J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rule, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rule, D. C.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:387-396
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Site and extent of digestion, duodenal flow, and intestinal disappearance of total and esterified fatty acids in sheep fed a high-concentrate diet supplemented with high-linoleate safflower oil

R. L. Atkinson, E. J. Scholljegerdes1, S. L. Lake, V. Nayigihugu, B. W. Hess and D. C. Rule2

University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071-3684


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 IMPLICATIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Our objective was to determine duodenal and ileal flows of total and esterified fatty acids and to determine ruminal fermentation characteristics and site and extent of nutrient digestion in sheep fed an 80% concentrate diet supplemented with high-linoleate (77%) safflower oil at 0, 3, 6, and 9% of DM. Oil was infused intraruminally along with an isonitrogenous basal diet (fed at 2% of BW) that contained bromegrass hay, cracked corn, corn gluten meal, urea, and limestone. Four crossbred wethers (BW = 44.3 ± 15.7 kg) fitted with ruminal, duodenal, and ileal cannulas were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square experiment, in which 14 d of dietary adaptation were followed by 4 d of duodenal, ileal, and ruminal sampling. Fatty acid intake increased (linear, P = 0.004 to 0.001) with increased dietary safflower oil. Digestibilities of OM, NDF, and N were not affected (P = 0.09 to 0.65) by increased dietary safflower oil. For total fatty acids (free plus esterified) and esterified fatty acids, duodenal flow of most fatty acids, including 18:2c-9,c-12, increased (P = 0.006 to 0.05) with increased dietary oil. Within each treatment, duodenal flow of total and esterified 18:2c-9,c-12 was similar (P = 0.32), indicating that duodenal flow of this fatty acid occurred because most of it remained esterified. Duodenal flow of esterified 18:1t-11 increased (P = 0.08) with increased dietary safflower oil, indicating that reesterification of ruminal fatty acids occurred. Apparent small intestinal disappearance of most fatty acids was not affected (P = 0.19 to 0.98) by increased dietary safflower oil, but increased (P = 0.05) for 18:2c-9,c-12, which ranged from 87.0 to 97.4%, and for 18:2c-9,t-11 (P = 0.03), which ranged from 37.9% with no added oil to 99.2% with supplemental oil. For esterified fatty acids, apparent small intestinal disappearance was from 80% for 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15 at the greatest level of dietary oil up to 100% for 18:1t-11 and 18:1c-12 with 0% oil. We concluded that duodenal flow of 18:2c-9,c-12 was predominately associated with the esterified fraction, suggesting that the extent of ruminal lipolysis was decreased with increased dietary high-linoleate safflower oil. Furthermore, biohydrogenation intermediates observed in the esterified fatty acids indicated that some reesterification occurred, and the high level of apparent absorption of esterified fatty acids indicated that intestinal lipolysis did not limit overall digestion of the fatty acids fed to the sheep.

Key Words: biohydrodgenation • dietary fat • lipids • ovine


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 IMPLICATIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Triacylglycerols consumed by sheep are rapidly hydrolyzed in the rumen, and unsaturated fatty acids are saturated through biohydrogenation (Jenkins, 1993Go). However, feeding high-concentrate diets can result in decreased biohydrogenation, which can lead to greater unsaturated fatty acid concentrations in tissues (Latham et al., 1972Go; Leat, 1977Go). Kucuk et al. (2001)Go reported greater duodenal flow of unsaturated fatty acids in sheep fed a high-concentrate diet compared with sheep fed a high-forage diet when total dietary fat was adjusted to 6% with soybean oil. Kucuk et al. (2004)Go subsequently determined that 9.4% soybean oil in a high-concentrate diet for lambs increased duodenal flow of linoleic acid (18:2c-9,c-12) by 48% compared with lambs fed a diet with no oil supplement. The increased duodenal flow of 18:2c-9,c-12 with soybean oil supplementation noted by Kucuk et al. (2004)Go might have occurred because of either less ruminal hydrolysis of dietary esterified 18:2c-9,c-12 or less ruminal biohydrogenation of free 18:2c-9,c-12.

Other studies have demonstrated that biohydrogenation of 18:2c-9,c-12 is rapid (Harfoot and Hazlewood, 1997Go) and that the free acid (carboxyl group) is required for biohydrogenation to be initiated. Protection of fatty acids from biohydrogenation has been demonstrated by esterification to substances not easily hydrolyzed in the rumen (Jenkins and Adams, 2002Go). We hypothesized that the increased duodenal flow of 18:2c-9,c-12 that occurs in lambs fed high-linoleate vegetable oil occurs from increased duodenal flow of esterified 18:2c-9,c-12. Our objectives were to determine duodenal and ileal flow of total and esterified fatty acids and to evaluate ruminal digestion and duodenal flow of other nutrients in lambs fed a high-concentrate diet supplemented with up to 9% of DM as high-linoleate safflower oil.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 IMPLICATIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Animals, Diets, and Sampling

Four crossbred wether lambs (BW = 44.3 ± 15.7 kg) were fitted with ruminal, duodenal (inserted cranial to the common bile and pancreatic duct), and ileal T-type cannulas. Lambs were housed in metabolism crates (1.4 x 0.6 m) within a temperature-controlled room (22°C) under continuous lighting. Fresh water and trace-mineralized salt (Iofix T-M, Morton Salt, Chicago, IL) were available ad libitum throughout the study. Guaranteed analysis of salt blocks indicated NaCl at 97.1% along with the following (in ppm): Zn, 3,500; Mn, 2,800; Fe, 1,750; Cu, 350 to 450; I, 70; and Co, 70. All procedures were conducted in accordance with an approved University of Wyoming Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol.

Lambs were assigned to one of 4 dietary treatments in a 4 x 4 Latin square. Diets consisted of the basal diet plus 0, 3, 6, or 9% high-linoleate (77% linoleic acid) safflower oil (DM basis). The basal diet was formulated on a DM basis to meet the maintenance requirements of a 40-kg finishing lamb (NRC, 1985Go) and included bromegrass hay, cracked corn, corn gluten meal, urea, and limestone (Table 1Go). Diets were fed at 2% of initial BW in 2 equal allotments at 0600 and 1800. To ensure that supplemental oil was completely consumed, high-linoleate safflower oil was infused intraruminally immediately after feeding. Intraruminal infusion of the oil was considered to be comparable with ingestion because oil infusion and diet consumption occurred simultaneously.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Ingredient and nutrient composition of the basal diet1
 
Each experimental period lasted 18 d; the first 14 d were used for adaptation to the respective diets. At each feeding, from d 6 to 16, wethers received intraruminal doses of 2.5 g of Cr2O3 (indigestible digesta flow marker) via gelatin capsules. Beginning at 0600 on d 15 of each experimental period, duodenal, ileal, and fresh fecal samples were collected at 4-h intervals. On d 16, collection times were advanced by 2 h, so that over a 48-h collection period every 2 h in a theoretical 24-h period was represented. Duodenal and ileal samples were composited within wether for each collection period and frozen at –20°C. Duodenal and ileal samples were lyophilized (Genesis 25 freeze dryer, The VirTis Co., Gardiner, NY) and ground through a 1-mm screen (Wiley mill, Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA). Fecal samples were composited within wether for each collection period and dried in a 55°C forced-air oven and ground through a 1-mm screen (Wiley mill).

On d 17 of each collection period, 100 mL of whole ruminal contents was collected from each wether immediately before feeding (0-h sampling time). Additional ruminal contents were collected at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, and 48 h thereafter. Ruminal pH was determined immediately for each fresh ruminal sample. Ruminal contents were then strained through 4 layers of cheesecloth, and 10 mL of the strained fluid was acidified with 0.1 mL of 7.2 N H2SO4 and frozen for later VFA analysis. The remaining whole ruminal contents were placed in a blender (Hamilton Beach/Proctor Silex, Washington, NC) with an equal volume of 0.9% NaCl (wt/vol) solution and homogenized for 1 min to dislodge particulate-associated bacteria. The homogenized solution was then strained through 8 layers of cheesecloth and frozen for later bacterial isolation by differential centrifugation (Merchen et al., 1986Go). The resulting bacterial isolate was lyophilized and ground with a mortar and pestle for subsequent laboratory analysis.

Sample Processing and Analysis

Feed, ruminal (including bacterial isolates), duodenal, ileal, and fecal samples were prepared for analysis as described by Kucuk et al. (2001Go, 2004)Go. Feed, duodenal, ileal, and fecal samples were analyzed for DM and ash; feed was analyzed for crude fat by ether extraction (AOAC, 1990Go) and for N content (Leco model FP-528 Nitrogen determinator, LECO, St. Joseph, MI). Neutral and acid detergent fiber contents of feed and NDF content of fecal and duodenal digesta were determined using an ANKOM 200 fiber analyzer (ANKOM Technology, Fairport, NY). Duodenal, ileal, and fecal samples were prepared for analysis of Cr according to Hill and Anderson (1958)Go. Chromium concentration was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Model 210 VDT atomic absorption spectrophotometer, Buck Scientific, Norwalk, CT) using an air plus acetylene flame. Ruminal NH3 concentrations were determined by the phenol-hypochlorite procedure (Broderick and Kang, 1980Go). Ruminal fluid was analyzed for VFA concentration (Goetsch and Galyean, 1983Go) using a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas liquid chromatograph (Hewlett-Packard, Avondale, PA) equipped with a 15-m x 0.53-mm (i.d.) column (Nukol, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) with an initial oven temperature of 110°C to a final temperature of 150°C at 8°C/min. Helium was used as carrier gas with a column flow rate of 20 mL/min. Injector and flame ionization detector temperatures were 250°C.

Duplicate samples of feed (1.0 g), duodenal (1.0 g), and ileal (4.0 g) contents; feces (4.0 g); and ruminal bacteria (0.20 g) were subjected to total lipid extraction for 4 h in chloroform, methanol, and water (1:2:0.8 vol/vol/vol) in 16- x 125-mm screw-capped tubes (Rule, 1997Go). Each extraction tube contained 2.0 mg of tritride-canoylglycerol as the internal standard (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Fatty acid methyl esters of the feed (Table 2Go) were prepared using methanolic HCl as described by Kucuk et al. (2001)Go. Lipid extracts of duodenal, ileal, and fecal samples were dried under N2 at 22°C and redissolved in 2.0 mL of chloroform; then, 1.0 mL was transferred into a separate tube. Both subsamples were then dried under N2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fatty acid concentration (mg of fatty acid/g of DM) of dietary ingredients1
 
Acylglycerolipids are hydrolyzed by bacterial lipases in the rumen (Jenkins, 1993Go). Therefore, quantitative analysis of total and esterified fatty acids was required to test the hypothesis that duodenal flow of dietary linoleic acid occurred because of duodenal flow of esterified linoleic acid. By using both acid and alkaline catalysts for methyl ester preparation of a total lipid extract of duodenal, ileal, and fecal contents, we were able to differentiate between total fatty acids (using the acid catalyst) and esterified fatty acids (using the alkaline catalyst) because alkaline catalysts do not react with NEFA in methanol to form methyl esters (Christie, 1982Go). Furthermore, in preliminary experiments, we have observed flat line responses upon GLC analysis after KOH was used as the esterification catalyst for preparation of fatty acid methyl esters with NEFA. However, with methanolic HCl as the esterification catalyst, fatty acid profiles with saponified lipids (NEFA) were similar to profiles determined by transesterification of acylglycerols.

Therefore, for each subsample in duplicate, one lipid extract was subjected to methyl esterification using 2.0 mL of 1.09 N HCl in methanol, and the other duplicate extract was subjected to methyl esterification using 2.0 mL of 0.2 N KOH in methanol (Murrieta et al., 2003Go). Thus, fatty acid methyl esters of one-half of the lipid extract represented total fatty acids (free plus esterified), and the other half represented esterified fatty acids. Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted in 3.0 mL of hexane and transferred to GLC vials containing a 1.0-mm bed of anhydrous sodium sulfate. Fatty acid quantification and identification were accomplished using GLC as described by Murrieta et al. (2003)Go. For this analysis, a 100-m capillary column, designed for cis and trans isomer separation, was used (SP2560, Supelco).

In addition to quantifying duodenal flow of total and esterified fatty acids, we determined the fatty acid profile within each major lipid class: neutral, free, and polar lipids. However, samples had to be pooled to obtain sufficient lipid for a meaningful fatty acid analysis of the neutral and polar lipid fractions. To accomplish this fractionation, total lipid extracts were subjected to solid phase extraction using a 6.0-mL solid phase, NH2 extraction column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). Approximately 45 mg of lipid was loaded onto the column in 0.7 mL of chloroform. Neutral lipids were eluted from the column with 12.0 mL of a 4:1 (vol/vol) mixture of chloroform:2-propanol. The neutral lipid fraction was contaminated with FFA; therefore, the initial neutral lipid fraction was loaded onto a fresh column and eluted with the chloroform:2-propanol mixture. Free fatty acids were eluted from the original column with 12.0 mL of 2% acetic acid in diethyl ether, and polar lipids were eluted with 12.0 mL of methanol. Cross-contamination of each fraction was not apparent as determined by TLC using 80:20:1 (vol/vol/vol/) petroleum ether, diethyl ether, and acetetic acid, respectively, as the developing solvent. Each lipid fraction was dried under N2, and methyl esters were prepared using 1.09 N HCl in methanol. Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted in 1.0 mL of hexane, concentrated to 0.5 mL by evaporation under N2, and transferred to a GLC vial containing a 1.0-mm bed of anhydrous sodium sulfate. Fatty acid methyl esters were separated and identified as described previously except that a 2.0-µL injection was used.

Calculations and Statistical Analysis

Organic matter flow was calculated by dividing the amount of Cr dosed by the concentration of Cr in the sample (duodenal, ileal, and fecal). Digesta flow of N, NDF, and individual fatty acids was calculated by multiplying nutrient concentration of OM at each site by OM flow. Bacterial isolates were used to calculate true ruminal OM digestibility as follows: [OM intake – (duodenal OM flow – duodenal microbial OM flow)/OM intake] x 100. Apparent small intestinal fatty acid disappearance was calculated as the difference between duodenal flow and ileal flow of fatty acid expressed as a percentage of the fatty acid duodenal flow.

All data were normalized to a constant BW of 50 kg. as the lambs grew at variable rates because of the difference in energy consumption throughout the experiment. All data except ruminal fermentation data were analyzed using the GLM procedures of SAS for a Latin square (Version 8.0, 1998, SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). The main plot was diet tested against animal x diet. Ruminal fermentation data (pH, NH3, and VFA) were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (Version 8.0, 1998). Compound symmetry was determined to be the most desirable covariance structure according to the Akaike’s Information Criterion. Animal was designated as the random effect for all analyses. Ruminal data (pH, NH3, and VFA) were analyzed using animal x period x diet as the subject index. No treatment x time interaction (P = 0.80) for ruminal pH was observed; therefore, only treatment effects were reported. When F-tests were significant, single degree of freedom orthogonal polynomial contrasts (Steel and Torrie, 1980Go) were used to determine linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of level of oil supplementation.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 IMPLICATIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Intake, Digestion, and VFA

By experimental design, intake of total and individual fatty acids increased (linear, P < 0.004) with increasing level of dietary safflower oil (Table 3Go). Intake of 18:2c-9,c-12 was the most substantial because high-linoleate safflower oil was fed. Similarly, OM intake increased (linear, P < 0.001), but NDF and N intake did not change (P = 1.00), with increased dietary safflower oil because all treatments received the same basal diet at 2% of BW.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Intake of fatty acids, OM, NDF, and N (g/d per 50 kg of BW) by wethers fed increasing levels of high-linoleate safflower oil
 
Apparent ruminal digestibilities (% of intake) of OM (52.33 ± 8.56), NDF (32.83 ± 21.8), and N (–5.1 ± 22.4) were not affected (P = 0.65 to 0.78) by increased dietary safflower oil. Similarly, true (only corrected for microbial contributions) ruminal digestibility of OM (69.1 ± 6.64) as well as lower tract (% entering the duodenum) and total tract digestibilities (% of intake) of OM (70.98 ± 4.5 and 86.6 ± 3.4, respectively), NDF (54.98 ± 14 and 65.3 ± 11.6, respectively), and N (77.8 ± 4.5 and 79.7 ± 1.8, respectively) were not affected (P = 0.09 to 0.43) by increased dietary safflower oil. These results were consistent with those of others who reported no effect of supplemental fat on digestibility of OM, NDF, and N (Bateman and Jenkins, 1998Go; Kucuk et al., 2004Go)

Increased dietary safflower oil did not affect ruminal pH (P = 0.41; Table 4Go). The average pH across treatments was 6.0, which suggests that the extent of fermentation of OM and NDF was not affected by increasing levels of dietary safflower oil. Extent of NDF fermentation was not expected to be altered because cellulolysis is not inhibited until pH decreases to <6.0 (Van Soest, 1994Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Ruminal pH and VFA of wethers fed increasing levels of high-linoleate safflower oil
 
Total ruminal VFA concentrations were not affected (P = 0.36) by increased dietary safflower oil (Table 4Go). A linear decrease (P = 0.02) in molar proportion of acetate along with a linear increase (P = 0.04) in molar proportion of propionate was observed with increased dietary safflower oil. The changes in molar proportions of acetate and propionate resulted in a decreased (linear, P = 0.05) acetate to propionate ratio. Kucuk et al. (2004)Go did not observe a change in the acetate to propionate ratio nor was an increase in molar proportion of propionate observed with increased dietary soybean oil. Kucuk et al. (2004)Go replaced corn with soybean oil; thus, there might have been little change in potential propionate precursors. The increase in molar proportion of propionate in the current study might have resulted from supplemental safflower oil, which increased availability of glycerol from ruminal lipolysis, which is rapidly converted to propionate in the rumen (Chalupa et al., 1986Go).

Linear decreases in molar proportions of isobutyrate and isovalerate (P = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively), but not of butyrate or valerate (P = 0.73 to 0.93), were observed with increased dietary safflower oil. The effect of dietary safflower oil on these VFA was unexpected because CP intake by all wethers was normalized for BW, and bacterial metabolism of the branched-chain amino acids, valine and leucine, results in the branched-chain VFA isobutryrate and isovalerate, respectively (Hespell and Smith, 1983Go).

Increased dietary safflower oil did not affect (P = 0.21) ruminal NH3 (data not shown). In the current study, ruminal NH3 concentrations were 1.40 mg/dL for the 9% safflower oil diet to 4.19 mg/dL for the 0% oil diet. The lack of effect on ruminal NH3 concentration was expected because true ruminal N digestion was not affected as dietary oil increased.

Duodenal Flow of Total Fatty Acids

Except for duodenal flow of 18:2 c-9,c-11 (P = 0.28), duodenal flow of all individual and total fatty acids increased (linear, P = 0.006 to 0.05) with increased dietary safflower oil (Table 5Go). Increased duodenal flow of 16:0 could be attributed to increased dietary intake as well as microbial fatty acid contributions (Pantoja et al., 1996Go). There was a 2.2-fold increase in duodenal flow of 18:0 from the 0 to the 6% oil diets; little further increase in duodenal flow was observed when dietary safflower oil was increased to 9%. The magnitude of increase in duodenal flow of 18:0 from 0 to 6% dietary oil indicated that biohydrogenation of dietary unsaturated fatty acids was occurring; however, duodenal flow of 18:0 leveled off between the 6 and 9% oil diets, suggesting that the extent of biohydrogenation was lower with the 9% safflower oil diet. Other researchers (Pantoja et al., 1996Go; Duckett et al., 2002Go; Kucuk et al., 2004Go) have also observed increased duodenal flow of 16:0 and 18:0 with fat supplementation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Duodenal fatty acid flow (g·d–1·50 kg of BW–1) of wethers fed increasing levels of high-linoleate safflower oil
 
Duodenal flow of 18:1t and 18:1c fatty acids increased (linear, P = 0.009 to 0.05) with increased dietary safflower oil. Duodenal flow of 18:1t-11 increased by over 15-fold from 0 to 9% dietary safflower oil and increased by 62% from 6 to 9% dietary safflower oil. The linear increase in duodenal flow of 18:1t-11 combined with the smaller increase in duodenal flow of 18:0 from 6 to 9% indicates that biohydrogenation was not going to completion with the greater percentage of oil in the diets. There was a substantial increase (linear, P = 0.03) in duodenal flow of 18:1c-12 when dietary safflower oil was increased from 0 to 9%. Duckett et al. (2002)Go reported a nearly 3-fold increase in the duodenal flow of 18:1c-12 in steers fed a high-corn (79%) diet supplemented with 2.4% corn oil compared with steers fed a control diet. Increased duodenal flow of 18:1c-12 with supplemental high-linoleate oil is not unusual. Hazlewood et al. (1976)Go reported that some bacterial organisms (EC7/2 and 2/9/I gram-negative rod and Vibrio sp.) convert linoleic and {alpha}-linolenic acids to a variety of 18:1t and 18:1c positional isomers of octadecenoic acid, including the 18:1c-12 isomer. In the current study, there was a linear increase in linoleic and linolenic acid intake; thus, observing an increase in duodenal flow of 18:1c-12 would be expected. However, the magnitude of the increase observed in the current study seems striking. Isomers 18:1c-9 and 18:1c-11 also increased (linear, P = 0.02 and 0.05, respectively) with increased dietary safflower oil.

Our study was predicated on the observation of Kucuk et al. (2004)Go, who noted a 2-fold (1.90 to 3.88 g/d) increase in the duodenal flow of 18:2c-9,c-12 when sheep were fed a high-concentrate diet supplemented with increasing levels (0 to 9.4%) of soybean oil. In the current study, high-linoleate safflower oil was used instead of soybean oil (58% 18:2c-9,c-12) to assure a similar or greater magnitude of increase in duodenal flow of this fatty acid as was observed by Kucuk et al. (2004)Go. A 5-fold increase (P = 0.01) in the duodenal flow of 18:2c-9,c-12 was observed from 0 to 9% added safflower oil. Duodenal flow of linolenic acid (18:3c-9,c-12,c-15) also increased (P = 0.02) with increased dietary safflower oil, suggesting that the extent of lipolysis and/or biohydrogenation was decreased with increasing levels of dietary safflower oil. Conversely, Duckett et al. (2002)Go did not observe an increase in the duodenal flow of either 18:2c-9,c-12 or 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15 when feeding beef steers a 79% corn diet supplemented with either high-oil corn or corn oil. However, the level of oil inclusion used by Duckett et al. (2002)Go was approximately 5% less, and the concentration of 18:2 c-9,c-12 was much lower, than in the current study.

With the exception of 18:2c-9,c-11, duodenal flow of all of the CLA isomers identified increased (linear, P = 0.02 to 0.05) with increased dietary safflower oil. Conjugated linoleic acid has several potential health benefits, and natural CLA isomers can only be found in ruminant products (Bauman et al., 2003Go). The CLA isomer 18:2t-10,c-12 was increased the most of any of the CLA isomers. Duckett et al. (2002)Go also observed that 18:2t-10,c-12 had the greatest increase, and the increase was only observed for diets with high lipid content (high-oil corn) vs. lower lipid levels (2.4% added corn oil). Similarly, Kucuk et al. (2004)Go observed increases in all identified CLA isomers with increased dietary soybean oil; 18:2t-10,c-12 showed the greatest increase. Griinari and Bauman (1999)Go proposed that the production of 18:2c-9,t-10 involved 18:2c-9,t-10 isomerase in ruminal bacteria, resulting in the formation of the 18:2t-10,c-12 conjugated double bond structure as one of the biohydrogenation intermediates.

Duodenal Flow of Esterified Fatty Acids

Duodenal flow of esterified 16:0 and 18:0 increased (linear, P = 0.04 and 0.05, respectively) with increased dietary safflower oil (Table 5Go). As dietary safflower oil increased, duodenal flow of esterified 16:0 increased 0.5-fold, which was much lower than the increased duodenal flow observed for total 16:0. A change of similar magnitude in duodenal flow of 18:0 was also observed when total 18:0 and esterified 18:0 duodenal flow values were contrasted. The increases in esterified 16:0 and 18:0 were expected because of the increased consumption of 16:0 and 18:0 with increased dietary safflower oil. However, the increases might also be attributed to de novo synthesis.

Duodenal flow of esterified 18:1t-11 tended to increase (linear, P = 0.08), and duodenal flow of esterified 18:1c-12 increased (linear, P = 0.04), with increased dietary safflower oil, which was a surprising observation because to become a biohydrogenation intermediate, its precursor would have had to be in the free fatty acid form. This indicates reesterification of a portion of the 18:1t-11 and 18:1c-12 to a glycerol backbone occurred within the rumen, possibly as part of rumen bacterial cell membranes. Harfoot and Hazlewood (1997)Go concluded that both ruminal protozoa and bacteria incorporate preformed fatty acids into their cellular lipids. Jenkins (1993)Go calculated the extent of microbial lipid synthesis in the rumen from a variety of reports and estimated that for every 100 g of lipid entering the rumen about 8 g were lost because of incorporation into microbial cells. Rumen microbial fatty acid analysis (data not shown) revealed that total 18:1t-11 tended to increase (linear, P = 0.07), and total 18:1c-12 increased (linear, P = 0.001), with increasing dietary safflower oil. Within the esterified fraction, duodenal flow of microbial 18:1t-11 (linear, P = 0.03) and 18:1c-12 (P = 0.01) were increased (data not shown), further supporting the conclusion that reesterification of fatty acids and microbial incorporation of preformed fatty acids into microbial membranes occurred.

Duodenal flow of esterified linoleic acid (18:2c-9,c-12) increased (linear, P = 0.007) with increased dietary safflower oil. When duodenal flow of total 18:2c-9,c-12 and esterified 18:2c-9,c-12 were compared by paired t-test, there was no difference (P = 0.32) in duodenal flow between the 2 forms. Free linoleic acid is rapidly hydrogenated within the rumen; thus, it is possible that initiation of fatty acid hydrolysis might have decreased because of saturation of the microbial enzyme system. Therefore, to increase the availability of 18:2c-9,c-12 for intestinal absorption, it must remain esterified.

Very little CLA was detected in the esterified fatty acids. Nevertheless, esterified 18:2t-10,c-12 tended (P = 0.07) to increase with increased dietary safflower oil, but the other CLA isomers were not affected (P = 0.21 to 0.50). Duodenal flow of esterified 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15 also increased (P = 0.02) with increased dietary safflower oil. In contrast to the duodenal flow of total 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15, which increased 3-fold, duodenal flow of esterified 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15 increased 2-fold with increased dietary safflower oil. However, at each dietary level of safflower oil, total and esterified 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15 in the duodenal contents were of similar magnitude. Thus, it is likely that duodenal flow of this fatty acid was not biohydrogenated because a large portion existed in the esterified form.

Solid Phase Lipid Extraction

Weight percentages of fatty acids extracted from the duodenal contents that were observed in the neutral lipid, polar lipid, and FFA fractions are shown in Table 6Go. There were insufficient duodenal contents from each animal to allow for quantitative comparisons. However, the results clearly indicate the pattern of distribution of fatty acids within each fraction. The neutral lipid fraction was composed primarily of triacylglycerols, but di- and, to a lesser extent, monoaclyglyerols were also present.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Weight percentage of fatty acids within neutral, polar, and free fatty acid fractions1,2
 
Within the neutral lipid fraction, the predominant fatty acids from duodenal contents of the 0% oil diet were 16:0, 18:1c-9, and 18:2c-9,c-12. However, when oil was added to the diet, 18:2c-9,c-12 was the predominant fatty acid in the neutral fraction followed by 18:1c-9 and 16:0. Within the polar lipid fraction, the predominant fatty acid with the 0% oil diet was 16:0, followed by 18:0, and then the total of unidentified 18:1t and 18:1c isomers; this pattern was unchanged when oil was added to the diet. The same fatty acids that were predominant in the polar lipid fraction were also the predominant fatty acids within the FFA fraction, with or without oil added to the diet.

The presence of 18:1t-11 in the neutral and polar lipid fractions further indicates that fatty acid reesterification occurred within the rumen because 18:1t-11, a biohydrogenation intermediate, could only be present if its precursor was a free fatty acid, and the presence of a free carboxyl group is absolutely required for hydrogenation to take place (Hazlewood et al., 1976Go). Harfoot (1981)Go provided insight on uptake of long-chain fatty acids by ruminal bacteria and the fractions in which they have been observed. After ruminal bacteria were incubated with 14C-linolenic acid, the proportion of 14C appearing in the sterol ester fraction as C18:2 fatty acids was 16%, as C18:1 fatty acids was 23% and 18:0 was 61%. Within the polar lipid fraction, 14C was present in all C18 fatty acids with 14% as C18:2 and 32% as C18:1 fatty acids. Therefore, we can conclude that the presence of 18:1t-11 within the polar lipid fraction observed in the current study represented microbial incorporation, and the presence of 18:2c-9,c-12 within the neutral fraction likely represented aclyglycerols of the feed component, which indicates a decrease in extent of lipolysis and, thus, biohydrogenation.

Apparent Small Intestinal Fatty Acid Disappearance

Ileal flow of fatty acids represents the amount of fatty acids that did not disappear between the duodenum and ileum; therefore, an estimation of apparent absorption can be made. Ileal flow of most individual, total, and esterified fatty acids were not affected by increased dietary safflower oil (data not shown).

Total Fatty Acids. Except for 18:2c-9,c-12 and 18:2c-9,t-11, apparent small intestinal disappearance (Table 7Go) of most individual fatty acids was not affected (P = 0.19 to 0.90) by increased dietary safflower oil. There was, however, a linear increase in small intestinal disappearance of 18:2c-9,c-12 (P = 0.05) and 18:2c-9,t-11 (P = 0.03) as dietary safflower oil increased. Kucuk et al. (2004)Go observed a quadratic increase in disappearance of 18:2c-9,c-12 from the small intestine but did not observe an increase in that of 18:2c-9,t-11 until soybean oil was included in the diet at 6.4%. Conversely, others have observed a linear decrease in small intestinal total fatty acid digestion with increasing level of fat supplementation (Zinn, 1989Go; Pantoja et al., 1996Go; Elliott et al., 1999Go). Contrasting results were likely attributable to differences in duodenal flow of saturated fatty acids, because Kucuk et al. (2004)Go reported decreased apparent disappearance of total fatty acids as the duodenal flow of stearate increased. Moreover, intestinal absorption of unsaturated fatty acids is greater compared with saturated fatty acids (Doreau and Chilliard, 1997Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Apparent small intestinal disappearance of fatty acids as a percentage of duodenal flow in wethers fed increasing levels of high-linoleate safflower oil1
 
Esterified Fatty Acids. Apparent small intestinal disappearance of esterified 18:1c-9, 18:2c-9,c-12, and total esterified fatty acids increased (P = 0.001 to 0.04) as dietary safflower increased. However, small intestinal disappearance of 18:1t-11 decreased (P = 0.05) and that of 18:1c-12 and 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15 tended to decrease (P = 0.08 and 0.06, respectively) with increased dietary safflower oil. Although there was a slight decrease in apparent disappearance of these fatty acids, their apparent disappearance within the small intestine was ≥90%.

According to Noble (1981)Go, absorption of fatty acids from large amounts of unhydrolyzed triacylglycerols that reach the small intestine may be delayed until they reach the mid jejunum because pancreatic lipase has an optimal pH of 7.5 and the pH in the distal duodenum is about 5.0. Thus, acylglycerols may not be as readily digested, which may decrease absorption. However, results of the current study are not in agreement with the conclusion of Noble (1981)Go because all esterified fatty acids within the duodenal contents were apparently absorbed at 80% for 18:3c-9,c-12,c-15 at the greatest level of dietary safflower oil up to 100% for 18:1t-11 and 18:1c-12 with 0% dietary safflower oil. Thus, in the current study, the physical and chemical properties of the dietary triaclyglycerols had minimal effects on apparent absorption of fatty acids by the small intestine.

In conclusion, increasing levels of dietary safflower oil increased the duodenal flow of linoleic acid along with other unsaturated fatty acids, indicating that the extent of ruminal biohydrogenation was decreased. Duodenal flow of linoleic acid associated with total fatty acids was similar to duodenal flow of linoleic acid associated with esterified fatty acids. Thus, we further conclude that the extent of ruminal lipolysis was also decreased with increased level of dietary safflower oil because of the requirement for a free carboxyl group for initiation of biohydrogenation and concomitant loss of linoleic acid. Additionally, the observation of biohydrogenation intermediates in the esterified pool of fatty acids indicated that reesterification of ruminal fatty acids was occurring, thus contributing to duodenal flow of biohydrogenation intermediates. Finally, at the levels of high-linoleate safflower oil fed, apparent disappearance, and thus apparent absorption, of fatty acids ranged from 80 to 100%, indicating that intestinal lipolysis did not limit overall digestion of the fatty acids fed to the sheep.


    IMPLICATIONS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 IMPLICATIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Producing ruminant meat and dairy products that are enriched with unsaturated fatty acids, such as various n-3, n-6, and conjugated linoleic acid, is desired. By feeding large dietary proportions of high-linoleate vegetable oils in high-concentrate diets, greater levels of linoleic acid and other polyunsaturated fatty acids will be available for incorporation into ruminant-derived food products.


    Footnotes
 
1 Current address: Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, Mandan, ND 58554. Back

2 Corresponding author: dcrule{at}uwyo.edu

Received for publication August 18, 2005. Accepted for publication October 5, 2005.


    LITERATURE CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 IMPLICATIONS
 LITERATURE CITED
 


AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA.

Bateman, H. J., II, and T. J. Jenkins. 1998. Influence of soybean oil in high fiber diets fed to nonlactating cows on ruminal unsaturated fatty acids and nutrient digestibility. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2451–2458.[Abstract]

Bauman, D. E., B. A. Corl, and D. G. Peterson. 2003. The biology of conjugated linoleic acids in ruminants. Page 146 in Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid Research. Vol. 2. J. L. Sebedio, W. W. Christie, and R. Adlof, ed. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL.

Broderick, G. A., and J. H. Kang. 1980. Automated simultaneous determinations of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J. Dairy Sci. 63:64–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chalupa, W., B. Vecchiatelli, A. Esler, D. S. Kronfeld, D. Sklan, and D. L. Palmquist. 1986. Ruminal fermentation in vivo as influenced by long-chain fatty acids. J. Dairy Sci. 69:1293–1301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christie, W. W. 1982. The preparation of derivatives of lipids. Page 51 in Lipid Analysis. 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, New York, NY.

Doreau, M., and Y. Chilliard. 1997. Digestion and metabolism of dietary fat in farm animals. Br. J. Nutr. 78(Suppl. 1):S15–S35.[Medline]

Duckett, S. K., J. G. Andrae, and F. N. Owens. 2002. Effect of high-oil corn or added corn oil on ruminal biohydrogenation of fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid formation in beef steers fed finishing diets. J. Anim. Sci. 80:3353–3360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Elliott, J. P., J. K. Drackley, A. D. Beaulieu, C. G. Aldrich, and N. R. Merchen. 1999. Effects of saturation and esterification of fat sources on site and extent of digestion in steers: Digestion of fatty acids, triglycerides, and energy. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1919–1929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Goetsch, A. L., and M. L. Galyean. 1983. Influence of feeding frequency on passage of fluid and particulate markers in steers fed a concentrate diet. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 63:727–730.

Griinari, J. M., and D. E. Bauman. 1999. Biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid and its incorporation into meat and milk in ruminants. Page 180 in Advances in Conjugated Linoleic Acid Research. Vol. 1. M. P. Yurawecz, M. M. Mossoba, J. K. G. Kramer, M. W. Pariza, and G. J. Nelson ed. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL.

Harfoot, C. G. 1981. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. Page 21 in Lipid Metabolism in Ruminant Animals. W. W. Christie ed. Pergamon Press, New York, NY.

Harfoot, C. G., and G. P. Hazlewood. 1997. Lipid metabolism in the rumen. Page 382 in The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. P. N. Hobson and C. S. Stewart, ed. Blackie Academic & Professional, London, England.

Hazlewood, G. P., P. Kemp, D. Lander, and R. M. C. Dawson. 1976. C18 unsaturated fatty acid hydrogenation patterns of some rumen bacteria and their ability to hydrolyze exogenous phospholipids. Br. J. Nutr. 35:293–297.[Medline]

Hespell, R. B., and C. J. Smith. 1983. Utilization of nitrogen sources by gastrointestinal tract bacteria. Page 167 in Human Intestinal Microflora in Health and Disease. D. J. Hentges ed. Acad. Press, New York, NY.

Hill, F. W., and D. L. Anderson. 1958. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determination with growing chicks. J. Nutr. 64:587–603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jenkins, T. C. 1993. Advances in ruminant lipid metabolism. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3851–3863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jenkins, T. C., and C. S. Adams. 2002. The biohydrogenation of linoleamide in vitro and its effects on linoleic acid concentration in duodenal contents of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 80:533–540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kucuk, O., B. W. Hess, P. A. Ludden, and D. C. Rule. 2001. Effect of forage:concentrate ratio on ruminal digestion and duodenal flow of fatty acids in ewes. J. Anim. Sci. 79:2233–2240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kucuk, O., B. W. Hess, and D. C. Rule. 2004. Soybean oil supplementation of a high-concentrate diet does not affect site and extent of organic matter, starch, neutral detergent fiber, or nitrogen digestion, but influences both ruminal metabolism and intestinal flow of fatty acids in limit-fed lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2985–2994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Latham, M. J., J. E. Storry, and M. E. Sharpe. 1972. Effect of low-roughage diets on the microflora and lipid metabolism in the rumen. Appl. Microbiol. 24:871–877.[Medline]

Leat, W. M. F. 1977. Depot fatty acids on Aberdeen Angus and Friesian cattle reared on hay and barley diets. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 89:575–582.

Merchen, N. R., J. L. Firkins, and L. L. Berger. 1986. Effect of intake and forage level on ruminal turnover rates, bacterial protein synthesis and duodenal amino acid flow in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 62:216–225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Murrieta, C. M., B. W. Hess, and D. C. Rule. 2003. Comparison of acidic & alkaline catalysts for preparation of fatty acid methyl esters from ovine muscle with emphasis on conjugated linoleic acid. Meat Sci. 65:523–529.

Noble, R. C. 1981. Digestion, absorption, and transport of lipids in ruminant animals. Page 57 in Lipid Metabolism in Ruminant Animals. W. W. Christie ed, Pergamon Press, New York, NY.

NRC. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Pantoja, J., J. L. Firkins, and M. L. Eastridge. 1996. Fatty acid digestibility and lactation performance by diary cows fed fats varying in degree of saturation. J. Dairy Sci. 79:429–437.[Abstract]

Rule, D. C. 1997. Direct transesterification of total tatty acids of adipose tissue, and of freeze-dried muscle and liver with boron-trifluoride in methanol. Meat Sci. 46:23–32.

Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY.

Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Pages 246–254 in Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed. Cornell Univ, Press. Ithaca, NY.

Zinn, R. A. 1989. Influence of level and source of dietary fat on its comparative feeding value in finishing diets for feedlot steers: Metabolism. J. Anim. Sci. 67:1038–1049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. J. Vander Pol, M. K. Luebbe, G. I. Crawford, G. E. Erickson, and T. J. Klopfenstein
Performance and digestibility characteristics of finishing diets containing distillers grains, composites of corn processing coproducts, or supplemental corn oil
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 639 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. W. Hess, G. E. Moss, and D. C. Rule
A decade of developments in the area of fat supplementation research with beef cattle and sheep
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E188 - E204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rule, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rule, D. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS