresponding author: Mette.Hedemann{at}agrsci.dk
Received for publication February 3, 2006. Accepted for publication February 26, 2008.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Serena, H. Jorgensen, and K. E. Bach Knudsen Absorption of carbohydrate-derived nutrients in sows as influenced by types and contents of dietary fiber J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 136 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |