|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL NUTRITION |



* Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108;
and
Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Morris 56267; and
and
Department of Animal and Range Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: carcass distillers dried grain with solubles growth swine
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Modern ethanol plants generally produce DDGS that has greater concentrations of fat, Lys, and ME (Spiehs et al., 2002
) and improved digestibility of phosphorus (Whitney and Shurson, 2001
) compared with values published in NRC (1998)
, which are based on DDGS produced in plants that were built before 1990. Furthermore, Whitney et al. (2000)
demonstrated that digestible Lys, Thr, and Trp concentrations in high-quality corn DDGS produced by modern ethanol plants are higher than values published in NRC (1998)
. Increased digestibility of AA indicates greater inclusion rates of high-quality DDGS may be possible before requiring the addition of crystalline AA to maintain proper AA balance.
Thus, a growth performance study was conducted to determine if adding increasing amounts of high-quality corn DDGS to grower-finisher diets in a phase feeding program will support growth performance and carcass quality similar to that obtained with diets based on corn and soybean meal.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 5-phase grower-finisher feeding program was utilized to evaluate growth performance and carcass characteristics. Target BW of the pigs were 23 to 40, 40 to 54, 54 to 72, 72 to 91, and 91 to 114 kg for phases 1 through 5, respectively. Diet changes were made on an individual pen basis, when the average BW of pigs in the pen was within 2.25 kg of the target BW for each phase.
Experimental diet composition and analyzed nutrient concentrations are presented for grower and finisher periods in Tables 1
and 2
, respectively. Experimental diets within each phase of growth were formulated to contain similar concentrations of total Lys, ME, Ca, total P, and supplemental vitamins and trace minerals. Total AA values of DDGS were obtained from Spiehs et al. (2002)
and were used in the formulation of experimental diets.
|
|
The ME values used in diet formulation were 3,776 kcal/kg (Spiehs et al., 2002
) and 7,234 kcal/kg (NRC, 1982
) for DDGS and soybean oil, respectively. The analyzed composition of DDGS used in this study was: 23.9% CP, 0.68% Lys, 10.3% crude fat, 0.2% Ca, and 0.82% P. Dietary total Lys concentrations were formulated to be 1.10, 1.00, 0.85, 0.72, and 0.64% for phases 1 to 5, respectively, based on mixed-sex pigs averaging 0.77 kg of ADG, 0.32 G:F, and 52% lean (NRC, 1998
). All diets were formulated to meet or exceed a minimum ratio relative to Lys of 100, 55, 65, and 20% for total Lys, Met + Cys, Thr, and Trp, respectively, and contained 0.15% crystalline Lys. Soybean oil was added to the control diets at a rate of 4, 4, 3, 1.5, and 1.5% for phases 1 through 5, respectively. The greater amounts of soybean oil used in phases 1 through 3 were primarily to provide ample supplemental energy to support optimal growth, whereas the lower concentrations used during phases 4 and 5 were primarily for dust control. Because DDGS contains approximately 10% crude fat, decreasing amounts of soybean oil were added as DDGS inclusion level increased in the diet, providing similar dietary ME concentration and preventing total dietary fat concentrations from exceeding 7.5%. The vitamin-trace mineral premix was prepared and delivered monthly.
Feed samples were obtained from each batch of feed manufactured and frozen at 20°C until laboratory analysis could be performed. At the end of each phase, samples from each batch of feed mixed were combined within experimental diet and subsampled for nutrient analysis. A portion of this subsample was submitted for proximate and mineral analysis (AOAC, 1998
; Iowa Testing Laboratories, Eagle Grove, IA). Another portion of the subsample was submitted for AA analysis by HPLC procedures (Experiment Station Chemical Laboratory, University of Missouri, Columbia).
Growth and Carcass Data Collection
Pigs were housed in an environmentally controlled, total confinement building. Pens measured 1.6 x 4.5 m and provided approximately 7.0 m2 of totally slotted floor space. Each pen was equipped with one 4-space feeder and 1 nipple drinker. Pigs were allowed ad libitum access to feed and water throughout the experiment. Pigs were weighed, and feed disappearance was recorded every 2 wk during the study to determine ADG, ADFI, and G:F. When the average BW of pigs in a pen reached 114 ± 2.25 kg, pigs were slaughtered, and tissue samples and carcass data were collected. On d 91 of the study, the first group of pigs reached the target BW and was marketed. At that time, growth performance and feed intake were determined for all pigs. Growth performance data were calculated for the period from d 0 to 91, and d 0 to marketing (overall) for each pen.
All pigs were kept on their respective diets until removed for market. On the day of marketing, pigs were weighed, tattooed individually with a unique number for each pig, and transported 3 km to a local assembly point. From this assembly point, pigs were transported about 350 km to a large commercial abattoir (Morrell Foods, Sioux Falls, SD). Pigs were slaughtered on the same day they were delivered to the abattoir. Of the 240 pigs that began the experiment, 225 were tattooed for collection of carcass data because 14 gilts were retained for breeding purposes and 1 pig died. At the time of slaughter, HCW was determined and 10th rib backfat thickness and loin depth were measured (Fat-O-Meater, SFK Technology, Copenhagen, Denmark) by plant personnel. Percent carcass lean was calculated using the following equation: 58.85 + 0.61 x 10th rib backfat depth, mm) + (0.12 x loin depth, mm)]. Useable carcass composition data were collected from 188 pigs assigned to the growth performance study.
Pigs slaughtered on 2 marketing days and 1 wk apart were designated for meat quality assessments. These slaughter groups were established because 2 pens from each dietary treatment achieved the desired market weight and were marketed on the same day. Seventy-seven and 68 pigs were marketed in the first and second slaughter groups, respectively. Approximately 24 h postmortem, 111 bellies (average internal temperature of 6.7°C; 74 and 37 bellies from groups 1 and 2, respectively) from the left sides of the carcasses were retrieved and subjected to a firmness test. Bellies from 34 carcasses were not recovered. The firmness test consisted of measuring belly length on a flat surface and then placing it skin-side down on the sharp edge of a triangular stainless steel smoke stick. The distance between the 2 ends of the suspended belly was then measured.
Belly firmness score, which is equal to the upper angle of the isosceles triangle created by hanging the belly over the smoke stick, was calculated as = c 1 {[0.5(L2) D2]/[0.5(L2)]} for each retrieved belly. Belly thickness, not including the skin, was determined by inserting a probe at the scribe line midway between the cranial and caudal ends. A fat sample was collected midway between the cranial and caudal ends of the belly at a point just dorsal to the scribe line and were packaged and transported to the South Dakota State University Meat Laboratory. Fat samples were analyzed in duplicate for iodine absorption number by the Hanus method, using approximately 0.5 g of dissolved fat (AOAC, 1998
).
Vacuum-packaged, boneless loin sections (n = 110) from the left sides of the carcasses in the 2 slaughter groups were purchased and transported to the South Dakota State University Meat Laboratory and stored (1°C) for 11 d. On d 12 postmortem, the loins were weighed, removed from the vacuum-packages, allowed to drip for approximately 15 min, and reweighed. From these data, purge loss was determined and expressed as a percentage of initial loin weight (NPPC, 2000
). Loins were then cut in half, and ultimate pH of the LM in the caudal end of the cranial loin section was measured (Meatcheck 160 pH meter, Sigma Electronic GmbH, Erfurt, Germany).
From the cranial end of the caudal section of the loin, a chop (2.5-cm thick) designated for drip loss was removed and trimmed of all subcutaneous fat and extra muscles. The remaining loin section was frozen (16°C) for subsequent Warner-Bratzler shear force measurement. Chops designated for drip loss were also assessed for color, marbling, and firmness according to NPPC (1999)
standards. Additionally, L* color value was measured with a D65 illuminant on those chops used for drip loss determination (Minolta Chroma Meter CR-310 colorimeter, Minolta Corp., Ramsey, NJ). Chops were then weighed, retail wrapped on styrofoam trays, and arranged at an approximate 30 degree angle. After 24 h, chops were reweighed and drip loss was determined and expressed as a percentage of initial weight (NPPC, 2000
).
Two chops (2.5-cm thick) from each frozen loin section were cut with a bandsaw and placed in freezer storage (16°C) for 1 to 2 wk. Chops were then thawed for 24 h at 1°C and cooked with an impingement oven (Model 1132-000-A, Lincoln Impinger, Fort Wayne, IN) at 190.5°C for 10.5 min. The resulting average final internal temperature of the chops was 68°C. Cooked chops were cooled to room temperature (20°C) before three 1.27-cm diam. cores per chop (6 cores per animal) were removed parallel to the longitudinal orientation of the muscle fibers. Individual cores were subjected to shear force determination using a Warner-Bratzler shear machine (G-R Manufacturing Co., Manhattan, KS). An average peak shear force was calculated and recorded for each pair of chops. Chops were weighed before and after cooking to determine cooking loss.
Statistical Analysis
Growth performance and carcass composition data were analyzed as a completely randomized design using PROC GLM (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The statistical model included dietary treatment (0, 10, 20, and 30% DDGS), initial weight group (light, medium, and heavy), and the interaction of diet and weight group. Mean separation was achieved using the PDIFF option of SAS. In addition, orthogonal polynomials were used to determine linear and quadratic effects of DDGS concentrations. The pen served as the experimental unit in the analyses.
Meat quality traits of loins and bellies were analyzed as a completely randomized design using PROC GLM. The statistical model included dietary treatment (0, 10, 20, and 30% DDGS), sex of the pig, and 2 slaughter groups. Analysis of belly firmness score included belly thickness as a linear covariate. Means were separated using the PDIFF option of SAS. Orthogonal polynomials were used to determine linear and quadratic effects of dietary DDGS concentrations. Additionally, regressions of iodine number on belly firmness score, belly thickness on belly firmness score, and iodine number and belly thickness on belly firmness score were developed. Pig served as the experimental unit for meat quality analysis. All means are reported as least squares means. Treatment effects were considered significant at P < 0.05, whereas P < 0.10 was considered a statistically significant trend.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Least squares means for BW and growth performance responses are presented in Table 3
. Initial BW and variation in BW were similar across dietary treatment groups. Including 20 or 30% DDGS in the diet resulted in similar feed intakes compared with the 0 or 10% dietary concentration, but lower growth rate (815 and 806 vs. 861 and 855 g/d, respectively; P < 0.05) over the initial 91-d feeding period. This resulted in poorer G:F for pigs fed the 30% DDGS diets compared with pigs fed 0 or 10% DDGS diets (P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed over the entire feeding period. Final weight was greater (P < 0.05) for pigs fed the 0 and 10% DDGS diets (116.9 and 117.6 kg, respectively) compared with pigs fed 20 or 30% DDGS (113.9 and 111.9 kg, respectively), although the experiment was designed to minimize differences in final BW.
|
Carcass Composition
Least squares means for initial carcass weight and composition are presented in Table 4
. Slaughter weights tended to be greater for pigs fed the 0 and 10% DDGS treatments (116.8 and 119.2 kg) compared with pigs fed the 20 or 30% DDGS diets (113.1 and 112.1 kg; P < 0.10). This resulted in greater HCW for pigs fed 0 or 10 compared with 20 or 30% DDGS diets (P < 0.05). As DDGS concentration increased in the diet, carcass weight linearly decreased (P < 0.01).
|
Fat and Muscle Quality
Iodine number increased linearly (P < 0.05), and thus belly fat became more unsaturated, as the dietary concentration of DDGS increased (Table 5
). Researchers have clearly established that feeding diets containing an unsaturated fat source can alter the degree of saturation in pork fat. Lea et al. (1970)
characterized adequately firm pork fat sampled from above the tailhead or around the kidneys as having an iodine number below 70. In our study, iodine values were greater than 70 for diets containing 20 and 30% DDGS. Overall, our values were within the upper range (50 to 72) of iodine numbers reported for pork belly fat in swine fed up to 19% raw soybeans (Pontif et al., 1987
) or barley- and maize-based diets (Lucas et al., 1960
; Lawrence, 1974
). In the current study, a significant amount of unsaturated fatty acids was supplied to experimental diets from supplemental soybean oil in addition to the corn oil present in DDGS. We estimate, based on NRC (1998)
, that a typical swine finisher diet without supplemental fat (85% corn, 11% soybean meal) would contain about 3% unsaturated fatty acids. By comparison, we estimated our phase 5 control diet contained 4.33% unsaturated fatty acids and the phase 5 diet with 30% DDGS contained 4.96% unsaturated fatty acids. We expect that if an animal fat source, which is lower in unsaturated fatty acid concentration, were added to the diets, or no supplemental fat was added, the iodine values of carcass fat from pigs fed high concentrations of DDGS would be lower, and the negative effects of adding DDGS to the diets on pork fat quality would be less. The effect of DDGS feeding on iodine number was reflected in the analysis of belly firmness score. Lower adjusted belly firmness scores (P < 0.05) indicated that bellies from pigs that were fed 30% DDGS were softer than bellies from pigs fed 0 or 20% DDGS. Softer bellies were most likely a consequence of elevated concentrations of dietary unsaturated lipids supplied by soybean oil and DDGS.
|
Color measurements (L*) of muscle were not different among dietary treatments (Table 6
). Likewise, visual evaluations of the LM muscle did not differ among treatments for color, firmness, or marbling scores. Moreover, ultimate pH was not different among treatments. Water holding capacity traits, including 24-h drip loss, cooking loss, and total moisture loss, were not influenced by feeding DDGS. Feeding the 20% DDGS diets increased (P < 0.05) 11-d purge loss compared with pigs fed diets containing 0% DDGS. Dietary treatment did not affect Warner-Bratzler shear force values of cooked loin chops. These data indicate feeding DDGS in swine finishing diets did not have meaningful effects on pork muscle quality.
|
| IMPLICATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Corresponding author: shurs001{at}umn.edu
Received for publication February 18, 2006. Accepted for publication July 19, 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R. Widmer, L. M. McGinnis, D. M. Wulf, and H. H. Stein Effects of feeding distillers dried grains with solubles, high-protein distillers dried grains, and corn germ to growing-finishing pigs on pig performance, carcass quality, and the palatability of pork J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1819 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Linneen, J. M. DeRouchey, S. S. Dritz, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, and J. L. Nelssen Effects of dried distillers grains with solubles on growing and finishing pig performance in a commercial environment J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1579 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |