J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Treiber, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Treiber, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:2357-2364
© 2005 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

Insulin resistance and compensation in Thoroughbred weanlings adapted to high-glycemic meals1

K. H. Treiber*,2, R. C. Boston{dagger}, D. S. Kronfeld*, W. B. Staniar* and P. A. Harris{ddagger}

* Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 24061-0306; and {dagger} Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square 19348; and and {ddagger} Equine Studies Group, Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Melton Mowbray, U.K.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Insulin resistance has been suggested to increase the risk of certain diseases, including osteochondrosis and laminitis. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of adaptation to high-glycemic meals on glucose-insulin regulation in healthy Thoroughbred weanlings. Twelve Thoroughbred foals were raised on pasture and supplemented twice daily with a feed high in either sugar and starch (SS; 49% nonstructural carbohydrates, 21% NDF, 3% crude fat on a DM basis) or fat and fiber (FF; 12% nonstructural carbohydrates, 44% NDF, 10% crude fat on a DM basis). As weanlings (age 199 ± 5 d; BW 274 ± 5 kg) the subjects underwent a modified frequently sampled i.v. glucose tolerance test. A series of 39 blood samples was collected from –60 to 360 min, with a glucose bolus of 300 mg/kg BW injected at 0 min and an insulin bolus of 1.5 mIU/kg BW at 20 min. All samples were analyzed for glucose and insulin, and basal samples also were analyzed for plasma cortisol, triglyceride, and IGF-I. The minimal model of glucose and insulin dynamics was used to determine insulin sensitivity (SI), glucose effectiveness, acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg), and disposition index (DI). Insulin sensitivity was 37% less (P = 0.007) in weanlings fed SS than in those fed FF; however, DI did not differ (P = 0.65) between diets because AIRg tended to be negatively correlated with SI (r = –0.55; P = 0.067). This finding indicates that the SI decrease was compensated by AIRg in the weanlings adapted to SS. This compensation was further demonstrated by greater insulin concentrations in SS-adapted weanlings compared with FF-adapted weanlings at 11 of 36 sample points (P < 0.055) and greater (P = 0.040) total area under the insulin curve in SS than in FF weanlings. Plasma cortisol and triglycerides did not differ between dietary groups, but IGF-I was greater (P = 0.001) in SS weanlings. Despite appearing healthy, horses adapted to high-glycemic feeds may exhibit changes in altered insulin sensitivity and compensation that increase the risk of diseases involving insulin resistance. These changes seem to be partially amenable to dietary management.

Key Words: Glycemic Meals • Horse • Insulin Sensitivity • Minimal Model


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Insulin resistance involves a decreased response to circulating insulin by insulin-sensitive cells primarily in muscle, adipose, and liver tissues. Resistance can refer to inefficient insulin signaling at the cell surface (i.e., low insulin sensitivity) or disruption of insulin signaling pathways within the cell (i.e., insulin ineffectiveness; Kronfeld et al., 2005Go). Insulin resistance has been observed in fasting, obese, and inactive horses (Argenzio and Hintz, 1971; Powell et al., 2002Go; Hoffman et al., 2003) and may affect reproduction and exercise performance (Fitzgerald et al., 2002Go; Powell et al., 2002Go).

Early studies observed lower oral glucose tolerance in horses fed grain diets compared with strictly forage-fed animals (Jacobs and Bolton, 1982Go). Modern tests, such as the minimal model, now allow for more comprehensive representations of the glucose and insulin system and affects of diet on glucose regulation. Decreased insulin sensitivity has now been quantified in nonobese horses adapted to high-glycemic grain concentrates (Hoffman et al., 2003). The objective of the present study was to further test whether insulin sensitivity would be altered in rapidly growing Thoroughbred weanlings chronically adapted to meals of a high-glycemic feed rich in starch and sugar (SS), compared with meals abundant in fat and fiber (FF), with glycemic and insulinemic responses resembling that of pasture.

We applied the minimal model of glucose-insulin dynamics (Bergman et al., 1979Go; Boston et al., 2004) to data from a frequently sampled i.v. glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). The minimal model is based on the physiological glucose and insulin system and has been applied extensively in human medicine as well as to cattle (Stanley et al., 2002Go), sheep (Williams et al., 2002Go), miniature pigs (Behme, 1996Go), and the horse (Hoffman et al., 2003) to evaluate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic ß-cell response.

Insulin resistance has been identified as a risk factor or component of several equine diseases, such as some forms of laminitis, hyperlipidemia (Jeffcott et al., 1986Go), pituitary adenoma (Garcia and Beech, 1986Go), and osteochondrosis (Ralston, 1996Go; Henson et al., 1997Go). As a secondary objective, we tested factors associated with insulin resistance that might contribute to laminitis, dyslipidemia, or osteochondrosis by measuring plasma concentrations of cortisol, triglyceride (TG), and IGF-I.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Animals
Twelve Thoroughbred foals were raised on two adjacent, matched 12-ha pastures of mixed grass-legume (bluegrass, fescue, clover) with dietary groups in separate enclosures to allow for daily supplementation of the feed groups in their natural herd environment with minimal disturbance at feeding times. The adjacent pastures were similar in contents of DE and major nutrients according to equivalence tests (Byrd et al., 2005Go), and groups were rotated between pastures each month to minimize the potential effects of confounding dietary treatment and group. The horses received meals twice daily from birth, six receiving the SS feed (four fillies, two geldings), and six receiving the FF feed (three fillies, three geldings). Feeds were offered to groups of weanlings in individual pans, each containing a single portion. The pans were placed in a circular pattern approximately 6 m apart to minimize competitive behavior, and the weanlings were observed at each meal to ensure that each consumed their allotted supplement. Before weaning, foals shared meals with their dams. After weaning, the subjects had access to 1.6 kg of feed per meal, with two meals per day providing approximately 50% of their recommended DE (NRC, 1989Go). All weanlings were observed regularly by an experienced equine veterinarian and were considered to be in good health. All had similar BCS of 5 or 6 (Henneke et al., 1983Go). Before the study, the weanlings were gathered in the mornings to acclimate them to the stalls. The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Dietary Treatments and Experimental Design
The supplementary feeds were formulated (as-fed basis) to be isocaloric (8.37 ± 0.07 Mcal/d) and isonitrogenous (13.2 ± 0.7% CP), with vitamin and mineral contents designed to complement the pasture and fulfill present recommendations (NRC, 1989Go; Hoffman et al., 2001Go). Feed compositions were reported previously (Hoffman et al., 2003bGo). Samples of feeds and pasture were submitted monthly to a commercial laboratory for proximate and mineral analysis (Table 1Go). In a preliminary study on 12 yearlings, glycemic and insulinemic responses to a 2.0-kg meal of FF were 59 and 63% less than corresponding responses to SS (P = 0.030 and 0.020, respectively). Glycemic indices of approximately 129% (high) and 53% (moderate) were assigned to SS and FF, respectively, in relation to a standard of 100% for oats (Kronfeld et al., 2004Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Chemical analysis (on a DM basis) of pasture (n = 12) and feeds rich in sugar and starch (SS, n = 3) or fat and fiber (FF, n = 3) summarized as arithmetic means (±SEM)a
 
The study consisted of a modified FSIGT administered to each horse (Caumo et al., 2000; Hoffman et al., 2003aGo). Three horses were assigned randomly to each of 4 d for sample collection. On the day before each test, the three subjects were weighed on an electronic scale (Tyrel Platform, model TC-10S; Allweights Hamilton Scale Corp., Richmond, VA). Catheters were inserted into a jugular vein, and the horses were kept in stalls overnight. The catheters were flushed with heparin in isotonic saline (10 U of heparin/mL of saline) that evening and again in the morning. To approximate a non-fasting grazing state, the stalled horses had access to orchardgrass hay and water ad libitum throughout the study. The nonstructural carbohydrate content of the hay was similar (P = 0.88) to that of the pasture. Hay consumption was of short duration and not expected to cause perturbations in plasma glucose or insulin (Stull and Rodiek, 1987; Pagan et al., 1999), while helping to avoid increases in insulin resistance possibly contributed by fasting or increased stress levels (Forehead and Dobson, 1997Go).

Blood Sample Collection
The modified FSIGT was initiated at 0900 with a bolus of 300 mg/kg BW of glucose (Dextrose Solution 50%; Phoenix Pharmaceutical, Inc., St. Joseph, MO) rapidly administered (within 2 min) through the catheter. Twenty minutes after the glucose bolus, an insulin bolus (Humulin R, Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) of 1.5 mIU/kg BW was rapidly administered (within 30 sec) through the catheter.

Thirty-six venous samples were collected from each horse over the 6-h FSIGT. Basal samples were taken 60, 45, and 0 min before the glucose dose. Blood samples were drawn at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330, and 360 min after the glucose bolus. This schedule provides comprehensive curves for mathematical analysis, with more frequent sampling when rapid changes in glucose and insulin are expected. The blood samples were immediately transferred to heparinized sample tubes (Vacutainer; Fisher Health Care, Chicago, IL) and placed in ice water until centrifuged (3,000 x g for 10 min). Plasma was removed within 30 min of collection and frozen at –4°C until analysis.

Analysis of Glucose, TG, and Insulin in Blood
Plasma glucose and TG samples were analyzed by enzymatic assay (Beckman Instruments, triglyceride GPO reagent, Glucose Procedure No. 16-UV, Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO). Insulin was determined using an RIA (Coat-A-Count Insulin, Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA) previously validated for equine insulin (Freestone et al., 1991Go). Cortisol was determined using an RIA (Coat-A-Count Cortisol, Diagnostic Products) previously validated for equine cortisol (Alexander and Irvine, 1998). Insulin-like growth factor-I was extracted with acid-ethanol to remove binding proteins and analyzed by double-antibody RIA (Berry et al., 2001Go), as modified for the horse (Staniar, 2002Go). The intraassay CV of duplicate samples was <1% for glucose, 5% for insulin, 13% for IGF-I, and 5% for TG.

Minimal Model Analysis
The glucose and insulin curves were interpreted according to the minimal model of glucose and insulin dynamics as described by the following equations (Bergman et al., 1981):


where G'(t) is the net rate (mg·dL–1·min–1) of change in plasma glucose. Glucose effectiveness (Sg) describes one component of this plasma disposal rate (min–1), which is the capacity of the cells to take up glucose without insulin mediation. The plasma glucose concentration (mg/dL) at time = t is G(t); Gb is the basal glucose concentration (mg/dL), maintained primarily by hepatic production. Insulin action, X(t), represents the insulin mediated component (min–1) of the plasma glucose disposal rate via the acceleration of glucose uptake in response to an increment change in the insulin concentration. This component is further described by:


where X'(t) is the rate of change of the insulin action, p3 describes delivery of insulin to the interstitium, and p2 describes the disposal of insulin from the interstitial fluid, possibly reflecting hepatic extraction of plasma insulin. Insulin sensitivity (SI, L·min–1·mIU–1) is the ratio of these parameters: SI = p3/p2, and represents the efficiency of insulin to accelerate glucose uptake by the cells.

Responsiveness of ß-cells to the glucose load is described by the acute response of insulin to glucose (AIRg, mIU/[L·min]), which is the increase in plasma insulin above basal concentration integrated from 0 to 10 min after the glucose dose (Bergman, 1997Go). The product of AIRg and SI determines the disposition index (DI) or the appropriateness of the ß-cell response relative to the degree of insulin resistance in the tissue.

The minimal model was applied to the data using MinMod Millenium (Boston et al., 2003Go). This software iteratively fits the above equations to the sampling curves for plasma glucose and insulin, initially solving for the unknown parameters Sg, p2, and p3.

Basal Proxies
Basal values of insulin and glucose were used to calculate simple estimates of insulin sensitivity and ß-cell responsiveness for comparison with results from the minimal model (Treiber et al., 2005Go). The reciprocal of the insulin square-root index (RISQI) was calculated as insulin–0.5 and estimates insulin sensitivity as being relative to the amount of insulin compensation required to chronically maintain basal glucose homeostasis. The modified insulin response to glucose (MIRG) was calculated as (800 – 0.30[insulin – 50]2)/(glucose – 30), and estimates the capacity of the pancreatic ß-cells to increase insulin secretion and compensate for exogenous glucose. This capacity is limited by chronic basal insulin secretion, while chronic decompensation is indicated by increasing basal glucose levels.

Statistics
Statistics were performed using Intercooled Stata 8.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX). Assumption of normality was tested by the Shapiro-Wilkes statistic. For comparisons when normality was rejected (i.e., basal glucose, SI, and TG), the feed groups were analyzed by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and data were reported as medians and 95% confidence intervals. All other comparisons were based on two-sample t-tests, and data were reported as arithmetic means and standard errors. Outliers were identified by Grubb’s test. Associations were determined by robust linear regression. Insulin secretion was calculated as the total area under the curve for insulin from 0 to 360 min and was calculated by trapezoidal approximation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
The horses had been weaned 29 ± 1 d before the day they underwent the test and were 199 ± 5 d old. Mean BW was 274 ± 5 kg. Weight, age, and number of days since weaning did not differ between groups (P = 0.75, 0.81, and 0.94 respectively). The ADG by the weanlings was 0.96 ± 0.03 kg/d from spring until 2 mo before the study, when it dropped to 0.53 ± 0.08 and then 0.33 ± 0.06 kg/d in the last months of dietary adaptation. The ADG did not differ between groups for any month from birth until the study. The minimal model successfully fit the glucose disposal curves for all 12 weanlings (R2 = 0.992 ± 0.001).

Results for basal plasma metabolites and hormones are reported in Table 2Go. There was no difference between SS and FF treatments for basal concentrations of glucose, cortisol, or triglyceride. Higher basal IGF-I concentrations (P = 0.007) and a trend for higher insulin (P = 0.065) were observed in SS weanlings (Table 2Go). Values for solved minimal-model parameters and proxies are reported in Table 3Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Dietary effects on basal concentrations of metabolites and hormones in Thoroughbred foals supplemented with meals rich in either sugar and starch (SS, n = 6) or fat and fiber (FF, n = 6) reported as arithmetic means (±SEM)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Diet effects on glucose effectiveness (Sg), insulin sensitivity (SI), acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg), disposition index (DI), insulin secretion, the reciprocal of the square root of basal insulin index (RISQI), and the modified insulin ratio with glucose (MIRG) of Thoroughbred foals supplemented with meals rich in either sugar and starch (SS, n = 6) or fat and fiber (FF, n = 6) reported as arithmetic means (±SEM)
 
Glucose curves did not differ between dietary groups (Figure 1AGo). Glucose peaked at 1 min (350 ± 6 mg/dL) and decreased rapidly, returning to baseline at approximately 180 min. Insulin concentrations during the FSIGT were greater (P < 0.055) in the SS weanlings at 11 of the 36 time points (Figure 1BGo). Insulin concentrations did not increase (P = 0.17) immediately following the insulin dose, as the dose was small relative to physiologic concentrations of insulin. Total insulin secretion, the area under the curve, was 44% (P = 0.044) greater in SS than in FF weanlings (Table 3Go).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plasma concentrations (mean ± SEM) of glucose (A) and insulin (B) in Thoroughbred weanlings during a frequently sampled i.v. glucose tolerance test with 300 mg/kg glucose administered i.v. at 0 min and 1.5 mIU/kg insulin administered i.v. at 20 min. Horses were adapted to diets high in glucose equivalence (SS, {circ}) or fat and fiber (FF, •). The insets within each of the large panels provide details of the first 40 min of glucose (A) or insulin (B) changes on an expanded scale. Asterisks indicate differences between dietary groups, P < 0.055.

 
The AIRg tended towards a negative correlation (r = –0.55; P = 0.067) with SI, so that their product, DI, did not differ (P = 0.65) between SS and FF. The RISQI tended to be greater (P = 0.064) in FF horses and was positively correlated to SI (r = 0.86; P < 0.001). The MIRG tended to be greater (P = 0.063) in SS horses and was positively correlated to AIRg (r = 0.65; P = 0.021).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
The results show lower SI in Thoroughbred weanlings adapted to twice-daily meals high in glucose equivalents compared with weanlings adapted to a feed rich in fat and fiber; however, increased insulin secretion resulted in similar DI between SS and FF groups. These results suggest that ß-cell insulin secretion compensated for insulin resistance in the SS group.

The minimal model fit the data from all 12 weanlings, despite the low insulin dose, demonstrating the robustness of the minimal model (Boston et al., 2003Go). The minimal model FSIGT was originally designed for use without an insulin dose and only later modified to improve precision, primarily for diabetic patients (Pacini et al., 1998Go). Previous administration of 30 mIU/kg insulin to mature geldings obscured the secondary insulin response (Hoffman et al., 2003). Small insulin doses therefore allow for better characterization of endogenous metabolite and hormone responses to the glucose challenge. Nonetheless, in subjects with lower insulin sensitivity or insulin response than those in this study, small insulin doses may be inadequate to provide significant responses or return glucose concentrations to baseline, both of which are necessary to solve for minimal model parameters. For future minimal model studies in horses, we generally recommend an insulin bolus of 20 mIU/kg.

An intraclass correlation of 0.91 demonstrated the repeatability of the minimal model on eight Standard-bred horses (Geor et al., 2005Go). In addition, a correlation of 0.87 was found between the different indices of insulin sensitivity measured by the minimal model and another quantitative method, the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (Pratt et al., 2005Go). As the first specific quantitative method for determining insulin sensitivity, the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp has been regarded as a historical "gold standard." However, the minimal model is now being widely accepted based on its merits as a more physiological test of the glucose-insulin regulatory system (Bergman, 1989Go). The correlation of 0.87 between clamp- and minimal model-derived insulin sensitivities in horses is comparable to correlations of 0.84, 0.82, and 0.91 between the two methods in humans, dogs, and cats, respectively (Finegood et al., 1984Go; Beard et al., 1986Go; Petrus et al., 1998Go).

A trend towards decreased SI was demonstrated previously in mature Thoroughbred geldings with normal BCS when adapted to the SS diet (Hoffman et al., 2003aGo). Insulin sensitivity also has been observed to decrease in humans after 4 mo of adaptation to high-glycemic diets and to increase in adaptation to low-glycemic diets (Wolever and Mehling, 2002Go). Decreased SI observed in SS-adapted weanlings indicates a change in insulin signaling affecting glucose entry into the cell. This change may involve interactions involving the surface of the cell, signal transduction pathways, or intracellular metabolism of glucose and fatty acids (Saltiel and Kahn, 2001Go; Kronfeld et al., 2005Go).

Insulin resistance is a normal response of the metabolic system to decreased energy availability or increased energy demand (Brand-Miller and Colagiuri, 1999Go). This adaptive strategy may be involved in the increased insulin resistance observed during fasting and pregnancy (Fowden et al., 1984Go; Forehead and Dobson, 1997Go). Rapid decreases in circulating glucose and insulin following meals high in sugar and starch could trigger similar energy-conserving regulation (Jenkins et al., 1987Go). These signals may affect glucose regulation and decrease the insulin sensitivity of the tissue (Yalow et al., 1969Go). The combination of low insulin sensitivity with high carbohydrate availability has been shown to elicit a variety of metabolic abnormalities, with implications to numerous disease states in many species (Shafrir and Ziv, 1998Go). Animal models similar to the one in the present study provide a useful window into the effects of diet on the well-conserved and complex system of glucose regulation, with implications to both animal and human health and welfare (Storlien et al., 2000Go).

In the present study, glucose effectiveness did not differ between dietary groups. This similarity suggests that Sg, the glucose-mediated component of glucose uptake, is not regulated by adaptation to a feed high in glucose equivalents. Similarly, Holstein or Jersey calves showed no difference in Sg when fed milk replacer as once- or twice-daily meals (Stanley et al., 2002Go). Humans adapted to diets with different glycemic indices also showed no significant change in Sg from baseline (Wolever and Mehling, 2002Go). Nevertheless, noninsulin-dependent GLUT-1 glucose transporters may represent a component of Sg and are capable of compensatory changes when nutrition is inadequate (Sadiq et al., 1999Go; Flanagan, 2000Go). In cases of extreme insulin resistance, Sg also may be required to compensate, so as to sufficiently clear glucose from the plasma (Hoffman et al., 2003aGo). Although consistent for all weanlings, Sg was lower in these weanlings than values reported for older horses and other species (Feldhahn et al., 1999Go; Stanley et al., 2002Go; Hoffman et al., 2003aGo).

Thoroughbred weanlings adapted to the SS meal had lower RISQI than weanlings adapted to the FF meal. These findings further indicate lower insulin sensitivity in the SS group and, along with strong correlations, demonstrate the capacity of basal proxies to estimate properties of the dynamic system. A number of studies of proxies or surrogates based on basal glucose and insulin values have been useful in public health (Legro et al., 1998Go; Gungor et al., 2004Go).

Lower SI in SS foals tended to be associated with increased AIRg, which represents compensation for the decreased efficiency of insulin to stimulate cellular responses. Similar compensation has been reported in apparently healthy mature Thoroughbred geldings, calves, and humans (Welch et al., 1990Go; Stanley et al., 2002Go; Hoffman et al., 2003aGo). Excessive compensation and elevated circulating insulin may be a precursor to metabolic disorders, such as laminitis and hyperlipidemia or osteochondrosis (Jeffcott and Field, 1985Go; Ralston, 1996Go).

Because of the inverse relationship of AIRg and SI, their product, DI, did not differ between dietary groups, suggesting that each group’s insulin response was appropriate to its insulin sensitivity. Similarly, final DI values did not differ between two human groups fed low or high-glycemic diets, indicating appropriate compensation in the high-glycemic group (Wolever and Mehling, 2002Go).

Consistent basal glucose concentrations across all weanlings suggests that hay consumption was either not variable before the study or had little effect on plasma glucose concentrations, as was predicted. No difference in circulating cortisol was observed between dietary groups, indicating that insulin resistance in Thoroughbred weanlings was not a result of changes in glucocorticoids, as have been associated with insulin resistance, obesity, and laminitis (Forehead and Dobson, 1997Go; Reeves et al., 2001Go; Johnson, 2002Go). Plasma TG concentrations showed large variations among individuals and were not different between dietary groups; however, plasma IGF-I concentrations were increased in SS-adapted weanlings, possibly reflecting altered insulin signaling on the somatotropic axis (Bereket et al., 1994Go; Smith et al., 1997Go) and additional metabolic regulatory hormones, such as growth hormone (Roth et al., 1963Go; Champion et al., 2000Go; Yakar et al., 2001Go). Increased IGF-I may be a risk factor for osteochondrosis and could explain the association between osteochondrosis, insulin resistance, and high-carbohydrate diets observed in growing horses (Ralston, 1996Go).

A recent study on quarter horse yearlings compared response to meals of a high-glycemic feed and a feed with 10% fat after 30- and 60-d adaptation (Ropp et al., 2003Go). Results were inconsistent, showing a tendency for a lower glucose response on the fat-added feed at 30 d only, greater insulin in the high-glycemic group at 60 d only, differences in GH secretion at 30 and 60 d, but no significant differences in IGF-I. Emphasis was placed on the IGF-I result, and it was concluded that added fat did not decrease the risk of skeletal abnormalities as has been suggested by others (Saastamoinen, 1996Go; Harris et al., 2004Go). This conclusion may be questioned, however, because of the similar glycemic responses to the feeds, probably due in part to the high starch content (24%) of the 10% fat diet. In addition, there were significant, albeit inconsistent, changes in responses of plasma insulin and growth hormone, which, like IGF-I, are components of the somatotropic axis regulating chondrocyte function and maturation (Thissen et al., 1994Go) and may therefore play a role in the development of osteochondrosis.

In summary, adaptation to a high-glycemic diet is associated with increased insulin resistance and a compensatory increase in insulin secretion. Increased insulin secretion maintains glucose homeostasis, but may alter insulin signaling in other systems, such as the somatotropic axis and increase the risk of metabolic disorder. This condition may be partially amenable to dietary management (Kronfeld et al., 2005Go).


    Implications
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Growing horses chronically adapted to meals rich in sugar and starch develop decreased insulin-mediated glucose disposal. This decreased insulin sensitivity is compensated for by increased insulin secretion. Changes in insulin sensitivity and compensation both alter insulin signaling and may increase the risk of certain diseases. These risk factors are partially amenable to dietary management.


    Footnotes
 
1 This research was supported in part by the late P. Mellon, Upperville, VA, the John Lee Pratt Graduate Fellowship Program in Animal Nutrition, and the Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Melton-Mowbray, U.K. We appreciate the help of staff and students at the Middleburg Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, the technical assistance of L. Gay, and the modeling assistance of P. Moate and D. Stefanovski of the New Bolton Center. Back

2 Correspondence: Virginia Tech MARE Center, 5527 Sullivans Mill Road, Middleburg 20117 (phone: 540-687-3521; fax: 540-687-5362; e-mail: ktreiber{at}vt.edu).

Received for publication April 13, 2005. Accepted for publication June 9, 2005.


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 


Beard, J. C., R. N. Bergman, W. K. Ward, and D. Porte, Jr. 1986. The insulin sensitivity index in nondiabetic man: Correlation between clamp-derived and IVGTT-derived values. Diabetes 35:362–369.[Abstract]

Behme, M. T. 1996. Dietary fish oil enhances insulin sensitivity in miniature pigs. J. Nutr. 126:1549–1553.

Bereket, A., C. H. Lang, S. L. Blethen, M. C. Gelato, J. Fan, R. A. Frost, and T. A. Wilson. 1994. Effect of insulin on the insulin-like growth factor system in children with new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 80:1312–1317.

Bergman, R. N., Y. Z. Ider, C. R. Bowden, and C. Cobelli. 1979. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. 236:E667–E677.

Bergman, R. N. 1989. Toward physiological understanding of glucose tolerance: Minimal-model approach. Diabetes 38:1512–1527.[Abstract]

Bergman, R. N. 1997. The minimal model: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Pages 3–50 in The Minimal Model Approach and Determinants of Glucose Tolerance. R. N. Bergman and J. C. Lovejoy, ed. Louisiana State Univ. Press, Baton Rouge.

Berry, S. D., T. B. McFadden, R. E. Pearson, and R. M. Akers. 2001. A local increase in the mammary IGF-I:IGFBP-3 ratio mediates the mammogenic effects of estrogen and growth hormone. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 17:209–218.

Boston, R. C., D. Stefanovski, P. J. Moate, A. E. Sumner, R. M. Watanabe and R. N. Bergman. 2003. MINMOD Millenium: A computer program to calculate glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 5:1003–1015.[Medline]

Brand-Miller, J. C., and S. Colagiuri. 1999. Evolutionary aspects of diet and insulin resistance. World Rev. Nutr. Dietetics 84:74–105.

Byrd, B. M., D. S. Kronfeld, W. B. Staniar, T. A. Cubitt, and P. A. Harris. 2005. Equivalence of nutrient composition in horse pastures: Implications for equine nutrition research. Page 147 in Proc. Equine Sci. Soc., Tuscon, AZ.

Champion, Z. J., E. A. James, M. H. Vicker, B. H. Breier, and P. J. Casey. 2000. The effects of bovine recombinant growth hormone administration on insulin-like growth factor-I and the haemopoietic system in Thoroughbred geldings. Vet. J. 160:147–152.[Medline]

Coffman, J. R., and C. M. Colles. 1983. Insulin tolerance in laminitic ponies. Can. J. Comp. Med. 47:347–351.[Medline]

Feldhahn, J. R., J. S. Rand, and G. Martin. 1999. Insulin sensitivity in normal and diabetic cats. J. Feline Med. Surg. 1:107–115.[Medline]

Finegood, D. T., G. Pacini, and R. N. Bergman. 1984. The insulin sensitivity index: Correlation in dogs between values determined from the intravenous glucose tolerance test and the euglycemic glucose clamp. Diabetes 33:362–368.[Abstract]

Fitzgerald, B. P., S. E. Reedy, D. R. Sessions, D. M. Powell, and C. J. McManus. 2002. Potential signals mediating the maintenance of reproductive activity during the non-breeding season of the mare. Reproduction 59(Suppl.):115–129.

Flanagan, D. E., V. M. Moore, I. F. Godsland, R. A. Cockington, J. S. Robinson, and D. I. W. Phillips. 2000. Fetal growth and the physiological control of glucose tolerance in adults: A minimal model analysis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 278:E700–E706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Forehead, A. J., and H. Dobson. 1997. Plasma glucose and cortisol responses to exogenous insulin in fasted donkeys. Vet. Sci. 62:265–269.

Fowden, A. L., R. S. Comline, and M. Silver. 1984. Insulin secretion and carbohydrate metabolism during pregnancy in the mare. Equine Vet. J. 239–246.

Freestone, J. F., K. J. Wolfsheimer, S. G. Kamerling, G. Church, J. Hamra, and C. Bagwell. 1991. Exercise induced hormonal and metabolic changes in Thoroughbred horses: Effects of conditioning and acepromazine. Equine Vet. J. 23:219–223.[Medline]

Garcia, M. C., and J. Beech. 1986. Equine intravenous glucose tolerance test: Glucose and insulin responses of healthy horses fed grain or hay and of horses with pituitary adenoma. Am. J. Vet. Res. 47:570–572.[Medline]

Geor, R., R. Li, L. Waterfall, L. Larsen, L. Stewart-Hurst, and J. McCutcheon. 2005. Repeatability of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness from minimal model analysis of the frequently sampled intravenous tolerance test in horses. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 19:484.

Gungor, N., R. Saad, J. Janosky, and S. Arslanian. 2004. Validation of surrogate estimates of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in children and adolescents. J. Pediatr. 144:47–55.[Medline]

Harris, P., W. B. Staniar, and A. D. Ellis. 2004. Effect of exercise and diet on the incidence of DOD. Pages 265–283 in Proc. 2nd Eur. Workshop Equine Nutr., Dijon, France.

Henneke, D. R., G. D. Potter, J. L. Kreider, and B. F. Yeates. 1983. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares. Equine Vet. J. 15:371–372.[Medline]

Henson, F. M. D., C. Davenport, L. Butler, I. Moran, W. D. Shingleton, L. B. Jeffcott, and P. N. Schofield. 1997. Effects of insulin and insulin-like growth factors I and II on the growth of equine fetal and neonatal chondrocytes. Equine Vet. J. 29:441–447.[Medline]

Hoffman, R. M., R. C. Boston, D. Stefanovski, D. S. Kronfeld, and P. A. Harris. 2003a. Obesity and diet affect glucose dynamics and insulin sensitivity in Thoroughbred geldings. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2333–2342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoffman, R. M., D. S. Kronfeld, W. L. Cooper, and P. A. Harris. 2003b. Glucose clearance in pregnant mares is affected by diet, pregnancy and lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 79:500–506.

Hoffman, R. M., J. A. Wilson, D. S. Kronfeld, W. L. Cooper, L. A. Lawrence, D. Sklan, and P. A. Harris. 2001. Hydrolyzable carbohydrates in pasture, hay, and horse feeds: Direct assay and seasonal variation. J. Anim. Sci. 79:500–506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jacobs, K. A., and J. R. Bolton. 1982. Effect of diet on the oral glucose tolerance test in the horse. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 180:884–886.[Medline]

Jeffcott, L. B., and J. R. Field. 1985. Current concepts of hyperlipaemia in horses and ponies. Vet. Rec. 116:461–466.[Abstract]

Jeffcott, L. B., J. R. Field, J. G. McLean, and K. O’Dea. 1986. Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in ponies and Standardbred horses. Equine Vet. J. 18:97–101.[Medline]

Jenkins, D. J. A., T. M. S. Wolever, G. R. Collier, A. Ocana, A. V. Rao, G. Buckley, Y. Lam, A. Mayer, and L. U. Thompson. 1987. Metabolic effects of a low-glycemic-index diet. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 46:968–975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Johnson, P. J. 2002. The equine metabolic syndrome peripheral Cushing’s syndrome. Vet. Clin. Equine 18:271–293.

Kronfeld, D. S., A. V. Rodiek, and C. L. Stull. 2004. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and glycemic dietatics. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 24:399–404.

Kronfeld, D. S., K. H. Treiber, T. M. Hess, and R. C. Boston. 2005. Insulin resistance in the horse: Definition, detection, and dietetics. J. Anim. Sci. 83:22–31.

Legro, R. S., D. Finegood, and A. Dunaif. 1998. A fasting glucose to insulin ratio is a useful measure of insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83:2694–2698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

NRC. 1989. Pages 39–48 in Nutrient Requirements of Horses. 5th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Pacini, G., G. Tonolo, M. Samataro, M. Maioli, M. Ciccarese, E. Brocco, A. Avogaro, and R. Nosadini. 1998. Insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness: Minimal model analysis of regular and insulin-modified FSIGT. Am. J. Physiol. 274:E592–E599.

Petrus, D. J., M. W. Jackson, J. W. Kemnitz, D. T. Finegood, and D. Panciera. 1998. Assessing insulin sensitivity in the cat: Evaluation of the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp and the minimal model analysis. Res. Vet. Sci. 65:179–181.[Medline]

Powell, D. M., S. E. Reedy, D. R. Sessions, and B. P. Fitzgerald. 2002. Effect of short-term exercise training on insulin sensitivity in obese and lean mares. Equine Vet. J. (Suppl.)34:81–84.

Pratt, S., R. Geor, J. McCutcheon, and J. Cant. 2005. Comparison of insulin sensitivity in horses derived by the euglycemic clamp, minimal model method or oral glucose tolerance test. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 19:484. (Abstr.)

Ralston, S. L. 1996. Hyperglycemia/hyperinsulinemia after feeding a meal of grain to young horses with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion. Pferdeheilkunde 12:320–322.

Reeves, H. J., R. Lees, and C. M. McGowan. 2001. Measurement of basal serum insulin concentration in the diagnosis of Cushing’s disease in ponies. Vet. Rec. 149:449–452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ropp, J. K., R. H. Raub, and J. E. Minton. 2003. The effect of dietary energy source on serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor-I, growth hormone, insulin, glucose, and fat metabolites in weanling horses. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1581–1589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Roth, J., S. M. Glick, R. S. Yalow, and S. A. Berson. 1963. Secretion of human growth hormone: Physiologic and study modification. Metabolism 12:577–579.[Medline]

Saastamoinen, M. T. 1996. Protein, amino acid and energy requirements of weanling foals and yearlings. Pferdeheilkunde 12:297–302.

Sadiq, H. F., U. G. Das, T. F. Tracey, and S. U. Devaskar. 1999. Intra-uterine growth restriction differentially regulates perinatal brain and skeletal muscle glucose transporters. Brain Res. 823:96–103.[Medline]

Saltiel, A. R., and C. R. Kahn. 2001. Insulin signaling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 414:799–806.[Medline]

Shafrir, E., and E. Ziv. 1998. Cellular mechanism of nutritionally induced insulin resistance: The desert rodent Psammomys obesus and other animals in which insulin resistance leads to detrimental outcome. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharm. 9:347–385.

Smith, T. R., J. S. Elmendorf, T. S. David, and J. Turinsky. 1997. Growth hormone-induced insulin resistance role of the insulin receptor, IRS-1, GLUT-1, and GLUT-4. Am. J. Physiol. 272:E1071–E1079.

Staniar, W. B. 2002. Growth and somatotropic axis in young Thoroughbreds. Ph.D. Diss., Virginia Polytechnic and State Univ., Blacksburg.

Stanley, C. C., C. C. Williams, B. F. Jenny, J. M. Fernandez, H. G. Bateman, II, W. A. Nipper, J. C. Lovejoy, D. T. Gantt, and G. E. Goodler. 2002. Effects of feeding milk replacer once versus twice daily on glucose metabolism in Holstein and Jersey calves. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2335–2343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Storlien, L. H., J. A. Higgins, T. C. Thomas, M. A. Brown, H. Q. Wang, X. F. Huang, and P. L. Else. 2000. Diet composition and insulin action in animal models. Br. J. Nutr. 83:S85–S90.

Thissen, J. P., J. M. Ketelslegers, and L. E. Underwood. 1994. Nutritional regulation of the insulin-like growth factors. Endocrine Rev. 15:80–101.[Abstract]

Treiber, K., D. Kronfeld, T. Hess, and R. Boston. 2005. Insulin sensitivity and pancreatic B-cell response in the horse: Screening proxies and reference quintiles assessed by the minimal model. Am. J. Vet. Res. (In press)

Welch, S., S. S. P. Gebhart, R. N. Bergman, and L. S. Phillips. 1990. Minimal model analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity in diabetic subjects. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 71:1508–1518.[Abstract]

Williams, C. C., K. J. Calmes, J. M. Fernandez, C. C. Stanley, J. C. Lovejoy, H. G. Bateman, L. R. Gentry, D. T. Gantt, and G. D. Harding. 2002. Glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity in Gulf Coast and Suffolk ewes during late gestation and early lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 80(Suppl. 1):351. (Abstr.)

Wolever, T. M. S., and C. Mehling. 2002. High-carbohydrate-low-glycaemic index dietary advice improves glucose disposition in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Br. J. Nutr. 87:477–487.[Medline]

Yakar, S., J. Liu, A. M. Fernandez, Y. Wu, A. V. Schally, J. Frystyk, S. D. Chernausek, W. Mejia, and D. Le Roith. 2001. Liver-specific IGF-I gene deletion leads to muscle insulin insensitivity. Diabetes 50:1110–1118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yalow, R. S., S. J. Goldsmith, and S. A. Berson. 1969. Influence of physiologic fluctuations in plasma growth hormone on glucose tolerance. Diabetes 18:402–408.[Medline]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
I. Vervuert, K. Voigt, T. Hollands, D. Cuddeford, and M. Coenen
Effects of processing barley on its digestion by horses
Vet Rec., May 24, 2008; 162(21): 684 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. H. Treiber, R. J. Geor, R. C. Boston, T. M. Hess, P. A. Harris, and D. S. Kronfeld
Dietary Energy Source Affects Glucose Kinetics in Trained Arabian Geldings at Rest and during Endurance Exercise
J. Nutr., May 1, 2008; 138(5): 964 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. L. Ordakowski-Burk, R. W. Quinn, T. A. Shellem, and L. R. Vough
Voluntary intake and digestibility of reed canarygrass and timothy hay fed to horses
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3104 - 3109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. S. Kronfeld, K. H. Treiber, T. M. Hess, R. K. Splan, B. M. Byrd, W. B. Staniar, and N. W. White
Metabolic Syndrome in Healthy Ponies Facilitates Nutritional Countermeasures against Pasture Laminitis
J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 2090S - 2093S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. H. Treiber, D. S. Kronfeld, and R. J. Geor
Insulin Resistance in Equids: Possible Role in Laminitis
J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 2094S - 2098S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. Harris, S. R. Bailey, J. Elliott, and A. Longland
Countermeasures for Pasture-Associated Laminitis in Ponies and Horses
J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 2114S - 2121S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Treiber, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Treiber, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS