|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION |
,1
* Department of Animal Sciences and
and
College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
), sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c), retinoid X receptor
(RXR
), and adipocyte fatty acid binding protein (aP2) mRNA transcripts, whereas these effects were prevented by the presence of Ro-61. Interestingly, TTNBP increased (P < 0.001) the mRNA abundance of the orphan nuclear receptor chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor 1 (COUP-TF1), whereas Ro-61 prevented this increase. These changes were independent of alterations in the mRNA abundances of the retinoic acid receptor
, and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein
and ß (C/EBPß; C/EBP
) genes. These results indicate that retinoic acid inhibits porcine preadipocyte differentiation by a mechanism that involves activation of the RAR and downregulation of PPAR
, RXR
, and SREBP-1C mRNA. This mechanism is independent of changes in C/EBPß and C/EBP
mRNA abundance and may involve COUP-TF.
Key Words: Adipogenesis Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor 1 Primary Culture Retinoic Acid Swine
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism by which ATRA inhibits the differentiation of pig preadipocytes is unclear. The biological activity of retinoids is manifested through binding to intracellular retinoic acid receptors (RAR) or retinoid X receptors (RXR). Ligand-activated RAR-RXR or RXR-RXR dimers then regulate the expression of ATRA target genes (Mangelsdorf and Evans, 1995
). Studies using 3T3-L1 preadipocytes suggest that ATRA inhibits adipogenesis in the mouse by downregulating the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
) and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein
(C/EBP
; Xue et al., 1994; Kawada et al., 2000
). The effect of retinoids on the expression of these transcription factors in pig preadipocytes has not been explored.
Better understanding of how retinoids inhibit the differentiation of pig preadipocytes may provide insight into the regulation of adipose tissue development in vivo. Therefore, the objective of this study was to use retinoid receptor-specific compounds to investigate the underlying mechanism by which retinoids inhibit the differentiation of porcine preadipocytes in primary culture by identifying the retinoid receptor mediating this action and examining the effect of retinoids on the expression of key adipogenic transcription factors.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and Cell Culture
Two-day-old crossbred pigs were obtained from a commercial producer (Drahn Acre Farms, Corvallis, OR) and killed by CO2 asphyxiation in a manner approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Oregon State University. Stromal-vascular (S-V) cells were harvested by a collagenase digestion procedure as previously described (Suryawan and Hu, 1997
). Aliquots of S-V cells were counted by hemacytometry, seeded in either 35- or 100-mm culture dishes at a density of 5 x 104 cells/cm2, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air. Plating medium consisted of 1,2-dimethoxyethane/F-12 (vol/vol; 1:1) containing 15 mM NaHCO3, 15 mM HEPES buffer, and 50 mg/L of gentamicin sulfate supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. After 24 h, attached cells were washed three times using plating medium to remove unattached cells and cellular debris. After washing, cells were maintained in serum-free DME/F-12 medium containing 100 nM insulin, 10 µg/ mL of transferrin, and 50 ng/mL of hydrocortisone. Culture media was changed every 3 d until d 8, except where stated otherwise. Cells were subjected to GPDH assays on d 8, and subsets of cells were harvested on d 2 and 8 for oil red O (ORO) staining and gene expression analysis. By d 8 in culture medium, more than 70% of the cells had accumulated multilocular lipid droplets.
Experiment 1: Concentration-Dependent Effect of Receptor-Specific Retinoids on Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GPDH) Activity in Differentiating Porcine Preadipocytes
Stromal-vascular cells were isolated from porcine adipose tissue and then seeded in plating medium for 24 h at 37°C at a concentration of 5 x 104 cells/cm2 (designated d 1). Cultures were continuously treated from d 0 to 10 with 0 to 10 µM ATRA (a nonspecific agonist for both the RAR and the RXR), 9-cis-retinoic acid, methoprene acid (RXR-selective agonist), or TTNPB (RAR-selective agonist) in differentiation medium. Cell lysates were harvested after 10 d of treatment and immediately assayed for GPDH activity. Six replicates were performed each using cells harvested from a different pig. Three replicate wells were assayed within treatment for each pig.
Experiment 2: Concentration-Dependent Effect of the RAR Antagonist, Ro61, on the Ability of ATRA or TTNPB to Inhibit GPDH Activity in Primary Cultures of Differentiating Porcine Preadipocytes
Stromal-vascular cells were isolated from porcine adipose tissue and then seeded in plating medium for 24 h at 37°C at a concentration of 5 x 104 cells/cm2 (designated d 1). Cultures were continuously treated from d 0 to 10 with 0 to 10 µmol/L Ro61 in the presence of either 1 µM ATRA or 0.1 nM TTNPB. Cell lysates were harvested after 10 d of treatment and immediately assayed for GPDH activity. Six replicates were performed each using cells harvested from a different pig. Three replicate wells were assayed within treatment for each pig.
Experiment 3: The Effect of RAR-Selective Retinoids on the mRNA Transcript Expression of Adipocyte-Related Genes
Stromal-vascular cells were isolated from porcine adipose tissue and then seeded in plating medium for 24 h at 37°C at a concentration of 5 x 104 cells/cm2 (designated d 1). Cultures were continuously treated with vehicle, 0.1 nM TTNPB (RAR-selective agonist), or 0.1 nM TTNPB plus 1 µM/L Ro61 (RAR-selective antagonist). Total RNA was isolated from duplicate treated plates on either d 2 or 8 of culture. The mRNA abundance for the adipocyte fatty acid binding protein (aP2), PPAR
, sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1C), chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor 1 (COUP-TF), RXR
, RAR
, and the C/EBP
and C/EBPß genes was measured using semiquantitative reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Three replicates were performed each using cells harvested from a different pig. Three replicate PCR reactions were performed within treatment for each pig.
Histochemistry
In order to qualitatively assess S-V cell differentiation by microscopy, cells were exposed to induction media from d 0 to 8, and then fixed in 10% formalin, stained with ORO for lipid, and extractable ORO was measured spectrophotometrically (570 nm) by modifying the procedure of Suryawan and Hu (1993)
. Briefly, the wells were fixed with Bakers formalin for 15 min, rinsed with distilled water, equilibrated in 100% propylene glycol for 2 min, and then stained with ORO for 10 min. Wells were then treated with 60% propylene glycol for 1 min to remove free ORO and rinsed with distilled water. The ORO was extracted with addition of isopropanol and ORO determined in aliquots from wells following shaking the culture plates 30 min at room temperature.
Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Activity
The Sn-GPDH (EC 1.1.1.8) activity was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the disappearance of NADH during the GPDH-catalyzed reduction of DHAP under zero-order conditions by the method of Kozak and Jensen (1974)
, as modified by Wise and Green (1979)
. Briefly, differentiated cells were harvested in ice-cold lysate buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiotheitol, 5 mM Tris base, pH 7.4). Membranes were disrupted by sonication and supernatants were collected following centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 10 min to remove cellular debris. The reaction was initiated by the addition of supernatants to a standard mixture containing 100 mM triethanolamine/HCL buffer (pH 7.4), 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.176 mM NADH, 0.37 mM DHAP, and 0.1 mM ß-mercaptoethanol. The reaction was linear for sample time and concentration. Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity was expressed as units per mg of protein where one unit of activity is defined as the oxidation of 1 nmol NADH/min. Protein was measured according to Bradford (1976)
.
RNA Isolation
Cells were harvested with a cell scraper and total RNA was extracted using the guanidinium-phenol-chloroform method (Chomczynski and Sacchi, 1987
). Total RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically using A260 and A280 measurements. The ratio of light absorbance at 260 nm to that at 280 nm was between 1.7 and 2.1 for all samples. Five micrograms of total RNA from each sample was separated on a 1.2% denaturing formaldehyde gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The RNA integrity was assessed visually by judging the quality of 18 and 28s rRNA bands.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR
Reverse transcription reaction solution (20 µL) consisted of 4 µg of total RNA, 50 U of SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), 40 U of an RNAse inhibitor (Invitrogen/ Life Technologies), 0.5 mmol/L of deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and 100 ng of random hexamer primers. Polymerase chain reaction was performed in 50 µL containing 20 mmol/L of TrisHCL, pH 8.4, 50 mmol/L of KCl, 1.0 µL of reverse transcription reaction, 2.5 U of Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Hot Start, Invitrogen/ Life Technologies), 0.2 mmol/L of deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 2 mmol/L of Mg2+(Invitrogen/Life Technologies), 10 pmol each of gene specific primers, and 10 pmol each of primers specific for either ß-actin or 36B4. Thermal cycling parameters were as follows: one cycle 94°C for 4 min, followed by 26 to 30 cycles, 94°C for 1 min, 56°C for 2 min, and 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 8 min. Primers were synthesized at the Center for Gene Research at Oregon State University. Identity of PCR products was verified either by restriction digest analysis or via DNA sequencing. Cycle number for each multiplex PCR reaction was selected by experimentally determining the highest cycle number in which the amplification of both cDNA products was within a linear range. The optimal cycle number was then considered to be two cycles lower than the highest cycle of linearity. The RT-PCR amplicons were visualized by separating DNA on a 3% agarose gel and staining with SYBR Green according to the manufacturers directions (Molecular BioProbes, Eugene, OR) followed by detection and quantification using the Kodak Digital Science Electrophoresis Documentation and Analysis System 120 (Rochester, NY). Primer sequences, amplicon size, and cycle length are listed in Table 1
. Data for each replicate represented the mean of three individual RT-PCR.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
gene relative to the control on both d 2 and 8 (Figure 4B
relative to the control on both d 2 and 8 (Table 2
, C/EBP
, and C/EBPß genes on any day measured (Table 2
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, RXR
, and SREBP-1c mRNA, but it was independent of changes in CAAT-enhancer binding protein mRNA steady-state concentrations. Furthermore, an upregulation of COUP-TF1 mRNA abundance was correlated with decreases in markers of adipogenesis, suggesting that COUP-TF1 may play a role in the antiadipogenic action of retinoids.
Retinoids regulate cellular functions by binding to intracellular RAR or RXR. Retinoic acid selectively binds to RAR leading to the formation of RAR-RXR heterodimer. Alternatively, 9-cis-retinoic acid, which can be generated by intracellular isomerization of ATRA (Levin et al., 1992
; Heyman et al., 1992
), can bind to either RAR or RXR with relatively high affinity, leading to the formation of a RAR-RXR heterodimer or a RXR-RXR homodimer. These receptor dimers then bind cis-acting DNA elements to regulate target gene expression (Leid et al., 1992
; Mangelsdorf et al, 1994
; Mangelsdorf and Evans, 1995
). The expression of the RAR
gene in pig adipocytes was confirmed for the first time as mRNA transcripts for RAR
were detected in primary cultures of porcine S-V cells derived from adipose tissue throughout the culture period. In agreement with Ding et al. (1999)
, RXR
mRNA transcripts were detected at the initiation of differentiation and their steady-state concentration remained high until the cultures were terminated on d 10 after induction.
Because treatment with ATRA could potentially lead to the activation of both RAR and RXR in pig preadipocytes, our first objective was to use RAR- or RXR-selective retinoids to determine which receptor family mediated the antiadipogenic activity of ATRA. The RAR-specific retinoid, TTNPB, was 1,000-fold more effective at inhibiting adipocyte differentiation than either ATRA or 9-cis-retinoic acid, as determined using GPDH activity as a marker of differentiation (Figure 1
). Furthermore, the antiadipogenic activity of TTNPB was blocked by addition of Ro-61 (Figure 2
). In contrast to RAR agonists, the RXR-specific retinoid, methoprene acid, stimulated the differentiation of pig preadipocytes (Figure 1
). We conclude the antiadipogenic action of retinoids is mediated by the RAR receptor system. This conclusion is supported by a previous study, where it was determined that RAR receptors mediated the anti-adipogenic effect of ATRA in mouse-derived 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes (Xue et al., 1996
).
Our second objective was to investigate the effect of retinoid administration on the expression of transcription factors that are known to regulate adipogenesis. In the current model derived primarily from the study of clonal preadipocyte cell lines, the sequential induction of C/EBPß, PPAR
, and C/EBP
in preadipocytes results in transactivation of adipocyte-specific genes leading to terminal differentiation of the adipocyte (Lazar, 2002
). During this process, ligand-activated PPAR
forms a heterodimer with RXR
, resulting in the induction of PPAR
-responsive genes. However, it is now clear that significant differences in the expression of adipogenic transcription factors exist between clonal cell lines and primary cultures of pig preadipocytes. Primary porcine preadipocytes express significant quantities of mRNA and protein for C/EBP
, -ß, and -
, as well as PPAR
, before differentiation is initiated, which obscures the developmental pattern of their expression (Lee et al., 1998
; Ding et al., 1999
; Hausman, 2000
). However, although PPAR
protein expression does not precede the expression of C/EBP
in primary cultures of porcine preadipocytes, in agreement with clonal cell line models, the cross talk between these two proteins seems to be necessary for porcine adipogenesis (Hausman, 2003
).
In the present study, TTNPB decreased the expression of PPAR
, SREBP-1c, RXR
, and aP2 mRNA transcripts in differentiating pig preadipocytes. These results are consistent with one study where the treatment of primary cultures of porcine S-V cells with ATRA for 3 d resulted in inhibition of PPAR
protein (Kim et al., 2000
). However, TTNPB-induced changes in the present study were independent of alterations in the mRNA abundances of the RAR
and C/EBP
genes. Work using mouse-derived 3T3-L1 preadipocytes as a model indicates that ATRA inhibits adipogenesis in clonal cells by down regulating PPAR
and C/EBP
protein, while not preventing the initial induction of C/ EBPß (Schwarz et al., 1997
). These changes seem to be the result of the down regulation of gene expression as subsequent studies have indicated that ATRA treatment decreases the mRNA abundance of the PPAR
, C/EBP
, RXR
, and RAR
but not C/EBPß genes in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (C. Y. Hu, unpublished data; Kawada et al., 2000
). These divergent effects of retinoids on RAR
and C/EBP
mRNA expression may be due in part to differences in the developmental stage of the preadipocyte between our primary system and clonal cell lines, heterogeneity of cell types in primary cultures of adipose tissue-derived S-V cells vs. homogeneity of cell lines, the timing and duration of serum exposure, or species-specific differences. These differences highlight the limitations of extrapolating between clonal cell lines and species of interest.
Interestingly, the mRNA expression of adipogenic transcription factors was rather stable between d 2 and 8 of culture in the present study. This contrasts with previous reports, in which the mRNA abundances of adipocyte-related genes such as lipoprotein lipase, fatty acid synthase, and glucose transporter 4 increased between 5- and 30-fold over a 10-d period following the induction of differentiation of porcine S-V cells in primary cultures (Ding et al., 1999
; McNeel et al., 2000
). However, in those studies, the increased mRNA abundances for adipogenic transcription factors were less robust than increases observed for functional genes. For instance, Ding et al. (1999)
reported there was no change in expression of SREBP-1C, RXR
, or C/EBP
on d 7 compared with d 0 of culture. McNeel et al. (2000)
reported that C/EBPß mRNA expression was unchanged following 7 d in culture; however, C/EBP
mRNA significantly increased compared with d 0 in that study. Ding et al. (1999)
reported a onefold induction of PPAR
mRNA during 10 d of culture, although differences between d 2 and 7 were significantly smaller. In agreement with those studies, C/EBPß, SREBP-1C, and RXR
mRNA were unchanged between d 2 and 8 of culture in the present study. However, PPAR
mRNA abundance was not altered by day, and C/EBP
and aP2 mRNA transcripts numerically increased only modestly (13 and 16%, respectively) between d 2 and 8 of culture. Although these studies share similar culture protocols, several factors may have contributed to the observed differences in gene expression. For instance, age and genetics of the pigs used by the two laboratories differed. Sex was not reported in these studies, so uncharacterized sex effects may have been present as well. Furthermore, plating density is known to affect the homeostasis of preadipocyte cultures, and differences in the plating density existed between studies (Novakofski, 1987
). Finally, subtle differences may arise from differences in medium components (e.g., serum, dimethyl sulfoxide carrier), plastics, and culture environment. These differences notwithstanding, generally the results in the current study agree with data reported previously, although in the present study, the expression of PPAR
, C/EBP
, and aP2 mRNA transcripts was affected only modestly by day in culture.
The downregulation of PPAR
and SREBP-1c in response to retinoids observed in the present study is consistent with the current model of adipogenesis. Based on research using clonal cell lines, PPAR
is now considered the master regulator of adipocyte differentiation, whereas C/EBP
is thought to potentiate differentiation by up-regulating genes that confer insulin sensitivity to the adipocyte (Hamm et al., 1999
; Lazar, 2002
; Rosen et al., 2002
). Currently, SREBP-1c is believed to potentiate adipogenesis both by upregulating PPAR
expression and by increasing the availability of ligands for PPAR
by upregulating genes involved in lipid metabolism (Kim et al., 1998
; Fajas et al., 1999
). Thus, it is conceivable that adipogenesis could be effectively inhibited through a mechanism that is independent of effects on the expression of either C/EBPß or C/EBP
, especially if the mechanism targets PPAR
. Clearly C/EBP
expression is essential for adipogenesis in the pig (Yu and Hausman, 1998
; Hausman, 2000
). Although C/EBP
mRNA expression remains relatively constant as adipogenesis progresses, PPAR
mRNA expression increases throughout culture concomitant with differentiation (Ding et al., 1999
; McNeel et al., 2000
; present study). Given that differentiation of pig preadipocytes was dramatically inhibited in the absence of significant changes in expression of C/EBP
, it is tempting to speculate that C/EBP
may play a permissive role in regulating the final stages of terminal differentiation of pig preadipocytes, whereas PPAR
and SREBP-1c may play more significant regulatory roles. Currently, the mechanism underlying crosstalk between C/EBP
and PPAR
is poorly characterized during pig preadipocyte differentiation, and more research is needed to better understand the regulatory roles of these two proteins.
Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcription factor is an orphan nuclear receptor that has been implicated in mediating the ATRA inhibition of differentiation in multiple cell types (Widom et al., 1992
; Jonk et al., 1994
; Van der Wees et al., 1996
). In the present study, TTNPB increased the expression of COUP-TF mRNA concomitant with the inhibition of markers of preadipocyte differentiation, providing correlative evidence suggesting that COUP-TF1 may play a role in the antiadipogenic action of retinoids in pig preadipocytes. It is known that COUP-TF can compete with PPAR
for both dimerization with RXR receptors and for binding to the same direct repeat site in the promoter regions of target genes (Tsai and Tsai, 1997
). Because PPAR
must bind to RXR to be transcriptionally active, even slight changes in the kinetics of RXR binding would be expected to significantly affect the transcriptional activity of PPAR
. Furthermore, initiation is the rate-limiting step in transcription. Thus, DNA binding of PPAR
to response elements in target genes represents a critical point in the regulation of gene transcription by PPAR
, and competition for DNA binding sites could be expected to significantly decrease the transcriptional activity of PPAR
. In this regard, Brodie et al. (1996)
observed that ATRA both induced the expression of COUP-TF and increased the binding of COUP-TF to a PPAR
binding sequence transfected into 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. In the present study, TTNPB increased the expression of COUP-TF mRNA, and this effect was blocked by the addition of the RAR receptor antagonist, Ro-61, in a manner that was parallel to the ability of retinoids to inhibit the differentiation of pig preadipocytes. Thus, although we did not examine the effect of retinoids on the transcriptional activity of PPAR
in the present study, a role for COUP-TF in the mechanism by which retinoids inhibited the differentiation of porcine preadipocytes is consistent with the current model of adipogenesis. This work provides a rationale for further studying the potential of COUP-TF as a regulator of porcine adipogenesis.
| Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and is correlated with the down regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
, retinoid X receptor
, and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c mRNA. Furthermore, this study is the first to identify chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor 1 as a novel potential regulator of fat cell differentiation in the pig. Understanding the action of retinoic acid will help us to devise an effective method to control adipose tissue development in meat-producing animals, so that meat products can be provided that are healthier to consume and more cost-effective to produce.
1 Correspondence: 138 Strand Ag Hall (phone: 541-737-1915; fax: 541-737-4574; e-mail: ChingYuan.Hu{at}orst.edu).
Received for publication June 21, 2004. Accepted for publication October 12, 2004.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. J. Anim. Sci. 78:12271235.
and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-
proteins in porcine stromal-vascular (S-V) cell cultures obtained before and after the onset of fetal adipogenesis. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 133:6170.[Medline]
in adipocyte differentiation. J. Anim. Sci. 77(Suppl 3):1622.
induces adipogenesis through PPAR
: A unified pathway. Genes Dev. 16:2226.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Camacho, C. Rodriguez, J. Salazar, J. Martinez-Gonzalez, J. Ribalta, J.-R. Escudero, L. Masana, and L. Vila Retinoic acid induces PGI synthase expression in human endothelial cells J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1707 - 1714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Arnett, M. E. Dikeman, C. W. Spaeth, B. J. Johnson, and B. Hildabrand Effects of vitamin A supplementation in young lambs on performance, serum lipid, and longissimus muscle lipid composition J Anim Sci, November 1, 2007; 85(11): 3062 - 3071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gupta, S. W. Park, M. Farooqui, and L.-N. Wei Orphan nuclear receptor TR2, a mediator of preadipocyte proliferation, is differentially regulated by RA through exchange of coactivator PCAF with corepressor RIP140 on a platform molecule GRIP1 Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2007; 35(7): 2269 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Barendse, R. J. Bunch, J. W. Kijas, and M. B. Thomas The Effect of Genetic Variation of the Retinoic Acid Receptor-Related Orphan Receptor C Gene on Fatness in Cattle Genetics, February 1, 2007; 175(2): 843 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Brandebourg and C. Y. Hu Isomer-specific regulation of differentiating pig preadipocytes by conjugated linoleic acids J Anim Sci, September 1, 2005; 83(9): 2096 - 2105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |