|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL GENETICS |
USDA, ARS, US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: callipyge reproduction sheep
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The DLK1 gene is highly expressed in preadipocytes, inhibits their differentiation, and is normally suppressed once the differentiation process begins (Smas and Sul, 1993
). Functional analysis of the tissues from lambs of each genotype indicated that the mutation in the paternally derived heterozygous state caused abnormal postnatal maintenance of elevated expression of DLK1, specific to fast-twitch muscle fibers (Charlier et al., 2001
; Murphy et al., 2005
). These temporal and spatial associations of altered gene expression make a strong argument that a varied DLK1 transcript level, and ultimately the level of the protein, is directly responsible for the hypertrophic condition.
A complete evaluation of all aspects of lifetime productivity is required to assess the relative merits of using specific genetic variation in a breeding program. In addition to the meat tenderness antagonism, any decreased reproductive fitness would be a potential cost component to consider while maintaining a terminal sire population fixed for the callipyge mutation. Our specific experimental objective was to estimate the effects of each callipyge genotype on reproductive traits to test the null hypothesis that this mutation has no effect on reproduction.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental procedures were approved and performed in accordance with US Meat Animal Research Center animal care guidelines. Animals in the study were produced as part of a Dorset-Romanov F2 resource population created to evaluate callipyge genotypic effects (Freking et al., 1998a
). Contemporary sets of F2 ewe lambs segregating for the callipyge mutation were produced in each of 5 yr from 1994 through 1998 (Table 1
). Ewe lambs produced in 1994 and 1995 from 8 F1 sires (7 paternally derived heterozygotes and 1 homozygous normal) were part of a serial slaughter design (ranging from 149 to 280 d of age) to estimate genotypic effects of the callipyge locus on slaughter, carcass, and meat quality traits (Freking et al., 1998b
, 1999
). Female reproductive tracts were removed in the abattoir, and both ovaries were examined. The total number of corpora lutea was recorded for each ewe. A total of 174 of 191 ewe lambs showed evidence of puberty, which allowed ovulation rate to be recorded from the estrous cycle at the time of slaughter.
|
Each trait was considered a trait of the ewe. Culling of ewes was practiced only for reasons that adversely affected their ability to produce or care for lambs. Primary culling reasons were mastitis and poor health (total of 88% of culls). The weight of each ewe was recorded at the beginning of each breeding season. Conception rate (0, 1) was determined for ewes exposed and still present at the start of each lambing season. The number of lambs born and birth and weaning weights of lambs were recorded. Ewes giving birth to triplets or quadruplets were generally limited to rearing only 2 lambs.
Excess lambs (17% of lambs born) were artificially reared in a nursery. All male lambs were castrated at approximately 14 d of age. All lambs were offered ad libitum access to a total mixed creep ration (2.90 Mcal of ME/kg of DM with 17.5% CP) by approximately 14 d of age. At weaning (56 d for lambs reared by the ewe and 32 d for lambs reared in the nursery), the number of lambs reared by the ewe and in the nursery was tabulated separately. Weaning weight was recorded for each lamb and was adjusted for age to 56 and 32 d for dam- and nursery-reared lambs, respectively. Litter weights of lambs reared naturally and in the nursery were calculated separately for each ewe. Longevity of the ewe was determined as a binary trait based on the presence or absence of the ewe in the breeding flock at 5 yr of age.
Data collected on 265 ewes entering the breeding flock were analyzed for longevity and productivity through 5 yr of age. These ewes generated 937 records for breeding weight and 925 records for conception rate. A total of 717 records was available for traits based on number of ewes lambing.
Genotypic Data
A blood sample was obtained from each ewe, and DNA was extracted following standard protocols (Miller et al., 1988
) or using Gentra Generation Capture kits (Gentra Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Genotypes for the callipyge (adenine to guanine transition) mutation were determined using a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry assay described in detail by Freking et al. (2002)
. For ewes that were heterozygous for the mutation and also derived from heterozygous matings, flanking marker information was required to determine paternal and maternal origin of alleles. Genotypic data were collected for 6 microsatellite loci (TGLA122, ILSTS054, MCM38, CSSM18, OY3, and OY15), flanking both sides of the causative mutation. Primer pair information, locus map positions, and genotyping procedures have been described in detail elsewhere (Freking et al., 1998a
). Grandparental (Dorset or Romanov) phase information was determined at the callipyge locus position from CHROMPIC output using CRIMAP version 2.4 software (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO). Each ewe was classified into 1 of 4 genotypes (NMatNPat, NMatCPat, CMatNPat, or CMatCPat), where N represents the wild type adenine base and C represents the mutant guanine base; the superscripts indicate maternal (Mat) or paternal (Pat) origin. Romanov alleles were all wild type, and Dorset alleles were either callipyge or normal, discriminated by phase-known information from the F1 sires of the F2 ewes.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed with the mixed model analysis of variance procedure of SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). The model for ovulation rate included fixed effects of year (1994 and 1995), callipyge genotype (NMatNPat, NMatCPat, CMatNPat, and CMatCPat), and the 2-way interaction. Genotype-specific, second-order polynomials of slaughter age were also fitted. Sire (n = 8) of the ewe was included as a random effect. The Satterthwaite option was used to approximate denominator df associated with the random effect of sire. Gene action was tested by 3 orthogonal, 3-df contrasts to partition the associated 9 df into additive (1, 0, 0, and 1), dominance (1, 1, 1, and 1), and reciprocal genetic effects (0, 1, 1, and 0).
The model for ewe longevity included fixed effects of ewe year of birth (1996, 1997, and 1998), callipyge genotype (NMatNPat, NMatCPat, CMatNPat, and CMatCPat), and the 2-way interaction. Sire (n = 4) of the ewe was fitted as a random effect. Models for ewe productivity traits were as described for longevity with the exception that ewe age (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 yr) was also fitted as a fixed effect along with all possible 2-way interactions; age was treated as a repeated measure effect of ewe within year of birth and callipyge genotype. A compound symmetry structure was assumed for the residual (co)variance matrix. Contrasts to test additive, dominance, and reciprocal effects were performed to partition the 3 df associated with callipyge genotypes.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of year of birth of ewe, age of ewe, and 2-way interactions among the fixed effects are not presented. Year of birth of the ewe only affected breeding weight and the number of lambs weaned by the ewe (P < 0.05). Results for this effect would not be expected to be repeatable because of the limited sample sizes used here. The interaction of age of ewe with callipyge genotype rarely approached significance. The age of ewe was highly significant for all traits.
Ovulation Rate
Callipyge genotype was associated with a decreased ovulation rate of ewe lambs (P < 0.05). Least squares means by genotype adjusted to the average slaughter age of 216 d are presented in Table 2
. There was a lack of evidence for differential effects between the reciprocal heterozygous classes (3 df, F = 1.62, P = 0.19); therefore, traditional sets of contrasts (additive, dominance, and reciprocal) to test gene action were considered appropriate. There was no evidence of an additive effect (3 df, F = 0.56, P = 0.65), but there was an indication of dominance (3 df, F = 2.45, P = 0.06). Inspection of the least squares means shows that heterozygous genotypes were not intermediate to the homozygous genotypes but were similar to CMatCPat. However, any ovum difference among callipyge genotypes in ewe lambs did not result in an increased number born at any ewe age (see subsequent data).
|
Callipyge genotype affected weight of ewes at breeding (P < 0.001; Table 3
). Reciprocal heterozygotes differed (1 df, F = 7.73, P = 0.006). Under this situation, a different set of 3 orthogonal contrasts were derived that included paternal polar overdominance as a description of gene action (Freking et al., 1998a
). These contrasts of NMatNPat, NMatCPat, CMatNPat, and CMatCPat effects defined additive (1, 0, 0, and 1), maternal dominance (1, 0, 2, and 1), and paternal polar overdominance (1, 3, 1, and 1) models of gene action, respectively. The additive (1 df, F = 2.38, P = 0.13) and maternal dominance (1 df, F = 0.04, P = 0.85) contrasts did not contribute significantly to variation in breeding weight, whereas the effect of paternal polar overdominance was detected (1 df, F = 12.26, P < 0.001). The NMatCPat genotype was 2.5 kg lighter at breeding, on average, than other callipyge genotypes.
|
There was little evidence that the callipyge genotype influenced (P = 0.20) conception rate (Table 3
). Ewes genotyped as CMatCPat had the lowest conception rates numerically (10% less than other genotypes). Limited sample size resulting in high standard errors for this trait did not allow us to detect this difference as significant.
Productivity to Weaning
Callipyge genotype did not contribute significantly to variation for measures of ewe productivity to weaning (Table 3
). Despite the significant differences among genotypes in ovulation rate of ewe lambs, there were no observed differences among genotypes in number of lambs born per ewe lambing at any ewe age (P = 0.98 for interaction of ewe age x genotype). All 4 genotypes averaged just over 2 lambs born per ewe lambing. Because of the nearly equivalent litter sizes at birth, litter birth weights were also similar across all genotypes. No difference was detected in lamb sex ratio, which was nearly 50% for each sex across the ewe genotypes. Maternal ability was evaluated to weaning and revealed no significant effect of genotype on number or weight of lambs weaned. The extra 0.3 nursery lambs per ewe lambing also did not differ by genotype. Growth rate and survival of progeny from ewes of all 4 genotypes were similar, indicating that maternal ability was not influenced by callipyge genotype.
Longevity
An evaluation of ewe longevity calculated at 5 yr of age is reported by genotype (Table 3
). Callipyge genotype did not contribute significantly to variation in the percentage of ewes still present in the breeding flock 30 d after the beginning of the fifth lambing season. Similar to the conception rate information, small sample sizes and large standard errors for the specific trait prevented detection of genotypic effects. However, inspection of the least squares means indicated that the lowest percentage of ewes maintained in the flock was from the NMatNPat ewes (41.9%) and the highest percentage was from those genotyped as CMatCPat (64.4%).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Differences were detected among genotypes for ovulation rate of ewe lambs at slaughter. Gene action was estimated to be complete dominance for the C allele; however, a 0.25 ovum difference of the NMatCPat compared with the NMatNPat genotype at the early age evaluated is not likely to be biologically important. In NMatCPat ewes, dietary protein is preferentially converted to carcass lean to the detriment of other tissues such as fat, wool, and internal organ growth. During the prepubertal growing phase, dietary inputs are preferentially allocated toward muscle growth, and the resultant lower degree of fatness associated with the NMatCPat genotype could delay onset of puberty. Data for ovulation rate in this study were not standardized to a common estrous cycle because of the serial slaughter design. A reasonable explanation of the lower ovulation rate of the NMatCPat genotype would be that this group had gone through fewer estrous cycles than other callipyge genotypes at the average age of 216 d. Alternatively, another locus on chromosome 18 near callipyge might have an effect on ovulation rate, where Romanov alleles exceed the Dorset alleles for ovum shed.
Live weight of the NMatCPat ewes at breeding was less than other genotypes. Although significant growth rate differences among genotypes during the finishing stages have not been reported, this result is consistent with previous research that identified lower live weight at slaughter age end points. This weight difference was primarily attributed to lower pelt weight, less kidney fat, and lighter liver and intestinal organ weights for the NMatCPat genotype (Koohmaraie et al., 1995
; Jackson et al., 1997a
; Freking et al., 1998b
). Consistent with lighter weights of internal organs, daily feed intake was reduced in this genotype compared with normal lambs (Jackson et al., 1997a
). Lower body weights and feed intakes, thus lower maintenance costs, would be considered beneficial in the female breeding population. However, extreme carcass leanness to the detriment of reproductive fitness can have dramatic negative impact on economic returns to a production system. Differences in breeding weights approached 2.5 kg, but this lower BW did not have an impact on subsequent fertility or productivity. As indicated previously, the relevant issue for a terminal sire population would be performance of CMatCPat ewes, which did not differ from NMatNPat.
Callipyge genotype did not influence component traits of overall reproductive performance. Conception rate, number born, and maternal ability were similar for all genotypes. Growth rate and survival of progeny were also similar regardless of genotype of the dam. One additional component trait to overall flock productivity is ewe longevity. Replacement rates within a ewe flock are a cost associated with maintaining a production system. Performance of young ewes is typically less than that of mature ewes (3 to 5 yr of age); therefore, the higher the percentage of replacement ewes required to maintain a flock, the greater the costs of production. In this experiment, ewes were allowed an opportunity to lamb annually for 5 consecutive yr. Although differences among genotypes in percentage of ewes maintained after the 5-yr evaluation period seemed substantial (ranging from 64.4 to 41.9%), the large standard errors for this trait did not allow us to detect genotype as a significant source of variation. Longevity was at least as high for CMatCPat ewes as for any other genotype. Despite dramatic differences in expression of DLK1 in muscle fibers associated with the callipyge mutation, there appeared to be no correlated long-term impact on health status or other measures of reproductive ability or fitness.
The current experiment indicated limited or no effects on component traits of reproduction and fitness. However, the documented adverse effects on meat tenderness still require an intervention strategy to ensure a favorable eating experience by consumers of loin chops (Koohmaraie et al., 1995
; Freking et al., 1999
). A genetic solution or an easily adaptable postmortem intervention strategy (Duckett et al., 1998
; Koohmaraie et al., 1998
; Solomon et al., 1998
) that solves the tenderness antagonism could have great impact on lean meat production in sheep. Experiments are underway at the US Meat Animal Research Center (Clay Center, NE) to investigate genetic solutions for the tenderness antagonism that would facilitate incorporation of callipyge into terminal sire production systems.
| IMPLICATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 The authors acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Troy Gramke for genotypic data collection and Jan Watts for secretarial support. ![]()
3 Corresponding author: freking{at}email.marc.usda.gov
Received for publication August 22, 2005. Accepted for publication October 25, 2005.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |