|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL NUTRITION |
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A8, Canada
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Complex Plant Cell Wall Ferulic Acid Esterase Feruloyl-Polysaccharides Multienzymes Ruminants
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The objectives of Exp. 1 were to determine enzymatic DM disappearance of oat hulls containing feruloyl ester bonds using ferulic acid esterase in combination with other cell wall-degrading enzymes, including xylanase, cellulose, and glucanases, to obtain the best multienzyme cocktail for further in situ and/or in vitro study. The objective of Exp. 2 was to determine the effect of the multienzyme cocktail on DM disappearance of oat hulls, wheat straw (standard), and alfalfa hay (standard). Dry matter digestibility was used as an indicator of cell wall digestibility because oat hull NDF content is comparable to its DM content.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Oat hulls were obtained from Can-Oat Milling Ltd. (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada). Oat hulls were screened to remove all foreign materials, and then ground to pass 1-mm and 250-µm pore-size mesh screens (Retsch ZM-1, Brinkmann Instruments Ltd., Ontario, Canada). The particle size used in this study was based on previous studies in our laboratory (Yu et al., 2002a
,b
; 2003
). The chemical composition of oat hulls is presented in Table 1
. The detailed procedures for analysis were reported by Thompson et al. (2000)
and Yu et al. (2002a
,b
, 2003
). Briefly, total alkali-extractable hydroxycinnamic acid content of oat hulls (10 mg) was determined by adding 1 M NaOH solution (0.55 mL), followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 h. After centrifugation (13,000 x g, 15 min), the supernatant fraction was collected, acidified with glacial acetic acid to pH 3, and extracted five times with equal volumes of ethyl acetate. The organic solutions were combined and evaporated to dryness in an evaporator unit under N2. The residue was dissolved in 1 mL of methanol/water (50:50, vol/vol) filtered through a 0.45-µm filter, and 10-µL samples were analyzed by HPLC. Total alkali-extractable ferulic and p-coumaric acids of oat hulls were reported previously by Yu et al. (2002a)
, and were 3.83 (±0.69) and 5.21 (±0.66) µg/mg (DM basis), respectively.
|
Enzymes and Activity Assays
Aspergillus ferulic acid esterase (lot No. 99021904), Trichoderma xylanase (lot No. 990215-04), cellulase (lot No. 99021901), endo-glucanase I (lot No. 99021902), endo-glucanase II (lot No. 99021903), and ß-glucanase (lot No. BGL-098) were obtained from Finnfeeds Int. (Marlborough, U.K.). The ferulic acid esterase activity was determined by measuring the rate of hydrolysis of methyl ferulate (methyl-4-hydroxy-3-methoxy cinnamate; Apin Chemicals Ltd., Abingdon, U.K.) by HPLC using the modified methods of Faulds and Williamson (1995)
and Kroon and Williamson (1996)
. The enzyme hydrolyses were carried out in a 100 mM 3-[N-morpholino]-propane-sulfuric acid buffer at pH 6.0 in a thermostatically controlled shaking incubator at 37°C (Yu et al., 2002a
). One unit of the ferulic acid esterase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 µmol of ferulic acid/min. The activity assays of xylanase, cellulose, endo-glucanase (I and II), and ß-glucanase have been reported previously (Yu et al., 2002a
,b
, 2003
, 2004
). One unit of enzyme activity (xylanase, cellulose, endo-glucanase [I and II], and ß-glucanase) was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 µmol of sugar/min.
All assays were performed in quadruplicate and replicated four times, with blanks to correct for background in enzyme and substrate samples. The activities of the ferulic acid esterase, xylanase, cellulase, endo-glucanase I and II, and ß-glucanase are presented in Table 2
.
|
Enzymes and Levels.
The experimental enzyme levels for ferulic acid esterase, xylanase, cellulase, endo-glucanase I and II, and ß-glucanase, chosen according to previous studies (Yu et al., 2002a
,b
, 2003
), are presented in Table 3
.
|
|
Enzymatic Disappearance of Wheat Straw and Alfalfa Hay (Standard Samples). To determine the value of the best multienzyme cocktail developed in the above experiment for digesting feed sources other than oat hulls, a second set of incubations was run with wheat straw and alfalfa hay (1 mm) as standard substrates. The wheat straw and alfalfa hay samples used for this trial were obtained from commercial sources through the University of Saskatchewan farm. These two feed sources were chosen because they represent a diverse range of cell wall chemical makeups and in degradability by ruminal microorganisms. The response of wheat straw and alfalfa hay to the best multienzyme cocktail was evaluated in terms of enzymatic disappearance of DM as described as above.
Experiment 2
In vitro studies with a 3 x 2 x 4 factorial arrangement with two replicates evaluated the responses of three feedstuffs (oat hulls, wheat straw, and alfalfa hay), two particle sizes (1 mm and 250 µm), and four in vitro incubation treatments to the multienzyme cocktail developed from the previous study. The multienzyme cocktail predominantly contained ferulic acid esterase (13 mU/assay), xylanase (4,096 U/assay), cellulase (1,024 U/assay), endo-glucanase I and II (256 U/assay), and (ß-glucanase (64 U/assay). The four treatments included 1) 24-h incubation in NaAc buffer (BUFFER); 2) 24-h incubation with the multienzyme cocktail (ENZYME); 3) 48-h in vitro incubation in ruminal fluid (RUMINAL FLUID); and 4) 24-h incubation with the multienzyme cocktail followed by a 48-h in vitro incubation in ruminal fluid (COMBINATION).
In Vitro Degradation Procedure. Each feed sample was weighed (1 g) into an in vitro tube and then mixed with 5 mL of buffer (pH 4.8), which contained the multi-enzyme cocktail. Control samples were treated with only 5 mL of buffer (no multienzyme cocktail). All samples were incubated (39°C) in a water bath for 24 h and then filtered through preweighed crucibles (with Hyflo super-cel [Johns-Manville Canada Inc., Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada] and filter paper) under low suction and rinsed (50 mL of distilled deionized water) to remove all solubilized material from the samples. The residue (undigested material) was dried overnight at 105°C and weighed for DM disappearance determination.
In Vitro Ruminal Degradation.
In vitro ruminal incubation was conducted as described for the first stage of the Tilley and Terry procedure (Marten and Barnes, 1980
). Ruminal fluid was collected 1 h after the morning feeding (0800) from two ruminally cannulated, nonlactating dairy cows located at the University Dairy Experimental Station (University of Saskatchewan, Canada). Each cow received daily 15 kg (as fed) of a total mixed ration, consisting of 27.5% pelleted concentrate (as shown in Table 5
), 55% barley silage, 12.5% alfalfa hay, and 5% dehydrated pelleted alfalfa (as fed) according to dairy cow maintenance requirements (NRC, 2001
). Both cows were individually fed twice daily at 0800 and 1600. Water was always available. The animals used in these experiments were cared for in accordance with the guidelines of the CCAC (1993)
. Inocula comprising 10 mL of ruminal fluid and 15 mL of McDougalls buffer solution (Troelsen, 1966, 1971
) were incubated for 48 h in the 90-mL in vitro polyethylene tubes placed in a 39°C shaking water bath. Four empty tubes also were incubated to serve as blanks.
|
In Vitro Ruminal Degradation of Preenzyme-Treated Feedstuffs.
Each feed sample was weighed (1 g) into in vitro tubes then mixed with 5 mL of NaAc buffer (pH 4.8), which contained the multienzyme cocktail. Control samples were treated with only 5 mL of NaAc buffer (no multienzyme cocktail). All samples were incubated (39°C) in a water bath for 24 h and freeze dried. The preenzyme-treated samples were then added to a mixture of ruminal fluid and McDougalls buffer solution for 48 h (Marten and Barnes, 1980
). The ruminal fluid and McDougalls buffer solution used were the same as stated above (Troelsen, 1966, 1971
). After incubation, the residues were filtered through preweighed crucibles (with Hyflo super-cel and filter paper) under low suction and rinsed (50 mL of distilled deionized water) to remove all solubilized material from the sample. The residue (undigested material) was dried overnight at 105°C and weighed to determine DM disappearance.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analysis was carried out using SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). The data from Exp. 1 were analyzed as a completely randomized design using the Proc GLM procedure, with a model including main effects (each enzyme) and enzyme interactions. Treatment means were compared using the Student-Newman-Keuls test (Steel and Torrie, 1980
). Significance was declared at P < 0.05. The data from Exp. 1 also were analyzed by a stepwise regression using Proc REG of SAS.
Data from Exp. 2 were analyzed as a 3 x 2 x 4 factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design with the following model: DM disappearance = mean + forage + particle size + treatment + forage x particle size + forage x treatment + particle size x treatment + forage x particle size x treatment + error. Treatment means were compared using the Student-Newman-Keuls test (Steel and Torrie, 1980
), and significance was declared at P < 0.05.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
250 µm) and also on the presence of the cell wall-degrading enzyme Trichoderma xylanase (Yu et al., 2002aExperiment 1
Effect of Multienzyme Cocktail on Disappearance of Oat Hulls.
The effects of the ferulic acid esterase in combination with other cell wall-degrading enzymes (xylanase, cellulose, and glucanases) on enzymatic DM disappearance of oat hulls are presented in Table 4
. All combinations of cell wall-degrading enzymes increased (P < 0.01) enzymatic DM disappearance by 7.7 to 86.3% compared with the control. The greatest enzymatic DM disappearance (16.3%) was found at 13 mU of ferulic acid esterase; 4,096 U of xylanase; 1,024 U of cellulase; 256 U of endo-glucanase I and II; and 64 U of ß-glucanase. This multienzyme cocktail contained the lowest level of ferulic acid esterase and the highest levels of the other cell wall-degrading enzymes. The results from the stepwise regression analysis showed that all enzyme activities could explain 74% of the variation in enzymatic DM disappearance, and the three enzyme activities (ferulic acid esterase, ß-glucanase, and cellulase) could explain 55% of the variation in enzymatic DM disappearance (Table 6
). The previous studies showed that ferulic acid esterase together with the other cell wall-degrading enzymes could synergistically act to disrupt hydroxycinnamic cross-linked complex cell wall polysaccharides to efficiently release ferulic acid and reducing sugars from the oat hulls (Yu et al., 2002a
,b
, 2003
). This may be the explanation for the observed increase in enzymatic DM disappearance of oat hulls. Such pretreatment may provide a unique advantage to ruminal microorganisms for the digestion of the ferulic cross-linked complex cell wall of oat hulls. Multienzymatic pretreatment may be a nutritional strategy that can be used to improve the digestibility and utilization of oat hulls and other high-fiber plant materials.
|
|
The main effects of substrate, particle size, and treatments on DM disappearance, as well as their two-way and three-way interactions (P < 0.05), are presented in Table 8
. The particle size of oat hulls affected the magnitude of response to pretreatment with the cocktail. Pretreatment of oat hulls with the multienzyme cocktail increased (P < 0.05) DM disappearance in ruminal fluid. With a particle size of 1 mm, DM disappearance increased by 6.5 percentage units; however, with a particle size of 250 µm, DM disappearance increased by 12.1 percentage units. The ability of the ENZYME treatment to degrade oat hulls with particle size of 1 mm was 10 percentage units lower than that by the RUMINAL FLUID treatment. With a particle size of 250 µm, the ability of ENZYME treatment to degrade oat hulls was improved, but DM disappearance was only four percentage units different than the RUMINAL FLUID treatment. The particle size of oat hulls affected the response to pretreatment of the multienzyme, which could be explained in part by our previous studies (Yu et al., 2002a
,b
). This multienzyme cocktail contains ferulic acid esterase. Ferulic acid esterase in combination with xylanase breaks the ester linkage between ferulic acid and the attached sugar, releasing ferulic acid from the hydroxycinnamic cross-linked complex plant cell walls of oat hulls. However, the release of ferulic acid by ferulic acid esterase depends on the particle size of oat hulls (
250 µm). With a particle size of 1 mm, ferulic acid esterase had little effect on the release of ferulic acid from the complex cell walls of oat hulls. An increase in the surface area available for enzymatic attack and/or enhanced accessibility to substrate could be potential reasons for increased DM disappearance with decreased particle size (Yu et al., 2002a
,b
).
|
In wheat straw, pretreatment with the multienzyme cocktail increased (P < 0.05) DM disappearance in ruminal fluid. With a particle size of 1 mm, DM disappearance increased 6.5 percentage units, which was similar to oat hulls. With particle size of 250 µm, DM disappearance increased (P < 0.05) only 5.1 percentage units, which was quite lower than that in oat hulls (12.1 percentage unit increase).
The responses of alfalfa hay (least response), wheat straw (moderate response), and oat hulls (greatest response) to the multienzyme cocktail could be due mainly to their internal plant cell wall structures (such as hydroxycinnamic acid content and lignification). For example, oat hulls contain relatively high ferulic acid (3-methoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) and p-coumaric acid (4-hydroxycinnamic acid). These acids are covalently cross-linked to polysaccharides and to lignin components (Scalbert et al., 1985
; Borneman et al., 1991
), resulting in limited cell-wall degradability (Borneman et al., 1986
; Hartley and Ford, 1989
; Brézillon et al., 1996
). It seems that the multienzyme cocktail is best suited for oat hulls, followed by wheat straw. The results indicate that addition of the multienzyme cocktail to poorly digestible feed with a relatively high amount of hydroxycinnamic acids before feeding has the potential to enhance degradation and digestion. Results of our previous studies indicate that synergistic interaction between ferulic acid esterase and xylanase to release ferulic acid from feruloyl-polysaccharides from oat hull makes the remainder of the polysaccharides vulnerable to further hydrolytic attack and facilitates the accessibility to the main chain of polysaccharide by the cell wall-degrading enzymes. This action facilitates cell wall hydrolysis, thereby releasing a higher yield of reducing sugars. In the present study, increased DM disappearance with the multienzyme pretreatment may have occurred due the actions noted in the previous work. Such multienzyme pretreatment could provide a unique advantage to ruminal microorganisms for the biodegradation of the complex plant cell walls with relatively high amount of hydroxycinnamic acids.
In conclusion, multienzyme cocktails (ferulic acid es-terase in combination with the other cell wall-degrading enzymes) increased enzymatic DM disappearance of oat hulls. The greatest enzymatic DM disappearance was found at 13 mU of ferulic acid esterase, 4,096 U of xylanase, 1,024 U of cellulase, 256 U of endo-glucanase I and II, and 64 U of ß-glucanase. Addition of the multi-enzyme cocktail to the forages improved in vitro ruminal fluid degradation. The response to the multienzyme cocktail often increased when the forage was ground to 250 µm. With respect to feedstuff, the following order of response to the multienzyme treatments was observed: oat hulls >wheat straw >alfalfa. The multienzyme cocktail seems most suitable for oat hulls, and it is likely that ruminal digestion of the hydroxycinnamic cross-linked complex cell wall of oat hulls could be improved with such multienzymatic pretreatment. The results from this study suggest that the addition of the multienzyme cocktail to poorly digestible feeds before feeding has the potential to enhance ruminal degradation and digestion.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Correspondence: 6D10 Agric. Bldg., 51 Campus Dr. (phone: +1 306 966 4132; fax: +1 306 966 4151; e-mail: yupe{at}sask.usask.ca).
Received for publication September 17, 2004. Accepted for publication February 21, 2005.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. N. Gozho, J. J. McKinnon, D. A. Christensen, V. Racz, and T. Mutsvangwa Effects of type of canola protein supplement on ruminal fermentation and nutrient flow to the duodenum in beef heifers J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3363 - 3371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Kang, A. T. Adesogan, S. C. Kim, and S. S. Lee Effects of an esterase-producing inoculant on fermentation, aerobic stability, and neutral detergent fiber digestibility of corn silage J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2009; 92(2): 732 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |