|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL GENETICS |

* ARS, USDA, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933 and
and
Lincoln, NE 68583
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Disease Resistance Growth Heritability Survival
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most common bacterial pathogen to cause IBK is Moraxella bovis (Brown et al., 1998
). Pathogenesis of the disease is influenced by many factors, such as season, mechanical irritation (dust, grass, weeds, etc.), host immune response, eye pigmentation, concurrent pathogens, environment, and strain of M. bovis. Transmission of M. bovis is by direct contact, nasal and ocular discharges, and most commonly by the face fly (Musca autumnalis; Brown and Adkins, 1972
). Control of M. autumnalis is the general approach to IBK prevention. Vaccination for M. bovis has not been successful (Brown et al., 1998
). Results of treatment including tropical, subconjunctival, and i.m. administration of antibiotics or antimicrobial drugs have varied according to the severity of IBK (Brown et al., 1998
).
Breed differences for incidence of IBK have been reported. Herefords may be more susceptible than most other breeds (Frisch, 1975
; Webber and Selby, 1981
). The lack of eyelid pigmentation has been associated with increased incidence of IBK (Ward and Nielson, 1979
; Caspair and Wood, 1980
; Pugh et al., 1986
). In Herefords, the lack of eye pigmentation has also been associated with ocular squamous carcinoma (cancer eye; Vogt et al., 1963
).
The extent to which genetic selection and breeding will decrease the incidence of IBK is unknown. Estimates of heritability of incidence of or resistance for IBK were not found in the literature. The objective of this study was to estimate breed differences and genetic effects on incidence of IBK.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Birth and health records of 45,497 calves from the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, over a 20-yr period (1983to 2002) were evaluated. The calving season typically began in mid-February and continued until early June, averaging 104 d. Calves were born in an open pasture. At birth, calves were weighed, dehorned, ear-tagged and tattooed for identification, and the navel was treated with iodine. Most bull calves were castrated by surgical excision. Management, pasture description, and supplemental feeding of cows and calves were previously described by Cundiff et al. (1998)
. At approximately 42-d of age when cows were placed into breeding pastures, calves were vaccinated with an 8-way Clostridial and a 5-way Leptospirial vaccine. At approximately 165 d of age, calves were given booster vaccinations of Clostridial and Leptospirial vaccines and a modified live vaccine for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, parainfluenza-3, and bovine viral diarrhea.
Calves were monitored daily by the staff veterinarian and/or beef cattle research technicians for health from birth until weaning at an average age of 194 d. Diseases were detected by physical examination, necropsy, or laboratory analyses and recorded. Records for IBK generally included unilateral and bilateral frequency but not severity code. The records were binary; for healthy cattle, the code was 200, and for IBK-infected cattle, the code was 100. To avoid multiple records on the same calf, which may have been due to lingering IBK or to reinfection, only the initial observed infection during the preweaning period was considered. Treatment of calves diagnosed with IBK included injections of antibiotics (oxytetracycline and ceftiofur sodium) and topical application of antimicrobial cloxacillin benzathine to the eye, which was then covered with an eye patch.
Whether an animal was tolerant or resistant to IBK could not be determined. Traditionally, tolerance is defined as the ability of an infected animal to show little or no measurable detrimental effect of the disease, whereas resistance is defined as the ability of the animal to resist infection or to limit the lifecycle of the infecting microbe. In this study, the term "resistant" was used to describe an animal that was not detected with clinical symptoms of IBK without regard to whether the animal was truly tolerant, resistant, subclinically infected, or not exposed to IBK causing organisms. Therefore, the trait measured was incidence of clinical IBK as observed under field conditions.
Three related sets of data were analyzed. The first set (n = 41,986; Table 1
) consisted of nine pure breeds (Angus, Braunvieh, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Hereford, Limousin, Pinzgauer, Red Poll, and Simmental) and three composite breeds (MARC I, MARC II, and MARC III). These animals were part of a large germplasm utilization study conducted to evaluate heterosis retention and use of breed differences in composite populations (Gregory et al., 1991
, 1999
). Most of these pure-bred and composite populations were present in each of the 20 yr except for Braunvieh (1983 to 1992), Red Poll (1983 to 1993), Simmental (1983 to 1997), Limousin (1983 to 1992), and Pinzgauer (1983 to 1993). No purebred or composite population was represented for less than 10 yr. Because an upgrading breeding program had been practiced to develop some of the pure-bred groups, animals with 7/8 and 15/16 of their genes from that breed were included in their respective pure-bred group when individual breeds were analyzed.
|
Because only one scientific study had previously compared Bos indicus to Bos taurus cattle (Frisch, 1975
), the incidence of IBK in tropically adapted breeds was compared to that for British and composite breeds. The third data set enabled comparison of cross-bred calves from MARC III dams sired by either tropically adapted breeds (Brahma, Boran, and Tuli) or sired by Hereford or Angus bulls, and also with pure-bred Hereford, Angus, and MARC III calves. Animals were from Cycle IV of the germplasm utilization study (Gregory, 1999
). All calves were born in one of two pastures each year from 1992 to 1994. The breeds were approximately evenly distributed each year across both pastures.
The data sets were edited before analyses to remove possibly incorrect records. Records on calves subjected to research protocols such as varying nutritional regimens, hormonal therapy, and antibody challenges, which may have influenced health or performance of it or its dam were removed. Only records of spring-and single-born calves that survived for at least 3 d postpartum were included. Records of calves with an unknown parent or born to a yearling heifer and of calves that died of a disease or other cause prior to weaning were not included.
Information for each calf included day of birth, weight at birth, age at weaning, age when IBK was first detected, and sex (male, including bulls and castrates, or female). Age of dam was grouped into five classifications: 2, 3, 4, 5 through 7, and 8 yr or older. Year of record, sex of calf, and age of dam were combined into a single factor. A code for birthing difficulty (dystocia) was assigned with a range of 1 to 7. Preliminary analyses found birthing difficulty not to be a significant effect related to IBK incidence, so it was not included in subsequent analyses.
Statistical Procedures
The pedigree files used to calculate the relationship matrices for breed specific data sets ranged in size from 1,059 to 12,547 with animals born between 1968 and 2002 (Table 2
). For most breeds, the numbers of sires and dams with calves were large. The weighted average inbreeding coefficient of inbred animals for all breeds was low (3.2%).
|
Descriptive statistics included overall IBK incidence by year, by age of calf, and by calendar day, and unadjusted means by germplasm group for IBK incidence. The general effect of IBK on calf weaning weight was estimated by using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). Data were limited to calves that survived to weaning and were either healthy (no recorded disease code) or diagnosed with IBK. The analysis included all breeds. The model included fixed effects for breed, year of record, sex of calf, age of dam, calving difficulty code, and health code (healthy or IBK). Age at weaning was included as a linear covariate. Because the effect of age of calf when IBK was diagnosed was not significant (P = 0.23) in preliminary analyses, age of calf when diagnosed was not included. Differences in weaning weight between healthy and IBK-diagnosed calves were tested using Tukeys range test.
Germplasm Groups
Variance components were estimated for each pure and composite breed. All available pedigree information between 1968 and 2002 for each breed was used. Variance components were estimated using single-trait models with a derivative-free REML algorithm (Graser et al., 1987
) using the computer programs of Boldman et al. (1995)
. Local convergence was considered to have been reached when the variance of the 2 logL in the simplex was less than 1 x 106. Global convergence was considered attained when the 2 log likelihoods did not change to the third decimal after restarting. Standard errors of heritability estimates were based on the average information matrix and the "delta" method (e.g., Dodenhoff et al., 1998
). The year-age of dam-sex of calf code combination was included as a fixed factor in the model. Calendar date of birth and birth weight were included as covariates. Random effects included the calf (genetic direct), permanent environmental effect of the dam, and the maternal genetic effect of the dam.
Four different models were compared (full model, two reduced models, and a constrained full model) for each breed. The permanent environmental effect of the dam was deleted in the first reduced model (R1). In the second reduced model (R2), the permanent environmental and maternal genetic effects of the dam were both deleted. The constrained model was identical to the full model, but the covariance of the direct and maternal direct effects was constrained to zero. The reduced and constrained models were compared with the full model by likelihood ratio tests. The most appropriate model was identified as the full model or a reduced model with a likelihood not significantly different from that for the full model.
Data from all purebred and composite breeds also were combined into an overall analysis. The full model included fixed effects for breed of calf, breed-year, breed-age of dam, and breed-sex of calf. Calf birth weight was not included because birth weight may be part of the breed effect. The three additional models equivalent to those in the individual breed analyses (R1, R2, and constrained model) were also used to obtain a pooled estimate of the genetic correlation between the direct and maternal genetic effects, and to determine the most appropriate model.
Breed-specific solutions related to the incidence of IBK were derived from the most appropriate overall model. Contrasts between breed specific solutions were tested for significance with a Students t-test. The Hereford breed, which had the greatest incidence of IBK, was chosen as the reference breed for the comparisons.
Heterozygosity
The effect of heterozygosity on decreasing the incidence of IBK was estimated with the data set containing records on Angus, Hereford, and their reciprocal crosses. The statistical analyses were similar to those previously described for the individual breed analyses with the omission of calf birth weight. Contrasts were constructed to test for differences between Hereford and Angus (combined direct and maternal breed test), purebreds vs. reciprocal crosses (classical heterosis test), and Angus x Hereford vs. Hereford x Angus (maternal test).
Tropically Adapted Breeds
The hypothesis of greater inherent resistance to IBK by tropically adapted breeds was investigated using a third REML analyses. The statistical model included fixed effects for the year-age of dam-sex of calf combinations (n = 22), breed and breed combinations (n = 16), and pasture location (n = 2). Julian day of birth was included as a covariate. Although the breed of sire of calves from MARC III dams was known, the individual sire of the calves was not known because most matings occurred in multisire pastures. To account for breed of sire, covariates summing to 1 within a calf for sire breed type(s) were included. The structure of the data set did not permit estimation of permanent environmental and maternal direct effects. Pairs of germplasm specific solutions were contrasted with a Students t-test. The Hereford breed was chosen as the arbitrary reference breed for the comparisons.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another limitation with these data is that because animal movement across pasture groups was not well recorded, spatial and temporal clustering effects could not be accounted for accurately. Clusters of diseases can occur within a group, pasture, herd, or region. Not accounting for clustering when it occurs may lead to false conclusions (Carpenter, 2001
). The REML analyses partially account for clustering by considering contemporary groups, which averages out the effects of years and pastures from the sire effects. The estimates of genetic parameters from REML procedures would not be expected to be greatly influenced by clustering. The effect of spatial and temporal clustering on variance estimation for disease traits, however, needs further investigation.
The incidence of IBK was less than 4% for most breeds (Table 1
). The Hereford breed was most affected (22.4%), with more than three times the overall average of 6.5%. Not considering the Hereford breed, the weighted average incidence of IBK was 4.5%. Breeds with the next highest incidences were Simmental (7.6%), Charolais (6.5%), and MARC III (5.9%). Other studies have reported a higher incidence of IBK in Herefords than in other breeds. A survey of Missouri cattle producers indicated that Hereford cattle have a significantly higher risk of IBK compared with Angus, Charolais, Holstein, and Shorthorn cattle (Webber and Selby, 1981
). In 12- to 18-mo-old heifers, Herefords had an incidence of 43% compared with 21% in Simmentals (Burns et al., 1988
). The incidence of IBK in calves before weaning was significantly higher in purebred Herefords than in Angus-Hereford crossbreds (87 vs. 21%, Ward and Nielson, 1979
).
Weaning weight was significantly reduced by IBK infection. The adjusted weaning weight of calves diagnosed with IBK was 8.9 kg less (P < 0.05) than for healthy calves (196.8 and 205.7 kg, respectively). Few calves diagnosed with IBK were culled (Table 1
). In the Charolais breed, approximately 1% of all infected calves were culled. The economic significance of IBK in this herd does not seem to be large, except for the Hereford breed.
Previous studies support the results that the effect of IBK on the Hereford breed is detrimental to production. The adjusted 205-d weaning weight of Hereford heifer calves infected with IBK was 18 kg less than uninfected calves (Thrift and Overfield, 1974
). Body weights of 8-mo-old Hereford x Shorthorn crossbred calves infected with IBK were 11.5 kg less than healthy calves (Frisch, 1975
). Bilateral infection of Hereford calves caused a threefold decrease in 205-d weaning weight compared with unilateral infection (16 vs. 5 kg; Killinger et al., 1977
). When infected Hereford calves were treated frequently, a difference of 1.7 kg for 205-d weaning weight was observed between infected and healthy calves (Ward and Neilson, 1979). The economic significance of IBK may be greater for producers of breeding stock than for commercial beef producers because ocular scaring as a result of IBK greatly diminishes the value of purebred cattle.
Environmental Factors
Incidence of IBK varied across years (Figure 1
). Annual incidence ranged from 1 to 28%, with a peak incidence in 1994. Generally, the incidence was less than 10%. The Hereford breed exhibited a greater incidence of IBK compared with all other breeds during years of increased infection (1988, 1992, 1994, and 2002; Figure 2
), as well as during years of low infection in other breeds (1984 and 1999). Because Hereford cows and calves were generally in pasture with other breeds during most of the preweaning period, clustering of the disease is not likely the reason for greater incidence in the Herefords.
|
|
|
A seasonal influence was indicated for date of detection of IBK in calves (Figure 4
). In the spring (approximately June 18), there was a sharp increase in the number of infected calves. Daily incidence peaked during the hot summer months (approximately July 17 to September 15). In the fall, the daily incidence rate declined. The numbers of infected calves by age (Figure 3
) and by date (Figure 4
) were partially confounded because of their relationship to day of birth, although the calving period was spread over an average of 104 d.
|
Female face flies predominately irritate cattle because they are attracted to cattle facial secretions and blood excretions as a protein source for egg development (Van Geem and Broce, 1985
). Feeding flies often irritate the hosts eye with their sharp prestomal spines, which cause superficial lesions and increased secretion of tears. The face fly carries M. bovis by retaining the bacteria in its crop and by regurgitating viable bacteria onto the feeding substrates (Krafsur and Moon, 1997
). Therefore, prevention and control methods for IBK commonly include application of pesticides to decrease the number of flies.
The increased incidence of IBK during mid- and late summer coincides with the annual peak of solar ultraviolet radiation which occurs from mid-June to mid-August in the central United States. Solar radiation may predispose the bovine eye to bacterial infection (Hughes and Pugh, 1970
; Webber and Selby, 1981
). Infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis has been induced in calves by exposure to artificial sunlamps emitting ultraviolet radiation and to M. bovis (Hughes et al., 1965
; Kopecky et al., 1980
). Studies in humans and rabbits found that ultraviolet radiation irritates the superficial corneal epithelium and may lead to separation of the corneal epithelium, which predisposes the cornea to infection (Dolin and Johnson, 1994
; Young, 1994
). However, very little ultraviolet radiation with wavelengths of less than 285 nm, which is associated with keratitis, penetrates the earths atmosphere. Thus, exposure to ultraviolet radiation may only be a predisposing cause of keratitis (Kopecky et al., 1980
).
Germplasm Groups
Estimates of genetic parameters varied across breeds and were also influenced by the model used (Table 3
). The full model was the significantly better-fit model for Hereford, Limousin, Pinzgauer, MARC I, and MARC II breeds. The permanent environmental effect of the dams was not a significant effect for the Angus, Simmental, and MARC III breeds, so that the R1 model was not significantly different from the full model. The maternal permanent environmental and genetic effects of the dam were not significant (R2 model) for Red Poll, Charolais, Gelbvieh, and Braunvieh calves. For most breeds, constraining the covariance of the direct and maternal effects to zero was not beneficial. In some breeds, the 2log L were lower in the reduced models, which may have been due to rounding error associated with the small variance estimate for maternal direct effects and the genetic correlation, as evidenced by a positive genetic correlation in the full model and a negative correlation in the reduced models.
|
The effect of the dam on the incidence of IBK was not important for most breeds. Estimates of variance due to maternal permanent environmental effects were near zero in the best fitting models for Hereford, Limousin, Pinzgauer, MARC I, and MARC II, ranging from 0.0 to 3.4 d2. Except for the Simmental breed, the best fitting models that included the maternal direct effect estimated the heritability of the maternal direct effect to be small, ranging from 0.02 to 0.11. The importance of maternal direct effects was larger in the Simmental breed (hmat2 = 0.20 ± 0.04).
The genetic correlations between the direct and maternal effects as estimated in the best-fitting full and R1 models were variable and ranged from 1.00 to 1.00. Extreme correlations are not usual and were often caused by rounding error when one of the variances is small such as the maternal effect in most breeds in this study.
With all breeds considered simultaneously, the best-fitting model from the across breed analysis was R1, which excluded only the permanent environmental effect of the dam (Table 4
). The estimated direct heritability in the across-breed analysis was 0.22 ± 0.02. This larger heritability estimate was not surprising because it is similar to a weighted average of the individual breed heritability estimates. In this analysis, the Hereford, Angus, and MARC III breeds contributed to 52% of the across-breed sampling size and had an average heritability of 0.26 (Table 3
).
|
|
Heterozygosity
Incidences of IBK varied in the Hereford, Angus, and reciprocal cross data (Table 6
). Incidence was greatest in Hereford, least in Angus, and intermediate in reciprocal crosses. Higher incidence in Angus x Hereford calves compared with Hereford x Angus calves (13.3 vs. 8.9%) suggests a maternal effect related to incidence of IBK.
|
|
Tropically Adapted Breeds
Analyses of the data with tropically adapted breeds supports the finding of Frisch (1975)
that crossbred Bos indicus calves have a lower incidence of IBK than crossbred Bos taurus calves. The incidence of IBK was greater in purebred Herefords, MARC III, and cross-bred Hereford/MARC III and Angus/MARC III calves compared with other germplasm (Table 8
). Crossbred calves sired by the tropically adapted breeds (Brahma, Boran, and Tuli) had lowest the incidences of IBK. Statistical tests of contrasts of germplasm group solutions from the REML analyses (Table 9
) support these unadjusted values. With the highest incidence (33.6%), Herefords differed significantly from all other germplasm groups. Herefords, MARC III, Hereford/ MARC III, and Angus/MARC III had greater incidences of IBK (Table 8
) and significantly differed from calves sired by tropically adapted breeds. Tropically adapted sire breeds did not differ for incidence of IBK. The incidence of IBK did not differ statistically between calves from reciprocal crosses of Herefords and Angus, and purebred Angus compared with calves sired by tropically adapted breeds. The large difference between the incidence of IBK in purebred Herefords (33.6%) and in calves sired by tropically adapted breeds (range 0.0 to 2.2%) agrees with the results of Frisch (1975)
, who reported 43.3% for 3-mo-old Hereford/Shorthorns compared with 6.7% for crossbred Brahman calves.
|
|
Results of this study suggest that calves sired by tropically adapted breeds have a lower incidence of IBK than some purebred and crossbred types but not lower than all Bos taurus germplasm. Physiological, biological, and epidemiological factors associated with these breed differences should be investigated. Genetic response to selection for decreasing the incidence of IBK will be slow because of low incidence and low heritability for most breeds. One exception would be for the Hereford breed, which has a high incidence and moderate heritability estimate. Breed selection may be more effective for decreasing the incidence of IBK, but it would need to be balanced by other breed characteristics. For example, the crossbred calves sired by tropically adapted breeds evaluated in this study were more resistant to IBK than most other Bos taurus groups, but they may have less desirable carcass characteristics (Crouse et al., 1989
).
| Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Correspondence: P.O. Box 166 (phone: 402-762-4167; fax: 402-762-4173; e-mail: snowder{at}email.marc.usda.gov).
Received for publication August 10, 2004. Accepted for publication December 2, 2004.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Casas and G. D. Snowder A putative quantitative trait locus on chromosome 20 associated with bovine pathogenic disease incidence J Anim Sci, October 1, 2008; 86(10): 2455 - 2460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Casas and R. T. Stone Putative quantitative trait loci associated with the probability of contracting infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3180 - 3184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |