J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2008. 86:339-347. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-796
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-796v1
86/2/339    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jouany, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Julliand, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jouany, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Julliand, V.

ANIMAL NUTRITION

Effect of live yeast culture supplementation on apparent digestibility and rate of passage in horses fed a high-fiber or high-starch diet1

J.-P. Jouany*, J. Gobert{dagger}, B. Medina{dagger},{ddagger}, G. Bertin{dagger} and V. Julliand{ddagger},2

* INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Site de Theix, 63122 Saint Genes Champanelle, France; and {dagger} Alltech-France, 14 Place Marie-Jeanne Bassot, 92593 Levallois-Perret, France; and {ddagger} Etablissement National d’Enseignement Supérieur Agronomique de Dijon (ENESAD), 26 Boulevard Dr Petitjean, BP 87999, 21079 Dijon, France


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Eight crossbred male horses aged 12 ± 5 yr and with BW of 305 ± 18 kg were used in pairs in a 4 x 4 Latin square design with 4 ground and pelleted diets. Each pair included a cecum and right ventral colon-fistulated animal and a cecal-fistulated animal. The 4 horse diets were a high-fiber diet (HF+0) based on dehydrated alfalfa, a high-starch diet based on barley and wheat bran (HS+0), and the HF or HS diets supplemented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) CBS 493.94 (HF+SC and HS+SC). The probiotic preparation contained 4.5 x 109 cfu/g of live yeast mixed with the culture medium, and was top-dressed onto the feed pellets at a rate of 10 g/d, equally distributed between the 2 daily meals. All 4 diets were offered in the same quantities (18.0 g of pelleted feed DM + 3.5 g of long wheat straw/kg of BW per d). Each of the 4 experimental treatments was divided into a 21-d period of diet adaptation followed by a 10-d period of total fecal collection for digesta flow rate and apparent digestibility measurements. Three markers were used to measure mean retention time (MRT) of the feed particles: Yb bound to the pelleted feeds for MRT in the whole digestive tract (MRTYb), Eu bound to the pelleted feeds, and Dy bound to the fecal particles for MRT in the hindgut (MRTEu and MRTDy). Apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, and CP were greater (P < 0.001) in the HS than HF diet, independently of SC supplementation, whereas ADF digestibility was greatest in the HF diet (P = 0.035). Cellulolytic activity estimated through the in vitro disappearance rate of the dietary ADF fraction (IVADADF) was less (P < 0.001) in the HS than the HF diet. There was no dietary effect on NDF digestibility due to the longer MRTEu of small particles in the hindgut (P = 0.036), which compensated for the lower fibrolytic activity expressed per unit of time in the HS compared with the HF diet. Supplementation with SC improved ADF digestibility (P = 0.038) and stimulated DM (P = 0.030) and NDF (P = 0.038) intakes, but had no effect on the MRT of solid digesta. The absence of any significant diet x SC interaction supports the strategy of using SC to stimulate cellulose digestion and improve the nutritional status of horses under both HF and HS diets.

Key Words: dietary effect • digestibility • fiber digestion • horse • live yeast • transit time


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In horses the energy supplied by forage diets does not meet the energy requirements for intense physical exercise due to the relatively low digestibility of cell wall carbohydrates. Consequently, athletic horse diets are supplemented with concentrate feeds, mainly comprising cereal grains and often distributed in a small number of meals throughout the day, resulting in ingestion of large quantities of starch by animals over a short time. Potter et al. (1992)Go reported that only limited amounts of starch are digested in the small intestine and that decreasing the dietary hay:grain ratio will increase the amount of undigested starch entering the hindgut, thus disturbing its microbial balance. The accumulation of lactate, and the subsequent drop in pH, impairs the activity of lower-gut cellulolytic bacterial populations and increases the horse’s susceptibility to colic pain or laminitis (Kronfeld and Harris, 1997Go).

Several strategies have been tested to reduce these dysfunctions of the equine intestinal ecosystem. One strategy consists of adding probiotics such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as recommended for ruminants fed high-starch diets (Wallace and Newbold, 1992Go; Nagaraja et al., 1997Go). Previous studies indicated that live yeasts can improve the microbial balance in the hindgut of horses, stimulating the population of cellulolytic bacteria and their activity (Medina et al., 2002Go), and increasing the digestibility of dietary nutrients (Glade, 1991aGo,bGo). However, the diet composition-related ability of live yeasts to modify microbial digestion and fiber degradation in horses has not been extensively studied.

Therefore, a study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a live yeast culture of S. cerevisiae CBS 493.94 on in vivo digestibility of dietary components and on the rate of cell wall digestion in horses fed either a high-starch or high-fiber diet. Mean retention times of digesta in the whole digestive tract and the hindgut were measured to explain the observed changes in digestibility.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
This experiment was carried out in the animal research unit of ENESAD (Etablissement National d’Enseignement Supérieur Agronomique de Dijon) under a license delivered by the Health and Animal Welfare department of the French Veterinary Authority.

Animals

Eight crossbred male horses (12 ± 5 yr; mean BW 305 ± 18 kg) were allocated into pairs consisting of a cecum and right ventral colon-fistulated animal and a second animal that was only cecally fistulated. The cannula (polyvinyl chloride, i.d. 30 mm) were fitted surgically by a certified veterinary surgeon at least 6 mo before the beginning of the trial (Drogoul et al., 2000Go).

Horses were wormed with a double dose of Pyrantel (Strongid, Laboratoire Pfizer, Orsay, France) followed 1 wk later by a single dose of Ivermectin (Eqvalan, Laboratoire Merial, Lyon, France) given 15 d before the experiment began. Indoor housing consisted of concrete-floored, individual loose boxes bedded with flax shavings (Ecolit, Croissanville, France). During the diet-adaptation period (21 d), animals were given access to a sandy paddock for 10 h/wk. During the following 10 d they were individually tethered in stalls and fitted with a fecal collection harness.

Diets

Feedstuffs as well as their physical form were chosen to mimic normal French feeding practices conducted in riding schools. Two diets were used (Table 1Go): a pelleted high-fiber (HF) concentrate or a pelleted high-starch (HS) concentrate, both given in mixture with long wheat straw to supply a minimum fiber content. Ingredients of the HF and HS concentrates were ground through a 1.5-mm sieve and pressed into 3-mm-diameter pellets. The 2 diets were supplemented (HF+SC; HS+SC) or not (HF+0; HS+0) with a lyophilized flocculent culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) strain CBS 493.94, including the growth medium (Yea-Sacc, Alltech Inc., Lexington, KY). The live yeast culture supplement containing 4.5 x 109 cfu/g was given at a rate of 10 g/d per horse.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Composition of the high-fiber (HF) and high-starch (HS) diets
 
The HF and HS diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous, to provide significantly different NDF:starch ratios (3.5 and 1.0 for the HF and HS diets, respectively), and to meet the energy requirements of the horses. Minimum daily voluntary intake of wheat straw was measured for all horses during a pre-experimental period performed with the same HF and HS concentrates. The lowest level of wheat straw intake recorded during this period (i.e., 3.5 g/kg of BW) was selected for the duration of the experiment.

All diets were given at the same rate (i.e., 18.0 g of pelleted feeds + 3.5 g of long wheat straw = 21.5 g of DM/kg of BW per d) to avoid any effect of meal size on the rate of passage of digesta (Drogoul et al., 2001Go; Pearson et al., 2001Go). At this intake level the HF diet provided 100% of energy requirements, whereas the HS diet provided 130% of the energy requirements (Martin-Rosset et al., 1994Go). The daily rations (6.5 kg/horse per d, on average) were divided into 2 equal meals given in individual troughs at 0800 and 1700. The pelleted concentrates were offered first with the SC culture top-dressed (5 g/meal), and the wheat straw fraction was provided 30 min later. Mean daily ingestion of starch was equal to 3.1 and 1.2 g/kg of BW per meal for the HS and HF diets, respectively (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Daily nutrient intake (g/kg of BW) in horses fed a high-fiber (HF) or high-starch (HS) diet with (+SC)1 or without (+0) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) supplementation
 
Horses were weighed on 2 consecutive days before each diet-adaptation period to adjust feed supply to animal BW. All horses were given individual free access to clean potable drinking water and a lick block of trace-mineral salts.

Experimental Design and Treatments

The 8 horses were randomly assigned by pairs in a double 4 x 4 Latin square design at the beginning of the experiment. Each pair included a cecum and right ventral colon-fistulated animal and a cecal-fistulated animal, and remained unchanged for the duration of the entire study. The 4 pairs of animals received 4 dietary treatments over 4 periods. The 4 dietary treatments described previously were applied as follows: 1) the high-fiber diet (HF+0 treatment); 2) the high-starch diet (HS+0 treatment) ; 3) the high-fiber diet supplemented with 10 g/d of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 493.94 preparation (HF+SC); and 4) the high-starch diet supplemented with 10 g/d of the same SC preparation (HS + SC).

Each of the 4 experimental periods lasted 31 d, split into a 21-d period that allowed for adaptation to experimental diets, followed by a 10-d period of total fecal collection, which comprised a 3-d period for animals to adapt to the fecal bags followed by a 7-d period for measurements on apparent digestibility and rate of passage of digesta.

Indigestible Markers used for Measurement of the Rate of Passage of Digesta

Three indigestible markers were used to calculate rate of passage of feed particles through the hindgut (cecum + colon) and whole digestive tract, as recommended by Pagan et al. (1998)Go and Drogoul et al. (2000)Go. Ytterbium was bound to the pelleted feeds and was fed to horses to estimate mean retention time (MRTYb) of small particles (≤2 mm) in the whole digestive tract. Europium (Eu) was bound to pelleted feeds and introduced manually through the cecal cannula in order to estimate the mean retention time (MRTEu) of small particles (≤2 mm) in the hindgut (cecum + colon). To measure mean retention time (MRTDy) of large particles (>2 mm) in the hindgut, dysprosium (Dy) was bound to the undigested fecal particles and introduced manually through the cecal cannula. Fecal particles intended to be labeled were collected during each period of animal adaptation to harnesses and were then water-washed and filtered through a 2.5-mm sieve. The particles retained on the sieve were labeled using a Dy oxide solution (Dy2O3; 50 mg of Dy/g of DM; pH 2.5). The 2 pelleted feeds (HF and HS) were labeled using either a Yb oxide solution (Yb2O3; 35 mg of Yb/g of DM; pH 2.5) or a Eu oxide solution (Eu2O3; 30 mg of Eu/g of DM; pH 2.5) according to the method described by Drogoul et al. (2000)Go. To prevent losses of small particles, pelleted feeds were placed into nylon bags with a 100-µm pore size (Blutex T120, Saati-France, Sailly Saillisel, France) during the labeling procedure. The labeled feeds were hand-pelleted with a syringe so that a precise dose of markers could be administered.

A single dose of Yb-labeled pellets (40 g) was fed to each animal mixed into one-third of the morning meal. After either complete ingestion, or at least a 45-min delay, refusals, if any, were weighed and removed from the trough. The rest of the pelleted concentrate meal was then given. During meal ingestion, all collection harnesses were cleaned of feces. The Eu-labeled pellets (30 g; particles ≤2 mm) and the Dy-labeled fecal particles (30 g; particles >2 mm) were introduced through the cecal cannula 4 h after the oral dose of Yb-labeled pellets (Drogoul et al., 2000Go). After ingestion of the Yb-labeled meal, excreted feces were collected from each horse at 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 32, 36, 40, 46, 52, 58, 64, 72, 84, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h postingestion. Individual fecal collections were weighed and thoroughly mixed, and a subsample (300 g of fresh matter) was taken to measure DM and marker concentrations. Markers were solubilized according to Siddons et al. (1985)Go. Ytterbium, Eu, and Dy concentrations were assayed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (SpectrAA 300, Zeeman–Varian, Les Ulis, France) with wavelengths set at 398.8, 421.2, and 459.4 nm for Yb, Dy, and Eu, respectively.

Collection of Samples for In Vivo Apparent Digestibility and Rate of Passage of Digesta Measurements

In vivo apparent digestibility and rate of passage of digesta were determined by the total fecal collection method using harnesses and collection bags for 7 d. Amount of feed offered, refused, and feces were weighed every day at 0800. Aliquots of individual feces (10% of total excreted fresh feces), offered feeds (500 g of fresh matter) and all refusals, if any, were taken daily and dried in a forced-air oven until constant weight at 65°C for DM determination. At the end of each period, aliquots were ground through a 0.8-mm mesh, and representative samples from each collection (offered feeds, refusals, and feces) were pooled for each animal over the 7-d period for subsequent analysis. Acid detergent fiber, NDF, and ADL were determined according to the procedure described by Van Soest and Wine (1967)Go. Organic matter was determined after ashing in a muffle furnace (550°C for 6 h). Crude protein determination was based on nitrogen content measured using a semiautomated micro-Kjeldahl method using a VDK 126A distillation unit (Velp Scientifica, Milan, Italy). Starch content was determined according to the method of Thivend et al. (1965)Go. All analyses were performed in duplicate.

Calculations and Statistical Analyses

Apparent digestibility of DM was calculated as the amount of digested DM (ingested DM – excreted DM in feces) per unit of ingested DM. Total DM intakes and fecal DM outputs were measured over the 7-d collection period. In vitro apparent disappearance rate (IVAD) of NDF was calculated as the amount of digested NDF (ingested NDF – excreted NDF in feces) per unit of retention time (h) of solid particles in the hindgut. The same relationship was applied to ADF, and to cellulose (ADF – ADL) and hemicellulose (NDF – ADF) cell wall fractions.

The MRT of small particles in the whole digestive tract and small and large particles in the hindgut compartment were calculated using the model established by Faichney (1975)Go and applied to the kinetic excretions of Yb, Eu, and Dy in feces as:


Formula

where {delta}ti is the time elapsed between introduction of the markers (time zero) and the middle of the ith collection intervals and calculated as Formula with ti being the time to the end of the ith interval; and Mi is the amount of marker excreted in the ith interval with all markers being excreted by the nth interval. The MRT of small particles from mouth to cecum was calculated by the difference MRTYb MRTEu.

All data were processed by ANOVA using the GLM procedure (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The model included the effects of horse (which was considered random), period, diet, yeast supplementation, and the interactive effects of diet type and yeast supplementation. No effect of period was detected; therefore, period was removed from the final statistical model. Least squares means were calculated for each variable and separated using the pairwise t-tests (PDIFF option of SAS).

A repeated-measurements ANOVA was performed to compare differences in marker excretion (cumulative Yb excretion and Eu excretion) at differing time points using the repeated time option of SAS. The model used included the effects of horse, diet, and yeast supplementation. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Only the values obtained from horses that had no significant feed refusals (less than 5% of offered DM) of pelleted feeds and for which the pelleted feed ratio in the total feed intake did not differ from 0.84 ± 0.02 are reported here. Thus, 29 of the total 32 observations were retained for statistical analyses of digestibility and MRTYb values. Due to missing data for 1 horse, only 25 observations were retained for the MRTEu, MRTDy, and (MRTYb – MRTEu) calculations.

All animals gained approximately 10% of their initial BW and there were no obvious signs of digestive or metabolic disorders during the duration of the study.

Nutrient Intake

There were no diet effects on DM, CP, and OM intakes (P > 0.068; Table 2Go). The greater proportion of barley in the HS diets led to an increase in starch intake (P < 0.001) and a decrease in NDF, ADF, cellulose, and hemicellulose intakes (P < 0.001). Yeast addition had a positive effect on DM (P = 0.03), NDF (P = 0.038), and hemicellulose (P = 0.023) intakes. A significant diet x SC interaction (P = 0.042) was observed on OM intake.

Rate of Passage of Digesta

There was no effect of SC supplementation on the MRT of solid particles in either the whole digestive tract or the hindgut (Table 3Go). Conversely, the MRT of small particles in the hindgut was 3.5 h longer with the HS diet than the HF diet (P = 0.036). A similar pattern was observed for the MRT of large particles (+3 h), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.08). The MRT of feed particles in the foregut section (stomach + small intestine), as estimated by the difference between the MRTYb in the whole digestive tract and the MRTEu in the hindgut compartments, was not different (P = 0.972) between the 2 diets. No diet x SC interaction was detected on rates of passage of digesta through the whole digestive tract, the foregut, or the hindgut.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Total and partial mean retention time (MRT, h) in the digestive tract of horses fed a high-fiber (HF) or high-starch (HS) diet with (+SC)1 or without (+0) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) supplementation
 
Because of the absence of any SC effect on MRT in the whole digestive tract, cumulative Yb excretion curves were constructed from the HF+0 and HF+SC values and the HS+0 and HS+SC values for the HF and HS diets, respectively. The curves showed that 46 and 39.5 h were required to excrete 75% of Yb-labeled particles with the HS and HF diets, respectively (Figure 1Go). The between-diet difference in peak shift of Eu excretion noted (6.7 h longer with HS) indicated differential rates of passage of dietary solid particles through the hindgut (Figure 2Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Cumulative Yb excretion (expressed as a percentage of total Yb excreted) through the whole digestive tract of horses. Because of the absence of any effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on Yb excretion, data with and without SC were pooled for each high-fiber (HF); n = 15) and high-starch (HS; n = 14) diet. *Means differed at time marked by an asterisk (P < 0.05); bars represent the SEM.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Europium (Eu) excretion per 12-h sampling period (expressed as a percentage of the total Eu excreted) through the large intestinal compartment (cecum + colon) of horses. Because of the absence of any effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) supplementation on Yb excretion, data with and without SC supplementation were pooled for each high-fiber (HF; n = 13) and high-starch (HS; n = 12) diet. *Means differed at time marked by an asterisk (P < 0.05); bars represent the SEM.

 
In Vivo Apparent Digestibility of the Diets

Apparent digestibility of DM, OM, and CP were greater (P < 0.001; Table 4Go) in HS diets than in HF diets. In contrast, there were no diet effects on the digestibility of total dietary cell wall fractions (NDF; P = 0.995), whereas the ADF fraction was better digested (P = 0.035) and the hemicellulose fraction tended to be less digested (P = 0.080) in HF than in HS diets. No significant diet x SC interaction was detected on in vivo apparent digestibilities.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Apparent digestibility (g/kg of DM) of dietary components in horses fed a high-fiber (HF) or high-starch (HS) diet with (+SC)1 or without (+0) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) supplementation
 
Yeast supplementation increased digestibility in the whole digestive tract of the ADF fraction of both diets (P = 0.038), but had no significant effect on digestibility of other dietary components.

In Vivo Apparent Disappearance Rate of Dietary Cell Wall Fractions

Because the hindgut is the only site of cell wall digestion in the digestive tract of horses, the disappearance rate of dietary cell wall fractions (i.e., IVAD) will be considered as an indicator of the microbial cellulolytic activity. A large diet effect was noted on IVADNDF, IVA-DADF, and IVADcellulose, which were much greater (P < 0.001) in HF than in HS diets. However, the diet had no effect (P = 0.341) on IVADhemicellulose. There was no diet x SC interaction on estimated IVAD parameters.

Yeast supplementation had no effect on IVADNDF, (P = 0.141), IVADhemicellulose (P = 0.453), or IVADcellulose (P = 0.124) in either diet but tended to improve IVADADF in both HF and HS diets (P = 0.077).


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Data collected in the present experiment were used to estimate the impact of a live yeast culture preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 493.94 on in vivo apparent digestibility, rate of cell wall digestion, and rate of passage of digesta in horses fed 2 different diets (i.e., a high-fiber diet vs. a high-starch diet). It was also possible to assess the apparent digestibility of these 2 extreme diets in horses.

Feed Intake

Although animals received similar amounts of feed, there was a general positive effect of SC on DM intake (P = 0.030). Data on ingestion indicated that non-yeast-supplemented animals tended to refuse a portion of their ration; whereas, yeast-supplemented animals ingested the whole ration. The positive effect of SC supplementation on mean DM, OM, and NDF intakes were greater for HF than HS diets, which explains both the overall positive effect of SC on NDF (P = 0.038) and hemicellulose (P = 0.023) intakes, and the significant diet x SC interaction on OM intake (Table 2Go).

Effect of Starch Supplementation on Digestion in Horses

A negative effect of starch on microbial cellulolysis in the hindgut of horses has been reported in previous experiments in which native grains were incorporated into the diet (>50% of DM intake) at the expense of forage (Thompson et al., 1984Go; Martin-Rosset and Dulphy, 1987Go; Palmgren-Karlsson et al., 2000Go; Drogoul et al., 2001Go). The amount of starch intake per se is one factor that could explain such negative interactions with cellulolysis and the degree of cellulolysis inhibition (Ott, 1981Go; Martin-Rosset and Dulphy, 1987Go). Furthermore, technological processes applied to grains (grinding, pelleting) can influence the enzymatic digestion of starch in the small intestine, and therefore, alter the amount of starch reaching the large intestine and interacting with fiber digestion (Julliand et al., 2006Go).

In the current experiment the amount of starch fed in the HS diet (3.1 g/kg of BW per meal) was similar to the 3.5 to 4.0 g/kg of BW per meal limit defined by Potter et al. (1992)Go and Kienzle (1994)Go as the maximum capacity of the small intestine for starch digestion. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that intestinal undigested starch can enter the hindgut of horses fed the HS diet. It is likely that the transit time of finely ground and pelleted diets is shortened when compared with unground diets, thus allowing more starch to escape small intestine digestion, reach the hindgut, and interact with the local microbial environment (Julliand et al., 2001Go). Also, we assumed that starch was more easily hydrolyzed by endogenous amylases in ground cereals, and the resultant effect of grinding on starch digestibility in the small intestine was probably minimal.

Medina et al. (2002)Go analyzed the concentrations and activities of hindgut microflora of horses fed diets similar to those used in the current study. They observed that the microbial profiles were altered for a high-starch diet. The number of cellulolytic bacteria was decreased benefiting lactobacilli and streptococci; thus, the lactic acid concentration was increased and pH of the hindgut content decreased, which impaired microbial fibrolytic activity. These results are consistent with the decreased disappearance rate of cell wall components (IVADNDF and IVADADF) observed here in the HS diet (Table 5Go), which explains the subsequent reduction of ADF digestibility in horses fed the HS diet compared with the HF diet (Table 4Go). As observed in the rumen (Hoover et al., 2006Go), it is likely that negative interactions on microbial fiber digestion originating from starch fermentation occurred in the hindgut of horses fed the HS diet. In addition, the lower IVADNDF and IVADADF are likely due to the decreased amount of cell wall material supplied to the hindgut and used as substrate by cellulolytic bacteria when animals were fed the HS compared with HF diet.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Apparent disappearance rate (IVAD)1 (g/h per 100 kg of BW) of cell wall components in the hindgut of horses fed either a high-fiber (HF) or high-starch (HS) diet with (+SC)2 or without (+0) Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) supplementation
 
The significant increase in DM and OM digestibility observed in the HS+0 diet compared with HF+0 diet were in the same range of those observed by Van der Noot and Gilbreath (1970)Go, Yoder et al. (1997)Go, and Palmgren-Karlsson et al. (2000)Go. The same pattern has been observed when forage-based diets were supplemented with raw cereals (Hintz et al., 1971bGo; Ott, 1981Go; Thompson et al., 1984Go; Pagan et al., 1998Go; Palmgren-Karlsson et al., 2000Go; Drogoul et al., 2001Go) or pelleted concentrates (Hintz et al., 1971aGo; Martin-Rosset and Dulphy, 1987Go; Vermorel et al., 1997Go). The greater DM and OM digestibility in the HS diet compared with the HF diet is due to diet composition, because starch is digested to a greater extent than the cell wall fractions of forages.

The apparent digestibility of CP was greater in the HS diet than in the HF diet and independent of SC supplementation. This is explained by the greater availability of soybean proteins to the endogenous enzymes in the small intestine of horses than the proteins from alfalfa. This could be due to a protective effect of cell wall components on intracellular proteins, and to differences in the secondary or tertiary structure of proteins between alfalfa and soybean meal as indicated by Wallace and Cotta (1988)Go. Also, greater proteolytic activity of hindgut digestive microbial ecosystem with HS diet could explain such a result, given that starch favors the growth of amylolytic bacteria (Medina et al., 2002Go) and that most amylolytic bacteria in the digestive tract are also proteolytic (Wallace et al., 1997Go).

Because the dietary ingredients of both diets were finely ground and pelleted, the MRT of small particles was considered a good indicator of the MRT of whole diets. The mean whole-tract digestive MRT in horses fed the HF diet (32.3 h) was identical to that reported by Pagan et al. (1998)Go for thoroughbred geldings fed a forage diet. Also, the mean MRT of feed particles in the hindgut of animals fed the HF diet (25.0 h) was in the same range as the MRT in the large intestines (23.3 h) of ponies fed timothy hay (Udén et al., 1982Go). Furthermore, the mean MRT of small particles in the prececal tract of horses fed the HF diet (8.0 h) was similar to that (8.7 h) reported for ponies (Cabrera, 1995Go).

The greater MRT of small particles and the trend for greater MRT of large particles in the hindgut of horses fed the HS diet, which are in agreement with the results obtained by Yoder et al. (1997)Go on ponies, could contribute to the improvement in DM and OM digestibility that was noted. Contrary to Nuss et al. (1982)Go, who observed that supplying long-form forages accelerated the rate of passage of digesta in the proximal part of digestive tract located before the large intestine, a similar transit time of solid digesta (8 h) was observed in both the HS and HF diets. The observation that animals were fed a limited amount of finely ground and pelleted feed may have reduced the strict fiber effect on transit that was observed with long forages.

Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 493.94 Supplementation on Digestion in Horses

Yeast supplementation had a positive overall effect on ADF apparent digestibility independently of diet. Because microbial digestion of the cell wall fraction occurs exclusively in the hindgut, the extent of microbial digestion is the result of the product of [microbial cellulolytic activity expressed as the amount of degraded cellulose per h = IVADADF] x [Time available for digestion expressed as the MRT in the hindgut, in h]. Because SC had no effect on the MRT of solid particles in the hindgut, the increase in the digestion of ADF material following SC supplementation is likely to be due to the stimulation of microbial cellulolytic activity in the hindgut, as confirmed by the IVADADF values (Table 5Go). Positive effects of SC on cellulose digestion in horses have previously been reported by Glade and Sist (1988)Go, Glade (1991aGo,bGo, 1992Go), Kim et al. (1991)Go, and Medina et al. (2002)Go, whereas other studies showed no effect of yeasts (Glade and Biesik, 1986Go; Hall et al., 1990Go). These discrepancies stemmed from a yeast strain effect and the concentrations of viable cells in the added preparations, as well as the experimental conditions, especially feeding conditions.

Because no literature or data on the effect of SC supplementation on the MRT of solid particles through the hindgut and the whole digestive tract of horses are available, the authors used data on ruminants to validate their results. The absence of an effect of SC supplementation on MRT of solid particles shown here has previously been reported by Plata et al. (1994)Go in beef cattle fed an oat straw-based diet and by Jouany et al. (1998)Go in sheep fed a mixed hay and barley diet dosed with 10 g of a preparation containing S. cerevisiae CBS 493.94 and 109 cfu/d of S. cerevisiae CNCM-1096, respectively.

The mode of action of live yeasts on digestive microbes has been extensively studied in ruminants (Dawson, 1990Go; Wallace and Newbold, 1992Go; Jouany, 2006Go) and horses (Glade and Biesik, 1986Go; Glade and Sist, 1988Go; Hall et al., 1990Go; Glade, 1991aGo,bGo; Kim et al., 1991Go; de Vaux and Julliand, 1994Go; Rowe et al., 1994Go; Medina et al., 2002Go). The microbial digestive disorders due to a negative digestive interaction between starch and cellulose that are expected to be corrected by yeasts would likely be less pronounced in the hindgut of horses than in the rumen, because most of the starch ingested is normally digested in the small intestine and only a small fraction reaches the hindgut. In addition, the positions of the rumen and the hindgut in the digestive tract make it likely that a lower concentration of live yeasts would reach the hindgut compared with the rumen for the same orally administered dose. However, the SC concentrations detected in the cecum (4.3 x 106 cfu/g) and in the colon (between 103 and 105 cfu/g) of horses given a 10-g oral dose of an SC preparation containing 4.5 x 109 cfu/g (Medina et al., 2002Go) were similar to those found in the rumen of sheep receiving a similar dose of yeasts (Durand-Chaucheyras et al., 1998Go).

In conclusion, the current study indicated that SC significantly improved the digestibility of the cellulose fraction in horses, regardless of diet. The results suggest that SC supplementation improved chiefly the activity of the complex microflora involved in digestion of the dietary ADF fraction.


    Footnotes
 
1 The authors would like to thank D. Juniper for his support on reviewing the draft of this manuscript, and F. Glasser and A. Breuvart for their contributions on statistical analysis. Back

2 Corresponding author: v.julliand{at}enesad.fr

Received for publication December 5, 2006. Accepted for publication August 30, 2007.


    LITERATURE CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 


Cabrera, L. 1995. Contribution à l’étude de l’utilisation de l’azote alimentaire chez Equus cabalus: Effet de la source azotée, du mode de distribution et de la forme de présentation du régime sur l’aminoacidémie et sur l’urémie. PhD thesis. ENSBANA, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France.

Dawson, K. A. 1990. Designing the yeast culture of tomorrow - Mode of action of yeast culture for ruminants and non-ruminants. Pages 59–78 in Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. T. P. Lyons, ed. Alltech Technical Publications, Nicholasville, KY.

de Vaux, A., and V. Julliand. 1994. Effect of a probiotic on caecal microbial digestion in the pony. Ann. Zootech. 43:259.[CrossRef]

Drogoul, C., A. de Fombelle, and V. Julliand. 2001. Feeding and microbial disorders in horses. 2. Effect of three hay:grain ratios on digesta passage rate and digestibility in ponies. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 21:487–491.[CrossRef]

Drogoul, C., C. Poncet, and J. L. Tisserand. 2000. Feeding ground and pelleted hay rather than chopped hay to ponies. 1. Consequences for in vivo digestibility and rate of passage of digesta. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 87:117–130.[CrossRef][Medline]

Durand-Chaucheyras, F., G. Fonty, G. Bertin, M. Theveniot, and P. Gouet. 1998. Fate of Levucell® SCI-1077 yeast additive during digestive transit in lambs. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 38:275–280.[CrossRef][Medline]

Faichney, G. J. 1975. The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants. Pages 276–291 in Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. I. W. McDonald and A. C. I. Warner, ed. The University of New England Publishing Unit., Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Fonnesbeck, P. V., J. L. Christiansen, and L. E. Harris. 1981. Linear models for calculating digestible energy for sheep diets. J. Anim. Sci. 52:1183–1196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glade, M. J. 1991a. Dietary yeast culture supplementation of mares during late gestation and early lactation: Effects on dietary nutrient digestibilities and fecal nitrogen partitioning. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 11:10–16.[CrossRef]

Glade, M. J. 1991b. Effects of dietary yeast culture supplementation of lactating mares on the digestibility and retention of the nutrient delivered to nursing foals via milk. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 11:323–329.

Glade, M. J. 1992. Effects of Yucca shidigera extract on feed utilization by equine weanlings. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 12:93–98.[CrossRef]

Glade, M. J., and L. M. Biesik. 1986. Enhanced nitrogen retention in yearling horses supplemented with yeast culture. J. Anim. Sci. 62:1635–1640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Glade, M. J., and M. D. Sist. 1988. Dietary yeast cultures supplementation enhances urea recycling in the equine large intestine. Nutr. Rep. Int. 37:11–17.

Hall, R. R., S. G. Jackson, J. P. Baker, and S. R. Lowry. 1990. Influence of yeast culture supplementation on ration digestion by horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 10:130–134.[CrossRef]

Hintz, H. F., R. A. Argenzio, and H. F. Schryver. 1971a. Digestion coefficients, blood glucose levels and molar percentage of volatile acids in intestinal fluid of ponies fed varying forage-grain ratios. J. Anim. Sci. 33:992–995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hintz, H. F., D. E. Hogue, E. F. Walker, J. E. Lowe, and H. F. Schryver. 1971b. Apparent digestion in various segments of the digestive tract of ponies fed diets with varying roughage-grain ratios. J. Anim. Sci. 32:245–248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoover, W. H., C. Tucker, J. Harris, C. J. Sniffen, and M. B. de Ondarza. 2006. Effects of nonstructural carbohydrate level and starch:sugar ratio on microbial metabolism in continuous culture of rumen contents. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 128:307–319.[CrossRef]

Jouany, J.-P. 2006. Optimizing rumen functions in the close-up transition period and early lactation to drive dry matter intake and energy balance in cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 96:250–264.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jouany, J. P., F. Mathieu, J. Senaud, J. Bohatier, G. Bertin, and M. Mercier. 1998. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on the digestion of the cell wall fraction of a mixed diet in defaunated and refaunated sheep rumen. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 38:401–416.[CrossRef][Medline]

Julliand, V., A. de Fombelle, C. Drogoul, and E. Jacotot. 2001. Feeding and microbial disorders in horses. 3. Effects of three hay:grain ratios on microbial profile and activities. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 21:543–546.[CrossRef]

Julliand, V., A. de Fombelle, and M. Varloud. 2006. Starch digestion in horses: The impact of feed processing. Livest. Sci. 100:44–52.[CrossRef]

Kienzle, E. 1994. Small intestinal digestion of starch in the horse. Rev. Méd. Vét. 145:199–204.

Kim, S. M., C. M. Kim, H. K. Lee, W. P. Park, Y. J. Lim, B. J. Kim, and T. Y. Chung. 1991. Evaluation of nutrients values of some feedstuffs, and the effects of yeast culture supplementation on digestibilities of nutrients and blood parameter in horse. Kor. J. Anim. Nutr. Feeds. 15:272–280.

Kronfeld, D. S., and P. Harris. 1997. Feeding the athletic horse. Pages 61–77 in The Veterinarian’s Practical Reference to Equine Nutrition. K. N. Thompson, ed. Purina Mills Inc. AAEP, St. Louis, MO.

Martin-Rosset, W., and J. P. Dulphy. 1987. Digestibility interactions between forages and concentrates in horses: Influence of feeding level–Comparison with sheep. Livest. Prod. Sci. 17:263–273.[CrossRef]

Martin-Rosset, W., M. Vermorel, M. Doreau, J.-L. Tisserand, and J. Andrieu. 1994. The French horse feed evaluation systems and recommended allowances for energy and protein. Livest. Prod. Sci. 40:37–56.[CrossRef]

Medina, M., I. D. Girard, E. Jacotot, and V. Julliand. 2002. Effect of a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on microbial profiles and fermentation patterns in the large intestine of horses fed a high fiber or a high starch diet. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2600–2609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nagaraja, T. G., C. J. Newbold, C. J. Van Nevel, and D. I. Demeyer. 1997. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation. Pages 523–632 in The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. P. N. Hobson and C. S. Stewart, ed. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.

Nuss, R., H. Meyer, and M. Schmidt. 1982. Entleerung und Zusammen setzung des ileum Chymus beim Pferde Zeitschift Für Tierphysiologie. Pages 13–23 in Beiträge zur Verdauungsphysiology des Pferdes, Tierphysiol., Tierernährg., Futtermittelkd, Hamburg, Germany.

Ott, E. A. 1981. Influence of level of feeding on digestion efficiency of the horse. Pages 37–43 in 7th ENPS Symp. Equine Nutrition and Physiology Society, Warrenton, VA.

Pagan, J. D., P. Harris, T. Brewster-Barnes, S. E. Duren, and S. G. Jackson. 1998. Exercise affects digestibility and rate of passage of all-forage and mixed diets in thoroughbred horses. J. Nutr. 128:2704S–2707S.[Free Full Text]

Palmgren-Karlsson, C., J. E. Lindberg, and M. Rundgren. 2000. Associative effect on total tract digestibility in horses fed different ratios of grass hay and whole oats. Livest. Prod. Sci. 65:143–153.[CrossRef]

Pearson, R. A., R. F. Archibald, and R. H. Muirhead. 2001. The effect of forage quality and level of feeding on digestibility and gastrointestinal transit time of oat straw and alfalfa given to ponies and donkeys. Br. J. Nutr. 85:599–606.[Medline]

Plata, P. F., M. G. D. Mendoza, J. R. Barcena-Gama, and M. S. Gonzalez. 1994. Effect of a yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on neutral detergent fiber digestion in steers fed oat straw-based diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 49:203–210.[CrossRef]

Potter, G. D., F. F. Arnold, D. D. Householder, D. H. Hansen, and K. M. Brown. 1992. Digestion of starch in the small or large intestine of the equine. Pages 107–111 in Europäiscche Konferenzüber die Ernährung des Pferdes. Physiologie und Pathologie des Verdauungskanals - Konsequenzen für die Ernährung. Pferdeheilkunde, Hanover, Germany.

Rowe, J. B., M. J. Lees, and D. W. Pethick. 1994. Prevention of acidosis and laminitis associated with grain feeding in horses. J. Nutr. 124:2742S–2744S.[Free Full Text]

Siddons, R. C., J. Paradine, D. E. Beever, and P. R. Cornel. 1985. Ytterbium acetate as a particulate phase digesta flow marker. Br. J. Nutr. 54:509–519.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thivend, P., C. Mercier, and A. Guilbot. 1965. Dosage de l’amidon dans les milieux complexes. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochem. Biophys. 5:513–526.[CrossRef]

Thompson, K. N., S. G. Jackson, and J. P. Baker. 1984. Apparent digestion coefficients and associative effects of varying hay:grain ratios fed to horses. Nutr. Rep. Int. 30:189–197.

Udén, P., T. R. Rounsaville, G. R. Wiggans, and P. J. Van Soest. 1982. The measurement of liquid and solid digesta retention in ruminants, equines and rabbits given timothy (Phleum pratense) hay. Br. J. Nutr. 48:329–339.[CrossRef][Medline]

Van der Noot, G. W., and E. B. Gilbreath. 1970. Comparative digestibility of components of forages by geldings and steers. J. Anim. Sci. 31:351–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Soest, P. J., and R. H. Wine. 1967. Use of detergent in analysis of fibrous feeds. IV: Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 50:50–55.

Vermorel, M., J. Vernet, and W. Martin-Rosset. 1997. Energy utilization of twelve forages or mixed diets for maintenance by sport horses. Livest. Prod. Sci. 47:157–167.[CrossRef]

Wallace, R. J., and M. A. Cotta. 1988. Metabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds. Pages 217–250 in The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. P. N. Hobson, ed. Elsevier Applied Science, New York, NY.

Wallace, R. J., and C. J. Newbold. 1992. Probiotics for ruminants. Pages 317–353 in Probiotics: The Scientific Basis. R. Fuller, ed. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

Wallace, R. J., R. Onodera, and M. A. Cotta. 1997. Metabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds. Pages 283–328 in The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. P. N. Hobson and C. S. Stewart, ed. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK.

Yoder, M. J., E. Miller, J. Rook, J. E. Shelle, and D. E. Ullrey. 1997. Fiber level and form: effects on digestibility, digesta flow and incidence of gastrointestinal disorders. Pages 122–127 in 15th ENPS. Equine Nutrition and Physiology Symposium, Fort Worth, TX.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J.-P. Jouany, B. Medina, G. Bertin, and V. Julliand
Effect of live yeast culture supplementation on hindgut microbial communities and their polysaccharidase and glycoside hydrolase activities in horses fed a high-fiber or high-starch diet
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 2844 - 2852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-796v1
86/2/339    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jouany, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Julliand, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jouany, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Julliand, V.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS