|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION |
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 LH pulse/h) earlier (P < 0.05) than in the OVXE-C treatment (307 ± 30 and 420 ± 21 d of age, respectively). It is concluded that advancing the reduction of estradiol negative feedback on secretion of LH is the mechanism by which early weaning and feeding a high-concentrate diet results in precocious puberty in heifers.
Key Words: early weaning estradiol negative feedback heifer luteinizing hormone puberty
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
300 d of age; Day and Anderson, 1998
Puberty is stimulated in heifers by increased LH secretion during the peripubertal period (Day et al., 1984
; 1987
). The peripubertal increase in LH secretion results from declining negative feedback of estradiol on GnRH/LH secretion (Kinder et al., 1995
; Day and Anderson, 1998
). Increased secretion of LH causes increased growth of dominant ovarian follicles (Bergfeld et al., 1994
) leading to increased systemic estradiol concentrations, which induces the initial preovulatory surge of LH. Precocious puberty is associated with advancement of the peripubertal increase in LH pulse frequency and greater maximum diameter of dominant follicles, duration of follicle waves, and circulating estradiol concentrations (Gasser et al., 2006a
,b
, companion paper). These changes are consistent with those that occur in response to the decline in estradiol negative feedback on GnRH secretion in heifers that reach puberty at 12 to 15 mo of age. The age at which estradiol inhibition of LH secretion declines can be influenced by diet (Kurz et al., 1990
), as it has been postponed through restriction of energy intake.
We hypothesized that precocious attainment of puberty in heifers that are weaned early and fed a high-concentrate diet is facilitated by a reduction in estradiol negative feedback on secretion of LH.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All procedures involving animals were in accordance with procedures approved by The Ohio State University Agricultural Animal Care and Use Committee.
Thirty crossbred Angus and Simmental heifers were weaned at 83 ± 2 d of age and 114 ± 3 kg of BW, blocked by BW, and randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatments. The treatments consisted of feeding either a high-concentrate (H) or a control diet (C) and bilateral ovariectomy (OVX), OVX with addition of an estradiol implant (OVXE), or no further treatment, retaining intact ovaries (INT), to result in the following treatments: INT-H, INT-C, OVX-H, OVX-C, OVXE-H, or OVXE-C.
All heifers were fed a receiving diet after weaning until a mean age of 120 d, at which time the heifers were transitioned over a 10-d period to their respective treatment diets (i.e., H or C). All diets consisted of whole shelled corn, alfalfa pellets, pelleted soybean hulls, and a supplement that contained ground corn, soybean meal, urea, vitamins, minerals, monensin (Rumensin, Elanco, Indianapolis, IN), and fat (Table 1
). Additionally, 1 kg of grass hay per heifer was added to the experimental diets each day to aid in the prevention of bloat.
|
Ovariectomy occurred at a mean age of 111 d in OVX heifers and 112 d in OVXE heifers and was performed under general anesthesia at The Ohio State University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. The OVXE heifers received implants made with polydimethylsiloxane tubing (3.35-mm i.d. x 4.65-mm o.d.; Dow Corning, Midland, MI) that were filled with 17ß-estradiol (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) and sealed at each end with medical-grade, adhesive silicone, type A (Dow Corning). A single implant was inserted into each heifer subcutaneously and caudal to the shoulder blade. The constant dose of estradiol delivered via these implants is determined by the surface area, and therefore the length of the implant, and not by the amount of estradiol because diameter and wall thickness of implants are constant (Dziuk and Cook, 1966
).
The implant scheme was designed to maintain circulating concentrations of estradiol between 2 and 4 pg/mL, as previously shown for ovary-intact heifers of this age (Gasser et al., 2006a
, companion paper). Based on previous experience with implants of this type in prepubertal heifers (Day et al., 1984
; Kurz et al., 1990
), it was estimated that BW-adjusted implants, resulting in 0.075 cm of implant/kg of BW would achieve circulating concentrations within this range. Therefore, the initial implant received by each heifer provided an implant length of 0.075 cm/kg of BW. As the heifers grew and BW increased to the point that the implant dose approached a mean of 0.05 cm/kg of BW for the group, or 0.045 cm/kg of BW in individual heifers, implants were replaced with new implants that restored the dose to 0.075 cm/kg of BW. The first implants were inserted in all OVXE heifers at a mean age of 112 d (the day of OVX), and the implants were replaced twice, at mean ages of 198 and 286 d. Implants were replaced 1 additional time in OVXE-C heifers at a mean age of 387 d.
Blood Sample Collection
Blood samples (10 mL) were collected weekly beginning at a mean age of 160 d and continuing throughout the experiment via jugular venipuncture into evacuated tubes containing anticoagulant (EDTA; Vacutainer, Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ), centrifuged at 2,785 x g for 20 min immediately after collection, and plasma was harvested and frozen at 20°C until analyzed for progesterone and estradiol concentrations. Age at puberty for heifers in the INT treatments was defined as 7 d before the date of collection of the first blood sample that contained a plasma progesterone concentration >2 ng/mL or 7 d before the collection date of the first of 2 consecutive blood samples with a plasma progesterone concentration >1 ng/mL (Day et al., 1984
). Heifers that reached puberty before 300 d of age were considered to have experienced precocious puberty.
To characterize LH concentrations, serial blood samples were collected at 12-min intervals for 12 h at a mean ages of 119, 149, 188, 217, 246, 281, 323, and 365 d. Samples were collected via indwelling jugular catheters into polypropylene tubes (Life Science Products Inc., Denver, CO), the blood was allowed to clot for 24 to 48 h at 4°C, the samples were centrifuged at 7,735 x g for 20 min, and serum was harvested and frozen at 20°C until analyzed for LH concentration. Individual INT heifers were removed from serial blood sampling procedures after attainment of puberty was confirmed. Heifers in the OVX and OVXE treatments were removed from serial blood sampling procedures after escape from estradiol negative feedback on LH secretion (detection of
1 LH pulse/h) was confirmed. To confirm escape from estradiol negative feedback in the OVXE-C treatment, 2 additional serial blood sample collections were conducted at mean ages of 407 and 449 d.
Hormone Quantification
Concentrations of LH were determined in duplicate for all serial blood serum samples with a double-antibody RIA (Anderson et al., 1996
). The average intraassay CV was 2.8%, and the average interassay CV for standard sera of 1.09 and 4.07 ng/mL were 18.6 and 17.8%, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.03 ng/mL. The frequency of LH pulses, LH pulse amplitude, and mean LH concentrations were determined as described by Goodman and Karsch (1980)
. Heifers were considered to have "escaped" from estradiol negative feedback on LH secretion when the frequency of LH pulses reached
1 pulse/h. This definition was developed based on previous research with OVX heifers indicating that after OVX (withdrawal of estradiol negative feedback), LH pulse frequency increases rapidly to
1 LH pulse/h (Day et al., 1984
).
Concentrations of progesterone were determined using a commercially available RIA kit (Coat-a-Count, Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA) as described previously for our laboratory (Burke et al., 2003
). The interassay CV were 10.7, 13.1, and 13.0% for standard concentrations of 1.6, 2.6, and 12.1 ng/mL, respectively. The average intraassay CV was 2.2%, and the assay sensitivity was 0.06 ng/mL.
Concentrations of estradiol were determined using a double-extraction, single-antibody RIA as reported by Kojima et al. (1992)
and previously validated in our laboratory (Anderson et al., 1996
). The blood samples were all included in a single assay. The average intraassay CV among duplicate samples was 2.5%, and the sensitivity of the assay was 0.6 pg/mL.
Statistical Analyses
The effects of treatment, mean day of age, and the interaction of treatment and mean day of age on BW, estradiol concentration, LH pulse frequency, mean LH pulse amplitude, and mean LH concentration were analyzed by ANOVA using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC), with repeated measures analysis included in the model. The repeated measures model was
![]() |
where Yijk = the observation of the jth heifer in the ith treatment on the kth day, µ = the overall mean, Ti = the ith treatment, hj:i = the random effect of the jth heifer within the ith treatment [hj:i ~ N(0,
2h)], Dk = the kth day, (TD)ik = the treatment x day interaction, and eijk = the random residual effect [eijk ~ N(0,
)], where
is the variance-covariance structure of the residual errors for repeated measurements within heifers.
The effect of treatment on ADG, age and BW at puberty, and age and BW at escape from estradiol negative feedback on LH secretion were analyzed by ANOVA using the MIXED procedure of SAS (Yij = µ + Ti + eij, with notations as defined previously).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Average daily BW gain from mean age of 120 to 322 d was greater (P < 0.05) in heifers fed the H than C diet (1.1 ± 0.1 and 0.7 ± 0.1 kg/d, respectively). Body weight of heifers fed the H diet was greater (P < 0.05) than in C heifers by a mean age of 202 d, and this difference persisted through the remainder of the experimental period (treatment x age, P < 0.01; Figure 1
). Within each diet, BW did not differ between heifers in the INT, OVX, and OVXE treatments at any age during the experiment.
|
Overall mean concentrations of estradiol during the experiment did not differ between the OVXE-H and OVXE-C treatments or between the INT-H and INT-C treatments. Overall mean concentrations of estradiol were also not different for the OVXE and INT treatments (Figure 2
) but were greater (P < 0.05) in the OVXE than INT treatments for approximately 1 to 3 wk after each time of insertion of new estradiol implants (treatment x age, P < 0.05).
|
|
Escape from estradiol negative feedback on LH secretion (
1 LH pulse/h) was achieved at an earlier age (P < 0.01) in OVXE-H than the OVXE-C treatment (307 ± 30 and 420 ± 21 d of age, respectively). Additionally, age at escape in OVXE-H treatment did not differ from age at puberty in INT-H treatment (275 ± 30 d of age). Likewise, age at escape in OVXE-C treatment did not differ from age at puberty in INT-C treatment (385 ± 14 d of age). Body weight at escape was not different between OVXE-H and OVXE-C treatment (mean = 372 ± 16 kg).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A rapid increase in mean LH concentrations and frequency of LH pulses was detected in heifers that were OVX at a mean age of 111 d, regardless of dietary treatment. This finding confirms previous reports (Moseley et al., 1984
; Anderson et al., 1986
) that ovarian factors are restraining LH secretion in heifers at this age. It appears that the primary factor is estradiol, as estradiol replacement completely prevented this post-OVX increase in LH pulses. The subsequent increase in LH secretion in estradiol-implanted heifers reflects the ensuing decline in estradiol negative feedback.
Some variation in estradiol concentrations was detected in heifers that received estradiol implants. These fluctuations are explained by the nature of the implant strategy for this experiment. As would be expected, estradiol concentrations in implanted heifers were greatest during the short period of time immediately after insertion of new implants. Over time, as heifers increased in BW the circulating concentrations of estradiol gradually decreased until replacement of implants was necessary to maintain the concentrations of estradiol within the appropriate range for heifers of this age. Though the pattern of estradiol concentrations in implanted heifers was not identical to that of the intact heifers, estradiol implants were successful in achieving the intended goal of overall mean concentrations that were not different from those of intact heifers.
The current study confirms previous reports using OVX and estradiol replacement in heifers (Day et al., 1984
, 1986a
; Kurz et al., 1990
) that the peripubertal decline in estradiol negative feedback will occur in the absence of the ovary. Downregulation of estradiol receptors in specific regions within the hypothalamus during the peripubertal period in heifers (Day et al., 1987
; Day and Anderson, 1998
) appears to be a critical component of the mechanism responsible for the decline in estradiol negative feedback. The primary signal that initiates the endocrine mechanisms leading to the decline in estradiol negative feedback is yet to be determined, but it was activated in the current study through feeding the high-concentrate diet.
Nutritional status has been linked with hypothalamic regulation in prepubertal heifers in other studies where dietary treatment effects on timing of the decline in estradiol negative feedback have been observed. Restriction of dietary energy intake that leads to delayed puberty in heifers has been shown to delay increases in mean LH concentration and frequency of LH pulses as well as attenuate responsiveness of LH secretion to GnRH (Day et al., 1986b
). Dietary energy restriction has also been shown to delay follicular development (Bergfeld et al., 1994
). Similarly, dietary energy restriction delayed the decline in estradiol negative feedback on LH secretion in heifers (Kurz et al., 1990
). It appears that the decline of estradiol negative feedback on secretion of LH is a common mechanism that is requisite for the process of puberty to progress to completion whether puberty occurs at a typical age or in the case of delayed or precocious puberty.
The nutritive or growth-related signals leading to activation of the reproductive axis in heifers with precocious puberty are unknown. One possible candidate that would provide a logical connection between the high-concentrate diet and precocious maturation of the reproductive axis is IGF-I. A concomitant increase of IGF-I concentration with LH concentration has been detected in heifers fed for increased growth rates that resulted in earlier age at puberty (Yelich et al., 1996
). In other work by Renaville et al. (2000)
, a progressive rise in IGF-I concentrations and coincident decrease in IGFBP 2 were detected as puberty approached in a group of control bulls, and the rise in IGF-I was delayed in feed-restricted bulls. Hiney et al. (1996)
has suggested from research with female rats that IGF-I of peripheral origin contributes to the initiation of female puberty by stimulating GnRH release from the hypothalamus via IGF-I receptors present in the median eminence. There is also evidence to support a role for IGF-I at the pituitary gland. Hashizume et al. (2002)
has reported from in vitro experiments with bovine anterior pituitary cells that IGF-I enhances GnRH-stimulated LH release without changing the number of GnRH receptors in the pituitary cells and that IGF-I also interacts with estradiol to increase the LH response to GnRH.
Other signals related to nutritional status that may contribute to initiation of mechanisms that facilitate precocious puberty include leptin (Maciel et al., 2004b
), neuropeptide Y (Morrison et al., 2003
), and transforming growth factor
(Ojeda and Ma, 1998
). Increasing concentrations of leptin have been detected in association with the attainment of puberty in heifers (Garcia et al., 2002
). However, leptin appears to have more of a permissive role than a stimulatory role in attainment of puberty in heifers (Maciel et al., 2004a
). Further research is needed to increase our understanding of the role of IGF-I and other potential factors in the process of pubertal development in heifers.
Based on the results of this experiment, we accept the hypothesis and conclude that advanced reduction of estradiol negative feedback on secretion of LH is the mechanism by which early weaning and feeding a high-concentrate diet induces precocious puberty in heifers.
| IMPLICATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Current address: Southern Utah Univ., 351 W. University Blvd., Cedar City, UT 84720. ![]()
3 Corresponding author: day.5{at}osu.edu
Received for publication November 3, 2005. Accepted for publication April 5, 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Roberts, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil Reproductive performance of heifers offered ad libitum or restricted access to feed for a one hundred forty-day period after weaning J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 3043 - 3052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Gasser, E. J. Behlke, D. E. Grum, and M. L. Day Effect of timing of feeding a high-concentrate diet on growth and attainment of puberty in early-weaned heifers J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3118 - 3122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |