| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* USDA-ARS, US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166; and
and
USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Research Laboratory, Bushland, TX 79106
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
Key Words: beef cattle • heat production • nutrient balance • protein oscillating
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
). Thus, factors that decrease urinary N excretion could decrease ammonia emissions (Erickson and Klopfenstein, 2001; Cole et al., 2005).
One possible means of improving N retention and reducing ammonia emission is by oscillating the dietary CP concentrations. Collins and Pritchard (1992) noted an improvement in N utilization with decreased frequency of protein supplementation to lambs. Similarly, Cole (1999) noted an increase in N retention in lambs by oscillating the CP concentration of the diet over 48-h intervals. However, Ludden et al. (2002a) did not observe an improvement in N retention with oscillating CP concentrations when sheep were fed at relatively high dietary CP concentrations (13 to 17%). Dietary CP (Ludden et al., 2002a) was likely in excess of needs for those lambs, such that any effect of oscillating diets on N metabolism may have been masked by the increased N that was excreted. Ludden et al. (2002a) also noted a decrease in overall N digestibility when lambs were fed oscillating CP diets, resulting in increased fecal relative to urinary N.
Studies showing improved N retention with oscillation of dietary protein in finishing diets have used sheep (Cole, 1999) or mathematical models (Cole et al., 2003). To the best of our knowledge, this concept has not yet been directly tested in finishing beef cattle.
Our hypothesis was that oscillating dietary protein diets reduce ammonia emissions by reducing urinary excretion of nitrogenous compounds. Additional effects on performance characteristics and odorous compound production are described in a companion paper (Archibeque et al., 2007b).
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
) in 4 step-up periods of 6 d each, wherein 25% of the growing ration was sequentially replaced with the finishing ration. The steers were fed the medium diet for 1 wk before initiation of the study. Steers were fed once daily throughout the study and allowed ad libitum access to diets by offering 110% of intake on the previous day. The dietary treatments consisted of a low-protein diet that was deficient in MP (NRC, 2000), a high-protein diet that was excessive in MP, and medium that was adequate in MP and had a N concentration that was near the mean of low and high (Table 1). The fourth dietary treatment was the oscillating diet that consisted of alternating feeding of low and high at 48-h intervals (low for 2 d, followed by high for 2 d).
|
–17°C) for subsequent analysis. Urine pH was measured with pH-sensitive paper before collection of aliquots to assure a pH < 4.
Composited feed, ort, and fecal samples were weighed and dried in a forced air oven (55°C). Dry samples were weighed, then ground with a Wiley Mill (Arthur Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA) fitted with a 1-mm screen. A sub-sample of feed, orts, and feces were dried at 70°C for determination of lab DM. Concentrations of N (Leco CN-2000 carbon/nitrogen analyzer, Leco Corporation, St. Joseph, MI) and P (HNO3 digestion and subsequent color development using the Fiske chemical method; Fiske and Subbarow, 1925) were determined in feed, orts, partly dried feces, and urine. Urinary urea N was measured (Marsh et al., 1965) using a Technicon Autoanalyzer (Method #339-01; Technicon Autoanalyzer System, Tarrytown, NY). Gross energy (bomb calorimetry) was determined for feed, orts, and feces. Urinary GE was estimated from urinary N, as described by Blaxter (1962).
Immediately after each balance trial, O2, CO2, and CH4 exchanges were measured by indirect calorimetry for 6 h, and heat production was calculated (Eisemann and Nienaber, 1990). Fresh feed and water were placed in the head-box calorimeters before the indirect calorimetry measurement to allow steers ad libitum access to their respective diets and water during the measurement.
In Vitro Ammonia Emissions
Composite samples of the feces that were collected from the steers throughout each of the balance trial collections were used for in vitro ammonia emission assays. Urine for the in vitro assay was collected by a urine collection harness and aspirated into polypropylene jugs, without acid, during the indirect calorimetry measurement, and subsequently was frozen until used.
The in vitro ammonia emission system has been described previously (Shi et al., 2001; Cole et al., 2005). Briefly, the system was composed of 48 sealed polyethylene chambers (20 cm x 20 cm x 12 cm), each attached to 2 ammonia-trapping bottles containing 100 mL of 0.9 M sulfuric acid at room temperature (
24°C). A vacuum system pulled air through the chambers and ammonia traps at a rate of approximately 3 L/min. Each chamber contained 1,550 g of screened soil (Pullman clay loam) and the feces and urine excretion of 1 steer (2 chambers/ steer). Soil had a pH of 7.68, was 91.7% DM (SEM = 0.36), and contained 0.10% N (SEM = 0.0011), 1.69% C (SEM = 0.005), 24 ppm (ammonia + ammonium)-N (NHx-N; SEM = 0.06), and 53 ppm (nitrate + nitrite)-N (NOx-N; SEM = 2.2), all on a DM basis. The quantity of urine and feces added to each chamber was equal to 1% of the daily excretion by the steer during the nutrient balance trial. Because a total of 2 in vitro ammonia emission runs were required, 4 chambers containing a common feces and urine were included in each run to correct for run-to-run variation in ammonia emissions. Differences in temperature, atmospheric ammonia, air-flow rate, or other factors may have contributed to the run-to-run variation. Two blank chambers containing soil without feces and urine were included in each run to correct for atmospheric ammonia contamination.
Acid traps were replaced with fresh traps each day for 5 d and then at 2-d intervals until d 11 of collection. At the conclusion of the run, the media in each chamber were thoroughly mixed, and a sample was obtained and stored frozen for later laboratory analyses.
Feces, soil, and media (soil + feces + urine mixture) samples were analyzed for DM by drying to a constant weight at 60°C in a forced draft oven. The pH of feces, soil, and media were determined by mixing 5 g of soil or feces with 5 mL of deionized water. The mixture was stirred, allowed to stand for 1 min, and the pH was determined using a combination electrode. The C and N contents of soil, feces, urine, and ending media were determined using a Carbon-Nitrogen Analyzer (Vario Max CN, Elementar Americas Inc., Mt. Laurel, NJ). The N content of the acid traps was determined colorimetrically using a flow injection analyzer (Lachat Instruments Quick Chem FIA+800, Milwaukee, WI, Method 10-107-06-2-E, 2001: USEPA, 1983, Method 351.2). Initial soil and fecal samples, and ending media samples were extracted with 2 M KCl (20 mL/2 g of air-dried sample) and filtered (Whatman #42 filter paper). The NHx-N content of the filtrate was determined by the phenate method (Lachat Method 12-107-06-1-A; 2001: USEPA, 1983, Method 365.34), and the NOx-N content was determined by cadmium reduction (Lachat Method 12-107-04-1-B; 2001: USEPA, 1983, Method 353.2) using the flow injection analyzer.
Statistical Analysis
The GLM procedure (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) was used for statistical analysis of the data. The model for nutrient and energy balance measures included the independent variables (replication, steer within replication, period within replication, and treatment). Treatment effects were considered significant at P < 0.05. A tendency for treatment to elicit a response was noted when P < 0.10. Least squares means were separated using a protected Student’s t-test.
Data for cumulative ammonia N emissions were analyzed as a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square, with repeated measures by day, and with AR(1) covariance using the MIXED procedure of SAS. The model included the independent variables (replication, steer within replication, period within replication, treatment, day, and treatment x day). Least squares means were compared using a protected Student’s t-test if a significant (P < 0.05) F-test was obtained. Additionally, regressions of cumulative ammonia emissions over 11 d were calculated for each of the treatment groups using the REG procedure of SAS. The quadratic term was included because, with the exception of the low treatment, it was determined to be different (P < 0.01) from 0. The least squares means are reported along with the regressions in Figure 1.
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
This study was designed to provide a linear increase in dietary N from subadequate (low) to adequate (medium) and excessive (high) levels. This design was intended to provide controls at these levels to determine if the oscillating differed from medium and the expected changes associated with a linear change in dietary N. However, due to variability in voluntary DMI (Table 2), daily N intake was not different (P 
0.10) among steers fed medium (131.3 g), high (142.5 g), or oscillating (133.1 g), but was less (P = 0.001) in steers fed low (94.3 g). Daily fecal N did not differ between steers fed high or medium, but was reduced when steers were fed oscillating (P = 0.05) or low (P = 0.01). Daily total urinary N was greatest (P = 0.01) in the steers fed high, intermediate in steers fed medium or oscillating, and least in steers fed low. Urinary urea N excretion was greatest (P < 0.01) in the steers fed high, intermediate in steers fed either medium or oscillating, and least in steers fed low. Similarly, urinary urea N as a percentage of total urinary N increased (P = 0.001) from 33.5% in steers fed low to 48.4% (medium) and 51.5% (oscillating) and was greatest (64.3%) for high.
|
).
Nitrogen retention (g/d) was greater (P = 0.02) in the steers fed oscillating compared with steers fed low or high (Table 2). Although medium did not differ in N intake from oscillating, N retention of steers fed medium differed only from the steers fed low, but not high.
Due to differences in the amounts and composition of excreta produced by steers on the 4 dietary treatments, there were subsequent differences in the amounts of feces and urine, and consequently different amounts of fecal and urinary N added to the in vitro ammonia emission chambers for each of the 4 treatments (Table 3). Although the amount of fecal C added to the ammonia emission chambers did not differ (P = 0.35) among treatments, the total amount of N added to the chambers for the low treatment was less than for the medium, high, or oscillating treatments. Additionally, urinary pH tended to increase (P = 0.06) from a low of 8.10 in the low treatment to 8.84 in the high treatment, whereas there was no difference between the urinary pH of the medium (8.66) and oscillating (8.36) treatments. Following the 11 d incubation, there were similar alterations in the final composition in the manure soil mixture. The final pH was greater (P = 0.04) in the high treatment than in the low treatment, whereas there was no difference between the final pH of the medium and oscillating treatments. Ultimately, this led to an increase (Figure 1; treatment x day, P < 0.001) in the cumulative amount of ammonia released from the chamber as dietary CP increased from low to medium and high. The cumulative ammonia emitted from the oscillating treatment was numerically lower than the medium treatment throughout the entire incubation, which was reflected by a lower rate of ammonia release from the chamber, as estimated by regression using the actual measured values over this 11-d period (Figure 1). The percentage of urinary N added to the chambers that was accounted for by cumulative ammonia volatilization over 11 d was lower (P < 0.001) for the low treatment (2.38%) than for the medium (8.01%), high (8.10%), or oscillating (6.73%) treatments (data not shown).
|
). Although there were no differences in P intake among the treatments (P = 0.17), there was a tendency for the steers fed medium to digest (P = 0.08) and retain more (P = 0.10) P than the steers fed low. The relationship between N and P in manure is of importance to the value of manure as a fertilizer. The N:P ratio was decreased (P < 0.001) from 9.57 in the high-fed steers to 6.92 in the medium-fed steers, 6.46 in the oscillating-fed steers, and 4.71 in the low-fed steers.
Energy metabolism components also differed among the dietary treatments (Table 4). Although there was no difference (P = 0.73) in intake energy, fecal energy of steers fed oscillating tended (P = 0.10) to be lower than that of steers fed low. As expected, urinary energy, calculated from urinary N, increased (P < 0.001) from 0.38 Mcal/d in steers fed low to 0.62 Mcal/d in the medium-fed steers, 0.63 Mcal/d in the oscillating-fed steers, and 0.95 Mcal/d in the steers fed high. Gaseous (P = 0.73) and retained (P = 0.54) energy did not differ among treatments, but heat production was less (P = 0.02) for the steers fed low than for those fed medium or oscillating. Additionally, although there were no differences in the apparent DE (P = 0.32) or ME (P = 0.53) among treatments, there were differences in the amount of DE and ME per kilogram of diet consumed. Apparent DE increased (P < 0.001) from 3.25 Mcal/kg (low) and 3.30 Mcal/kg (medium) to 3.44 Mcal/kg (high and oscillating). Similarly, ME increased (P = 0.03) from 3.05 Mcal/kg (low and medium) to 3.20 Mcal/kg (oscillating), with an intermediate value for the high treatment (3.13 Mcal/ kg). Gas exchanges from the indirect calorimetry (Table 5) indicate that the steers fed low consumed less O2 (P = 0.01) and produced more CO2 (P = 0.04) than those fed medium or high.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
; Cole, 1999; Cole et al., 2003). This improvement in the retention of N may provide a viable means to reduce the release of N, especially ammonia, into the environment. Cole (1999) hypothesized that the improvement in N retention by oscillating the dietary CP is due to improved recycling of N to the rumen as urea, stimulating an increase in total entry of urea N back to the gastrointestinal tract. That hypothesis is supported by results of Archibeque et al. (2007a), who observed greater transfer of urea N to the portal drained viscera when wethers were fed oscillating CP diets compared with those consuming a similar amount of daily protein at a static concentration. Increased recycling of urea to the portal drained viscera would likely lead to an increase in ammonia within the rumen, which may allow greater microbial CP synthesis in steers fed high concentrate diets (Devant et al., 2001). It is also worthy of note that although the weighted average of the low and high treatments would equate to 11.5% CP, steers fed oscillating consumed, on average, 12.7% CP. This may be a result of steers fed the oscillating diet selecting for a greater intake when fed high than when fed low, which may have also influenced the retention of N.
Typical feedyard finishing diets for beef cattle contain approximately 13 to 13.5% CP and contain 0.5 to 1.0% urea to provide adequate ruminally degradable intake protein (Galyean and Gleghorn, 2001). In general, as N intake increases, excretion of urinary urea N increases (Gueye et al., 2003; McBride et al., 2003), and as the dietary ratio of ruminally degradable:undegraded intake protein increases, urinary N excretion increases (Cecava and Hancock, 1994; Gueye et al., 2003; McBride et al., 2003). As this excreted N enters the environment, the current dogma is that most urea is rapidly hydrolyzed by endemic bacterial urease in the environment and subsequently yields ammonia. Cole et al. (2005) demonstrated a 60 to 200% increase in ammonia emission from cattle waste when protein concentration in the diet increased from 11.5 to 13%. However, performance of cattle fed the same diets (Gleghorn et al., 2004) appeared to be moderately decreased when the cattle were fed the lower levels of dietary protein. Similarly, there were decreases in performance (Archibeque et al., 2007b), N retention (current study), and ammonia emissions (current study) as dietary CP was decreased below that provided by medium. Therefore, although reducing dietary CP will substantially reduce ammonia emissions from cattle feedlots, it may be at an undesirable cost of production, which would necessitate development of feeding methodologies that will reduce ammonia emissions without sacrificing performance.
In the companion study (Archibeque et al., 2007b) with slurries of feces, urine, soil, and water, there was more production of products associated with protein fermentation (ammonia and branched-chain VFA) for oscillating than for medium. Additionally, the manure slurries from steers fed oscillating tended to have greater production of total VFA than those from steers fed medium. The production of these acidic compounds would be expected to alter manure pH. Although there was no significant alteration in pH when steers were fed oscillating instead of medium, there was a numerically lower pH, which may have had a modest influence on ammonia volatilization from these manures. The pH effect would be more prominent due to the larger numerical differences in initial pH between the manures from the oscillating-and medium-fed steers. This early point of manure fermentation would be the time when a larger proportion of ammonium would be liberated from the urea in the urine as it interacts with the urease in the manure. Additionally, this may have coincided with the alterations in VFA production to create a more rapid drop in pH in the manures from the steers fed the oscillating diet, which would have effectively trapped the ammonia in the mixture before it volatilized.
In our study, only a relatively small proportion of urinary N applied to the system was lost as ammonia N (2.4 to 8.1%) over 11 d. These values are similar to those of Cole et al. (2005) who reported between 3.15 and 4.34% of applied urinary N being lost as ammonia from the same chambers under very similar conditions and length of analyses. This may be in part due to the low rate of turnover of gas within the chambers (1.2 turnovers/min). However, the loss of N from the in vitro system that was not accounted for by ammonia N release suggests that there were significant losses of N in forms other than ammonia N, such as N2 and NOx. This issue warrants future studies to quantify the amount and chemical entity of N lost from these systems. However, observed losses of urinary N as ammonia N when applied to pasture and ammonia N losses from manure slurries that were applied to cropland have been between 4 to 50% (Ryden et al., 1987; Jarvis et al., 1989; Lockyer and Whitehead, 1990). Additionally, Stewart (1970) observed a 25 to 90% loss of urinary N as ammonia N when applied to soil columns, whereas Kellems et al. (1979) observed a 95% loss of urinary N as ammonia N from cattle manure slurries that did not use soil. Soil inclusion may also influence ammonia volatilization (Fenn and Kissel, 1976; Kumar and Aggarwal, 1998). This large variation in apparent volatilization of ammonia N among differing methodologies is likely due to a variety of factors such as air turnover rates, soil presence and composition, and other environmental factors. For example, air turnover rate increases ammonia N emissions from chambers or wind tunnels linearly up to 15 turnovers/min (Kissel et al., 1977; Whitehead and Raistrick, 1991). Therefore, although relative comparisons within a given method of assessing ammonia N emissions from a given system are likely valid, comparisons among different methodologies should be made carefully. Additionally, the production of greenhouse gasses (CO2 and CH4) was not affected by oscillating dietary protein. Although there was less CO2 produced when steers were fed low, this is likely a result of lower DMI.
Although there were only limited differences in energy metabolism among the various diets, there were notable differences in the apparent DE concentrations of the feeds. Digestible energies were similar for high and oscillating, which were greater than low and medium. If indeed there was greater recycling of urea N to the rumen when steers were fed oscillating as compared with a comparable static intake of CP, this would likely have resulted in similar ruminal ammonia status between the oscillating and high diets. Satter and Slyter (1974) noted that in vitro digestion of a corn-based concentrate diet may be affected by increasing ammonia concentration of ruminal contents. It is reasonable to assume that a similar alteration may have occurred in this study. This effect would likely not occur if the diet contains adequate degradable intake protein to provide for microbial needs. In conjunction with the adequate supply of ammonia to ruminal microbes, increased dietary N would reduce the recycling of urea to the rumen (Bunting et al., 1987, 1989), which could also alleviate the potential for the oscillating diet to stimulate increased recycling of urea to the rumen. These effects of greater CP diets upon ruminal ammonia concentrations and urea flux could also possibly explain why Ludden et al. (2002a, b) did not observe an improvement in N utilization of ruminants when oscillating CP diets were fed. This also may partially explain why any improvements in N retention in our study were limited. Use of oscillation of the dietary protein may have limited application in finishing systems that typically formulate diets to be in excess of the N needs, but as greater emphasis is placed on nutrient management, feeding oscillating CP diets may be a viable means of improving N efficiency. It is possible that improvements in response to oscillation of dietary protein diets would be greater when dietary N concentrations are reduced below those examined in our study.
These data support previous findings that oscillation of the dietary CP may slightly improve N retention in ruminants fed finishing diets compared with those fed similar quantities of CP in a static fashion. Additionally, these data demonstrate that the changes in manure composition of steers fed oscillating CP diets is of a great enough magnitude to then reduce overall ammonia volatilization from these manures. This technique may provide a viable option for producers who are compelled to reduce ammonia emissions from a feedlot operation without sacrificing performance.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
2 The author acknowledges the secretarial assistance of J. Byrkit and the technical assistance of C. Felber, C. Haussler, and K. Sorensen.
3 Present address: Dept. Anim. Sci., Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1171.
4 Corresponding author: cal.ferrell{at}ars.usda.gov
Received for publication April 4, 2006. Accepted for publication January 26, 2007.
|
LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
TopAbstractINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONLITERATURE CITED |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Kebreab, K. A. Johnson, S. L. Archibeque, D. Pape, and T. Wirth Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, October 1, 2008; 86(10): 2738 - 2748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. K. Reynolds and N. B. Kristensen Nitrogen recycling through the gut and the nitrogen economy of ruminants: An asynchronous symbiosis J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E293 - E305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. A. Cole and R. W. Todd Opportunities to enhance performance and efficiency through nutrient synchrony in concentrate-fed ruminants J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E318 - E333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
