J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2008. 86:2068-2075. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0528
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0528v1
86/9/2068    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Afolayan, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Afolayan, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, N. M.

ANIMAL GENETICS

Genetic variation of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 in young crossbred ewes and its relationship with their maintenance feed intake at maturity and production traits1

R. A. Afolayan and N. M. Fogarty2

The Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The genetic variation of plasma IGF-I in crossbred ewe lambs postweaning was evaluated together with its potential use as a physiological marker for selection in meat sheep. Genetic variation for IGF-I was analyzed among 1,246 young crossbred ewes that were the progeny of 30 sires from various maternal breeds and Merino dams. The estimate of heritability of IGF-I was 0.28 ± 0.10, with sire breed not being significant. Genetic correlations were estimated between IGF-I and performance traits of the ewes, including feed intake, growth, body composition, wool, and reproduction over 3 matings. Although the genetic correlations had high standard errors because of the limited size of the data set, the correlation between IGF-I and grazing feed intake of the mature ewes at maintenance was positive (0.32 ± 0.31). The genetic correlations of IGF-I with other traits ranged from positive and low to moderate for growth (0.05 to 0.36), positive for ultrasound eye muscle depth (0.15), and negative for ultrasound fat depth (–0.12) in the mature ewes, and close to zero for the wool traits. The genetic correlation between IGF-I and the average number of lambs born per ewe mated was negative (–0.18), whereas that for the average number of lambs weaned per ewe mated was positive (0.10). The parameters indicated that genetic variation exists for IGF-I in sheep, and selection for low IGF-I in young ewes may result in some reduction in feed intake and improvement in maintenance efficiency of mature ewes under grazing, with little impact on other production traits. However, the genetic correlations had high standard errors, and more precise estimates of these parameters are required for genetic evaluation and to predict with confidence the outcome of breeding programs.

Key Words: ewe • feed intake • genetic parameter • heritability • insulin-like growth factor-I


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Insulin-like growth factor-I could be a useful physiological indicator to assist in the screening and selection of livestock at an early age. Insulin-like growth factor-I is a naturally occurring hormone that influences growth and development as part of a complex system. It can be measured relatively easily in young animals and could be used to predict future performance, especially for production traits that are difficult or expensive to measure, such as feed efficiency (Bunter et al., 2005bGo).

Several studies have shown a link between circulating IGF-I concentration and growth traits in laboratory animals (Blair et al., 1988Go), cattle (Davis and Simmen, 1997Go), sheep (Olsen et al., 1981Go; Roberts et al., 1990Go; Hegarty et al., 2006Go), swine (Buonomo et al., 1987Go; Scanes et al., 1987Go), and chickens (Goddard et al., 1988Go). Carcass quality characteristics have also been correlated with IGF-I in cattle (Davis and Simmen, 2000Go) and pigs (Suzuki et al., 2004Go). There is moderate heritability for IGF-I levels in beef cattle (Herd et al., 1995Go; Davis et al., 2003Go) and dairy cattle (Hayhurst et al., 2006Go). Bunter et al. (2005b)Go reported a range of 0.21 to 0.58 for heritability of IGF-I in juvenile pigs and that IGF-I was genetically correlated with backfat depth, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio. Divergent selection for plasma IGF-I in sheep over 5 generations indicated moderate heritability and some association between juvenile IGF-I and feed efficiency and lean growth (Blair et al., 2002Go).

This study reports on the genetic variation in postweaning plasma IGF-I of crossbred ewe lambs and the genetic correlations of their IGF-I level with the maintenance grazing feed intake of the ewes at maturity and several other growth and body composition, wool production, and reproduction traits of the ewes. The implications for use of IGF-I in sheep breeding programs are discussed.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The project was conducted under approval of the NSW Department of Primary Industries Orange Animal Ethics Committee (ORA 97/001).

Animals and Traits

The 1,246 crossbred ewes in this study were a subset of ewes at the Cowra site of the Maternal Sire Central Progeny Test (MCPT; Fogarty et al., 2005Go). The ewes were progeny of medium wool Merino dams and 30 individual sires from several maternal crossing breeds. There were 3 cohorts of the crossbred ewes, born in August 1997 and in July of 1998 and 1999 following synchronized matings by laparoscopic AI using thawed-frozen semen. Nine different sires were used each year and 3 additional sires were used every year to provide genetic links across years for evaluation. The sires were from several breeds, including Border Leicester (n = 7), East Friesian (3), Finnsheep (3), Coopworth (3), White Suffolk (3), Corriedale (2), Booroola Leicester (3), and other (1 sire from each of English Leicester, Gromark, Merino, Wiltshire Horn, and 2 composite breeds). Further details of the MCPT, including generation of the crossbred ewes, management at the sites, and genetic merit of the sires used, have been provided by Fogarty et al. (2005)Go

Live weights were measured on the ewes at birth (BWT), weaning (WWT) at 9 to 12 wk of age, postweaning (PWWT) at approximately 6 mo of age, and as mature adults (AWT) at approximately 4 yr of age. Wool production of the ewes was measured in their first year after a lamb shearing, and the traits included greasy and clean fleece weight, clean yield, and average fiber diameter. The ewes were mated naturally to groups of Poll Dorset rams for 5 to 6 wk in either autumn or spring over 3 yr to assess ewe reproductive performance. After being weaned, each cohort of crossbred ewe lambs was randomly assigned within sire group to either autumn or spring mating groups. The autumn cohort groups were first mated at 7 mo of age (February to March) to lamb at 12 mo of age (July to August). The spring cohort groups were first mated at 14 mo of age (October to November) to lamb at 19 mo of age (March to April). The reproduction traits were the number of lambs born and weaned (of ewes mated), which was averaged over their first 3 matings. Where ewes did not survive for 3 matings, the average of available matings was used.

The feed intake (DDMI, digestible DMI) of the mature ewes (nonpregnant and nonlactating at approximately 4 yr of age) while grazing on pasture at maintenance was also obtained. This was estimated by using the fecal marker dilution technique with chromium sesquioxide controlled-release devices, which has been shown to allow relatively precise estimation of grazing intake for large numbers of sheep (Parker et al., 1989Go; Lee et al., 1995Go). The ewes grazed mixed grass-alfalfa pasture with greater than 1.5 t of DM/ha. The paddock for each group was selected to be as uniform as possible and to have sufficient growth to maintain the ewes for 4 wk. Pastures were sampled to estimate available DM, green and dead material, the proportion of legume, and DM digestibility. Fecal samples were collected on 3 occasions over a 7- to 10-d period after an initial 7- to 10-d period following administration of the controlled release devices, with the detailed procedures and results reported separately (Fogarty et al., 2006Go). There was a decline in the release rate of the devices over the 3 yr of sampling, resulting in heterogeneity of variance of DDMI across cohort groups. This was removed by expressing the DDMI of individual ewes as a ratio of the mean for each cohort group, that is, relative DDMI (rDDMI; Fogarty et al., 2006Go). The body composition traits (fat depth and eye muscle depth) were measured on the mature ewes by an accredited ultrasound scanner at the time of feed intake estimation, and AWT was recorded as well. Fat depth and eye muscle depth were measured at the C site, which is 45 mm from the mid-line over the 12th rib. Feed intake data were available for 1,088 ewes.

Blood Collection and IGF-I Assay Procedures

A blood sample was collected from the crossbred ewe lambs after weaning at approximately 18, 22, and 31 wk of age for the 1997, 1998, and 1999 cohort ewes, respectively. Both age at collection and the interval from weaning to collection differed between cohorts. Blood was collected by jugular venipuncture into 10-mL heparin Vacutainer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) tubes, held on ice and spun in a refrigerated centrifuge, and the plasma was pipetted into a container and held frozen at –20°C. Samples were assayed at the Primegro Limited laboratory (Adelaide, Australia) by using a commercially available ELISA assay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories Inc., Webster, TX). This kit is a nonextraction IGF-I ELISA, using an enzymatically amplified "2-step" sandwich-type immunoassay. It is validated to quantify IGF-I concentration in human plasma with an intra-assay CV of <10% and sensitivity for minimum detection of 0.01 ng/mL.

Statistical Analysis

A linear mixed model was used to analyze the plasma IGF-I level in the young crossbred ewes. The model included fixed effects for assay (batch and plate), cohort (1997, 1998, 1999, year of birth), and sire breed (1 to 8). The effect of mating group was not significant because the groups were split close to or after blood sampling, and the effect was not included in the final model. Age of the ewe lambs was not included because they were produced from synchronized matings with a small age range of approximately 7 d within each cohort. There were age differences at sampling across the years that are part of the cohort effect. All 2-way interactions were not significant (P > 0.05) and were excluded from the final model (model 1). A second model (model 2) was also fitted, which included linear covariates to examine the effects of WWT and postweaning ADG (PADG) on IGF-I. A univariate animal model was used to estimate variance components for IGF-I by restricted maximum likelihood procedures using ASReml (Gilmour et al., 2006Go). Under this model, the sire breed fixed effect was tested relative to the genetic (between-sire) variance. The sire progeny means for IGF-I were predicted from the sire solution deviations in the univariate analysis (using the fixed-effects model 1), which are estimates of the breeding values. The overall mean was added to the sire solutions so that they were expressed in actual IGF-I values rather than deviations. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between plasma IGF-I and the various production traits for the crossbred ewes were estimated by using bivariate animal models. The fixed effects in the bivariate models included those above for the univariate model for IGF-I, with cohort having 6 levels to account for year of birth and autumn and spring mating groups for all the other traits except BWT and WWT. The bivariate models for live weight, wool, and reproduction traits also included the type of birth and rearing (11, 21, and 22) of the ewe and the source of dam (detailed in Fogarty et al., 2005Go). The feed intake traits included AWT, ewe weight gain over the sampling period, previous lambing record, and the ultrasound fat and eye muscle depth measurements to account for these environmental effects (Fogarty et al., 2006Go). Fat and eye muscle depth included AWT as a covariate. The random effect of dam was significant for BWT, WWT, and PWWT, and it was included in the bivariate analyses for these traits.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The number of sires and crossbred ewes sampled for plasma IGF-I analyses in the various cohorts and their growth performance traits are shown in Table 1Go. There was considerable variation among the cohorts for plasma IGF-I, with the coefficient of variation ranging from 15 to 21% for the various cohorts. The 1999 cohort ewes had greater plasma IGF-I levels and were 2 to 3 mo older than the other cohorts at sampling, with little difference in IGF-I between the 1997 and 1998 cohorts. There was little difference among the cohorts for BWT, whereas at later ages the 1998 cohort ewes were lower than the 1997 and 1999 cohort ewes for WWT, PWWT, and PADG. The growth difference was not obvious at mature weight because of compensatory growth in advanced ages.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Number of sires and ewes and means (SD) for IGF-I, age at sampling, birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT), postweaning weight (PWWT), postweaning ADG (PADG), and adult weight (AWT) for cohorts of crossbred ewes by different sire breeds
 
The significance of the fixed effects for IGF-I in models 1 and 2 is shown in Table 2Go. Assay effects (batch and plate) were highly significant (P < 0.001), which is typical of ELISA techniques. Cohort was highly significant (P < 0.01), whereas sire breed was not significant. There were no significant interactions between the various systematic factors. Weaning weight and PADG were highly significant (P < 0.001) and accounted for a large portion of the variation in IGF-I. Predicted means for plasma IGF-I from models 1 and 2 for the cohorts and sire breeds are shown in Table 3Go. Sire breed was not significant, although the predicted mean for the ewes by the 2 Corriedale sires was 13 to 22% lower than all the other breed groups for both models. The regression coefficients for both WWT (4.07 ± 0.52 ng/mL per kg) and PADG (0.38 ± 0.07 ng·mL–1·g–1·d–1) were positive and significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Degrees of freedom (df), F-values, and significance of factors for IGF-I in the fixed-effects models 1 and 2
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Predicted means (±SE) of IGF-I (ng/mL) for sire breed and cohort of crossbred ewes for models 1 and 2 and regressions on weaning weight (WWT) and postweaning ADG (PADG)
 
Genetic Parameters

There was considerable genetic variance for plasma IGF-I of the crossbreed ewe lambs, with an estimated heritability of 0.28 ± 0.10 and phenotypic standard deviation of 62.1 ng/mL. Inclusion of WWT and PADG as covariates in the model had little effect on the estimate of heritability (0.27 ± 0.09) and slightly reduced the phenotypic standard deviation to 59.7 ng/mL. Removal of breed of sire of the crossbred ewe from the model also did not significantly change the genetic variance or the estimate of heritability. The predicted sire means showed a considerable range for plasma IGF-I within the various sire breeds, as well as across all 30 sires (Table 4Go). There was a range of >15% in plasma IGF-I level across sire progeny groups within most sire breeds of the crossbred ewes, with the range for the Finnsheep and East Friesian being 28%, White Suffolk 19%, and Border Leicester 15%. The numbers of ewe progeny sampled per sire for the 3 link sires (Border Leicester 12, Finnsheep 7, and Coopworth 5) were 84, 77, and 81, respectively. The other 27 sires had an average of 25.7 crossbred ewe progeny per sire, ranging from 17 to 34. Heritabilities estimated from the bivariate analyses of IGF-I with all the production traits were similar to those estimated from the univariate analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Predicted progeny means (±SE) for IGF-I of sires from various breeds (model 1) and the number of crossbred ewe progeny
 
The genetic and phenotypic correlations between the plasma IGF-I level in the young crossbred ewes and their various feed intake, growth, composition, wool, and reproduction traits are shown in Table 5Go. The magnitude and direction of the estimates of covariance for IGF-I and most of the production traits were similar for both models, except for the correlations of IGF-I with the growth traits. The genetic correlations between plasma IGF-I and the live weights were positive (0.05 to 0.36) for model 1, but were reduced and generally negative and close to zero (–0.24 to 0.11) for model 2, which included WWT and PADG as covariates. The genetic correlations of IGF-I with maintenance feed intake were positive and moderate (0.23 ± 0.34 for DDMI and 0.32 ± 0.31 for rDDMI, model 1) and were also slightly reduced under model 2. The genetic correlation for ultrasound fat depth was negative (–0.12 ± 0.24), whereas that for eye muscle depth was positive (0.15 ± 0.24) and those for most of the wool traits were close to zero except for clean yield (–0.24 ± 0.27). The genetic correlations with reproduction traits were negative for the number of lambs born and positive for the number of lambs weaned (–0.18 ± 0.25 and 0.10 ± 0.26, respectively, model 1). In general, all the genetic correlations were low and smaller in magnitude than their standard errors. The phenotypic correlations were generally smaller in magnitude than the corresponding genetic correlations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic correlations (±SE) between IGF-I and production traits of crossbred ewes for models 1 and 2
 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Many physiological processes are affected by IGF-I, and it is closely linked with GH and postnatal growth and production efficiency in livestock species (Blair et al., 2002Go; Bunter et al., 2005bGo; Hegarty et al., 2006Go). Several nongenetic factors can affect plasma IGF-I levels, including age in sheep (Roberts et al., 1990Go; Morel et al., 1991Go), calves (Davis et al., 1995Go), and pigs (Bunter et al., 2005bGo), as well as season and sex (Davis et al., 1995Go). Although there was little difference in weaning age within the cohorts, the 1999 ewes were somewhat older than the other cohorts at sampling (215 vs. 131 and 151 d) and had higher IGF-I levels (Table 1Go). This difference may be due to between-year variation, because Roberts et al. (1990)Go found little increase in IGF-I in ewes until after 230 d of age. Divergence in IGF-I concentration has been observed between the sexes, with males having greater IGF-I concentrations than females in sheep (Roberts et al., 1990Go; Morel et al., 1991Go; Medrano and Bradford, 1991Go) and cattle (Kerr et al., 1991Go; Davis et al., 1995Go). Older rather than younger dams have been reported to produce progeny with greater concentrations of IGF-I at weaning in lambs (Morel et al., 1991Go) and calves (Enns et al., 1991Go). Other nongenetic factors that have been reported to influence plasma IGF-I concentrations in beef calves include ambient temperature (Holland et al., 1988Go) and humidity (Sarko et al., 1994Go), probably because of their effects on feed intake.

The moderate estimate of heritability (0.28 ± 0.10) indicates there is scope for genetic change in IGF-I with selection in young sheep. Our results are consistent with the divergent response in IGF-I achieved in Romney sheep selected after weaning at 4 mo of age (Blair et al., 2002Go). The heritability is also similar to the estimates in terminal (0.21) and maternal (0.24) sire lines of juvenile pigs (Bunter et al., 2005bGo) and in beef cattle (0.31 to 0.52; Herd et al., 1995Go; Johnston et al., 2001Go; Moore et al., 2005Go; Davis and Simmen, 2006Go).

Because IGF-I can be measured relatively easily at low cost early in life, Bunter et al. (2005b)Go suggested it could be used as a physiological indicator for performance traits related to growth and feed efficiency. From a simulation study in beef cattle, Wood et al. (2002)Go concluded that IGF-I could be used effectively as a screening test in a 2-stage selection strategy for identifying animals for expensive residual feed intake testing. High genetic correlations have also been reported between various measures of feed efficiency in growing cattle and efficiency in mature cows (Archer et al., 2002Go). The utility of using IGF-I as an indirect selection criterion depends largely on its genetic correlations with the direct traits of interest and other important production traits. The genetic correlation between postweaning plasma IGF-I and relative feed intake of the mature crossbred ewes at maintenance was positive (rDDMI, 0.32 ± 0.31), although with a high standard error because of the limited size of the data set. The positive correlation indicates that low IGF-I levels may be associated with reduced feed intake for ewe maintenance and improved efficiency, because feed intake was adjusted for weight and other environmental effects (Fogarty et al., 2006Go). For young growing animals of other species, the genetic correlations reported between IGF-I and feed efficiency traits have usually been in the same direction, although generally higher in magnitude than in our study. In reviewing 5 pig trials, Bunter et al. (2005b)Go reported means for the genetic correlations of IGF-I with feed intake of 0.41 (the range of estimates was –0.20 to 0.78, generally with SE of approximately 0.3) and with a feed conversion ratio of 0.65 (range 0.50 to 0.84). In 2 beef cattle trials reported by Johnston et al. (2002)Go, the genetic correlations for IGF-I were 0.01 ± 0.30 and 0.27 ± 0.14 for feed intake, 0.56 ± 0.35 and 0.39 ± 0.13 for residual feed intake, and 0.37 ± 0.42 and 0.55 ± 0.16 for feed conversion ratio, and Moore et al. (2005)Go reported an estimate of 0.41 ± 0.21 for residual feed intake in another study. As expected, our estimate of the phenotypic correlation between IGF-I and relative feed intake (0.05 ± 0.04) was much lower than the corresponding genetic correlation, which was similar to the pig trials (Bunter et al., 2005bGo).

We found positive genetic correlations between plasma IGF-I and birth and subsequent live weights of the ewes, although the magnitude of the correlation was close to zero at birth. On the contrary, negative genetic correlations between IGF-I and growth traits have been reported in pigs for birth weight (–0.33, Hermesch et al., 2001Go) and daily gain (–0.09, Bunter et al., 2005bGo) and in beef cattle for daily gain (–0.2, Johnston et al., 2002Go, and –0.52, Moore et al., 2005Go) and 200-d weight (–0.40, Moore et al., 2005Go). The age at IGF-I sampling may be important because Bunter et al. (2005b)Go noted, in reviewing several pig trials, there was a suggestion that the genetic correlation was positive for early growth and changed to negative for later growth. However, the genetic correlations among measures of IGF-I at different ages in cattle are very high (>0.86, Moore et al., 2005Go; Davis and Simmen, 2006Go). The phenotypic correlations between IGF-I and growth were also much lower than the corresponding genetic correlations in our results and for these other reports.

Although the genetic correlation between IGF-I and ultrasound subcutaneous fat depth of the mature ewes was not significantly different from zero (–0.12 ± 0.24) in this study, a similar correlation was reported in Angus beef carcasses (Davis and Simmen, 2000Go), although there were contrary positive correlations for ultrasound measures of fat in Angus beef cattle in the United States (Davis et al., 2003Go) and Australia (Moore et al., 2005Go), as well as in pigs (0.46 ± 0.08, Hermesch et al., 2001Go; 0.57, Bunter et al., 2005bGo). The genetic correlation between plasma IGF-I level and eye muscle depth (0.15 ± 0.24) was small and positive, which is similar in direction and magnitude to those reported for eye muscle area in beef carcasses (Davis and Simmen, 2000Go), although they were negative early postweaning and positive at older ages for ultrasound measures in live animals (Davis et al., 2003Go; Moore et al., 2005Go). The positive direction of the genetic correlation between IGF-I and eye muscle depth in this study is supported by that between IGF-I and the weight traits. The genetic correlations between IGF-I and the reproduction traits were smaller than their standard errors. Although the negative genetic correlation with average number of lambs born (–0.18 ± 0.25) indicates that selection for low IGF-I may result in improved lambing potential, the change in sign to a positive genetic correlation between IGF-I and average number of lambs weaned (0.10 ± 0.26) may indicate an adverse response associated with maternal environment. However, both correlations have high standard errors, as is the case with the few reports of correlations with reproduction traits in pigs (Bunter et al., 2005aGo) and cattle (Yilmaz et al., 2004Go; Hayhurst et al., 2006Go). The genetic correlations for the important wool traits are close to zero and little change would be expected from selection for IGF-I. The heritability estimates for the various correlated traits from the bivariate analyses are generally higher than those from the larger MCPT data set (Ingham et al., 2007Go)

Sheep breeding programs could be enhanced by inclusion of a physiological trait that is an indicator of performance if genetic variation can be measured cost effectively at an early age. The range in sire progeny means and estimated heritability of plasma IGF-I in young sheep shows there is genetic variation that could respond to selection. In some species, plasma IGF-I level has been suggested as an indicator of growth and feed efficiency, and this is the first report for these genetic correlations in sheep. The genetic correlations are only moderate to low in magnitude and have high standard errors because of the limited size of the data set. They are in a direction that indicates selection for low plasma IGF-I may reduce feed intake and improve the maintenance efficiency of mature ewes under grazing, with little impact on lamb growth, wool production, and reproduction. However, more precise estimates of these parameters are required for accurate prediction of the likely outcomes of breeding programs and inclusion of IGF-I in the genetic evaluation of sheep.


    Footnotes
 
1 Financial support was provided by Meat and Livestock Australia (Sydney), the Australian Government through The Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre (Armidale, Australia), and NSW Department of Primary Industries (Orange, Australia). The authors wish to thank K. Lees, J. Morgan, K. Thornberry, D. Stanley, and Ashley Radburn for technical support; K. Bunter and R. Banks for discussions and facilitation of the study; and Arthur Gilmour for statistical advice. Primegro Limited (Adelaide, Australia) carried out the IGF-I assays. Back

2 Corresponding author: neal.fogarty{at}dpi.nsw.gov.au

Received for publication August 16, 2007. Accepted for publication May 7, 2008.


    LITERATURE CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 


Archer, J. A., A. Reverter, R. M. Herd, D. J. Johnston, and P. F. Arthur. 2002. Genetic variation in feed intake and efficiency of mature beef cows and relationships with postweaning measurements. Communication No. 10–07 in Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France. INRA, Montpellier, France.

Blair, H. T., S. N. McCutcheon, B. H. Breier, and P. D. Gluckman. 2002. Correlated response in lamb birthweight following about 5 generations of selection for high or low plasma IGF-1. Communication No. 19–04, pages 417–420 in Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France. INRA, Montpellier, France.

Blair, H. T., S. N. McCutcheon, D. D. S. Mackenzie, J. E. Ormsby, R. A. Siddiqui, B. H. Breier, and P. D. Gluckman. 1988. Genetic selection for insulin-like growth factor-1 in growing mice is associated with altered growth. Endocrinology 123:1690–1692.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bunter, K. L., C. Bennett, and B. G. Luxford. 2005a. Genetic correlations between juvenile insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and measures of sow reproductive performance are low. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Breed. Genet. 16:95–98.

Bunter, K. L., S. Hermesch, B. G. Luxford, H. U. Graser, and R. E. Crump. 2005b. Insulin-like growth factor-I measured in juvenile pigs is genetically correlated with economically important performance traits. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 45:783–792.[CrossRef]

Buonomo, F. C., T. J. Lauterio, C. A. Baile, and D. R. Campion. 1987. Determination of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and IGF binding protein levels in swine. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 4:23–31.[CrossRef][Medline]

Davis, M. E., M. D. Bishop, N. H. Park, and R. C. M. Simmen. 1995. Divergent selection for blood serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration in beef cattle: I. Nongenetic effects. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1927–1932.[Abstract]

Davis, M. E., S. L. Boyles, S. J. Moeller, and R. C. M. Simmen. 2003. Genetic parameter estimates for serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentration and ultrasound measurements of backfat thickness and longissimus muscle area in Angus beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2164–2170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davis, M. E., and R. C. M. Simmen. 1997. Genetic parameter estimates for serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration and performance traits in Angus beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 75:317–324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davis, M. E., and R. C. M. Simmen. 2000. Genetic parameter estimates for serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentration and carcass traits in Angus beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2305–2313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Davis, M. E., and R. C. M. Simmen. 2006. Genetic parameter estimates for serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations, and body weight and weight gains in Angus beef cattle divergently selected for serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 84:2299–2308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Enns, R. M., J. S. Brinks, K. L. Hossner, and R. G. Mortimer. 1991. Parameter estimates of insulin-like growth factor I and relationship to performance traits in beef cattle. In 42nd Annual Beef Cattle Improvement Report and Sale Data. Technical Report TR91–4. Dept. Anim. Sci., Colorado State University, Fort Collins.

Fogarty, N. M., V. M. Ingham, A. R. Gilmour, L. J. Cummins, G. M. Gaunt, J. Stafford, J. E. Hocking Edwards, and R. G. Banks. 2005. Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 1. Breed and fixed effects for birth and weaning weight of first-cross lambs, gestation length, and reproduction of base ewes. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56:443–453.[CrossRef]

Fogarty, N. M., G. J. Lee, V. M. Ingham, G. M. Gaunt, and L. J. Cummins. 2006. Variation in feed intake of grazing crossbred ewes and genetic correlations with production traits. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57:1037–1044.[CrossRef]

Gilmour, A. R., B. J. Gogel, B. R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2006. ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. VSN Int. Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.

Goddard, C., R. S. Wilkie, and I. C. Dunn. 1988. The relationship between insulin-like growth factor-1, growth hormone, thyroid hormones and insulin in chickens selected for growth. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 5:165–176.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hayhurst, C., A. P. F. Flint, P. Lovendahl, J. A. Woolliams, and M. D. Royal. 2006. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among metabolic hormones and fertility in UK Holstein Friesian female calves. CD-ROM Communication No. 01–18 in Proc. 8th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Instituto Prociencia, Belo Horizonte, M. G., Brazil.

Hegarty, R. S., J. R. McFarlane, R. Banks, and S. Harden. 2006. Association of plasma metabolites and hormones with the growth and composition of lambs as affected by nutrition and sire genetics. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57:683–690.[CrossRef]

Herd, R. M., P. F. Arthur, K. Zirkler, C. Quinn, and V. H. Oddy. 1995. Heritability of IGF-I in beef cattle. Proc. Aust. Assoc. Anim. Breed. Genet. 11:694–695.

Hermesch, S., K. L. Bunter, and B. G. Luxford. 2001. Estimates of genetic correlations between IGF-I recorded at 4 weeks of age and individual piglet weights at birth and 14 days, along with lifetime growth rate and backfat. Proc. Assoc. Advmnt. Anim. Breed. Genet. 14:227–230.

Holland, M. D., K. L. Hossner, J. D. Tatum, M. E. King, H. S. Mauck, and K. G. Odde. 1988. Serum insulin-like growth factor I profiles in beef heifers with single and twin pregnancies. J. Anim. Sci. 66:3190–3196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ingham, V. M., N. M. Fogarty, A. R. Gilmour, R. A. Afolayan, L. J. Cummins, G. M. Gaunt, J. Stafford, and J. E. H. Edwards. 2007. Genetic evaluation of crossbred lamb production. 4. Genetic parameters for first-cross animal performance. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 58:839–846.[CrossRef]

Johnston, D. J., R. M. Herd, M. J. Kadel, H. U. Graser, P. F. Arthur, and J. A. Archer. 2002. Evidence of IGF-I as a genetic predictor of feed efficiency traits in beef cattle. Communication No. 10–16, pages 257–260 in Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France. INRA, Montpellier, France.

Johnston, D. J., R. M. Herd, A. Reverter, and V. H. Oddy. 2001. Heritability of IGF-I in beef cattle and its association with growth and carcase traits. Proc. Assoc. Adv. Anim. Breed. Genet. 14:163–166.

Kerr, D. E., B. Laarveld, M. I. Fehr, and J. G. Manns. 1991. Profiles of serum IGF-I concentrations in calves from birth to eighteen months of age and in cows throughout the lactation cycle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71:695–705.

Lee, G. J., K. D. Atkins, and S. I. Mortimer. 1995. Variation between Merino ewes in pasture intake. 1. Between flock differences and some environmental sources of variation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 41:133–142.[CrossRef]

Medrano, J. F., and G. E. Bradford. 1991. Growth performance and plasma insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations in sheep selected for high weaning weight. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1912–1918.[Abstract]

Moore, K. L., D. J. Johnston, H. U. Graser, and R. Herd. 2005. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and net feed intake, fat, and growth traits in Angus beef cattle. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56:211–218.[CrossRef]

Morel, P. C. H., H. T. Blair, S. N. McCutcheon, B. H. Breier, and P. D. Gluckman. 1991. Responses to divergent selection for plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) in sheep. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 51:417–422.

Olsen, R. F., P. J. Wangsness, W. H. Patton, and R. J. Martin. 1981. Relationship of serum somatomedin-like activity and fibroblast proliferative activity with age and body weight gain in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 52:63–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Parker, W. J., S. N. McCutcheon, and D. H. Carr. 1989. Effect of herbage type and level of intake on the release of chromic oxide from intraruminal controlled release capsules in sheep. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 32:537–546.

Roberts, C. A., S. N. McCutcheon, H. T. Blair, P. D. Gluckman, and B. H. Breier. 1990. Developmental patterns of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 concentrations in sheep. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 7:457–464.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sarko, T. A., M. D. Bishop, and M. E. Davis. 1994. Relationship of air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, photoperiod, wind speed and solar radiation with serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentration in Angus beef cattle. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 11:281–290.[CrossRef][Medline]

Scanes, C. G., D. Lazarus, S. Bowen, F. C. Buonomo, and R. L. Gilbreath. 1987. Postnatal changes in circulating concentrations of growth hormone, somatomedin C and thyroid hormones in pigs. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 4:253–257.[CrossRef][Medline]

Suzuki, K., M. Nakagawa, K. Katoh, H. Kadowaki, T. Shibata, H. Uchida, Y. Obara, and A. Nishida. 2004. Genetic correlation between serum insulin-like growth factor-1 concentration and performance and meat quality traits in Duroc pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82:994–999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wood, B. J., J. A. Archer, and J. H. J. vander Werf. 2002. Genetic and economic evaluation of IGF-1 as an indirect selection criterion in beef cattle. Communication No. 02–26 in Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France. INRA, Montpellier, France.

Yilmaz, A., M. E. Davis, and R. C. M. Simmen. 2004. Estimation of (co)variance components for reproductive traits in Angus beef cattle divergently selected for blood serum IGF-I concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2285–2292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0528v1
86/9/2068    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Afolayan, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Afolayan, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Fogarty, N. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS