J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:919-927. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-342
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-342v1
85/4/919    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, S. P.

ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

Leucine stimulates mammalian target of rapamycin signaling in C2C12 myoblasts in part through inhibition of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase1

M. Du2, Q. W. Shen, M. J. Zhu and S. P. Ford

Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is one of the main signaling pathways controlling protein synthesis. Leucine treatment upregulates mTOR signaling, which enhances protein synthesis; however, the mechanisms are not well understood. Herein, treatment of C2C12 myoblast cells with leucine enhanced the phosphorylation of mTOR and ribosomal protein S6 kinase. Leucine treatment also decreased the adenosine monophosphate/ATP ratio in myoblasts by 36.4 ± 9.1% (P < 0.05) and reduced the phosphorylation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) {alpha} subunit at Thr172 (28.6 ± 4.9% reduction, P < 0.05) and inhibited AMPK activity (43.6 ± 3.5% reduction, P < 0.05). In addition, leucine increased the phosphorylation of mTOR at Ser2448 by 63.5 ± 10.0% (P < 0.05) and protein synthesis by 30.6 ± 6.1% (P < 0.05). Applying 5-aminoimidazole-4-carbox-amide 1-beta-d-ribonucleoside, an activator of AMPK, abolished the stimulation of mTOR signaling by leucine, showing that AMPK negatively controls mTOR signaling. To further show the role of AMPK in mTOR signaling, myoblasts expressing a dominant negative AMPK{alpha} subunit were employed. Negative myoblasts had very low AMPK activity. The activation of mTOR induced by leucine in these cells was abated, showing that AMPK contributed to mTOR activation. In conclusion, leucine stimulates mTOR signaling in part through AMPK inhibition. This study implicates AMPK as an important target for nutritional management to enhance mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in muscle cells, thereby increasing muscle growth.

Key Words: adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase • leucine • myoblast cell • mammalian target of rapamycin • protein synthesis


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Signaling within the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway involves the sensing of nutritional status in cells and coordinates nutrient status with protein synthesis (Bodine et al., 2001Go; Bolster et al., 2003Go; Sakamoto et al., 2003Go). Activation of mTOR upregulates protein production through phosphorylating eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) and ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K; Schmelzle and Hall, 2000Go; Hara et al., 2002Go; Shen et al., 2005Go).

Adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a heterotrimeric enzyme with {alpha}, ß, and {gamma} subunits, is mainly recognized as a critical regulator of energy metabolism (Kim et al., 2004Go). The AMPK is activated when the cellular energy level is low. Activation of AMPK phosphorylates tuberous sclerosis-2 (TSC2; Figure 1Go), which negatively controls mTOR signaling, linking energy availability to mTOR signaling.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Hypothesized role of leucine in adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling associated with protein synthesis and muscle growth. Proposed pathways and known pathways for leucine-induced mTOR activation. BCAT = branched chain aminotransferase; BCKD = branched-chain {alpha}-keto acid dehydrogenase; 4E-BP1 = eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1; eEF2 = eukaryotic elongation factor 2; Rheb = Ras homolog enriched in brain; S6K = ribosomal protein S6 kinase; TCA = tricarboxylic acid; TSC1/TSC2 = tuberous sclerosis-1/tuberous sclerosis-2. Dashed lines indicate pathways will be tested.

 
Leucine supplementation stimulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle (Anthony et al., 2001Go; Lynch et al., 2003Go; Lang and Frost, 2005Go). This stimulation of protein synthesis involves upregulation of mTOR signaling (Lynch et al., 2003Go; Tokunaga et al., 2004Go). The mechanisms associated with enhanced mTOR signaling due to leucine, however, are poorly understood (Martin and Hall, 2005Go). We hypothesized that leucine activates mTOR in part through AMPK inhibition. Leucine and other branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) are not degraded in the liver due to the absence of branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (BCAT), whereas other amino acids are catabolized mainly in the liver. However, BCAT is present in skeletal muscle (Sweatt et al., 2004Go), and degradation of BCAA in skeletal muscle is hypothesized to provide energy that inhibits AMPK activity, leading to mTOR activation (Figure 1Go).

The objective of this study was to examine whether leucine stimulates mTOR signaling in part through inhibition of AMPK activity.

All animal procedures were approved by the University of Wyoming Animal Care and Use Committee.

Antibodies and Chemicals for Cell Culture
Antibodies against phospho-mTOR at Ser2448, phospho-AMPK{alpha} at Thr172, and phospho-S6K at Thr389 were purchased from Cell Signalling Technology Inc. (Beverly, MA). Antibody against actin was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Iowa City, IA). Cell culture medium [Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)] and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The C2C12 myoblast cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The L-[2,3,4,5,6-3H]phenylalanine was bought from Amersham Biosciences (Buckinghamshire, UK). L-Leucine and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma.

C2C12 Myoblast Cells
The C2C12 myoblast cells were grown to 60% confluence in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS plus 50 U/mL of penicillin and 50 µg/mL of streptomycin in an incubator under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C. Then, the cells were starved in low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 0.2% FBS for 4 h. The cells were subjected to various treatments in the same starvation media by adding 2 mM L-leucine, 2 mM AICAr, 2 mM D-leucine, 2 mM glucose, or 2 mM sodium pyruvate, and collected for the analyses 30 min after application of the treatments, unless specifically indicated.

Primary skeletal muscle cells were obtained from the skeletal muscle of wild-type mice and mice that had muscle-specific expression of dominant negative AMPK{alpha}; the AMPK activity in skeletal muscle of such mice was very low (Mu et al., 2001Go). Mice that specifically expressed dominant negative AMPK{alpha} were obtained from M. J. Birnbaum (Department of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania). The skeletal muscle was minced in DMEM after trimming off all visible fat and connective tissue, and then incubated in 1 mg/mL of protease (P5985, Sigma) at 37°C for 1 h. The tissue slurry was centrifuged at 1,500 x g for 10 min, and the pellet was suspended in DMEM and centrifuged at 400 x g for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred to another tube and centrifuged at 1,500 x g for 10 min. The resulting pellet containing myoblast cells was used for cell culture. Before treatments, primary myoblast cells were induced to fuse into myotubes by providing them with 2% horse serum (Sigma).

Preparation of Cell Lysates
Cells were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4; 137 mM NaCl; 1% NP-40; 10% glycerol; 2 mM Na3VO4; 100 mM NaF; 1 mM MgCl2; 1 mM CaCl2; 2.5 mM EDTA; and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). The cell lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C, and the protein concentration of the supernatant was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method (Biorad, Hercules, CA; Zhu et al., 2006Go).

Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting
Cell lysates containing equivalent amounts of protein were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer with 5% mercaptoethanol at 95°C for 5 min. A 5 to 20% gradient gel was used for SDS-PAGE separation of the proteins. A Hoefer mini-gel system (Hoefer Inc., San Francisco, CA) was used for casting gels and running electrophoresis. After electrophoresis, the proteins on the gel were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (BioRad, Hercules, CA) in a transfer buffer containing 20 mM Trisbase, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS, and 20% methanol.

The nitrocellulose membranes were incubated in a blocking solution consisting of 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS/T (0.1% Tween-20; 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; and 150 mM NaCl) for 1 h followed by an overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibodies appropriately diluted with TBS/T containing 1% nonfat dry milk. At the end of the incubation with primary antibody, the membranes were washed 3 times for 5 min each with 20 mL of TBS/T. After that, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies at an appropriate dilution for 1 h in TBS/T with gentle agitation. After three 10-min washes, the secondary antibody was visualized using the ECL Western blotting reagents (Amersham Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ) and exposure to film (MR, Kodak, Rochester, NY). The density of the bands was quantified by using an Imager Scanner II and ImageQuant TL software (Amersham Bioscience; Du et al., 2004Go). To reduce the variation between blots, cell lysates from all treatments were run on each gel. The band density among different blots was normalized according to the density of the reference band, which was loaded on all gels. The band density was also normalized to the actin content (Yang et al., 2005Go).

For reprobing, the membranes were incubated in a stripping solution (100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; 2% SDS; 62.5 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.7) at 50°C for 30 min with shaking. Then, the membranes were thoroughly washed with TBS/T and blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS/T. The membranes were used for actin content measurement by immunoblotting as described above.

Measurement of Protein Synthesis
Protein synthesis was measured by the rate of incorporation of [3H]phenylalanine into total mixed proteins. Two microcurie of L-[2,3,4,5,6-3H]phenylalanine (120 Ci/mmol) was added to each flask of C2C12 myoblast cells or myotubes and incubated for 30 min. Then, the cells were lysed as described above, and the cell lysates were mixed with an equal volume of 20% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma). The resultant precipitate was solubilized by treatment with 200 µL of 1 M NaOH for 30 min and mixed with 5 mL of ScintiVerse (Fisher Scientific, Hanover Park, IL). The incorporation of the radioisotopes was measured by liquid scintillation counting (Shen et al., 2005Go).

Measurement of AMPK Activity
The AMPK activity was measured as previously reported (Zhu et al., 2004Go), with modifications. Briefly, the cell lysates were centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 x g at 4°C. Then, AMPK in the cell lysates was immunoprecipitated by using an antibody against AMPK{alpha} and sepharose protein-A beads (Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, PA; Hao et al., 2004Go). The beads were incubated for 10 min at 37°C in 40 mM HEPES, 0.2 mM SAMS peptide (His-Met-Arg-Ser-Ala-Met-Ser-Gly-Leu-His-Leu-Val-Lys-Arg-Arg; Invitrogen), 0.2 mM AMP, 80 mM NaCl, 8% (wt/vol) glycerol, 0.8 mM EDTA, 0.8 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.2 mM ATP + 2 µCi [32P]ATP (Amersham Biosciences), pH 7.0, in a final volume of 50 µL. An aliquot (20 µL) was removed and spotted onto a 2 x 2–cm piece of Whatman P81 filter paper. The remaining [32P]ATP was removed with 3 washes of 1% phosphoric acid (Sigma) and once with 100 mL of acetone (Sigma) to remove the water. The filter paper was air-dried, and radioactivity was quantified after immersing the filter paper in 3 mL of ScintiV-erse (Fisher Scientific).

Measurement of AMP and ATP Content
Adenosine triphosphate and AMP content were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Beckman Instruments Inc., Fullerton, CA), as previously described (Shen et al., 2006Go). Briefly, cultured cells were collected and homogenized in 3 volumes of ice-cold 0.9 N perchloric acid. After extraction for 30 min on ice, the supernatant was obtained by centrifuging at 13,000 x g, 4°C for 10 min, and neutralized with 2 M KOH and centrifuged again under the same condition to remove KClO4. The neutralized supernatant was passed through a 0.2-µm filter (Pall Corp., East Hills, NY). Ten-microliter aliquots of the final muscle extract were injected into the chromatography column (Phenomenex C18-MC1, 250 x 4.60 mm, 5 µm). Mobile phase A was phosphate buffer (0.04 M potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate and 0.06 M dipotassium hydrogen orthophosphate, pH 7.0). Mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The UV detection was carried out at a wavelength of 254 nm. The peaks were identified and quantified by comparison for retention time and peak area with known external standards (Sigma).

Statistics
The data were analyzed as a complete randomized design using the GLM procedure (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Three separate experiments were conducted, and each experiment was regarded as a replicate. The differences (P < 0.05) between the means were evaluated with Tukey’s multiple comparison test, and the means and SEM were reported.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Figure 2Go shows the time-course of mTOR phosphorylation at Ser2448 following leucine treatment. The phosphorylation of mTOR reached maximal at 30 min following leucine treatment (Figure 2Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Time-course of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation due to leucine supplementation. The C2C12 cells were treated with 2 mM leucine and collected at 5, 15, 30, and 60 min later for the analyses of mTOR phosphorylation at Ser2448 by immunoblotting. A representative immunoblot and mean ± SEM (n = 3) were reported. a,bBars that do not have a common superscript differ, P < 0.05.

 
Leucine treatment stimulated the phosphorylation of mTOR and its downstream effector, ribosomal protein S6 kinase at 30 min following leucine treatment (Figure 3a,d,eGo). No difference in actin content was detected, showing that the differences observed for the phosphorylated mTOR and S6K were not due to sample loading differences (Figure 3aGo). This upregulation of mTOR signaling due to leucine treatment might be related to the inhibition of AMPK activity. Leucine treatment reduced the activity of AMPK by 43.6 ± 3.5% (P < 0.05, Figure 3cGo). The phosphorylation of AMPK{alpha} at Thr172, which is correlated with the AMPK activity, was also reduced for 28.6 ± 4.9% (P < 0.05, Figure 3bGo).


Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effect of leucine on mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in C2C12 cells. The cells were incubated in the presence of 2 mM leucine or an activator of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase [AMPK; ß-D-ribofuranosyl)-5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AICAr)], or both. A) Representative blots showing the phosphorylation of AMPK{alpha}, mTOR, and S6K. B) Mean ± SEM (n = 3) for the phosphorylation of AMPK{alpha}. C) Mean ± SEM (n = 3) for the activity of AMPK. D) Mean ± SEM (n = 3) for the phosphorylation of mTOR. E) Mean ± SEM (n = 3) for the phosphorylation of S6K. a–cBars that do not have a common superscript differ, P < 0.05.

 
To confirm the role of AMPK activation in the regulation of mTOR signaling, (ß-D-ribofuranosyl)-5-amino-imidazole-4-carboxamide (AICAr), a specific activator of AMPK, was used to activate AMPK. Activation of AMPK by AICAr dramatically inhibited mTOR and S6K phosphorylation (Figure 3dGo). When applying AICAr, leucine treatment did not change phosphorylation or activity of AMPK (Figure 3b,cGo). No significant increase in the phosphorylation of mTOR and S6K due to leucine treatment was observed in cells treated with AICAr.

The ATP content in cells was significantly increased following leucine treatment. The AMP/ATP ratio was decreased from 0.22 ± 0.04 to 0.14 ± 0.02 (P < 0.05). Because AMPK is activated when the AMP/ATP ratio in cell increases, the reduction in AMPK activity is likely due to the decrease in AMP/ATP ratio after leucine treatment. To further identify whether the increase of AMP/ATP ratio was due to leucine specific effect or due to a general increase in energy sources, other substrates, including 2 mM glucose, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, and 2 mM D-leucine, were added separately into medium. Phosphorylatoin of mTOR and AMP/ATP ratio were analyzed after 30-min incubation (Figure 4Go). L-Leucine and D-leucine were equally effective in enhancing mTOR signaling, whereas glucose and pyruvate slightly increased mTOR signaling. Addition of L-Leucine, D-Leucine, and pyruvate decreased the AMP/ATP ratio in myoblast cells (P < 0.05, Figure 4Go).


Figure 4
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effect of L-leucine, D-leucine, glucose, and pyruvate on mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and the adenosine monophosphate/ATP ratio in C2C12 cells. The cells were incubated in the presence of 2 mM L-leucine, D-leucine, glucose, or pyruvate for 30 min. Mean ± SEM (n = 3) for the phosphorylation of mTOR and the AMP/ATP ratio. a–cBars that do not have a common superscript differ, P < 0.05.

 
To further show the role of AMPK in the upregulation of mTOR signaling following leucine treatment, myoblast cells expressing dominant negative AMPK{alpha} subunit (negative) were employed. Such myoblasts have a very low AMPK activity (Mu et al., 2001Go). In these myoblast cells, leucine stimulated the phosphorylation of mTOR by 26.1 ± 10.2% (Figure 5a,bGo). This mTOR phosphorylation was weaker compared with the phosphorylation of mTOR (59.2 ± 5.7%) in wild-type myoblasts following leucine treatment (Figure 5c,dGo). Because the major difference between negative and wild-type myoblasts was AMPK activity, these data show that AMPK is involved in the mTOR activation induced by leucine.


Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Effect of leucine on mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in myoblast cells over-expressing dominant negative adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) {alpha}2 subunit (negative) and wild-type control cells. Mean ± SEM (n = 3) for the phosphorylation of mTOR in control cells and negative cells. a,bBars that do not have a common superscript differ, P < 0.05.

 
Leucine treatment increased the protein synthesis by 30.6 ± 6.1% (P < 0.05) and the application of AICAr inhibited synthesis by 42.1 ± 6.1% (P < 0.05, Figure 6Go) in C2C12 myoblast cells. This result is in agreement with the activation of mTOR signaling following leucine treatment and inhibition of mTOR signaling by AICAr (Figures 3Go and 6Go). In contrast, no difference in protein synthesis was observed for negative cells due to leucine or AICAr treatment, though a similar numerical change was observed as in C2C12 cells (Figure 6Go). This numerical change could be due to the residual AMPK activity in negative cells.


Figure 6
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effect of leucine and (ß-D-ribofuranosyl)-5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide (AICAr) on protein synthesis in C2C12 and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-negative cells. Cells were incubated in the presence of 2 mM leucine or AICAr, or both. Mean ± SEM (n = 3). a–cBars that do not have a common superscript differ, P < 0.05.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling is one of the major cell signaling pathways controlling protein synthesis (Figure 1Go). Phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by mTOR releases eIF4E, which instead binds to eIF4G and initiates translation. The mTOR directly phosphorylates S6K and S6K phosphorylates ribosomal protein S6 (Jefferies et al., 1997Go; Bodine et al., 2001Go). Phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 drives translation of a small family of abundant transcripts that encode primarily ribosomal proteins and components of the translational apparatus (Jefferies et al., 1997Go; Schmelzle and Hall, 2000Go). Thus, activation of mTOR upregulates the translational machinery and promotes protein translation (Schmelzle and Hall, 2000Go; Shen et al., 2005Go). Mammalian target of rapamycin is a large protein with a molecular weight around 290 kDa. Growth factors, such as insulin and IGF-I, activate PI3K/Akt pathway, leading to mTOR phosphorylation, cell growth, and proliferation (Anthony et al., 2001Go). The nature of the upstream kinases involved in the activation of mTOR remains controversial (McManus and Alessi, 2002Go; Inoki et al., 2003Go; Ma et al., 2005Go).

Adenosine monophosphate activated-protein kinase is mainly recognized as a critical regulator of energy metabolism, which is a heterotrimeric enzyme with {alpha}, ß, and {gamma} subunits (Hardie, 2005Go). Each subunit exists as isoforms ({alpha}1, {alpha}2, ß1, ß2, {gamma} 1, {gamma} 2, {gamma} 3; Hardie, 2004Go). The {alpha} subunit is the catalytic unit, the {gamma} subunit has a regulatory function, and the ß unit provides anchorage sites for {alpha} and {gamma} (Sambandam and Lopaschuk, 2003Go). Adenosine monophosphate activated-protein kinase acts as a monitor of cellular AMP/ATP ratio, and is switched on by an increase in the AMP/ATP ratio, an indicator of low energy level in cells (Hardie, 2004Go).

Numerous studies show that leucine supplementation stimulates protein synthesis in skeletal muscle (Anthony et al., 2001Go; Lynch et al., 2003Go; Lang and Frost, 2005Go). This stimulation of protein synthesis involves the upregulation of mTOR signaling (Lynch et al., 2003Go; Tokunaga et al., 2004Go). Amino acids, leucine in particular, independently stimulate protein synthesis through pathways separated from insulin signaling (O’Connor et al., 2003Go). Mechanisms of amino acid in the control of mTOR signaling are poorly understood.

Leucine and other BCAA have a distinct metabolic pathway compared with other amino acids. Other amino acids are mainly degraded in liver. However, due to the absence of BCAT in liver, BCAA are degraded primarily in skeletal muscle (Sweatt et al., 2004Go). Leucine is oxidized to isovaleryl-CoA and NADH in skeletal muscle, resulting in increased ATP synthesis (Lynch et al., 2003Go; Tokunaga et al., 2004Go). In spite of studies regarding to the oxidation of leucine for energy, no study was conducted to assess the contribution of AMPK inhibition to the activation of mTOR signaling induced by leucine. Here, we assessed the contribution of AMPK to the activation of mTOR signaling induced by leucine in a model system.

Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase may control the activation of mTOR and protein synthesis through several possible mechanisms. First, AMPK phosphorylates TSC2 directly, thereby enhancing the activity of TSC1/TSC2 complex (Inoki et al., 2003Go). Activated TSC2 acts through Rheb to inhibit mTOR function (Gao et al., 2002Go). Second, AMPK may also inhibit the activity of mTOR directly by phosphorylation at Thr2446. The phosphorylation at Thr2446 and Ser2448 is mutually exclusive and might act as a switch to integrate energy status with protein synthesis (Cheng et al., 2004Go). Third, AMPK phosphorylates and inhibits the activity of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2). The activation of AMPK by AICAr activates eEF2 kinase, which phosphorylates and inactivates eEF2 (Horman et al., 2002Go; Browne et al., 2004Go), leading to the inhibition of protein synthesis (Bolster et al., 2002Go; Browne et al., 2004Go).

Leucine treatment increased ATP content in muscle cells and reduced the AMP/ATP ratio, confirming that leucine was used to generate energy in muscle cells. To test whether this is due to a L-leucine specific effect, D-leucine, glucose, and pyruvate were used to treat cells. As did L-leucine, D-leucine also reduced AMP/ATP ratio in cells. The reason for this reduction in AMP/ATP ratio could be due to the presence of D-amino acid oxidase in skeletal muscle (Wang and Zhu, 2003Go). D-Leucine is converted to {alpha}-ketoisocaproic acid by D-amino acid oxidase and used for oxidation (Hasegawa et al., 2002Go). Similar to L-leucine and D-leucine, glucose and pyruvate also reduced AMP/ATP ratio in muscle cells. Alteration in AMP/ATP ratio inhibits AMPK activity (Hardie, 2004Go). Indeed, the AMPK activity was reduced due to leucine treatment. To show that AMPK indeed contributes to the upregulation of mTOR stimulated by leucine, we used myoblasts expressing dominant negative AMPK{alpha} subunit. In these cells, AMPK activity was very low. Without functional AMPK, the mTOR signaling induced by leucine was muted, showing that AMPK is involved in the leucine induced mTOR activation. Activation of AMPK by AICAr dramatically inhibited mTOR signaling, eliciting that AMPK is an important negative regulator of mTOR signaling. Thus, inhibition of AMPK activity due to leucine treatment contributes significantly to the activation of mTOR signaling and is a potential strategy to enhance protein synthesis and skeletal muscle growth. In a previous report in adipose tissue in rats, the major effect of leucine on mTOR signaling was demonstrated to be mainly through the direct stimulation on mTOR itself, rather than the metabolites of leucine (Lynch et al., 2003Go). This result is partially in agreement with our results because we showed that leucine stimulated mTOR signaling despite abolishing the function of AMPK. In addition, despite similar effects of leucine, glucose, and pyruvate in reducing AMP/ATP ratio in cells, leucine was more effective in enhancing mTOR signaling compared with glucose and pyruvate, showing that leucine stimulated mTOR signaling through an energy-independent mechanism. Furthermore, leucine supplementation provides energy to muscle cells, which inhibits AMPK and promotes mTOR signaling. Due to the unique catabolism pathway of BCAA compared with other amino acids, leucine is effectively oxidized by skeletal muscle in vivo (Sweatt et al., 2004Go), which provides energy and contributes to mTOR activation through AMPK inhibition.

This study shows that AMPK is an important negative regulator of mTOR signaling in muscle. Data suggested that mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in muscle can be enhanced by proper nutritional management to inhibit AMPK activity, resulting in enhanced muscle growth. The important role of AMPK in muscle growth is elegantly shown in Hampshire pigs carrying Rendement Napole (RN) gene. A mutation in the AMPK {gamma}3 subunit was identified as the reason for the RN genotype whereby lean growth is enhanced (Enfalt et al., 1997Go; Milan et al., 2000Go). It is quite possible that AMPK mutation in RN pigs causes enhanced mTOR signaling which leads to enhanced muscle growth, and further investigation is needed to confirm this hypothesis.

In summary, we demonstrate that AMPK activation downregulates mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in myoblasts. Leucine stimulates mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in muscle cells in part through inhibition of AMPK. These data implicate that nutritional management to inhibit AMPK is a potential strategy to promote mTOR signaling and protein synthesis in muscle cells, enhancing lean growth in livestock.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by National Research Initiative Grants 2004-35503-14792 and 2006-55618-16914 from the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service. The monoclonal antibody of actin developed by Jim Jung-Ching Lin was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by the University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences, Iowa City 52242. Back

2 Corresponding author: mindu{at}uwyo.edu

Received for publication May 26, 2006. Accepted for publication December 11, 2006.


    LITERATURE CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 


Anthony, J. C., T. G. Anthony, S. R. Kimball, and L. S. Jefferson. 2001. Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J. Nutr. 131:856S–860S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bodine, S. C., T. N. Stitt, M. Gonzalez, W. O. Kline, G. L. Stover, R. Bauerlein, E. Zlotchenko, A. Scrimgeour, J. C. Lawrence, D. J. Glass, and G. D. Yancopoulos. 2001. Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:1014–1019.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bolster, D. R., S. J. Crozier, S. R. Kimball, and L. S. Jefferson. 2002. AMP-activated protein kinase suppresses protein synthesis in rat skeletal muscle through down-regulated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 277:23977–23980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bolster, D. R., N. Kubica, S. J. Crozier, D. L. Williamson, P. A. Farrell, S. R. Kimball, and L. S. Jefferson. 2003. Immediate response of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signalling following acute resistance exercise in rat skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 553:213–220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Browne, G. J., S. G. Finn, and C. G. Proud. 2004. Stimulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase leads to activation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase and to its phosphorylation at a novel site, serine 398. J. Biol. Chem. 279:12220–12231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cheng, S. W., L. G. Fryer, D. Carling, and P. R. Shepherd. 2004. Thr2446 is a novel mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) phosphorylation site regulated by nutrient status. J. Biol. Chem. 279:15719–15722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Du, M., M. J. Zhu, W. J. Means, B. W. Hess, and S. P. Ford. 2004. Effect of nutrient restriction on calpain and calpastatin content of skeletal muscle from cows and fetuses. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2541–2547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Enfalt, A. C., K. Lundstrom, I. Hansson, S. Johansen, and P. E. Nystrom. 1997. Comparison of non-carriers and heterozygous carriers of the RN- allele for carcass composition, muscle distribution and technological meat quality in Hampshire-sired pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 47:221–229.

Gao, X., Y. Zhang, P. Arrazola, O. Hino, T. Kobayashi, R. S. Yeung, B. Ru, and D. Pan. 2002. Tsc tumour suppressor proteins antagonize amino-acid-TOR signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:699–704.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hao, L., M. Du, A. Lopez-Campistrous, and C. Fernandez-Patron. 2004. Agonist-induced activation of matrix metalloproteinase-7 promotes vasoconstriction through the epidermal growth factor-receptor pathway. Circ. Res. 94:68–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hara, K., Y. Maruki, X. Long, K. Yoshino, N. Oshiro, S. Hidayat, C. Tokunaga, J. Avruch, and K. Yonezawa. 2002. Raptor, a binding partner of target of rapamycin (TOR), mediates TOR action. Cell 110:177–189.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hardie, D. G. 2004. AMP-activated protein kinase: A key system mediating metabolic responses to exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36:28–34.

Hardie, D. G. 2005. New roles for the LKB1 -> AMPK pathway. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17:167–173.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hasegawa, H., T. Matsukawa, Y. Shinohara, and T. Hashimoto. 2002. Kinetics of sequential metabolism from D-leucine to L-leucine via alpha-ketoisocaproic acid in rat. Drug Metab. Dispos. 30:1436–1440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Horman, S., G. Browne, U. Krause, J. Patel, D. Vertommen, L. Bertrand, A. Lavoinne, L. Hue, C. Proud, and M. Rider. 2002. Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase leads to the phosphorylation of elongation factor 2 and an inhibition of protein synthesis. Curr. Biol. 12:1419–1423.[CrossRef][Medline]

Inoki, K., T. Zhu, and K. L. Guan. 2003. TSC2 mediates cellular energy response to control cell growth and survival. Cell 115:577–590.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jefferies, H. B., S. Fumagalli, P. B. Dennis, C. Reinhard, R. B. Pearson, and G. Thomas. 1997. Rapamycin suppresses 5' TOP mRNA translation through inhibition of p70s6k. EMBO J. 16:3693–3704.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kim, J., R. S. Solis, E. B. Arias, and G. D. Cartee. 2004. Postcontraction insulin sensitivity: Relationship with contraction protocol, glycogen concentration, and 5' AMP-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. J. Appl. Physiol. 96:575–583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lang, C. H., and R. A. Frost. 2005. Endotoxin disrupts the leucine-signaling pathway involving phosphorylation of mTOR, 4E-BP1, and S6K1 in skeletal muscle. J. Cell. Physiol. 203:144–155.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lynch, C. J., B. Halle, H. Fujii, T. C. Vary, R. Wallin, Z. Damuni, and S. M. Hutson. 2003. Potential role of leucine metabolism in the leucine-signaling pathway involving mTOR. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 285:E854–E863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ma, L., Z. Chen, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and P. P. Pandolfi. 2005. Phosphorylation and functional inactivation of TSC2 by Erk implications for tuberous sclerosis and cancer pathogenesis. Cell 121:179–193.[CrossRef][Medline]

Martin, D. E., and M. N. Hall. 2005. The expanding TOR signaling network. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17:158–166.[CrossRef][Medline]

McManus, E. J., and D. R. Alessi. 2002. TSC1-TSC2: A complex tale of PKB-mediated S6K regulation. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:E214–E216.[CrossRef][Medline]

Milan, D., J. T. Jeon, C. Looft, V. Amarger, A. Robic, M. Thelander, C. Rogel-Gaillard, S. Paul, N. Iannuccelli, L. Rask, H. Ronne, K. Lundstrom, N. Reinsch, J. Gellin, E. Kalm, P. L. Roy, P. Chardon, and L. Andersson. 2000. A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle. Science 288:1248–1251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mu, J., J. T. Brozinick, Jr., O. Valladares, M. Bucan, and M. J. Birnbaum. 2001. A role for AMP-activated protein kinase in contraction- and hypoxia-regulated glucose transport in skeletal muscle. Mol. Cell 7:1085–1094.[CrossRef][Medline]

O’Connor, P. M., J. A. Bush, A. Suryawan, H. V. Nguyen, and T. A. Davis. 2003. Insulin and amino acids independently stimulate skeletal muscle protein synthesis in neonatal pigs. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 284:E110–E119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sakamoto, K., W. G. Aschenbach, M. F. Hirshman, and L. J. Goodyear. 2003. Akt signaling in skeletal muscle: Regulation by exercise and passive stretch. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 285:E1081–E1088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sambandam, N., and G. D. Lopaschuk. 2003. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) control of fatty acid and glucose metabolism in the ischemic heart. Prog. Lipid Res. 42:238–256.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schmelzle, T., and M. N. Hall. 2000. TOR, a central controller of cell growth. Cell 103:253–262.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shen, W. H., D. W. Boyle, P. Wisniowski, A. Bade, and E. A. Liechty. 2005. Insulin and IGF-I stimulate the formation of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4F complex and protein synthesis in C2C12 myotubes independent of availability of external amino acids. J. Endocrinol. 185:275–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shen, Q. W., W. J. Means, K. R. Underwood, S. A. Thompson, M. J. Zhu, R. J. McCormick, S. P. Ford, M. Ellis, and M. Du. 2006. Early post-mortem AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation leads to phosphofructokinase-2 and -1 (PFK-2 and PFK-1) phosphorylation and the development of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) conditions in porcine longissimus muscle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:5583–5589.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sweatt, A. J., M. Wood, A. Suryawan, R. Wallin, M. C. Willingham, and S. M. Hutson. 2004. Branched-chain amino acid catabolism: Unique segregation of pathway enzymes in organ systems and peripheral nerves. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 286:E64–E76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tokunaga, C., K. Yoshino, and K. Yonezawa. 2004. mTOR integrates amino acid- and energy-sensing pathways. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 313:443–446.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wang, L. Z., and X. Z. Zhu. 2003. Spatiotemporal relationships among D-serine, serine racemase, and D-amino acid oxidase during mouse postnatal development. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 24:965–974.[Medline]

Yang, X., M. J. Zhu, N. Sreejayan, J. Ren, and M. Du. 2005. Angiotensin II promotes smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration through release of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor and activation of EGF-receptor pathway. Mol. Cells 20:263–270.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhu, M. J., S. P. Ford, W. J. Means, B. W. Hess, P. W. Nathanielsz, and M. Du. 2006. Maternal nutrient restriction affects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring. J. Physiol. 575:241–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu, M. J., S. P. Ford, P. W. Nathanielsz, and M. Du. 2004. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction in sheep on the development of fetal skeletal muscle. Biol. Reprod. 71:1968–1973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. G. Anthony and J. C. Anthony
AMPing Down Leucine Action in Skeletal Muscle
J. Nutr., December 1, 2008; 138(12): 2307 - 2308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. M. Pruznak, A. A. Kazi, R. A. Frost, T. C. Vary, and C. H. Lang
Activation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase by 5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide-1-{beta}-D-Ribonucleoside Prevents Leucine-Stimulated Protein Synthesis in Rat Skeletal Muscle
J. Nutr., October 1, 2008; 138(10): 1887 - 1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-342v1
85/4/919    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Du, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, S. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS