J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2006. 84:3259-3265. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-173
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avendaño-Reyes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avendaño-Reyes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. H.

ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

Effects of two ß-adrenergic agonists on finishing performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of feedlot steers1,2

L. Avendaño-Reyes*,3, V. Torres-Rodríguez{dagger}, F. J. Meraz-Murillo{dagger}, C. Pérez-Linares{ddagger}, F. Figueroa-Saavedra{ddagger} and P. H. Robinson§

* Instituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ejido Nuevo León, Baja California, México; and {dagger} Asociación Ganadera Local Especializada en Bovinos para Engorda de Baja California, Mexicali, Baja California, México; and {ddagger} Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Baja California, México; and and § Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
The impact of using 2 ß-adrenergic agonists in feedlot cattle fed finishing diets was evaluated using 54 steers (45 crossbred Charolais and 9 Brangus) initially weighing 424 ± 26.6 kg in a randomized complete block design with 3 treatments and 6 blocks (i.e., 18 pens with 3 steers per pen). Response variables were feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality. Treatments were 1) control (no supplement added); 2) zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH; 60 mg·steer–1·d–1); and 3) ractopamine hydrochloride (RH; 300 mg·steer–1·d–1). The ß-agonists were added to the diets during the final 33 d of the experiment. The groups of steers fed ZH or RH improved (P < 0.01) ADG by 26 or 24%, respectively, compared with control steers. Steers supplemented with RH consumed less (P = 0.03) DM (8.37 kg) than control steers (8.51 kg), whereas intake was similar (P = 0.37) for ZH and control steers. Addition of either ß-agonist to the diet considerably improved (P < 0.01) the G:F (ZH, 0.253 and RH, 0.248 vs. control, 0.185). Hot carcass weight and carcass yield were enhanced (P < 0.05) with both ß-agonists. The LM area was increased (P = 0.026) by ZH (75.2 cm2), but that of RH (72.2 cm2) was similar (P = 0.132) to the control steers (66.8 cm2). Meat from the ZH- (P = 0.0007) and RH- (P = 0.0267) supplemented steers had greater shear force values than control steers (ZH = 5.11; RH = 4.83; control = 4.39 kg/cm2). Variables related to meat color indicated that both ß-agonists led to a similar redness of the LM area related to the control group. In general, feedlot performance was greatly enhanced by ß-adrenergic agonists, and meat tenderness from treated animals was classified as intermediate. Furthermore, meat color was not altered by ß-agonist supplementation.

Key Words: ß-adrenergic receptor agonist • carcass characteristic • feedlot cattle • meat quality


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
As the beef industry continues to adapt to changing consumer demands, beef producers develop and use research-based dietary additives to enhance the efficiency of gain, such as ß-adrenergic agonists (ß-AA). The ß-AA improve the efficiency of gain and affect carcass characteristics and meat quality of several animal species (Pringle et al., 1993Go; Crome et al., 1996Go). Mexico and South Africa approved use of ß-AA, including the feed additives zilpaterol hydrochloride (ZH) and ractopamine hydrochloride (RH), more than 10 yr ago to improve feedlot performance. In 2003, RH was approved for use in cattle in the United States, and ZH was just approved in 2006 for increased rate of weight gain, improved feed efficiency, and increased carcass leanness in cattle fed in confinement for slaughter during the last 20 to 40 d on feed. Use of all ß-AA is prohibited in Europe (Council of European Communities, 1986Go), and this is unlikely to change in the near future.

The ß-AA are organic molecules that bind to ß-adrenergic receptors, present on most mammalian cells, to increase skeletal muscle mass and protein content through hypertrophy and reduce fat accretion (Yang and McElligott, 1989Go). Although the mechanism of action of ß-AA is not fully understood, ß-AA administered orally to mammals may increase muscle protein synthesis or decrease muscle protein degradation, or both, as well as decrease carcass fat mass (Dunshea et al., 2005Go) because of decreased lipogenesis and increased lipolysis (Mersmann, 1998Go).

In Mexico, consumption of viscera from animals fed with clenbuterol has caused acute toxicity in consumers, indicating an abuse in the use of this product, and therefore this ß-AA was removed from the market. However, ß-AA such as ZH and RH are metabolized rapidly and cleared from cattle tissues (Sumano et al., 2002Go). Moreover, Mexican beef feedlot operators and meat packers need to know the potential advantages of using legal ß-AA products as well as their impact on carcass traits and meat quality.

Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate effects of ZH and RH on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of beef steers.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
All procedures involving animals were made following approved local official techniques of animal care (NOM-051-ZOO-1995: Humanitarian care of animals during mobilization of animals; NOM-024-ZOO-1995: Animal health stipulations and characteristics during transportation of animals; NOM-EM-015-ZOO-2002: Technical stipulations for the control use of beta agonists in animals).

Location of the Study
The study was completed at the Feedlot Experimental Unit of the Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias of the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, located 10 km south of Mexicali in northwestern Mexico. The zone has a latitude of 32° 40' and a longitude of 115° 28', is about 10 m above sea level, and has Sonoran desert conditions. The experiment was conducted between February and March, with an average temperature of 18.6°C and relative humidity of 50.6%.

Animals, Housing, and Experimental Design
Forty-five crossbred steers (approximately 50% Charolais, 30% Limousine, and largely Zebú in the remainder) and 9 Brangus, with an average initial BW of 424 ± 26.6 kg, were used in a 33-d feeding study. This period is considered the last phase during the feedlot stage, so that steers had been previously adapted to the steam-rolled wheat grain-based finishing diet. In Mexico, beef consumers demand meat with low fat content, so cattle are killed at a lighter BW, and therefore they are in the feedlot for a shorter period of time. Steers were selected from 2 pens of 60 cattle each from a commercial feedlot and transported to the experimental unit.

Beginning 105 d before initiation of the study, all steers were managed similarly, including vaccinations (Express 5 HS and Caliber 7, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jalisco, México), injection of vitamins (4 mL of Se Ve, LAPISA, Michoacán, México), parasite control (injection of 10 mL of Novox 50, PISA, Jalisco, México), and implantation with a combination of 100 mg of progester-one and 10 mg of estradiol benzoate (Synovex-C, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Overland Park, KS). Sixty days before the study, the steers were treated again and reimplanted with a combination of 200 mg of trenbolone acetate and 28 mg of estradiol benzoate (Synovex Plus, Fort Dodge Animal Health) and given parasite control again [12 mL of Albendaphorte 10%, Salud y Bienestar Animal (Distrito Federal, México)]. The selected steers showed no symptoms of morbidity, were uniform in BW, and were blocked by initial BW and assigned to 18 pens, each containing 3 steers (i.e., 6 blocks). Pen dimensions were 50 m2, with 21 m2 of overhead shade, which was in an east-west orientation. Automatic water troughs, with float-activated water supplies, were located at the north end of each pen. The concrete feed bunk in each pen was 3.7 m long. Pens were situated in 2 adjacent lines, 8 pens on 1 side and 10 pens on the other. The Brangus steers were equally distributed across each of the 3 treatments.

Pens were assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: 1) control (no feed additive in the diet); 2) 60 mg of ZH (Zilmax, Intervet, México City, México) steer–1·d–1; or 3) 300 mg of RH (Optaflexx, Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN) steer–1·d–1. The ZH and RH feed additives were mixed into the mineral supplement and added to the diet. There was only 1 diet used during the finishing phase, and it was prepared in a commercial feed mill and transported to the experimental feedlot unit every 4 to 5 d. Table 1Go shows the ingredient and nutrient composition of the diet. All steers were fed the control diet for 1 wk before initiation of the study to allow for acclimation to the diet and to the facilities. So that all steers arrived at the abattoir at the same time, the ZH-treated steers began the study 3 d earlier than the RH group to allow for the legal preslaughter ZH withdrawal time. During the feedlot phase, steers were provided ad libitum access to their diet and water. The steers were monitored daily for health status, including symptoms of acidosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Ingredient and calculated nutrient composition of the diet treatments
 
Performance
The BW measurements were obtained using a single scale that was calibrated before each weigh day. At the beginning and end of the 33-d feeding trial, the steers were weighed before the morning feeding. The diet was-fed twice daily (0700 and 1200) in a 60:40 proportion. Feed bunks were evaluated daily at 0600; the remaining feed in the bunks was weighed daily to determine the amount of feed to be offered each day and to reach the amount of supplement to be consumed per pen. The daily amount of diet consumed was determined on a pen basis. Two steers were removed during the study, one from the control group shortly after beginning the study because of its violent temperament, whereas a group ZH steer died after 11 d on the study. Acidosis was diagnosed as the cause of death by the veterinarian. Diet consumption records in these pens were adjusted accordingly.

Carcass Data Collection
Immediately after termination of the feeding phase, the steers were transported to a commercial abattoir (Rastro TIF 301; located 5 km south from the Feedlot Experimental Unit) for slaughter according to an approved technique (NOM-033-ZOO-1995: Humanitarian slaughter of domestic and wild animals in México). Carcass and hide weights were collected after removal of KPH. After the carcasses were chilled for 24 h at –4°C, 12th rib fat (cm), LM area (cm2), pH, and weight of each carcass were recorded. The difference between the chilled carcass weight and HCW was used to estimate storage loss (this variable was estimated at 24 h because that is the one time the packing plant commercializes the carcasses). Dressing percent was calculated using HCW divided by final BW and multiplying the result by 100 (Boggs and Merkel, 1993Go). All 52 carcasses from the experimental animals were then deboned, and lean, bone, and fat data were collected from each pen, so there was a small loss because of the storing time and the deboning process.

Meat Quality Data Collection
Two LM steaks (10-cm thick) from each carcass were removed between 12th and 13th rib interface, frozen immediately on dry ice, and shipped to the Meat Quality Laboratory of the IICV-UABC in Mexicali (Baja California, México), where they were frozen at –20°C, vacuum-packaged, and stored for subsequent meat quality trait analysis. One-half of the steaks from each animal was analyzed 5 d postmortem, and the remaining one-half at 14 d. Variables measured at these times included pH, color, shear force (SF), water-holding capacity (WHC), and drip loss (DL).

For pH analysis, a portable pH meter with a puncture electrode (Delta Track Inc., ISFET pH 101, Pleasanton, CA) was used. The color values L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) were determined using a Minolta CM-2002 spectrophotometer (Minolta Camera Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan), utilizing an integrated specular component (SCI), a D65 illuminator, and a 10° observer. The chroma (C*) and hue angle (h°) were estimated as C* = [(a*)2 + (b*)2]1/2, and h° = tan–1(b*/a*). The 10-cm-thick steaks previously obtained from the rib were thawed and stored for approximately 24 h at 4°C.

To obtain SF values, previously cooked steaks of 1.27-cm diam. were aged 24 h and then cut parallel to the muscle fiber orientation. The SF measurements (kg/cm2) were determined using a Lloyd Texturometer (Lloyd Instruments, Fareham, Hampshire, UK) equipped with Warner-Bratzler shear blades with a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. Water-holding capacity was determined using a modified compression technique described by Owen et al. (1982)Go, from the method termed press juice (Boakye and Mittal, 1993Go), in which 0.3 kg of a meat sample is positioned between 2 layers of filter paper and 2 plaques of acyclic Plexiglas, and compressed at a force of 5 N for 60 s using the Lloyd Texturometer. The WHC was estimated as juice lost divided by the initial sample mass. Drip loss was measured using the technique described by Honikel and Hamm (1994)Go.

Statistical Analyses
Feedlot performance variables and carcass characteristics were analyzed using a randomized complete block design, blocking according to initial BW, and weighted to the number of steers in each pen because of the 2 missing steers. Treatment effects were tested using orthogonal contrasts that compared the control vs. the RH and ZH groups. Results are reported as least squares means and P values, using the GLM procedure (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Meat quality variables measured over time (pH, L*, a*, b*, C*, h°, SF, WHC, and DL) were analyzed using a mixed model with a randomized complete block design, by using the REPEATED and RANDOM statements of the MIXED procedure (SAS Inst. Inc.).

For each meat quality variable analyzed, several variance-covariance structures were evaluated (i.e., unstructured, simple, compound symmetry, first order autoregressive, and first order heterogeneous autoregressive). Selection of the variance-covariance structure was based on Akaike’s Information Criterion and the Bayesian Information Criterion, with the variance-covariance structure that resulted in these 2 criteria being closest to zero being used (Littell et al., 1996Go). The simple variance-covariance structure had the best fit for WHC, L*, a*, b*, C*, and h°, whereas for pH and DL the first order heterogeneous autoregressive had the best fit. Finally, a first order autoregressive variance-covariance structure best fit SF.

The linear model for meat quality variables included effects of day, block, treatments, and the interaction of day x treatment. Pen within treatment was considered as a random effect. The same orthogonal contrasts were used. Least squares means and SE are reported, and significance was declared at the 5% level. A trend to a difference was accepted where 0.05 < P < 0.10.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
Feedlot Performance
Initial BW (Table 2Go) was similar for all treated groups (P = 0.958 for control vs. ZH, and P = 0.723 for control vs. RH). However, final BW was greater for ZH (P < 0.001) and RH (P < 0.030) steers compared with control steers. Steers fed ZH and RH had 26 and 24% greater ADG vs. control steers (P < 0.001 for both comparisons), respectively. Steers fed RH consumed less (P < 0.031) DM than control steers, but DM intake of ZH steers did not differ (P = 0.374) from control steers. Addition of either ß agonist to the diet considerably improved (P < 0.001 for both comparisons) G:F.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Least squares means of feedlot performance variables in steers supplemented with 2 beta agonists during the last 33 d in the feedlot
 
Carcass Characteristics
The effect of both beta agonists is evident in HCW (Table 3Go), with carcasses from ZH and RH steers being 7% (P < 0.001) and 5% (P = 0.002) heavier than carcasses from control steers. As a result, carcass yield was greater in ZH steers (P = 0.003) and RH steers (P = 0.018) than in control steers. The LM area was larger (P < 0.02) in ZH steers than in control steers, but that of RH steers did not differ (P = 0.13) from control steers. There was a trend (P = 0.06) for ZH steers to have less 12th rib fat than control steers, but the amount in RH steers did not differ (P = 0.49) from control steers. After carcasses were deboned, RH steers tended (P = 0.07) to produce more lean then control steers, whereas meat yield of ZH steers and control steers did not differ (P = 0.14). Bone yield was similar for control vs. ZH (P = 0.186), and control vs. RH (P = 0.367), as well as fat yield for control vs. ZH (P = 0.367), and control vs. RH (P = 0.736).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Least squares means of carcass characteristics and yield of steers supplemented with 2 beta agonists during the last 33 d in the feedlot
 
Meat Quality
Treatment effect was important (P < 0.01) for SF, indicating that both ß-AA led to an apparent toughening of the LM area (Table 4Go). There was a treatment effect (P = 0.03) for h°, indicating that both ß-AA led to increased redness of the LM area compared with control steers. There was only a trend (P = 0.065) for b* in treatment RH to be greater than in control steers, whereas the ZH treatment did not differ (P = 0.632) from control steers. A day x treatment interaction occurred (P < 0.05) for pH, WHC, DL, L*, a*, and C* variables. The interaction for pH indicated that, in general, pH values decreased slowly from d 1 to 5 and then increased by d 14. However, all values were within the accepted normal range of pH; therefore, these changes are not large enough to suggest an alteration of meat pH. A similar situation was observed with variables DL, C*, and a*, suggesting that color was similar for all groups. The WHC tended to decrease from d 5 to 14 in control and RH groups, although WHC for ZH steers had an opposite effect with time (Figure 1AGo). Meat lightness (L*) was similar for all groups (P = 0.272) on d 1 and 14 and on d 5 control steers showed lower (P = 0.035) L* values than treated steers (Figure 1bGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Least squares means of pH, water-holding capacity (WHC), drip loss (DL), shear force (SF), and meat color variables (L*, a*, b*, C*, and h°) in steers supplemented with 2 ß agonists during the last 33 d in the feedlot1
 

Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of storage time and treatment on (A) water-holding capacity (WHC) and (B) color L* = lightness of LM. ZH = Zilpaterol hydrochloride; and RH = ractopamine hydrochloride.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 
In feedlot operations, ADG, feed intake, and gain efficiency are essential cost-effective traits that affect the time that steers spend on feed and, therefore, profitability. From the literature, it is clear that addition of ß-AA to diets has positively enhanced performance of cattle (Vestergaard et al., 1994Go; Schroeder, 2004Go; Dunshea et al., 2005Go). However, the effect of ß-AA for extended time during the end of the finishing period on feedlot cattle performance appears to diminish as the time of treatment increases. This observation is consistent with desensitization and downregulation of the ß-adrenergic receptor, thereby decreasing growth rate responses (Moloney et al., 1991Go). In an experiment that fed cimaterol to steers from wk 4 of age to slaughter, Chikhou et al. (1993a)Go found little beneficial effect on growth rate and the efficiency of gain compared with a shorter-term treatment. In contrast, using the recently US-approved ß-AA RH at the same dietary level as in the current study, Schroeder (2004)Go summarized results from 10 experiments completed in different regions of United States during the feedlot finishing phase and found that ADG, total BW gain, and the efficiency of gain were improved significantly by 26, 20, and 20.5%, respectively, compared with nonsupplemented controls. A slightly lower response in the same variables was observed in heifers treated with RH. However O’Neill (2001)Go reported an increase of 10.4% in ADG, and 15.1% in the efficiency of gain in steers consuming 6 mg/d of ZH, although these differences were not statistically significant. However, Plascencia et al. (1999)Go reported an improvement of 36 and 39% in ADG and G:F, respectively, of steers when the finishing diet was supplemented with 6 mg/kg of ZH. Using other animal models (i.e., pigs, lambs, and rats), the increase in ADG and the efficiency of gain has been considerably greater when animals supplemented with a ß-AA were compared with nonsupplemented controls.

An impressive response of almost 22 kg in HCW for the ZH group, and of 14 kg for the RH group, compared with control steers has not previously been reported. Schroeder (2004)Go reported an improvement in HCW of 8.3 kg in steers treated with RH, and Plascencia et al. (1999)Go reported 13 kg more in HCW in steers treated with ZH, both vs. steers with no ß-AA supplementation. Wheeler and Koohmaraie (1992)Go fed 3 ppm of the ß-AA L644–969 to steers for 6 wk and reported that, even though treated and control steers had similar BW and ADG, treated animals had heavier HCW, larger LM area and lower USDA yield grades. However, fat deposition in several organs was not affected by ß-AA supplementation. The authors attributed these results to induced muscle hypertrophy, which, in turn, was due to increased calpastatin activity in supplemented steers. Chikhou et al. (1993b)Go fed cimaterol in the diet for a longer period (i.e., 60 wk) in Friesian steers and observed that cimaterol increased lean meat accretion, reduced adipose tissue deposition, increased SF values, and diminished meat quality, leading to their conclusion that benefits were minimal in terms of carcass composition. Increased muscle mass in mammals is recognized as an important effect of ß-AA oral administration by increasing the synthesis of muscle protein, reducing the degradation of muscle protein, or a combination of both. This ß-AA induced muscle hypertrophy is accredited to an increased rate of muscle {alpha}-actin synthesis as well as to the inhibitory activity of calpastatin (Smith et al., 1989Go; Yang and McElligott, 1989Go; Helferich et al., 1990Go). Apparently, these effects were more evident for the ZH group in the current study than the RH group due to the improvement in LM area and the tendency to reduce 12th rib fat.

According to Price and Schweigert (1987)Go, the pH range that categorizes a meat as normal is between 5.4 and 5.8, and the pH values obtained in the current study from the 3 groups were close to the lower value of this range. This suggests that our ß-AA did not alter meat pH, which is consistent with results of experiments using other ß-AA. For example, Fiems et al. (1990)Go fed cimaterol to Charolais and double muscled Belgian white-blue bulls and concluded that the treatment did not change meat pH, color, or water holding capacity.

In the current study, both ß-AA increased the SF of meat, which has been a general result in studies using feedlot cattle supplemented with these ß-AA. Vestergaard et al. (1994)Go reported a dramatic increase in SF (2- to 3-fold greater) in meat from young bulls fed cimaterol, and these results were corroborated by the taste panel evaluation. Luño et al. (1999)Go assessed the quality of meat from steers fed clenbuterol and found that meat texture variable determined with a Warner-Bratzler shear blade were similar at d 1 postmortem, but at d 8 postmortem, all parameters were increased in meat from treated steers. Schroeder (2004)Go reported that RH increased the SF of meat from steers, but the sensory panel did not detect differences in juiciness or flavor of meat from treated- and control-steers. However, O’Neill (2001)Go found no differences in SF values for meat from steers treated, or not treated, with ZH, and concluded that this ß-AA did not cause tougher meat.

Boleman et al. (1997)Go suggested a categorization of meat tenderness based on Warner-Bratzler SF where an intermediate meat is classified in a range of 4.08 to 5.40 Kg and a tough meat is classified when SF is between 5.9 and 7.1 Kg. In contrast, Miller et al. (2001)Go classified an intermediate meat between 3.92 and 4.5 Kg and a tough one between 5.42 to 7.2 Kg. According to these 2 categorizations of meat tenderness, meat from steers fed both ß-AA in the current study was within acceptable or intermediate classification. Factors induced by ß-AA treatment, such as reduced protein degradation, probably decreased proteolytic activity, decreased collagen solubility, and changed the fiber component of the muscle, which are all considered responsible for reduced meat tenderness (Geesink et al., 1993Go; Vestergaard et al., 1994Go).

According to the meat color variables measured, a trend to redness in meat color was uniform in all groups. With time, meat also tended to become paler, even though there was more red pigment than yellow. Meat from all 3 treatment groups darkened with time, but the effect was more evident in the ZH group. In general, there is no strong evidence that color was affected by either ß-AA. A trend to paler meat has been reported in studies using ß-AA (Geesink et al., 1993Go; Vestergaard et al., 1994Go), probably due to reduced heme pigmentation and to a larger proportion of fast twitch glycolytic fibers (Beerman et al., 1987Go; Wheeler and Koohmaraie, 1992Go).

It is confirmed that dietary supplementation of ZH and RH improved feedlot performance of steers based on values of ADG and the efficiency of gain. Hot carcass weight and dressing were also increased by ß-AA supplementation. The LM area was improved by ZH but not by RH. Both ß-AA increased SF, suggesting tougher meat than in the nonsupplemented steers. However, meat obtained from ß-AA supplemented steers was classified as having intermediate toughness. In general, meat color was unaffected by ß-AA supplementation. The use of ß-AA may optimize steer performance without substantively compromising meat quality.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was conducted with financial support from Fundación Produce de Baja California under the project number 02-2005-1845. The first author thanks UCMEXUS-CONACYT Faculty Fellowship program for support in writing the manuscript. Back

2 The authors thank Orlando Platt-Lucero and Baraquiel Fimbres-Preciado for support during the study, from the commercial feedlots Ganadera Platt and Engorda La Casita, respectively, from Rastro TIF No. 301 in Mexicali, Baja California, México, and from L. Erasmus of the University of Pretoria in obtaining a key thesis reference. Back

3 Corresponding author: lar62{at}uabc.mx

Received for publication March 23, 2006. Accepted for publication July 22, 2006.


    LITERATURE CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 LITERATURE CITED
 


Beerman, D. H., W. R. Butler, D. E. Hogue, V. K. Fishell, R. H. Dalrymple, C. A. Ricks, and C. G. Scanes. 1987. Cimaterol-induced muscle hypertrophy and altered endocrine status in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 65:1514–1524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boakye, K., and G. S. Mittal. 1993. Changes in pH and water holding properties of Longissimus dorsi muscle during beef ageing. Meat Sci. 34:335–349.[CrossRef]

Boggs, D. L., and R. A. Merkel. 1993. Live Animal Carcass Evaluation and Selection Manual. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. and Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI.

Boleman, S. J., S. L. Boleman, R. K. Millar, J. F. Taylor, H. R. Cross, T. L. Wheeler, M. Koohmaraie, S. D. Shackelford, M. F. Miller, R. L. West, D. D. Johnson, and J. W. Savell. 1997. Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1521–1524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chikhou, F. H., A. P. Moloney, P. Allen, J. F. Quirke, F. H. Austin, and J. F. Roche. 1993a. Long-term effects of cimaterol in Friesian steers: I. Growth, the efficiency of gain, and selected carcass traits. J. Anim. Sci. 71:906–913.[Abstract]

Chikhou, F. H., A. P. Moloney, P. Allen, R. L. Joseph, P. V. Tarrant, J. F. Quirke, F. H. Austin, and J. F. Roche. 1993b. Long-term effects of cimaterol in Friesian steers: II. Carcass composition and meat quality. J. Anim. Sci. 71:914–922.[Abstract]

Council of the European Communities. 1986. Council Directive 86/469/EEC of 16 September 1986. Off. J. Eur. Commun. L275:36.

Crome, P. K., F. K. McKeith, T. R. Carr, D. J. Jones, D. H. Mowrey, and J. E. Cannon. 1996. Effect of ractopamine on growth performance, carcass composition, and cutting yields of pigs slaughtered at 107 and 125 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci. 74:709–716.[Abstract]

Dunshea, F. R., D. N. D’Souza, D. W. Pethic, G. S. Harper, and R. D. Warner. 2005. Effects of dietary factors and other metabolic modifiers on quality and nutritional value of meat. Meat Sci. 71:8–38.[CrossRef]

Fiems, L. O., B. Buts, Ch. V. Boucqué, D. I. Demeyer, and B. G. Cottyn. 1990. Effect of a ß-agonist on meat quality and myofibrillar protein fragmentation in bulls. Meat Sci. 27:29–39.

Geesink, G. H., F. J. M. Smulders, H. L. J. M. van Laack, J. H. van der Kolk, Th. Wensing, and H. J. Breukink. 1993. Effect of meat quality of the use of clenbuterol in veal calves. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1161–1170.[Abstract]

Helferich, W. G., D. B. Jump, D. B. Anderson, D. M. Skjaerlum, R. A. Merkel, and W. G. Bergen. 1990. Skeletal muscle ß-actin is increased pretranslational in pigs fed the phenotholamine ractopamine. Endocrinology 126:3096–3100.[Abstract]

Honikel, K. O., and P. Hamm. 1994. Measurement of water-holding capacity and juiciness. Pages 137–139 in Quality Attributes and Their Measurement in Meat, Poultry and Fish Products. A. M. Pearson and T. R. Dutson, ed. Blackie Academic & Professional.

Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.

Luño, M., J. A. Beltrán, I. Jaime, and P. Roncalés. 1999. Textural assessment of clenbuterol treatment in beef. Meat Sci. 51:297–303.[CrossRef]

Mersmann, H. J. 1998. Overview of the effects of ß-adrenergic receptor agonists on animal growth including mechanism of action. J. Anim. Sci. 76:160–172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miller, M. F., M. A. Carr, C. B. Ramsey, K. L. Crockett, and L. C. Hoover. 2001. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 79:3062–3068.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moloney, A. P., P. Allen, R. Joseph, and V. Tarrant. 1991. Influence of beta-adrenergic agonists and similar compounds on growth. Pages 455–513 in Growth Regulation in Farm Animals. Advances in Meat Research, Vol. 7. A. M. Pearson and T. R. Dutson, ed. Elsevier Applied Science, New York, NY.

O’Neill, H. A. 2001. The effect of Zilpaterol hydrochloride on dietary N-requirements and the quality and nutritional value of meat components. Master of Science Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Owen, J. E., and A. T. Arias, and O. M. Cano de los Ríos. 1982. Manual de Prácticas para Cursos de Tecnología de la Carne. Facultad de Zootecnia. Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.

Plascencia, A., N. Torrentera, and R. A. Zinn. 1999. Influence of the ß-agonist, zilpaterol, on growth performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. In Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 50:331–334.

Price, J. F., and B. S. Schweigert. 1987. Muscle function and postmortem changes. Pages 174–191 in The Science of Meat and Meat Products. 3rd ed. Food and Nutrition Press Inc., Westport, CT.

Pringle, T. D., C. R. Calkins, M. Koohmaraie, and S. J. Jones. 1993. Effects over time of feeding a beta adrenergic agonist to wether lambs on animal performance, muscle growth, endogenous proteinase activities, and meat tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 71:636–644.[Abstract]

Schroeder, A. L. 2004. The effect of OptaflexxTM on growth performance and carcass traits of steers and heifers. Pages 65–81 in Proc. 19th Annu. Southwest Nutrition and Management Conf., Univ. Arizona, Tucson.

Smith, S. B., D. K. Gracia, and D. B. Anderson. 1989. Elevation of a specific mRNA in longissimus muscle of steers fed ractopamine. J. Anim. Sci. 67:3495–3502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sumano, L. H., C. L. Ocampo, and O. L. Gutiérrez. 2002. Clenbuterol and other ß-agonists, are they an option for meat production or threat for public health? Vet. Méx. 33:137–159. (in Spanish)

Vestergaard, M., K. Sejrsen, and S. Klastrup. 1994. Growth, composition and eating quality of Longissimus dorsi from young bulls fed the ß-agonist cimaterol at consecutive developmental stages. Meat Sci. 38:55–66.[CrossRef]

Wheeler, T. L., and M. Koohmaraie. 1992. Effects of the ß-adrenergic agonist L644,969 on muscle protein turnover, endogenous proteinase activities, and meat tenderness in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3035–3043.[Abstract]

Yang, Y. T., and M. A. McElligott. 1989. Multiple actions of the ß-adrenergic agonists on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Biochem. J. 261:1–12.[Medline]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. T. Vasconcelos, R. J. Rathmann, R. R. Reuter, J. Leibovich, J. P. McMeniman, K. E. Hales, T. L. Covey, M. F. Miller, W. T. Nichols, and M. L. Galyean
Effects of duration of zilpaterol hydrochloride feeding and days on the finishing diet on feedlot cattle performance and carcass traits
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 2005 - 2015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. Quinn, C. D. Reinhardt, E. R. Loe, B. E. Depenbusch, M. E. Corrigan, M. L. May, and J. S. Drouillard
The effects of ractopamine-hydrogen chloride (Optaflexx) on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of finishing feedlot heifers
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 902 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avendaño-Reyes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avendaño-Reyes, L.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS