Erratum
for
Zhang et al., J. Anim Sci. 85 (3) 583-591.
J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:1351.
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science
Erratum
In the published manuscript, Effects of breed, sex, and halothane genotype on fatty acid composition of pork longissimus muscle (J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85:583–591), the numbers in the body of the table had the decimal place incorrect, and also had incorrect fatty acid designations in footnotes 6 and 8. The correct table is provided below.
Additional corrections to the manuscript include the following (indicated in bold):
On pg. 585, the sentence should read "Breed was a significant source of variation for both the thioesterase and elongase indicies (Table 2
).";
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2. Effects of breeds from the National Barrow Show Sire Progeny Test Program on fatty acid composition, total lipid content, and fatty acid indices of LM1
|
|
On pg. 588, the sentence should read "The indicies of 
9-desaturase, thioesterase, and elongase did not differ between the 2 sex groups (P > 0.05), indicating similar enzyme activities in barrows and gilts.";
On pg. 589, the sentence should read "Consequently, the total SFA and MUFA concentrations and IA were greater (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) in NN pigs, whereas the total PUFA concentration and P:S ration were greater (P < 0.01) in Nn pigs."; and In
Table 3, footnote 6 should read "Calculated as 100 x [16:1n-7/(16:1n-7 + 16:0)]." and footnote 8 should read "Calculated as 100 x [16:1n-7 + 18:1n-9/(16:1n-7 + 16:0 + 18:1n-9 + 18:0."
