J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2006. 84:2065-2071. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-695
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suteevun, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, X. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suteevun, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, X. C.

ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

Epigenetic characteristics of cloned and in vitro-fertilized swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos1

T. Suteevun*,{dagger}, R. Parnpai*, S. L. Smith{dagger}, C-C. Chang{dagger}, S. Muenthaisong* and X. C. Tian{dagger},2

* Embryo Technology and Stem Cell Research Center and School of Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand; and {dagger} Center for Regenerative Biology and Department of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Swamp buffalos are becoming endangered due to reproductive inefficiencies. This is of concern because many countries depend heavily on their products. Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is a potential strategy for preserving endangered species. To date, SCNT in swamp buffalo has succeeded in the creation of blastocyst embryos. However, development to term of SCNT swamp buffalos is extremely limited, and only 1 live birth has been reported. An abnormal epigenetic mechanism is suspected to be the cause of developmental failure, as is also seen in other species. The DNA methylation and histone acetylation are key players in epigenetic modification and display marked variability during embryonic preimplantation development. Knowledge of epigenetic modifications will aid in solving the developmental problems of SCNT embryos and improving reproductive technology in the swamp buffalo. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between preimplantation embryonic development and 2 epigenetic patterns, global DNA methylation and histone acetylation, in SCNT and in vitro-fertilized (IVF) swamp buffalo embryos. In addition, we examined the correlations between those 2 mechanisms in the SCNT and IVF swamp buffalo embryos throughout the developmental stages using double immunostaining and quantification of the emission intensities using confocal microscopy. We discovered an aberrant methylation pattern in early preimplantation-stage swamp buffalo SCNT embryos. In addition, greater variability in the DNA methylation levels among nuclei within SCNT embryos was discovered. Hyperacetylation was also observed in SCNT embryos compared with IVF embryos at the 4- and 8-cell stages (P < 0.05). Dynamic changes and interplay between these 2 epigenetic mechanisms could be crucial for embryonic development during the early preimplantation period. The aberrancies uncovered here may contribute to the low efficiency of SCNT.

Key Words: DNA methylation • epigenetics • histone acetylation • nuclear transfer • preimplantation embryo • swamp buffalo


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) is a multipurpose animal. Many countries depend heavily on the buffalo’s meat, milk, and labor. Thus, the importance of the swamp buffalo is equal to cattle in many regions of the world. However, the buffalo population in many countries has been reduced drastically because of a very low birth rate. Because of this, the swamp buffalo may be endangered and could potentially become extinct. Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) or cloning is a potentially useful strategy for the prevention of extinction of an animal species. In 1999, Parnpai et al. (1999)Go reported successful creation of swamp buffalo cloned blastocysts. However, to date only 1 live-born cloned swamp buffalo, which died a few days after birth, has only been reported in the news (http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2005-03/21/content_2724026.htm; last accessed 6 February, 2006). This low efficiency seems to be a common trait of SCNT in all species in which live animals have been obtained. The success of SCNT has increased significantly in species such as cattle because of the large number of studies conducted to improve the nuclear transfer procedure in the bovine. However, there have been very few studies with the swamp buffalo because of the limited population distribution of the species.

It is known that SCNT can reprogram a differentiated somatic cell to a totipotent state because cloned animals are born with all tissue types (Kikyo et al., 2000Go; Wade and Kikyo, 2002Go). However, incomplete nuclear reprogramming is believed to be the cause of developmental failure in cloned animals. Nuclear reprogramming is brought about by epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone acetylation, which do not involve changes in the DNA sequence. The assessment of the epigenetic status in cloned embryos of different species is valuable to learn more about its role in early mammalian development and determine any relationship with low cloning efficiency. In the current study, we report for the first time DNA methylation and histone acetylation patterns in preimplantation, swamp buffalo SCNT embryos compared with in vitro-fertilized (IVF) embryos.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
All procedures using animals were approved by the Suranaree University of Technology’s equivalent to an animal use and care committee in Thailand.

Donor Cell Preparation
Ear skin was biopsied from a swamp buffalo at a local abattoir and kept in modified Dulbeccco’s phosphate buffered saline (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 4° C during transportation to the laboratory. Skin tissues were removed from cartilage and cut into small pieces (about 1 mm2) before being placed in a 60-mm culture dish (Nunc GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany) and covered with a glass slide. Five milliliters of alpha modified Eagle’s medium ({alpha}MEM, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen) was added to the dish, and the tissue was cultured under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37.0° C.

Fibroblast outgrowths from the ear skin tissue were harvested and seeded into a 25-cm2 culture flask (Nunc, GmbH & Co. KG) in {alpha}MEM plus 10% FBS. To preserve these cells, skin fibroblasts were frozen with 10% di-methyl sulfoxide (Sigma) in {alpha}MEM plus 20% FBS at the third cell culture passage and stored in liquid nitrogen. For SCNT, frozen-thawed fibroblasts were cultured for 4 to 8 passages in {alpha}MEM plus 10% FBS and used as nuclear donor cells. The subconfluent donor cells were resuspended in Emcare medium (ICPBio, Auckland, New Zealand) before injection and were not subjected to serum starvation.

Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
Swamp buffalo oocytes derived from abattoir-collected ovaries were matured in vitro for 22 h (Parnpai et al., 1999Go). Cumulus cells were mechanically removed by repeated pipetting in 0.2% hyaluronidase using a fine-tip pipette, and the oocytes were subsequently washed 5 times in Emcare medium. For enucleation, matured oocytes were placed into culture medium containing 5 µg of cytochalasin B (Sigma)/mL for 15 min. The zona pellucida above the first polar body was cut with a glass needle, and a small volume (about 10%) of the cytoplasm was extracted. Complete enucleation was confirmed by staining with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma).

To transfer the donor cells, individual fibroblasts were injected into the perivitelline space of the enucleated oocytes, and fusion was initiated by placing the couplets into Zimmerman fusion medium (Zimmermann and Vienken, 1982Go) followed by electrical stimulation using 2 DC pulses at 26 V, for 17 µs using a SUT F-1 stimulator (Suranaree University of Technology, Nakorn Ratchasima, Thailand). The reconstructed embryos were activated in 7% ethanol for 5 min and then cultured in modified synthetic oviductal fluid culture media (mSOF; Gardner et al., 1994Go) containing 3 mg of BSA (Sigma)/mL, 1.25 µg of cytochalasin D (Sigma)/mL and 10 µg of cycloheximide (Sigma)/mL for 5 h.

Activated embryos were cultured for 2 d in 100-µL droplets of mSOF under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 at 38.5° C. The 8-cell stage embryos were selected and cocultured for another 5 d in 100-µL droplets of mSOF with bovine oviductal epithelial cells under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 38.5° C. Embryos at 2-, 4-, and 8-cell, morula, and blastocyst stages were collected at 22, 28, 34, 108, and 132 h postactivation, respectively. All embryos at the 2-, 4-, 8-cell, morula, and blastocyst stages were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stored at 4° C until further analysis.

In Vitro Fertilization
In vitro-fertilized embryos were selected as control embryos in this study because in vivo swamp buffalo embryos are very difficult to obtain due to the lack of experimental animals and the lack of information on superovulation and nonsurgical flushing methods. Although IVF embryos have less developmental competence than those produced in vivo, they do not suffer the extreme embryonic/fetal loss that is commonly seen in SCNT (Heyman et al., 2002Go). Additionally, in bovine SCNT studies, IVF embryos are commonly compared with SCNT embryos, even though in vivo-produced embryos are more readily attained (Daniels et al., 2000Go; Bourc’his et al., 2001Go; Wrenzycki et al., 2002Go). Therefore, whereas the use of in vivo-derived embryos is ideal, comparing IVF embryos with those produced by SCNT is a meaningful and well-accepted alternative.

To control for variation from genetic differences, buffalo semen from the same bull was used for the production of IVF embryos. Frozen semen was thawed at 37° C and washed twice by centrifugation at 500 x g for 7 min in Brackett and Oliphant (BO) medium (Brackett and Oliphant, 1975Go) without BSA but supplemented with 10 mM caffeine (caffeine-BO; Sigma). The pellet was resuspended in caffeine-BO at the concentration of 8 x 106 sperm/mL and then diluted with an equal volume of BO medium supplemented with 20 mg of BSA/mL and 20 µg of heparin (Sigma)/mL.

After 22 h of maturation, the cumulus oocyte complexes were transferred into 100-µL droplets of sperm suspension under mineral oil (Sigma) and incubated for 2 d under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, 90% N2 at 38.5° C. Eight-cell stage embryos were selected and cocultured for another 5 d in 100-µL droplets of mSOF with bovine oviductal epithelial cells under humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 38.5° C. Embryo collection and fixation were as described for SCNT embryos.

Immunostaining of Preimplantation Buffalo Embryos
Fixed embryos were washed in PBS before permeabilization in 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma). Embryonic DNA was denatured by incubation of the fixed embryos in 4 N HCl for 1 h at 37° C, and then to prevent nonspecific binding the fixed embryos were incubated in PBS containing 2% BSA (PBS-BSA 2%) for 1 h. Embryos were stained with a 1:50 dilution of primary mouse monoclonal antibody against 5-Methylcytosine (Eurogen-tech, San Diego, CA) and a 1:50 dilution of primary rabbit monoclonal antibody against acetylated histone H3 lysine 18 (H3K18; Cell Signaling-Technologies Inc., Boston, MA). Embryos were subsequently incubated in fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG, 1:100; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and in Texas Red isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:100; Jackson ImmunoResearch), respectively. Individual embryos were mounted on slides by using 50% glycerol.

Confocal Microscopy
The immunostained embryos were observed with confocal microscopy (TCSSP2 True scanning, Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany). The DNA methylation and histone acetylation on H3K18 were analyzed and quantified by manually outlining a limited area of each individual nucleus at the brightest focal plane for the emission frequencies of FITC and TRITC. Emission intensities of all individual nuclei of embryos at the 2-, 4-, and 8-cell stages, and 20 nuclei per morula and 30 nuclei per blastocyst were captured and automatically converted to an arbitrary fluorescence unit and recorded. Arbitrary fluorescence intensity of each nucleus in an embryo was used to represent the DNA methylation/histone acetylation of that nucleus, and the level of global DNA methylation/histone acetylation of an embryo was represented by the sum of all analyzed nuclei in that embryo. Experiments were performed in 4 replicates per stage with 3 embryos per replicate (n = 12) for each embryo type. Appropriate controls for autofluorescence and nonspecific binding by the secondary antibodies were used to subtract the background from the arbitrary fluorescence measurements.

Blastocyst Counter-Stain and Cell Count
To distinguish cells of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE), embryos were counterstained. Briefly, the zona pellucidas of blastocysts at 6.5 d postactivation/insemination were removed by 0.5% protease (Sigma) and washed in SOF medium. The zona-free blastocysts were incubated in 10% rabbit anti-buffalo spleenocyte antibodies generated in our lab (Iwasaki et al., 1990Go) for 45 min before subsequent transfer into a mixture of 10% guinea pig complement (Sigma), 75 µg of propidium iodide (Sigma)/mL, and 100 µg of Hoechst 33258 (Bis-benzimide; Sigma)/mL for 45 min. The ICM cells (blue) and TE (red) cells were counted under UV light-fluorescence microscopy.

Statistical Analysis
Data analyses for differences in embryonic development, and for DNA methylation and histone acetylation, as assessed by relative amounts of arbitrary FITC and TRITC emission signals, respectively, were carried out by ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS (version 9.0, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Main effects were embryo type (SCNT or IVF), stage of embryo development, and day of analysis. The interaction of embryo type and stage also was included in the model. We tested the normality and homogeneity of variance assumptions of all data sets before ANOVA. In an attempt to satisfy these assumptions, the histone acetylation and DNA methylation data were log transformed. The transformation was effective for all data sets except for the global DNA methylation, for which the normality was only slightly improved.

The predicted difference function of the GLM procedure was used to compare least squares means among the developmental stages and between the embryo types. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. To determine any relationship between DNA methylation and histone acetylation on a per embryo basis (sum of intensities from each nucleus within an embryo) and a per developmental stage basis (sum of intensities of all nuclei from the 12 embryos per stage within an embryo type), Pearson correlation was used.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Preimplantation Development of Swamp Buffalo Embryos
Developmental rates of SCNT and IVF swamp buffalo embryos are summarized in Table 1Go. Stable losses were seen throughout embryo development in both IVF and SCNT groups. In most cases, developmental rates for embryos derived from SCNT were less than those for embryos derived from IVF. A significant difference (P < 0.05) in development to the blastocyst stage was observed between the 2 types of embryos. Interestingly, the most dramatic loss of SCNT embryos, as much as 42%, occurred during development from the 8-cell to the morula stage. In the blastocysts, there were 3 times as many cells in the TE as in the ICM in embryos from both groups. No differences, however, were observed in the number of cells in ICM or TE, or the proportion of ICM over total cells between blastocysts from SCNT or IVF.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Development of preimplantation swamp buffalo embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and in vitro fertilization (IVF)1
 
DNA Methylation in Preimplantation Swamp Buffalo Embryos
Representative images of SCNT and IVF preimplantation embryos immunostained for DNA methylation are shown in Figure 1AGo. To compare with previously published data, we obtained and analyzed data for global DNA methylation of the entire embryo because these data were the only criterion used in studies of methylation status of SCNT embryos in other species. Additionally, we also obtained and analyzed data from individual nuclei in each embryo because the DNA methylation status in a particular nucleus is independent of that in another nucleus of the same embryo. Furthermore, mosaic DNA methylation of different nuclei in SCNT embryos has been observed (Dean et al., 2001Go). The DNA methylation in each nucleus, as represented by the means of arbitrary fluorescence intensities of nuclei of SCNT and IVF embryos at various embryonic developmental stages, is shown in Figure 1BGo. In both types of embryos, the relative levels of DNA methylation per nuclei decreased from the 2-cell stage until the 8-cell stage, where they reached a nadir. Then, levels of DNA methylation/nucleus began to increase at the morula stage and reached the greatest level at the blastocyst stage. Additionally, DNA methylation levels of nuclei from SCNT embryos were much more variable than those in IVF embryos, from 102 to 7,795 vs. 78 to 3,894 arbitrary units of FITC emission intensity. This demonstrates the highly heterogenic nature of DNA methylation in cloned embryos.


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The DNA methylation in swamp buffalo somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and in vitro-fertilized (IVF) embryos. (A) Representative images of SCNT (top row) and IVF (bottom row) swamp buffalo embryos stained for 5-Methylcytosine at the 2-cell to the blastocyst stages. (B) Relative levels of DNA methylation per nucleus (mean ± SEM) in SCNT (white bars) and IVF embryos (gray bars). Different letters (a, b) depict differences (P < 0.05) in relative levels of DNA methylation across developmental stages within each embryo type. (C) Relative levels of global DNA methylation (mean ± SEM) in SCNT (white bars) and IVF embryos (gray bars). Different letters (a, b) depict differences (P < 0.05) in relative levels of global DNA methylation between embryo types at the same developmental stage.

 
The relative level of global methylation for each embryo (Figure 1CGo), as represented by the sum of arbitrary fluorescence intensities of all analyzed nuclei in the embryo, was also greater (P < 0.05) in embryos derived from SCNT at the 4-cell, 8-cell, and morula stages.

Histone Acetylation in Preimplantation Swamp Buffalo Embryo
Representative images of SCNT and IVF buffalo embryos immunostained for acetylated histones are shown in Figure 2AGo. Mean relative levels of histone acetylation from each nuclei of SCNT and IVF embryos at various stages of embryonic development are shown in Figure 2BGo. Overall, we observed similar patterns in the relative levels of histone acetylation in nuclei of SCNT and IVF embryos throughout preimplantation development. In embryos of both types, histone acetylation increased moderately from 2- to 4-cell stages, which was followed by a decrease to a nadir at the morula stage. Subsequently, histone acetylation/nucleus increased again to the greatest level at the blastocyst stage. Similar to the DNA methylation data, the relative levels of histone acetylation of individual nuclei of the SCNT embryos were also highly variable, from 45 to 3,279 in the SCNT embryos vs. 43 to 2,889 arbitrary units of TRITC emission intensity in the IVF embryos. Globally, greater relative levels of histone acetylation were observed in the SCNT embryos than in the IVF embryos at the 4-(P < 0.01) and 8-cell (P < 0.02) stages (Figure 2CGo).


Figure 2
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Histone acetylation in swamp buffalo somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and in vitro-fertilized (IVF) embryos. (A) Representative images of SCNT (top row) and IVF (bottom row) swamp buffalo embryos stained for acetylation of histone H3 lysine 18at the 2-cell to the blastocyst stages. (B) Relative levels of histone acetylation per nucleus (mean ± SEM) in SCNT (white bars) and IVF embryos (gray bars). Different letters (a, b) depict differences (P < 0.05) in relative levels of histone acetylation across developmental stages within each embryo type. (C) Relative levels of global histone acetylation (mean ± SEM) in SCNT (white bars) and IVF embryos (gray bars). Different letters (a, b) depict differences (P < 0.05) in relative levels of global histone acetylation between embryo types at the same developmental stage.

 
Correlation of Relative Levels of DNA Methylation and Histone Acetylation During Preimplantation Development
It was reported previously that for individual genes that are under epigenetic regulation, such as those imprinted or X-linked, the levels of DNA methylation and acetylation of histone H3 or H4 or both are inversely correlated (Yoshida et al., 1990Go; Kharroubi et al., 2001Go). Therefore, we analyzed correlations of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in buffalo embryos in the current study. Significant positive correlations were found between relative levels of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in IVF (r = 0.65) and SCNT embryos (r = 0.87) at the 2-cell stage. At the 4-cell stage, the correlation was significant (P < 0.05) in the SCNT embryos (r = 0.85) but not for the IVF embryos (r = 0.46). Interestingly for the 8-cell embryos, correlations between global histone acetylation and DNA methylation were reversed in the 2 embryo types, i.e., a significant positive correlation (r = 0.76) was found in the IVF embryos but not in the SCNT group (r = –0.1). When correlations in individual embryos were examined at this stage, 10 of 12 of the IVF embryos had significant positive correlations (r > 0.75), whereas most of SCNT embryos (9 of 12) showed low or negative correlations (–0.3 < r < 0.3). At the blastocyst stage, little correlation between DNA methylation and histone acetylation was found among the IVF or SCNT embryos (r < 0.3).


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Numerous studies have shown that incorrect DNA methylation patterns result in aberrant embryonic growth and development (Reik et al., 2001Go; Santos et al., 2003Go; Beaujean et al., 2004Go). There is evidence that aberrant DNA methylation leads to loss of imprinting (Li, 2002Go), which plays an essential role in fetal development. Furthermore, DNA methylation cooperates with histone deacetylation and heterochromatic proteins to cause the heterochromatin configuration and global gene silencing.

The DNA methylation has been studied in cloned embryos from numerous species. With the exception of the pig, all species have exhibited global DNA hypermethylation (Dean et al., 2001Go; Kang et al., 2001Go). Additionally, aberrant gene expression was also reported in cloned embryos (Daniels et al., 2001Go; Wrenzycki et al., 2001Go). The latter observation may be related to DNA methylation, which can directly and indirectly block transcription leading to aberrant gene expression and possible subsequent fetal abortion and developmental abnormalities in cloned animals.

During in vitro culture of SCNT and IVF buffalo embryos, a greater developmental arrest rate was found in SCNT embryos, and this developmental arrest was mostly observed during the 8-cell to morula stages. This observation is in agreement with a report by Kitiyanant et al. (2001)Go, who reported a 33% blastocyst rate after a decline from a 77% cleavage rate in swamp buffalos embryos during in vitro production. This arrest in embryonic development is correlated with the beginning of de novo DNA methylation as shown in bovine IVF embryos at this stage (Dean et al., 2001Go). The sharp decline in the development rate of the SCNT embryos at this stage observed in this study corresponds with the drastic changes in DNA methylation. Because DNA methylation has been shown to suppress gene expression, it is plausible that the hypermethylation may cause improper expression of developmentally important genes, which in turn leads to the developmental failure of the SCNT embryo.

Although there are no prior data for comparison in swamp buffalo SCNT or IVF embryos, the hypermethylation of DNA in SCNT swamp buffalo embryos and the dynamic changes of DNA methylation during embryo development observed in the current study are consistent with previous work in bovine SCNT embryos and other species (Dean et al., 2001Go; Kang et al., 2001Go; Beaujean et al., 2004Go). In bovine SCNT embryos, it was shown that both greater DNA de novo methylation and insufficient DNA demethylation account for the aberrant hypermethylation of DNA (Dean et al., 2001Go). It was also shown that greater levels of maternal DNA methylatransferase 1 (DNMT1), which is responsible for maintaining DNA methylation, were present in SCNT bovine embryos (Wrenzycki et al., 2001Go). Our previous work showed that DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B (genes responsible for de novo DNA methylation) were expressed at greater levels at the 8-cell and blastocyst stages in swamp buffalo SCNT embryos as compared with IVF embryos (Suteevun et al., 2005Go). Taken together, the hypermethylation observed here could result from lesser levels of demethylation and greater levels of de novo methylation in SCNT embryos. Additionally, the greater variation of DNA methylation in different nuclei of each SCNT buffalo embryo observed here may indicate that nuclear reprogramming occurs throughout preimplantation development and is incomplete in a proportion of the cells in the embryos.

Histone acetylation neutralizes the histone positive charge through binding of the acetyl group on lysine residue at histone N-terminus and allows chromatin decondensation and gene activation (Kikyo et al., 2000Go; Wade and Kikyo, 2002Go; Jaskelioff and Peterson, 2003Go). Enright et al. (2003)Go indicated that histone acetylation patterns in somatic cells can be remodeled in culture and that the lysine 18 on histone H3 (H3K18) is a common acetylated lysine position that is acetylated throughout the bovine embryonic stages. Therefore, we also chose to use the same antibody to detect histone acetylation status and found moderate histone hyperacetylation among the swamp buffalo SCNT embryos at all preimplantation stages except for the blastocyst stage. Additionally, when the global levels of histone acetylation were compared between SCNT and IVF embryos, we found significant hyperacetylation at the 4-cell and 8-cell stages. These findings agree with the study by Santos et al. (2003)Go, who reported hyperacetylation of H3K9 in bovine SCNT embryos at all embryonic stages examined. Surprisingly, we observed the least histone acetylation level at the morula stage among all preimplantation stages analyzed. The significance of this phenomenon in embryo development is unclear; however, it is possible that the pattern observed here is unique to swamp buffalo embryos.

Previously, negative correlations between the levels of DNA methylation and histone acetylation were found on chromatin of individual genes subjected to epigenetic regulation (Goto and Monk, 1998Go). We analyzed correlations between these 2 chromatin modifications on a whole cell and whole embryo basis. Also, for the first time, we studied correlations during many different stages of preimplantation development, whereas previous studies were limited to studying bovine blastocysts (Enright et al., 2003Go; Santos et al., 2003Go), which were found to be both hypermethylated and hyperacetylated. We found that swamp buffalo embryos at different stages of development have different correlations between global DNA methylation and histone acetylation, suggesting dramatic changes in chromatin modification during the early preimplantation period. Inconsistent correlations between DNA methylation and histone acetylation at the 4- and 8-cell stages in the IVF vs. SCNT embryos indicates that the interaction of these epigenetic mechanisms influences early embryonic development.

In summary, we generated SCNT swamp buffalo embryos and compared their epigenetic status with that of IVF embryos. We found that the SCNT embryos are not only hypermethylated and hyperacetylated but are also more heterogeneous in DNA methylation and histone acetylation among different cells of the same embryo than those in IVF embryos. Additionally, the anomalous correlations between DNA methylation and histone acetylation may contribute to the developmental failure seen in SCNT embryos.


    Footnotes
 
1 Acknowledgments: This work was funded by grants from the USDA, CSREES, NRI, to X. Cindy Tian. Partial work was supported by the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program of the Thailand Research Fund awarded to Rangsun Parnpai. The authors are grateful to Carol Curchoe for editing the manuscript, John Riesen for statistical consultation, Brian Enright for advice on immunochemistry, and Michele Barber for assistance with confocal microscopy. Back

2 Corresponding author: xiuchun.tian{at}uconn.edu

Received for publication December 1, 2005. Accepted for publication March 1, 2006.


    LITERATURE CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 


Beaujean, N., J. Taylor, J. Gardner, I. Wilmut, R. Meehan, and L. Young. 2004. Effect of limited DNA methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol. Reprod. 71:185–193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bourc’his, D., D. Le Bourhis, D. Patin, A. Niveleau, P. Comizzoli, J. P. Renard, and E. Viegas-Pequignot. 2001. Delayed and incomplete reprogramming of chromosome methylation patterns in bovine cloned embryos. Curr. Biol. 11:1542–1546.[CrossRef][Medline]

Brackett, B. G., and G. Oliphant. 1975. Capacitation of rabbit spermatozoa in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 12:260–274.[Abstract]

Daniels, R., V. J. Hall, A. J. French, N. A. Korfiatis, and A. O. Trounson. 2001. Comparison of gene transcription in cloned bovine embryos produced by different nuclear transfer techniques. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 60:281–288.[CrossRef][Medline]

Daniels, R., V. Hall, and A. O. Trounson. 2000. Analysis of gene transcription in bovine nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed with granulosa cell nuclei. Biol. Reprod. 63:1034–1040.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dean, W., F. Santos, M. Stojkovic, V. Zakhartchenko, J. Walter, E. Wolf, and W. Reik. 2001. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: Aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13734–13738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Enright, B. P., B. S. Jeong, X. Yang, and X. C. Tian. 2003. Epigenetic characteristics of bovine donor cells for nuclear transfer: Levels of histone acetylation. Biol. Reprod. 69:1525–1530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gardner, D. K., M. Lane, A. Spitzer, and P. A. Batt. 1994. Enhanced rates of cleavage and development for sheep zygotes cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro in the absence of serum and somatic cells: Amino acids, vitamins, and culturing embryos in groups stimulate development. Biol. Reprod. 50:390–400.[Abstract]

Goto, T., and M. Monk. 1998. Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation in development in mice and humans. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:362–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Heyman, Y., P. Chavette-Palmer, D. LeBourhis, S. Camous, X. Vignon, and J. P. Renard. 2002. Frequency and occurrence of late-gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biol. Reprod. 66:6–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Iwasaki, S., N. Yoshiba, H. Ushijima, S. Watanabe, and T. Nakahara. 1990. Morphology and proportion of inner cell mass of bovine blastocysts fertilized in vitro and in vivo. Reproduction 90:279–284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jaskelioff, M., and C. L. Peterson. 2003. Chromatin and transcription: Histones continue to make their marks. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:395–399.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kang, Y. K., D. B. Koo, J. S. Park, Y. H. Choi, A. S. Chung, K. K. Lee, and Y. M. Han. 2001. Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nat. Genet. 28:173–177.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kharroubi, A. E., G. Piras, and C. L. Stewart. 2001. DNA demethylation reactivates a subset of imprinted genes in uniparental mouse embryonic fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 276:8674–8680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kikyo, N., P. A. Wade, D. Guschin, H. Ge, and A. P. Wolffe. 2000. Active remodeling of somatic nuclei in egg cytoplasm by the nucleosomal ATPase ISWI. Science 289:2360–2362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kitiyanant, Y., J. Saikhun, B. Chaisalee, K. L. White, and K. Pavasuthipaisit. 2001. Somatic cell cloning in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): Effects of interspecies cytoplasmic recipients and activation procedures. Cloning Stem Cells 3:97–104.[CrossRef][Medline]

Li, E. 2002. Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:662–673.[CrossRef][Medline]

Parnpai, R., K. Tasripoo, and M. Kamonpatana. 1999. Development of cloned swamp buffalo embryos derived from fetal fibroblast: Comparison in vitro cultured with or without buffalo and cattle epithelial cells. Buffalo J. 15:371–384.

Reik, W., W. Dean, and J. Walter. 2001. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science 293:1089–1093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Santos, F., V. Zakhartchenko, M. Stojkovic, A. Peters, T. Jenuwein, E. Wolf, W. Reik, and W. Dean. 2003. Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine pre-implantation embryos. Curr. Biol. 13:1116–1121.[CrossRef][Medline]

Suteevun, T., S. L. Smith, S. Muenthaisong, X. Yang, R. Parnpai, and X. C. Tian. 2005. Anomalous mRNA levels of chromatin remodeling genes in swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) cloned embryos. Theriogenology. Epub 10-25-06.

Wade, P. A., and N. Kikyo. 2002. Chromatin remodeling in nuclear cloning. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:2284–2287.[Medline]

Wrenzycki, C., A. Lucas-Hahn, D. Herrmann, E. Lemme, K. Korsawe, and H. Niemann. 2002. In vitro production and nuclear transfer affect dosage compensation of the x-linked gene transcripts G6PD, PGK, and XIST in pre-implantation bovine embryos. Biol. Reprod. 66:127–134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wrenzycki, C., D. Wells, D. Herrmann, A. Miller, J. Oliver, R. Tervit, and H. Niemann. 2001. Nuclear transfer protocol affects messenger RNA expression patterns in cloned bovine blastocysts. Biol. Reprod. 65:309–317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshida, M., M. Kijima, M. Akita, and T. Beppu. 1990. Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J. Biol. Chem. 265:17174–17179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zimmermann, U., and J. Vienken. 1982. Electric field-induced cell-to-cell fusion. J. Membr. Biol. 67:165–182.[CrossRef][Medline]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. H. Shi, J. S. Ai, Y. C. OuYang, J. C. Huang, Z. L. Lei, Q. Wang, S. Yin, Z. M. Han, Q. Y. Sun, and D. Y. Chen
Trichostatin A and nuclear reprogramming of cloned rabbit embryos
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1106 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. M. Sellner, J. W. Kim, M. C. McClure, K. H. Taylor, R. D. Schnabel, and J. F. Taylor
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Applications of genomic information in livestock
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3148 - 3158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suteevun, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, X. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suteevun, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, X. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS