|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL NUTRITION |
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.10) among protein supplements. This interaction was not observed for carcass-adjusted ADG (P = 0.60). Final live weights (P = 0.02) and carcass weights (P = 0.01) were greater with ractopamine feeding. Carcass marbling scores and yield grades were not affected by ractopamine or protein source (P
0.39). Plasma total
-amino N and glucose concentrations decreased more from pretreatment concentrations when heifers were fed ractopamine (P < 0.05). Feeding ractopamine to heifers for 28 d before slaughter improved ADG and efficiency of gain without any large effects on carcass characteristics. The MP supply does not need to be increased from that provided by finishing diets based on steam-flaked corn with urea as the primary N supplement to allow the maximal response to ractopamine by finishing heifers.
Key Words: heifer metabolizable protein protein requirement ractopamine
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Requirements for MP differ depending on rate and composition of gain. Thus, MP requirements could be increased by growth promotants that cause cattle to grow faster and deposit more lean tissue. Ractopamine is a ß1-adrenergic agonist recently introduced for use in cattle in the United States. Feeding ß-agonists (clenbuterol, cimaterol, zilpaterol) to cattle leads to marked alterations in metabolism that increase leanness and muscle accretion, with only moderate effects on fat deposition (Mersmann, 1998
), which could increase MP requirements. Alternately, ß-agonists could enhance the efficiency with which cattle use MP, thereby leading to no change or even a decrease in MP requirements. Feeding ractopamine to pigs increased lean tissue deposition, but pigs fed ractopamine required no change in dietary protein to achieve optimal response to ractopamine (Mitchell et al., 1991
; Xiao et al., 1999
).
Our objectives were to determine the impact of feeding ractopamine to heifers for 28 d before slaughter and to determine whether or not the response of heifers to ractopamine is influenced by supplemental protein sources supplying differing amounts of MP.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mixed-breed medium- to large-framed heifers that were predominantly continental crosses (n = 72; 475 kg of initial BW, range 393 to 583 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design with a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of treatments to evaluate the effects of ractopamine and supplemental protein source (supplying differing amounts of MP) on growth and carcass characteristics. Dietary treatments (Table 1
) consisted of finishing diets based on steam-flaked corn, formulated to contain 13.7% CP, with urea, solvent soybean meal (SSBM), or expeller soybean meal (ESBM) as the primary supplemental protein source and with 0 or 200 mg of ractopamine-HCl/d (23 ppm; provided as Optaflexx, Elanco Animal Health, Indianapolis, IN). Heifers were implanted with 140 mg of trenbolone acetate and 14 mg of estradiol-17ß (Revalor H; Intervet, Millsboro, DE) 60 d before the experiment started. All heifers had been fed and housed individually for 49 d before initiation of our trial, and all were fed a common diet based on steam-flaked corn for ad libitum consumption for 27 d before initiation of our trial. Dietary treatments, which had little impact on heifer performance, had been applied between 27 and 49 d before initiation of our trial, and these prior treatments were randomly distributed among our treatments.
|
Hot carcasses were weighed at slaughter. Percentage of KPH, 12th-rib fat thickness, marbling score, LM area, USDA yield grade (calculated), and marbling score of the carcasses were measured after a 24-h chill. Marbling scores were determined by a USDA grader.
Jugular blood samples were collected 1 d before initiation of ractopamine feeding at 0800 and 13 d later at 0800. Blood was collected into vacuum tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) containing sodium heparin, immediately placed on ice, and centrifuged for 20 min at 1,000 x g to obtain plasma. Plasma samples were stored (20°C) for later analysis of plasma urea (Marsh et al., 1965
), total
-amino N (Palmer and Peters, 1969
), glucose, and lactate (glucose/lactate auto-analyzer; YSI 2300 STAT Plus, YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH).
Data were analyzed by using the MIXED procedure of SAS (Release 8.1, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The model included the effects of protein source, ractopamine, and ractopamine x protein. Block was included as a random effect. For final BW and HCW, initial BW was included as a covariate. Treatment means were computed with the LSMEANS option. When an F-test for protein or for the ractopamine x protein interaction was significant (P < 0.05), individual treatment means were separated with pairwise t-tests among all means.
Diets were evaluated with level 1 of the NRC (1996)
model and with the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System 5.0 (CNCPS, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY; Fox et al., 1992
; Russell et al., 1992
; Sniffen et al., 1992
). Inputs included DMI of 8.7 kg/d and BW of 480 kg (averages for our experiment). For the NRC (1996)
evaluation, ESBM was assumed to contain 48% CP, with 45% of CP being DIP; SSBM was assumed to contain 55% CP, with 65% of CP being DIP. For both models, concentrated separator by-product was considered similar to beet molasses, with 20% ash and 17.6% CP, with 100% of CP being DIP. Nutrient contents of other feedstuffs were as specified by the models databases.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.13). Average daily gain was increased 18% by ractopamine (P = 0.02). When daily gains were calculated from carcass weights, ractopamine increased ADG by 25% (P = 0.008). Basing daily gains on carcass weights removes potential differences in gut fill, perhaps allowing a more accurate evaluation of heifer growth. Similarly, Carroll et al. (1990)
|
Carcass-adjusted daily gain, efficiency of gain, and carcass-adjusted efficiency of gain were not affected (P
0.52) by protein source. For ADG, heifers demonstrated a ractopamine x protein source interaction (P = 0.04). Heifers not fed ractopamine had greater ADG when fed ESBM than when fed urea, whereas heifers fed ractopamine showed no response (P
0.10) to protein supplementation. The response of heifers not receiving ractopamine suggests that performance was improved by increasing MP supply. However, heifers receiving ractopamine showed numerical decreases in daily gains as MP was increased. For heifers fed ractopamine, carcass-adjusted gains were numerically greater when they were fed the urea-supplemented diets, suggesting that there was no benefit to increasing the MP supply. Feedlot steers implanted with trenbolone acetate and estradiol-17ß had gain efficiencies that were numerically greater when the diet was supplemented with a combination of 75% feather meal: 25% soybean meal rather than 50:50 or 25:75 of feather meal and soybean meal (Cecava and Hancock, 1994
). This suggested that aggressively implanted finishing steers might respond to increases in MP supply, but this response was not observed in our implanted heifers fed ractopamine. Anderson et al. (1989)
observed no interaction between dietary ractopamine-HCl (0 to 80 ppm) and dietary protein concentration (11 or 14% CP) for performance of finishing steers over a 56-d period, suggesting that, similar to our results, ractopamine feeding did not markedly increase the MP requirement.
Protein source did not alter HCW (P = 0.65), but HCW was increased (P = 0.008) 6.9 kg when heifers were fed ractopamine. Schroeder et al. (2003b)
observed a significant increase in HCW from heifers fed ractopamine, with an improvement of 2.9 kg. Carroll et al. (1990)
, Schroeder et al. (2003a)
, and Laudert et al. (2004)
showed similar increases in HCW of feedlot steers fed 20 ppm ractopamine (6.4, 5.6, and 4.9 kg, respectively).
Final BW were 8.3 kg greater when heifers were fed ractopamine (P < 0.02). Heifers also demonstrated a ractopamine protein source interaction (P = 0.04) for final BW that was similar to that observed for ADG. Heifers not fed ractopamine had greater final BW when fed ESBM than when fed urea, whereas heifers fed ractopamine showed no response (P
0.10) to protein supplementation. Data reported from previous studies showed a 7.2-kg (Schroeder et al., 2003a
) and 6.7-kg (Laudert et al., 2004
) increase in final BW of feedlot steers and a 6.6-kg (Schroeder et al., 2003b
) increase in feedlot heifers in response to 20 ppm ractopamine fed for 28 or 42 d.
Carcass data for heifers are shown in Table 2
. Dressing percent, LM area, 12th-rib fat thickness, USDA yield grade, and marbling score were not affected by ractopamine or protein source (P
0.07). This is in agreement with Schroeder et al. (2003b)
, who showed no response to ractopamine in feedlot heifers for dressing percent, 12th-rib fat thickness, LM area, marbling score, USDA yield grade, or USDA quality grade. The KPH of control heifers was least when SSBM was fed, whereas the KPH of heifers fed ractopamine was least when ESBM was fed (ractopamine x protein source interaction, P = 0.002). These differences are unlikely to be of biological importance. In our experiment, modest responses to the treatments for carcass characteristics would not be detected due to the number of heifers studied. Previous research showed no effect of ractopamine on KPH in feedlot steers (Schroeder et al., 2003a
; Laudert et al., 2004
) or feedlot heifers (Schroeder et al., 2003b
). Carroll et al. (1990)
and Schroeder et al. (2003a)
reported that ractopamine fed to feedlot steers significantly increased dressing percent and LM area. These same responses in dressing percent and LM area were also observed in feedlot heifers (Laudert et al., 2004
). With ractopamine feeding, lean muscle deposition increases, potentially leading to increases in LM area (Mersmann, 1998
).
Plasma metabolites are presented in Table 3
. Because differences among treatments existed before the experiment, changes in plasma metabolite concentrations after implementation of treatments were calculated and considered most appropriate for assessing treatment responses. The decrease in plasma glucose concentrations from before the experiment to d 13 was greater when heifers were fed ractopamine (P < 0.05). Changes from pretreatment concentrations of plasma lactate were not different (P
0.14) among treatments.
|
-amino N could be expected to increase with increases in MP supply, but differences among diets were not observed. Decreases from pretreatment concentrations for plasma total
-amino N were greater for heifers fed ractopamine (P = 0.004), suggesting that more AA were taken up by tissues in response to this growth promotant.
Our diets were formulated to provide different amounts of MP to the heifers, with the urea diet providing the least and the ESBM diet providing the most. Metabolizable protein balances for the urea, SSBM, and ESBM diets were calculated with models from level 1 of the NRC (1996)
and the CNCPS, and the results are shown in Table 4
. Both models predicted energy allowable gains that were less than those observed. This is likely due to our heifers being individually fed in small pens, thereby minimizing activity of the heifers and reducing their nonproductive energy usage. Because gains for the heifers were underpredicted, MP requirements would also be underpredicted, and MP balance would be overpredicted. Prediction of MP balance by the NRC model showed that the urea diet was slightly deficient, but MP balances were positive with SSBM and more so with ESBM. Predictions from the CNCPS showed all diets to be in a positive MP balance. Lesser MP supply from the urea diet than from the SSBM and ESBM diets was also predicted. The more positive MP balances predicted by the CNCPS than by the NRC can be attributed to 1) the lesser gain predicted by CNCPS, which results in lesser MP requirements, and 2) greater predictions of MP supply by the CNCPS, which resulted from greater predictions of microbial protein supply. The NRC and CNCPS predicted the greatest ruminal N balance for the urea diet and the least for the ESBM diet, although the NRC predicted a 121 g/d difference among diets and the CNCPS predicted only a 19 g/d difference. Because ruminal N balance was predicted by the CNCPS to be negative for the ESBM diet, MP balance predicted by the CNCPS did not differ much between the SSBM diet and the ESBM diet. In contrast, the NRC model, which predicted positive ruminal N balances for all diets, predicted a greater difference between the SSBM and ESBM diets. Predictions for MP requirements are based on heifers fed no ractopamine; MP requirements for heifers fed ractopamine would be greater if the efficiency of MP use for tissue gain is not affected by the ractopamine.
|
It was unknown whether heifers fed ractopamine might respond to increases in MP supply because ractopamine increases growth rate and lean tissue deposition, which in turn might lead to a greater need for MP. Our study demonstrates that heifers fed ractopamine did not respond to increased MP supply. Thus, provision of adequate DIP to the diet by the addition of urea seems sufficient to meet the MP needs of ractopaminefed heifers consuming typical finishing diets based on steam-flaked corn.
| IMPLICATIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Corresponding author: etitgeme{at}ksu.edu
Received for publication October 21, 2005. Accepted for publication May 22, 2006.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Quinn, C. D. Reinhardt, E. R. Loe, B. E. Depenbusch, M. E. Corrigan, M. L. May, and J. S. Drouillard The effects of ractopamine-hydrogen chloride (Optaflexx) on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of finishing feedlot heifers J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 902 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Cole and R. W. Todd Opportunities to enhance performance and efficiency through nutrient synchrony in concentrate-fed ruminants J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E318 - E333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Sissom, C. D. Reinhardt, J. P. Hutcheson, W. T. Nichols, D. A. Yates, R. S. Swingle, and B. J. Johnson Response to ractopamine-HCl in heifers is altered by implant strategy across days on feed J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2125 - 2132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |