J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:1228-1234. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-385
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-385v1
85/5/1228    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Or-Rashid, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Or-Rashid, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.

Fatty acid composition of ruminal bacteria and protozoa, with emphasis on conjugated linoleic acid, vaccenic acid, and odd-chain and branched-chain fatty acids1

M. M. Or-Rashid, N. E. Odongo and B. W. McBride2

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Knowledge of the fatty acid profile of microbial lipids is of great nutritional importance to the animals and, subsequently, their products. This study was conducted to examine the fatty acid profiles of mixed rumen bacteria and protozoa. Bacterial and protozoal cells were isolated by differential centrifugation of rumen contents. The main fatty acids were palmitic (16:0) and stearic (18:0) in both the bacterial and protozoal fractions. Palmitic acid was 74% greater in the protozoal fatty acids than in the bacterial fatty acids, whereas bacteria had 2.25-times greater stearic acid (18:0) proportions compared with protozoa. The total odd-chain plus branched-chain fatty acids were 16.5% of bacterial fatty acids and 11.0% of protozoal fatty acids. The anteiso-17:0 proportions in bacterial and protozoal fatty acids were 1.4 and 2.9%, respectively. The most abundant trans-18:1 isomer, vaccenic acid (18:1 trans-11), was 6.6% of total fatty acids in protozoa and 2.0% of total fatty acids in bacteria. The cis-9, trans-11 CLA was 8.6-times greater in the protozoal fraction (1.32% of total fatty acids) than in the bacterial fraction (0.15%). These results suggest that the presence of protozoa in the rumen may increase the supply of CLA and other unsaturated fatty acids for lower gut absorption by ruminants.

Key Words: conjugated linoleic acid • odd- and branched-chain fatty acid • rumen bacteria and protozoa • vaccenic acid


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The ruminant is dependent on the fermentation of its feed constituents by the rumen microorganisms, which are accommodated in a complex forestomach, the ruminoreticulum (Williams, 1986Go). In the rumen, dietary lipids are subject to hydrolysis by microbial lipases followed by biohydrogenation of the unsaturated FFA by rumen bacteria. In the case of linoleic acid (18:2n-6), the end product of the hydrogenation is stearic acid (18:0; Jenkins, 1993Go). When biohydrogenation does not go to completion, intermediates (e.g., trans-18:1) from the incomplete biohydrogenation of PUFA become available for deposition in microbial biomass as well as in animal tissues (Bauman and Griinari, 2003Go).

One of the microbial transformations in the rumen is the microbial synthesis of odd- and branched-chain fatty acids (Kim et al., 2005Go). These fatty acids are regarded as important compounds within microbial lipids (O’Kelly and Spiers, 1991Go) to maintain optimal fluidity of the microbial cell membrane. Branched-chain fatty acids of bacterial origin can make up 1.0 to 3.0% of milk lipids (Alonso et al., 1999Go) and carcass lipids (Bas and Morand-Fehr, 2000Go).

On the other hand, there has been a great deal of interest in possible health benefits of cis-9, trans-11 CLA in human diets (Ip et al., 1999Go). The major sources of CLA for humans are ruminant products such as meat, milk, and other dairy products (Chin et al., 1992Go). The major CLA, cis-9, trans-11 CLA, is synthesized either in the rumen as an intermediate in the biohydrogenation of linoleic acid or in the tissues by {Delta}-desaturase from vaccenic acid (VA; 18:1 trans-11), another intermediate in ruminal biohydrogenation (Griinari and Bauman, 1999Go). Formation of CLA in the rumen has been mainly associated with bacterial activity, and the role of protozoa in the synthesis of CLA is unknown. Rumen protozoa contain a greater proportion of unsaturated fatty acids than bacteria (Devillard et al., 2004Go). Approximately 7.5 to 15% of the lipids present within the rumen digesta are of protozoal origin (Keeney, 1970Go). Thus, protozoa represent a potential source of lipid for the host animal (Katz and Keeney, 1967Go).

Knowledge of the fatty acid profile of microbial lipids is of great nutritional importance to animals and, subsequently, their products. The purpose of this research was to determine the fatty acid composition of mixed ruminal bacteria and protozoa with emphasis on CLA, VA, and odd- and branched-chain fatty acids.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Animals were cared for in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care regulations, and the University of Guelph Animal Care Committee reviewed and approved the experiment and all procedures carried out in the study.

Fractionation of Rumen Contents
Three, dry, ruminally fistulated Holstein cows (719 ± 39 kg of BW) were given ad libitum access to a total mixed ration (Table 1Go) offered twice daily at 0800 and 1500 h for 3 wk before the first rumen sampling. Ad libitum intake was insured by feeding up to 5% orts. The mean intake was 17.5 ± 1.8 kg of DM/d. Fresh H2O was available at all times. Rumen contents were collected from the 3 cows 3 times at 3-d intervals before the morning feeding. The samples were composited during each collection, transported to the laboratory, blended in a kitchen blender (Kenmore mini food processor model CH-03C, Sears Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) for 20 s to detach the microbes from the feed particles, and then strained through 2 layers of surgical gauze into a 2-L separatory funnel flushed continuously with CO2. Strained rumen contents (1 L) were then diluted with a 30% volume of MB9 buffer (2.8 g of NaCl/L; 0.1 g of CaCl2·2H2O/L; 0.1 g of MgSO4·7H2O/L; 2.0 g of KH2PO4/L; and 6.0 g of Na2HPO4/L; Or-Rashid et al., 2001Go). The funnel containing rumen fluid was left to stand for 60 to 90 min in a H2O bath (37°C) to allow small feed particles to float and the microbial fraction to sediment to the bottom of the funnel.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Ingredient and chemical composition of the diet
 
Rumen microbial fractions were prepared according to the method of Denholm and Ling (1989)Go and Lee et al. (2000)Go. Briefly, most of the lower liquid portion (not the floating feed particles) was collected gravimetrically from the funnel and centrifuged at 150 x g for 5 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was designated ruminal bacteria plus a few protozoa. A portion of this supernatant was further centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min at 4°C, and the resultant supernatant (ruminal bacterial preparation) was found by microscopic examination to be free from all protozoa and virtually all plant material. Some of this preparation was then centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, and the resultant residue was resuspended in MB9 buffer and labeled bacterial suspension.

The pellet obtained from the initial 150 x g centrifugation was used to produce the rumen protozoal preparations. The pellet was diluted with MB9 buffer and washed by centrifugation (approximately 4 to 6 times) until essentially free from feed material (checked under microscope) and finally resuspended in the same buffer to give a protozoal suspension. Bacterial and protozoal pellets resuspended in MB9 buffer were then transferred into 2-mL Eppendorf tubes and kept at –20°C until further analysis.

Preparation and Derivatization of the Samples for Analysis of Fatty Acids
The suspended microbial pellets in the Eppendorf tubes were thawed, 1 g of zirconium beads [0.5 and 0.1 mm at a ratio of 1:1 (wt/wt)] was added, and the tubes were shaken for 2.5 min twice, with a 5-min intervening period, at room temperature on a reciprocating shaker (Mini-Bead-Beater-8, Biospec Products Inc., Bartlesville, OK) at the maximum speed to cause mechanical disruption of the ruminal contents. Contents of the tubes were then transferred into 15-mL culture tubes equipped with screw caps and Teflon liners. Two portions of 1.9 mL of CH3OH were added to the Eppendorf tube to ensure complete transfer. The contents of the culture tubes were well mixed by vortexing and allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 h. After 1 h, 1.9 mL of CHCl3, 1.8 mL of H2O, and 0.1 mL of 3 M HCl were added, vortex-mixed, and centrifuged. The acid was added to ensure the pH of the extract was acidic. The CHCl3 layer (bottom phase), containing esterified lipid and FFA, was removed using 2 pasture pipettes, one inserted into another. The CH3OH-H2O phase was extracted with an additional 1.9 mL of CHCl3, and the CHCl3 phases were combined, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and filtered. Chloroform was removed from the vials under a stream of N2, and 3 drops of C6H6 was added and mixed. Then, 1 mL of 1 M NaOH (dissolved in 95% C2H5OH) was added to the vials, vortex-mixed, and kept at room temperature overnight in a dark place.

The following day, 1.0 mL of 3 M HCl was added and extracted twice with C6H14 (1.0 mL each time). After evaporation of C6H14 under N2, 0.8 mL of C6H6, and 0.2 mL of CH3OH were added. After mixing, 7 to 8 drops of trimethylsilyl-diazomethane were added to the vials, shaken lightly (trimethylsilyl-diazomethane is explosive) and occasionally over 60 min. After derivatizing for 60 min at room temperature, a few drops of glacial acetic acid were added until the yellow color disappeared to inactivate the derivatizing agent. Then, 0.5 mL of H2O and 1.0 mL of C6H14 were added and vortexed. The C6H14 layer was extracted, and this was repeated 1 time with same amount of C6H14. The vial containing C6H14 (approximately 2 mL) was placed under a stream of N2 until 90 to 100 µL remained. Then, the C6H14, containing fatty acid methyl esters, was analyzed by GLC. For mechanical disruption of the microbial cells, we did not use a sonicator as commonly used for disrupting cells because Or-Rashid et al. (2003)Go suggested that it destroyed 50 to 60% of the total unsaturated fatty acids.

Analysis of Fatty Acid Composition by GLC
Analysis of fatty acid methyl esters was performed using an Agilent 6890N GLC (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a split-splitless injector at 250°C, a flame ionization detector at 250°C, and a CP Sil 88 column (100 m x 0.25 mm, 0.2 µm of film thickness, Varian Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Hydrogen was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min. The temperature of the GLC oven was set to 45°C for 4 min, increased at 13°C/min to 175°C and held for 27 min, and increased at the rate of 4°C/min to a final temperature of 215°C and held for 35 min. Agilent Technologies Chemstation software (Rev. B.01.01) was used for data analysis.

A 1-µL sample was injected at splitless mode. Peaks were routinely identified by comparison of the retention times with fatty acid methyl ester standards (GLC no. 463, no. UC-59-M, 21:0, 23:0, and 26:0, Nu-Check-Prep Inc., Elysian, MN). Individual isomers of 18:1 fatty acids were determined as follows. The temperature of the GLC oven was maintained at 45°C for 4 min, increased to 167°C at a rate of 13°C/min and held for 40 min, and again increased at the rate of 4°C/min to a final temperature of 218°C and held for 23 min. Peaks of 18:1 isomers were identified by order of elution according to Precht and Molkentin (1997)Go, Shingfield et al. (2003)Go, and Loor et al. (2004)Go. Fatty acid composition was expressed as a percentage of total fatty acids.

Chemical Analyses
Feed and orts samples were collected 3 times per week and analyzed for DM content by drying them in an oven at 60°C for 48 h (AOAC, 1990Go). A subsample was ground using a Wiley mill with a 1-mm screen (Thomas-Wiley, Philadelphia, PA) and stored at –20°C until analyzed. The feed samples were analyzed for CP using the Kjeldahl procedure (AOAC, 1990Go) and for ADF (AOAC, 1990Go), NDF (Goering and Van Soest, 1970Go), ash (AOAC, 1990Go), and crude fat (AOAC, 1990Go).

Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed as a completely randomized design using PROC MIXED (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) with the model Yij = µ + {alpha}i + ßj + {varepsilon}ij, where µ = the overall mean; {alpha} = the effect of day (i = 1 to 3); ß = the effect of treatment (j = bacteria or protozoa); and {varepsilon}ij = the residual error. Effects were considered significant at a probability of P < 0.05. Means of individual fatty acids were the average of 3 measurements.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Cellular lipids of rumen microorganisms may be generated by both de novo synthesis and also through the direct incorporation of preformed precursor molecules, which may be of dietary origin (Harfoot and Hazlewood, 1997Go). The results of fatty acid analyses are summarized in Tables 2Go, 3Go, and 4Go. The predominant fatty acids were palmitic (16:0) and stearic (18:0) in both the bacterial and protozoal fractions. Palmitic acid was 74% greater in the protozoal than in bacterial fatty acids (P < 0.001), whereas bacteria had 2.25-times greater stearic acid (18:0) content compared with protozoa (P = 0.009). These findings are in agreement with earlier work (Williams and Dinusson, 1973Go). Emmanuel (1974)Go showed that mixed protozoal suspensions formed structurally related long-chain fatty acids, principally 16:0 from short-chain precursors such as acetate and butyrate. Protozoa can also incorporate 16:0 from feed supplied to the host animals (Williams, 1986Go). In contrast, Wu and Palmquist (1991)Go showed that rumen bacteria more likely incorporated palmitic acid from feed, sparing de novo synthesis from short-chain precursors (e.g., acetate and butyrate), and this might explain the greater percentage of 16:0 in protozoa compared with bacteria.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Fatty acid composition of mixed rumen bacteria and protozoa1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. The 18:1 isomer contents in mixed rumen bacteria and protozoa1
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Conjugated linoleic acid composition of mixed rumen bacteria and protozoa1
 
The percentages of some branched-chain SFA (e.g., iso-13:0, anteiso-13:0, iso-14:0, anteiso-15:0, and iso-16:0) were greater in bacteria, but protozoa had greater percentages of iso-17:0 and anteiso-17:0 (Table 2Go). These fatty acids are synthesized by chain elongation of branched chain VFA (i.e., branched short-chain carboxylic acids) generated by metabolism of branched-chain AA (Garton, 1977Go). The branched-chain fatty acids could be considered as H acceptors during anaerobic fermentation, thus the synthesis of these long branched-chain fatty acids from the branched short-chain carboxylic acids (e.g., isobutyric, isovaleric, and 2-methylbutyric acids) may contribute to energy conservation (Bas et al., 2003Go).

On the other hand, 18:1 trans-11 was found in much greater (P = 0.001) amounts (approximately 3 times) in the protozoal fraction than in the bacterial fraction (6.6 vs. 2.0% of total fatty acids; Table 3Go). We hypothesize that rumen protozoa may have {Delta}11-desaturase activity, allowing conversion of 18:0 to 18:1 trans-11. In support of our hypothesis, it was shown by Emmanuel (1974)Go in a study of mixed rumen protozoa that octadecenoic acids, consisting mainly of the {Delta}11 isomer, were synthesized by direct desaturation of saturated acids. However, engulfment of VA (associated with feed particles and bacterial cells) by protozoa may be another way it is incorporated into protozoal lipids. The percentages of other trans-18:1 isomers such as trans-9, trans-10, and trans-12 were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in protozoa than bacteria (Table 3Go).

The percentages of odd-chain fatty acids (9:0, 11:0, 17:0, 19:0, etc.) in bacteria were greater (P ≤ 0.05) than in protozoa, except for 13:0 (P = 0.47) and 15:0 (P = 0.12; Table 2Go). Microbial odd-chain fatty acids are formed through elongation of propionate or valerate (Emmanuel, 1974Go; Kaneda, 1991Go). Odd- or branched-chain fatty acids with an iso- or anteiso-structure provide biological advantage to rumen microbes because the odd-chain fatty acids and the iso-fatty acids with n atoms of C have a melting point 1 to 2°C lower than those of straight-chain fatty acids with n-1 atoms of C (Wu and Palmquist, 1991Go; Gunstone et al., 1994Go). The melting point of even-chain fatty acids with an anteiso-structure is lower by 25 to 30°C compared with its corresponding straight-chain SFA (Gunstone et al., 1994Go). In rumen microbes with a lower content of unsaturated fatty acids, these odd- and branched-chain fatty acids provide structural lipids with optimal fluidity for cell membranes (Hauser et al., 1979Go). However, the total amount of odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in the protozoal fraction was 47% lower than that of the bacterial fraction (Table 2Go). In this case, the 2- to 3-times greater content of unsaturated fatty acids in protozoa might compensate for the deficiency of available odd- and branched-chain fatty acids for maintaining lipid fluidity and cell membrane function of protozoa. Odd- and branched-chain fatty acids are generally rare or absent from feeds (Diedrich and Henschel, 1990Go). In fact, Keeney et al. (1962)Go suggested that major sources of these fatty acids in rumen and milk are from bacterial origin and might be used as markers to quantify bacterial matter leaving the rumen. Dewhurst et al. (2000)Go also suggested that these fatty acids in duodenal digesta and milk could provide a qualitative description of the proportions of different classes of microbes leaving the rumen. In this group of fatty acids, the protozoal fraction had 2.05-times greater anteiso-17:0 (2.89% of total fatty acids) content than bacterial fraction. Therefore, anteiso-17:0 content in milk and meat might be used as a marker to quantify protozoal biomass in response to dietary shifts. However, further research is necessary to correlate anteiso-17:0 content in milk or meat with changes of protozoal biomass with different diet formulations. Similarly, iso-13:0, iso-15:0, anteiso-15:0, etc. could be used to quantify bacterial biomass (Vlaeminck et al., 2006Go).

Among MUFA, oleic acid (18:1 cis-9) was the greatest both in bacteria and protozoa. Protozoa contained 3.7-times greater oleic acid than bacteria (P = 0.006; Table 3Go). The percentages of linoleic acid (18:2 cis-9, cis-12) were the greatest among PUFA both in bacteria and protozoa, followed by linolenic acid (18:3n3; Table 2Go). The protozoal fraction had 4.8-times greater linoleic acid (7.2% of total fatty acids) compared with the bacterial fraction (1.5%; P < 0.001). One of the causes is that the linoleic acid uptake rate from feed particles by protozoa might be greater than that by bacteria. However, Viviani and Borgatti (as cited by Viviani, 1970Go) demonstrated that the rumen protozoa were able to incorporate 14C-acetate into linoleic acid. Therefore, the linoleic acid synthesizing ability of protozoa could be another factor for increased level of this fatty acid in protozoal biomass. Additionally, bacteria contained more nervonic acid (24:1 cis-15) than protozoa (P = 0.04), although the percentage was very low in both fractions (Table 2Go).

The total SFA in bacteria were 29% greater than that in protozoa (P < 0.001; Table 2Go). However, the long-chain SFA (17:0 to 26:0) in bacteria were 123% greater than in protozoa (P = 0.004). Conversely, protozoa had greater percentages of total MUFA, total n-6 PUFA, total n-3 PUFA, and total CLA (2.3-, 3.9-, 3.45-, and 6.8-times, respectively) compared with bacteria. Thus, fatty acids in mixed rumen protozoa were less saturated than those of mixed rumen bacteria. In addition, bacteria had lower levels of total trans-18:1 isomers than did protozoa (3.6 vs. 9.7% of total fatty acids; P = 0.007). Protozoa had a greater proportion of total cis-18:1 than bacteria (8.9 vs. 3.2% of total fatty acids; P = 0.008).

Among all CLA isomers, cis-9, trans-11 CLA was the most abundant isomer in both bacteria and protozoa (Table 4Go). Interestingly, cis-9, trans-11 CLA proportions in protozoa were 8.6-times greater than bacteria (P = 0.002). It is not clear why protozoal lipid contained so much more cis-9, trans-11 CLA (1.32% of total fatty acids) than that of bacteria. However, protozoa may have {Delta}9-desaturase activity that could convert VA to cis-9, trans-11 CLA. Additionally, protozoa could incorporate cis-9, trans-11 CLA from symbiotic bacteria, which isomerize 18:2 cis-9, cis-12 to cis-9, trans-11 CLA inside the protozoal cells. At present, there are no reports demonstrating the capability of protozoa to isomerize 18:2 cis-9, cis-12 to cis-9, trans-11 CLA. However, earlier results, without showing isomerization, suggested that protozoa had limited or no ability to hydrogenate various substrates (Chalupa and Kutches, 1968Go; Girard and Hawke, 1978Go). The second largest CLA was the mixture of trans-9, trans-11 CLA plus trans-10, trans-12 CLA, which was present in both bacterial and protozoal fractions. Again, protozoa had greater percentages than bacteria (P = 0.01). Other minor CLA isomers detected in bacteria and protozoa included the following: cis-10, trans-12; trans-9, cis-11; trans-10, cis-12; and trans-11, trans-13.

It should be noted that our microbial samples were all collected before feeding. Fatty acid profiles of rumen microbial fractions (e.g., bacterial and protozoal biomass) could change during the postprandial period (Devillard et al., 2004Go). Diet variation is another factor that could affect the fatty acid profiles of rumen microbes, and the relevance of our observations might be limited to diets similar to those we fed.

In summary, the main fatty acid in mixed rumen bacteria was stearic acid, whereas palmitic acid was predominant within protozoa. Both bacteria and protozoa contained odd- and branch-chained fatty acids in different proportions. These fatty acids could play a role in H transfer, thus conserving potential energy. Protozoa had 2.05-times greater anteiso-17:0 content than bacteria; thus, this fatty acid may be a potential biomarker for protozoal biomass. Additionally, protozoa contained a greater proportion of unsaturated fatty acids and CLA than the bacteria. These results suggest that the presence of protozoa in the rumen may increase the supply of CLA and other unsaturated fatty acids for lower gut absorption by ruminants.


    Footnotes
 
1 We would like to thank Jim Van Dusen, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, for managing the animals. Financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Ottawa, Ontario) is gratefully acknowledged. Back

2 Corresponding author: bmcbride{at}uoguelph.ca

Received for publication June 14, 2006. Accepted for publication November 21, 2006.


    LITERATURE CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 


Alonso, L., J. Fontecha, L. Lozada, M. J. Fraga, and M. Juárez. 1999. Fatty acid composition of caprine milk: Major, branched-chain, and trans fatty acids. J. Dairy Sci. 82:878–884.[Abstract]

AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. AOAC Int., Arlington, VA.

Bas, P., H. Archimède, A. Rouzeau, and D. Sauvant. 2003. Fatty acid composition of mixed-rumen bacteria: Effect of concentration and type of forage. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2940–2948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bas, P., and P. Morand-Fehr. 2000. Effect of nutritional factors on fatty acid composition of lamb fat deposits. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:61–79.[CrossRef]

Bauman, D. E., and J. M. Griinari. 2003. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 23:203–227.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chalupa, W., and A. J. Kutches. 1968. Biohydrogenation of linoleic-1-14C acid by rumen protozoa. J. Anim. Sci. 27:1502–1508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chin, S. F., W. Liu, J. M. Storkson, Y. L. Ha, and M. W. Pariza. 1992. Dietary sources of conjugated dienoic isomers of linoleic acid, a newly recognized class of anticarcinogens. J. Food Comp. Anal. 5:185–197.[CrossRef]

Denholm, A. M., and J. R. Ling. 1989. In vitro metabolism of 2,2'-diaminopimelic acid from gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial cells by ruminal protozoa and bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:212–218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Devillard, E., F. M. McIntosh, K. Young, M. Castet, R. J. Wallace, and C. J. Newbold. 2004. Conjugated linoleic acid composition of rumen bacterial and protozoal populations. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 44(Suppl. 1):S60. (Abstr.)

Dewhurst, R. J., D. R. Davies, and R. J. Merry. 2000. Microbial protein supply from the rumen. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 85:1–21.[CrossRef]

Diedrich, M., and K. P. Henschel. 1990. The natural occurrence of unusual fatty acids. 1. Odd numbered fatty acids. Nahrung 34:935–943.[CrossRef]

Emmanuel, B. 1974. On the origin of rumen protozoan fatty acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 337:404–413.[Medline]

Garton, G. A. 1977. Fatty acid metabolism in ruminants. Page 337–370 in Biochemistry of Lipids II. T. W. Goodwin, ed. Univ. Park Press, Baltimore, MD.

Girard, V., and J. C. Hawke. 1978. The role of holotrichs in the metabolism of dietary linoleic acid in the rumen. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 528:17–27.[Medline]

Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Agric. Handb. no. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC.

Griinari, J. M., and D. E. Bauman. 1999. Biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid and its incorporation into meat and milk in ruminants. Pages 180–200 in Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid Research. Vol. 1. M. P. Yurawecz, M. M. Mossoba, J. K. G. Kramer, M. W. Pariza, and G. J. Nelson, ed. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL.

Gunstone, F. D., J. L. Harwood, and F. B. Padley. 1994. Dictionary. Page 1273 in The Lipid Handbook. 2nd ed. F. D. Gunstone, J. L. Harwood, and F. B. Padley, ed. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

Harfoot, C. G., and G. P. Hazlewood. 1997. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. Pages 382–426 in The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. P. N. Hobson and C. S. Stewart, ed. Blackie Academic and Professional, London, UK.

Hauser, H., G. P. Hazlewood, and R. M. C. Dawson. 1979. Membrane fluidity of a fatty acid auxotroph grown with palmitic acid. Nature 279:536–538.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ip, C., S. Banni, E. Angioni, G. Carta, J. McGinley, H. J. Thompson, D. Barbano, and D. Bauman. 1999. Conjugated linoleic acid-enriched butter fat alters mammary gland morphogenesis and reduces cancer risk in rats. J. Nutr. 129:2135–2142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jenkins, T. C. 1993. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3851–3863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kaneda, T. 1991. Iso- and anteiso-fatty acids in bacteria: Biosynthesis, function, and taxonomic significance. Microbiol. Rev. 55:288–302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Katz, I., and M. Keeney. 1967. The lipids of some rumen holotrich protozoa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 144:102–112.[Medline]

Keeney, M. 1970. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. Pages 489–503 in Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. A. T. Phillipson, E. F. Annison, D. G. Armstrong, C. C. Balch, R. S. Comline, R. N. Hardy, P. N. Hobson, and R. D. Keynes, ed. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Keeney, M., I. Katz, and M. J. Allison. 1962. On the probable origin of some milk fat acids in rumen microbial lipids. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 39:198–201.

Kim, E. J., R. Sanderson, M. S. Dhanoa, and R. J. Dewhurst. 2005. Fatty acid profiles associated with microbial colonization of freshly ingested grass and rumen biohydrogenation. J. Dairy Sci. 88:3220–3230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee, S. S., J. K. Ha, and K.-J. Cheng. 2000. Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi to in vitro degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3807–3813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Loor, J. J., K. Ueda, A. Ferlay, Y. Chilliard, and M. Doreau. 2004. Biohydrogenation, duodenal flow, and intestinal digestibility of trans fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acids in response to dietary forage:concentrate ratio and linseed oil in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2472–2485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

O’Kelly, J. C., and W. G. Spiers. 1991. Influence of host diet on the concentrations of fatty acids in rumen bacteria from cattle. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42:243–252.[CrossRef]

Or-Rashid, M. M., J. Gong, and J. K. Kramer. 2003. Comparison of methods for total CLA and PUFA analysis in rumen fluid. Page 20 in Proc. 94th AOCS Ann. Meet. Expo, Kansas City, MO.

Or-Rashid, M. M., R. Onodera, and S. Wadud. 2001. Biosynthesis of methionine from homocysteine, cystathionine and homoserine plus cysteine by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55:758–764.[CrossRef][Medline]

Precht, D., and J. Molkentin. 1997. Trans-geometric and positional isomers of linoleic acid including conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in German milk and vegetable fats. Lipids 99:319–326.

Shingfield, K. J., S. Ahvenjarvi, V. Toivonen, A. Ärölä, K. V. V. Nurmela, P. Huhtanen, and J. M. Griinari. 2003. Effect of fish oil on biohydrogenation of fatty acids and milk fatty acid content in cows. Anim. Sci. 77:165–179.

Viviani, R. 1970. Metabolism of long-chain fatty acids in the rumen. Adv. Lipid Res. 8:267–346.[Medline]

Vlaeminck, B., V. Fievez, D. Demeyer, and R. J. Dewhurst. 2006. Effect of forage:concentrate ratio on fatty acid composition of rumen bacteria isolated from ruminal and duodenal digesta. J. Dairy Sci. 89:2668–2678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Williams, A. G. 1986. Rumen holotrich ciliate protozoa. Microbiol. Rev. 50:25–49.[Free Full Text]

Williams, P. P., and W. E. Dinusson. 1973. Amino acid and fatty acid composition of bovine ruminal bacteria and protozoa. J. Anim. Sci. 36:151–155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wu, Z., and D. L. Palmquist. 1991. Synthesis and biohydrogenation of fatty acids by ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3035–3046.[Abstract]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. M. Or-Rashid, J. K. G. Kramer, M. A. Wood, and B. W. McBride
Supplemental algal meal alters the ruminal trans-18:1 fatty acid and conjugated linoleic acid composition in cattle
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 187 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. E. Odongo, M. M. Or-Rashid, R. Bagg, G. Vessie, P. Dick, E. Kebreab, J. France, and B. W. McBride
Long-Term Effects of Feeding Monensin on Milk Fatty Acid Composition in Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5126 - 5133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-385v1
85/5/1228    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Or-Rashid, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Or-Rashid, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS