|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL NUTRITION |
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, and The Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Columbus 43210
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: amino acid digestibility distillers grain ileum pig
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ileal digestibility technique reduces the confounding effects of the microbial populations present in the cecum and large intestine (Low and Zebrowska, 1989
). Amino acids collected from ileal digesta, however, are not solely of dietary origin. Endogenous AA from microbial protein, sloughed intestinal cells, mucosal proteins, and digestive enzymes are present in the digesta (Moughan and Schuttert, 1991
), thus confounding ileal digestibility values. An adjustment for the endogenous fractions allows for a more accurate assessment of AA digestibility. Providing a low-protein casein diet should more closely mimic the metabolic state of a fed animal than a protein-free diet (Low, 1980
).
This study evaluated different response criteria using apparent and standardized AA digestibility as well as energy digestibility from 5 different sources of corn DDGS that varied in their degree of color (light to dark).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Samples of DDGS were collected from 5 corn ethanol plants in the upper Midwestern United States that used the dry-grinding process. All DDGS diets were formulated to 15% CP solely from the test DDGS source (Table 1
), based on an assumed CP content of 24.8% in the DDGS sources. The 5 DDGS treatment diets were fortified with vitamins and minerals to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements for growing pigs (NRC, 1998
).
|
The experiment was conducted as a 6 x 6 Latin-square design replicated twice. After fasting for 24-h, 12 crossbred barrows [(Yorkshire x Landrace) x Duroc] averaging 28 ± 1.1 kg of BW were surgically fitted with a T-cannula in the distal ileum, according to the method by Sauer et al. (1983)
. During an approximately 10-d recovery period, pigs were fed a restricted amount of a corn-soybean meal diet formulated to contain 1.00% total lysine.
Pigs were housed in individual 0.6 x 1.2-m, stainless steel adjustable-width metabolism crates (Rohn Agri Products, Peoria, IL). Room temperatures were maintained at 26 ± 2°C, with fluorescent lighting provided from 0600 to 1830. The surgical site around the cannula was cleaned daily with an antibacterial soap (Palmolive Antibacterial, Colgate-Palmolive, New York, NY) followed by application of a thin layer of zinc oxide cream (Desitin, Pfizer, New York, NY).
Pigs within each replicate were allotted to treatment sequences such that each animal received the 6 diets in a different order, with each pig being fed 1 treatment diet within each collection period. The quantity of feed provided daily during the initial period was adjusted to the average animals metabolic body weight (0.09·BW0.75) but equalized for all pigs within each study period. Feed intake was increased by approximately 150 g/d for each subsequent period. Diets were provided in meal form twice daily in equal amounts at 12-h intervals (0600 and 1800) with an approximate water to diet ratio of 1.5:1 (wt/wt). Within each pen, additional water was provided free choice via an adjacent nipple waterer.
Study periods totaled 7 d, with a 5-d diet acclimation period followed by 2 d of digesta collection for two 12-h (0600 to 1800) periods on d 6 and 7. Plastic collapsible tubes (50-mm inside diameter) were attached to the cannula, with digesta collected at 20- to 30-min intervals for the 12-h period. Care was taken to ensure that digesta flow into the tube was unobstructed during collection. Samples were frozen immediately ( 20°C) upon collection, subsequently thawed and pooled by pig for the 2-d period, mixed, and freeze-dried before analysis.
Analyses
Color score (L*, a*, and b*) was measured using a model CR-410 colorimeter (Konica Minolta Photo Imaging USA Inc., Mahwah, NJ). Samples of DDGS were placed in aluminum pans (23 x 23 x 2.5 cm deep), leveled, and measured by lightly setting the probe on the surface of the DDGS. The mean color score was the average of 10 measurements, with the sample being mixed and leveled between each determination. Low values for L* indicate a dark color, whereas high scores indicate a light color (0 = black; 100 = white). Greater values of a* and b* indicate a greater degree of redness and yellowness, respectively.
Freeze-dried digesta and DDGS were analyzed for energy, N, AA, and Cr content. Crude protein was calculated from the N content using a Perkin-Elmer 2410 Series II N analyzer (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). Amino acids were determined using a Beckman 6300 AA analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA) by methods outlined by AOAC (1995
; methods 988.15 [sulfur and regular] and 994.12 [tryptophan]) at the University of Missouri Agriculture Experiment Station Chemical Labs. The analytical AA values for DDGS sources were used to calculate the dietary contribution used in digestibility equations. Chromium was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry after wet ashing in HCl (AOAC, 1995
) at the University of Missouri Agriculture Experiment Station Chemical Labs. Gross energy was analyzed for treatment diets and freeze-dried digesta using an adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (model 1241, Parr Instrument Manual, Parr Instruments, Moline, IL).
Apparent ileal digestibility (AID, %) was calculated using the Cr concentration in the feed and digesta by using the equation: AID = 100 ([ND/NF] x [CrF/CrD] x 100). In this equation, ND is the nutrient concentration present in the ileal digesta, NF is the nutrient concentration in the feed, CrF is the Cr concentration in the feed, and CrD is the Cr concentration in the ileal digesta.
Endogenous AA losses (EAL) were calculated according to the equation reported by Moughan et al. (1992)
: EAL = (ND x [CrF/CrD]). Standardized ileal digestibility (SID, %) was calculated using the equation: SID = (AID + [EAL/NF]) x 100.
The data were analyzed using the Mixed procedure of SAS (V. 9.1, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). A Latin Square design was followed according to the method of Steel and Torrie (1980)
, using the individual pig as the experimental unit. The low protein treatment diet was not incorporated in the treatment contrast comparisons. Instead, the low protein treatment was used solely for calculating standardized digestibility within each study period and was used to compare across study periods.
The statistical model was: NDijkl = µ + ri + pj + Dk + al:i + eijkl, where i = 1,2; j = 1,2,3,4,5,6; k = 1,2,3,4,5; ri ~iidN(0,
); pj ~ iidN(0,
); al:i ~ iidN(0,
); and eijkl~iidN(0,
), where ND is nutrient digestibility; r = random effect of replicate; p = random effect of experimental period; D = fixed effect of the 5 DDGS sources; and a = random effect of pig nested within replicate. Mean comparisons were calculated using the DIFF option of the LSMEANS statement and using the Tukey Kramer adjustment for multiple contrasts for all pairwise comparisons. A probability of P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Endogenous AA losses (mg/kg of feed intake) determined by the low-protein 5% casein diet are presented in Table 5
. There were no period differences in endogenous AA losses. Consequently, standardized lysine digestibility (Table 6
) ranged from 38.2 to 61.5% being the lowest in sources 1 and 5 (P < 0.05) and greatest for sources 2, 3, and 4. Standardized digestibility was similar among sources 1 to 4 for all AA except leucine, lysine, glutamic acid and proline. Standardized digestibilities of all AA except histidine, lysine and proline were approximately 10% lower (P < 0.05) for source 5 than the other DDGS sources.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the number of DDGS samples in our study were limited, our results indicate considerable differences in the degree of lightness or darkness between samples as measured by the Minolta equipment. It seems from this and other studies that excessive heat during the drying process may form several results from Maillard reactions between lysine residues and carbohydrate moieties. The process may not only darken the color of the final product (Parsons et al., 1992
) but may also influence the digestibility of the AA lysine. The more firmly bound lysine is apparently not available for use by the animal, nor does the bound lysine seem to be easily released during acid hydrolysis conditions used in AA analysis (Hurrell, 1983
). Depending upon the extent of the Maillard reaction and or the drying process, some lysine may be chemically converted to other products, thus reducing the total lysine content of the DDGS. However, the Maillard reaction may firmly bind products not readily released during the digestive process and therefore may not be utilized by the animal. Therefore, the darker colored DDGS sources (1 and 5) in our experiment may have had a greater degree of Maillard reaction that may have resulted in a lower analyzed value, and also a lower digestible lysine content.
Reduction in the overall AA digestibility suggests another role that excessive heat may have on other dietary components. Research by Evans and Butts (1948)
suggests that excessive heating can bind AA and protein to other compounds, such as fiber, effectively reducing the digestibility of AA in nonruminants. However, unlike lysine that is altered in Maillard reactions, these bound AA and proteins may be liberated during the acid hydrolysis procedure. This may explain why there was no marked reduction in the amount or digestibility of essential AA other than lysine in the darker colored DDGS sources.
Other research investigating corn DDGS have come to similar conclusions about the relationship of color and AA digestibility. Spiehs et al. (2001)
reported that lighter colored DDGS had an AID for lysine of 47.4%, which is similar to our value of 49.2%. Darker colored DDGS in the current experiment had an AID for lysine of 23.0% that differed from the 0% values reported by Spiehs et al. (2001)
. The differences between the 2 values in the darker colored samples may be due to the degree of darkness but also to differences in the amount of DDGS in the diets and the way in which the digestibility values were calculated. Cromwell et al. (1993)
reported that darker colored DDGS resulted in poorer performance responses in both pigs and chickens, suggesting reduced lysine digestibility. The NRC (1998)
and Ajinomoto Heartland (2004)
reported AID values for lysine in DDGS of 47 and 52.9%, respectively. These values are comparable with the values determined in the current experiment but only for the lighter colored DDGS samples.
Standardized lysine digestibility in the current experiment varied from 40.9 in the darkest 2 sources to 58.1% in the lightest 3 DGGS sources. For the lighter sources, our standardized lysine digestibility values are similar to the values of 59 and 58.2% reported by the NRC (1998)
and Ajinomoto Heartland (2004)
, respectively.
There were no differences in energy digestibility among the sources suggesting that the fiber component does not seem to be affected by DDGS color as the AA.
| IMPLICATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Animal care and procedures followed were approved by the Ohio State University Animal Care and Use Committee, protocol # 03-AG003. ![]()
3 Appreciation is expressed to John Goihl for obtaining the DDGS samples used in this experiment, the 5 plants (anonymous) who donated product, Juliette Hanson for the surgical preparation of animals, Jack Bardall for feed manufacture, and Ken Mays and Larry Warnock for animal care. ![]()
4 Corresponding author: nfasting{at}uiuc.edu
Received for publication June 9, 2005. Accepted for publication January 16, 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. E. Urriola, D. Hoehler, C. Pedersen, H. H. Stein, and G. C. Shurson Amino acid digestibility of distillers dried grains with solubles, produced from sorghum, a sorghum-corn blend, and corn fed to growing pigs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2009; 87(8): 2574 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Stein and G. C. Shurson BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: The use and application of distillers dried grains with solubles in swine diets J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1292 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Pahm, C. Pedersen, D. Hoehler, and H. H. Stein Factors affecting the variability in ileal amino acid digestibility in corn distillers dried grains with solubles fed to growing pigs J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2180 - 2189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Widmer, L. M. McGinnis, D. M. Wulf, and H. H. Stein Effects of feeding distillers dried grains with solubles, high-protein distillers dried grains, and corn germ to growing-finishing pigs on pig performance, carcass quality, and the palatability of pork J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1819 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Hill, J. E. Link, M. J. Rincker, D. L. Kirkpatrick, M. L. Gibson, and K. Karges Utilization of distillers dried grains with solubles and phytase in sow lactation diets to meet the phosphorus requirement of the sow and reduce fecal phosphorus concentration J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 112 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Pedersen, M. G. Boersma, and H. H. Stein Digestibility of energy and phosphorus in ten samples of distillers dried grains with solubles fed to growing pigs J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1168 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |