J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Sullivan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerry, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Sullivan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerry, J. P.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:2384-2391
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL PRODUCTS

Influence of concentrate composition and forage type on retail packaged beef quality

A. O’Sullivan*,1, K. O’Sullivan{dagger}, K. Galvin*, A. P. Moloney{ddagger}, D. J. Troy{ddagger} and J. P. Kerry*

* Department of Food Science and Technology, University College, Cork, Ireland; and {dagger} Department of Statistics, National University of Ireland, Cork; and and {ddagger} Teagasc, the National Food Centre, Castleknock, Dublin 15, Ireland


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of type of conserved forage and concentrate composition on the quality of beef held in over-wrapped (aerobic) or modified atmosphere packaging under simulated retail display for 17 d. Friesian steers (n = 45) were assigned randomly to one of five dietary treatments: 1) extensively fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate (EFS); 2) restricted fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate (RFS); 3) starch-based concentrate plus wheat straw (SC); 4) nonstarch-based concentrate plus wheat straw (NSC); or 5) zero-grazed perennial ryegrass plus grass concentrate (RYE). Meat quality was determined by measuring color, lipid oxidation (TBARS), {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations, and fatty acid composition. In aerobically packaged beef, there was a display x diet interactive effect (P < 0.001) on Hunter a* values, with steaks from the EFS group having higher (P < 0.05) a* values than all other dietary groups from d 6 through d 17. Moreover, during the last 12 d of display, beef from the EFS group had the lowest (P < 0.01) proportion of metmyoglobin (display day x diet; P < 0.001). Under aerobic packaging, the SC and NSC groups produced steaks with higher (P < 0.05) TBARS values than RFS, EFS, and RYE groups, which did not differ from each other (display day x diet; P < 0.01). The SC and NSC groups had higher (P < 0.05) oxidation levels than RFS, EFS, and RYE groups, which did not differ from each other. Beef from the EFS group had (P < 0.05) higher concentrations of {alpha}-tocopherol than from the SC, NSC, and RYE groups. Beef from EFS-fed steers had a higher (P < 0.05) proportion of saturated fatty acids than the SC and NSC groups. It was concluded that the method of grass conservation influenced beef color, whereas concentrate composition did not. Color of aerobically packaged beef was improved by feeding animals silage that had undergone extensive fermentation. Conversely, oxidative stability was decreased by feeding animals starch- and nonstarch-based concentrate diets.

Key Words: Beef Quality • Color • Concentrate • Fermented Silage • Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids • Vitamin E


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Color is an extremely critical component of the appearance of fresh beef sold through retail, and among visual characteristics has substantial influence on purchase decisions. In red meats, consumers relate a bright-red color to freshness, but discriminate against meat that has turned brown (Morrissey et al., 1994Go). The feeding regimen of the animal can affect meat color, quality (O’Sullivan et al., 2002Go, 2003Go), flavor, and lipid oxidation (Gray et al., 1994Go). Diet formulation, therefore, may have an effect on meat quality, meat composition (Mitchell et al., 1991Go; Wood and Enser, 1997Go), and, ultimately, shelf life.

Today’s consumer demands a more healthy diet; therefore, considerable effort has focused on the impact of natural diets, such as grass, silage, and grain, on the eating quality of red meats. Many studies have been carried out on the effect of forage (Baker et al., 1992Go; French et al., 2000Go, 2001Go) and concentrates (Schnell et al., 1997Go) on beef quality. Grass silage is the predominant forage of Irish beef cattle finished indoors. Silage is produced by controlled fermentation of crops of high moisture content (McDonald et al., 1995Go). Restricting fermentation of grass in the silo is likely to capture more available nutrients for conversion into animal product. Wilting is one such strategy that has been to shown to have a dramatic effect on fatty acids. If restricting fermentation by acid addition influences the fatty acid composition of silage, this may have an impact on the stability of muscle lipids in animals consuming such silage. Similarly, if acid addition alters the concentration of antioxidants in silage, this might affect the color stability of meat. Limited research has been done on the extent of silage fermentation effects on color, consumer perception, and overall beef quality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of grass conservation method and composition on retail packaged beef color stability.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Animals and Diets
The experiment was carried out at Teagasc, Grange Research Centre (Meath, Ireland). Animals were penned indoors in groups of five in a slatted-floor shed with 3 m2 of space each. In a randomized block design, with blocks based on BW, groups of 15 2-yr-old Friesian steers (498 kg ± 29.3 initial BW) were individually offered (as-fed) 1) extensively fermented, unwilted grass silage with 25 kg of molasses per tonne of grass (EFS); 2) restricted-fermented, unwilted grass silage was treated with 48% formic acid and 16% ammonium tetraformate/(L•t) (RFS); 3) a starch-based (895 g of barley per kilogram) concentrate (SC); 4) a nonstarch-based fibrous (880 g of sugar beet pulp per kilogram) concentrate (NSC); or 5) zero-grazed perennial ryegrass (RYE). Silage was prepared from a regrowth of a predominantly perennial ryegrass sward, whereby alternative strips of grass were treated with the appropriate additive prior to pickup and removal to the silo. The perennial ryegrass sward available for zero-grazing was managed such that the grass offered was a 4-wk regrowth. Grass was harvested and offered to the cattle on the same day. Concentrate allowances were restricted and offered 1 kg (as-fed) of wheat straw per steer daily. The forages were supplemented with a common concentrate (formulated to balance for estimated metabolizable protein supply [Table 1Go]) to ensure similar carcass growth for all groups. After 140 d, steers were slaughtered in a commercial slaughter facility according to industry-accepted procedures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Chemical composition of dietary ingredients
 
Slaughter and Beef Sampling
After slaughter, carcasses were chilled for 24 h at 4°C. For the purpose of this study, nine carcasses from each dietary group were chosen at random, and the LM was excised from each carcass. Two 2.5-cm-thick steaks were cut from each carcass, vacuum-packaged, and frozen at –30°C for subsequent analysis. On the day before analysis, steaks were removed from the freezer and thawed at 2°C overnight. Then, duplicate 2.5-cm-diameter cores were removed from one steak for objective and subjective color measurements, whereas the other steak was used for all other data collection.

Packaging
Aerobic packaging consisted of placing duplicate meat cores and steaks on separate polystyrene/ethylvinylalcohol (EVOH)/polyethylene (PE) trays (203 x 146 x 47 mm), and over-wrapped with oxygen-permeable (6,000 to 8,000 cm3/[m2•24 h] at standard temperature and pressure), PVC film (Wrap Film Systems Ltd., Shropshire, England). Additional duplicate meat cores and steaks were packed separately in polystyrene/EVOH/PE trays, gas flushed with a 80:20 mixture of O2:CO2, and heat-sealed using a low-oxygen-permeable (3 cm3/[m2•24 h]) lidding material composed of a laminate of 20-µm oriented polypropylene (OPP) and a co-extrusion layer (50-µm) of PE/EVOH/PE (Cryovac; W. R. Grace Europe Inc., Lausanne, Switzerland). Steaks and cores were packaged using a packaging machine (type VS 100 BS; Gustav Muller and Co., Bad Homburg, Germany).

Determination of Color
Both aerobic and modified atmosphere–packaged (MAP) samples were stored in a chest display case (Criosbanc, Padova, Italy) under simulated retail conditions at 4°C (616 lux; Osram L36W/76 Natura de Luxe lighting) for 17 d. Hunter a* values of meat cores were measured using a Minolta chromameter CR-300 (Minolta Camera Co., Osaka, Japan). The proportion of the pigment metmyoglobin was also determined using the method of Krzywicki (1979)Go. The same meat cores were analyzed on a spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere Lambda 2 UV/Visible spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer, Beaconsfield, Bucks, U.K.). This method uses the reflex attenuance of incident light at the isosbestic points of 572, 525, 473, and 730 nm. From these absorbance values, the relative proportions of the pigment states were calculated and values were measured in duplicate on d 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 17 of retail display. On d 0, meat cores were allowed bloom for 3 h before color was determined.

Sensory Evaluation of Beef (Visual Assessment)
A semitrained panel of 15 people (consisting of departmental staff and postgraduate students) were asked to examine the meat color on the same days as objective color analysis. Two displays of meat, Display X (aerobically packaged) and Display Y (MAP), were shown to panelists. Within each display, there were five trays, with each tray (203 x 146 x 47 mm) containing meat cores from the nine steaks per dietary group. Panelists were asked to evaluate each display separately and score the color of each tray of meat cores on a 10-point scale (1 = very poor color to 10 = excellent color). Panelists were also asked to indicate in terms of color their most preferred dietary group.

Determination of Oxidative Stability
The extent of lipid oxidation was determined by the 2-thiobarbituric acid assay using the distillation method of Tarladgis et al. (1960)Go, as modified by Ke et al. (1977)Go. Results were expressed as thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances (TBARS; milligrams of malonaldehyde per kilogram of meat). Lipid oxidation was measured in duplicate for each steak at d 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 17 for both aerobic and MAP packed samples.

Determination of {alpha}-Tocopherol from Muscle Tissue
The {alpha}-tocopherol was extracted from duplicate 1-g samples of each LM steak using the method of Sheehy et al. (1993)Go and quantified by HPLC using a Waters model S10 pump, a Waters 717 autosampler, a Machery-Nagel Nucleosil 5 C18 (250 x 0.4 mm) reverse-phase column, and a Waters model 486 UV-visible wavelength detector (Millipore Corp., Milford, MA) set at 292 nm. The mobile phase was methanol:water (97:3) at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. Data were recorded and integrated using the Millennium 32 Chromatography Manager (Millipore Corp.).

Fatty Acid Analysis of Beef
Total fat was extracted from duplicate, 1-g samples using the method of Folch et al. (1957)Go. Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared according to the procedure of Slover and Lanza (1979)Go, and analysis was carried out using a gas chromatograph (model GC-14A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with flame ionization detection, equipped with an auto-injector (model AOC-17; Shimadzu). The column used was a DB-WAX fused-silica capillary column (i.d. = 25 m x 0.32 mm and film thickness = 0.25 µm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). Carrier gas was N at a pressure of 1 kg/cm2. Oven temperature programming was as follows: 50 to 200°C at 10°C/min and held isothermally at 200°C for 37 min, and then increased to 230°C at 10°C/min and held isothermally for 38 min. The injector port and detector temperature was 250°C. Chromatograms were processed using the Millennium 32 Chromatography Manager (Millipore Corp.).

Chemical Composition of Dietary Ingredients
Dry matter concentration, CP, DM digestibility, and ash were measured as described by Moloney and O’Kiely (1999)Go. Starch concentration was measured by polarimetry, oil by acid hydrolysis, and ether extract, and sugar concentration by the Luff-Schoorl method (ECMFR, 1984Go).

Statistical Analysis
A significant three-way interaction was obtained for diet, time, and packaging method. To investigate this further, a full, repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to investigate the effect of time and diet, and the interaction of time and diet within each packaging type. Diet represented the "between subjects," where subjects were individual steers. The effect of day was measured "within subjects," and multiple measurements were made for the same animal. Tukey’s test was used to assess the significance of difference within subjects (Neter et al. 1990Go). For muscle vitamin E and fatty acid concentrations, one-way ANOVA was used to test for the effect of diet. Tukey’s test was again used for multiple comparisons. Sensory data were analyzed using the {chi}2 test. All analyses were carried out using SPSS 8.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL) software.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Daily DM intakes of forages were 7.9, 6.98, 0.84, 0.84, and 9.4 kg, whereas daily DMI of concentrates were 3.46, 3.46, 6.98, 7.60, and 1.79 kg, for steers in the EFS, RFS, SC, NSC, and RYE groups, respectively (results not shown). Dietary treatment had no (P = 0.180) effect on carcass weight (313, 318, 324, 313, and 324 kg) or LM intramuscular fat content (39.7, 40.0, 29.6, 37.2, and 37.3 g/kg; P = 3.392) of steers fed EFS, RFS, SC, NSC, and RYE, respectively.

The average pH, residual water-soluble carbohydrate, lactic acid concentration, and ammonia concentration was 4.01, 23.3 g/kg DM, 78.6 g/kg DM, and 2.1 g/kg DM, respectively, for EFS and 4.04, 28.5 g/kg DM, 59.0 g/kg DM, and 3.3 g/kg DM, respectively, for RFS (results not shown). The higher lactic acid and correspondingly lower residual carbohydrate in EFS compared with RFS indicated that in-the-silo fermentation was more extensive in EFS as planned. The higher ammonia concentration in RFS reflects the contribution from the additive used because a more extensive fermentation would be expected to result in a higher concentration of ammonia.

Hunter a* Values
There was a display day x diet interaction (P < 0.001) for a* values of steaks aerobically packaged (Figure 1aGo). On d 6 through 17 of display, beef from the EFS group had higher (P < 0.05) a* values than beef from the SC, NSC, and RYE groups. The EFS group had higher (P < 0.01) a* values than the RFS group on d 8, 10, and 17 of display; however, a* values were not (P > 0.05) different among SC, NSC, and RYE beef. Redness (a*) values for aerobically packaged LM steaks decreased (P < 0.001) as retail display increased from d 0 to 17, regardless of dietary treatment. Yet, under MAP packaging there was there was no difference (P > 0.771) in a* values of beef among the five dietary groups, regardless of retail display day.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Hunter a* values (mean + SEM) of A) aerobically packaged and B) modified atmosphere packaged longissimus muscle steaks during 17 d of display (display day x diet; P < 0.001). {diamondsuit} = extensively fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate, {blacksquare} = restricted-fermentation grass silage plus silage concentrate, {blacktriangleup} = starch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, x = nonstarch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, and {square} = zero-grazed, perennial ryegrass plus grass concentrate.

 
Metmyoglobin Formation
There was a display day x dietary treatment interactive effect (P < 0.001) on metmyoglobin formation under aerobic packaging (Figure 2aGo). On d 4, 10, and 17 of display, steaks from the EFS group had a lower (P < 0.01) proportion of metmyoglobin than the other four dietary groups. On d 6, steaks from the EFS group had a lower (P < 0.01) proportion of metmyoglobin than beef from the SC and NSC groups, and, by d 12, beef from the EFS group had a lower (P < 0.01) proportion of metmyoglobin than all other dietary groups, except RYE. There was no (P > 0.092) difference in the proportion of metmyoglobin between SC and NSC beef. Moreover, in MAP samples, the only difference observed was on d 10 of display, when beef from the EFS group had a lower (P < 0.05) proportion of metmyoglobin than beef from the NSC group. However, there was no difference (P > 0.092) in MAP samples among the dietary groups at any other display day.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Proportion of metmyoglobin (mean + SEM) in A) aerobically packaged and B) modified atmosphere packaged longissimus muscle steaks during 17 d of display (display day x diet; P < 0.001). {diamondsuit} = extensively fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate, {blacksquare} = restricted-fermentation grass silage plus silage concentrate, {blacktriangleup} = starch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, x = nonstarch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, and {square} = zero-grazed, perennial ryegrass plus grass concentrate.

 
Sensory Analysis
Panel scoring of dietary groups under aerobic packaging is shown in Figure 3aGo. A higher score indicates that the color level of excellence was higher. On d 0 and 2 of display, there was no (P > 0.05) difference in scores among the five dietary treatments; however, by d 6, cores from the EFS group received the highest (P < 0.001) color scores (mean = 7.33), whereas the RFS was scored next highest (mean = 4.5). On d 8, the EFS group was still the most preferred (P < 0.05; mean = 6.46), yet, after 12 d of display, there was no (P > 0.12) difference in the mean ranking of the five dietary groups. Panelists’ scoring of the dietary groups under MAP is presented in Figure 3bGo. On d 0 and 2 of display, no (P > 0.07) difference in the mean scoring of the five dietary groups was observed, but the EFS and RFS groups were most preferred (P < 0.001) on d 6 and 8 of display. By d 12, steaks from the EFS group were most preferred (P < 0.001, mean = 4.80), whereas the RFS beef was the second most preferred (P < 0.001, mean = 3.40).



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Subjective color scores (mean + SEM) of A) aerobically packaged and B) modified atmosphere packaged longissimus muscle steaks during 17d of display. Panelists scored fresh beef color based on a 10-point scale (1 = very poor color to 10 = excellent color). EFS = extensively fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate, RFS = restricted-fermentation grass silage plus silage concentrate, SC = starch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, NSC = nonstarch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, and RYE = zero-grazed, perennial ryegrass plus grass concentrate.

 
Oxidative Stability
In aerobically packaged samples, there was display day x dietary treatment interaction (P < 0.01) for TBARS values (per gram of fresh tissue; Figure 4aGo). On d 4, beef from NSC-fed steers had higher (P < 0.05) TBARS values than beef from EFS-, RFS-, and RYE-fed steers. Furthermore, steaks from steers fed SC and NSC had higher (P < 0.05) TBARS values than steaks from the EFS, RFS, and RYE groups after 8 d of retail display. On d 12 of display, beef from the NSC group had higher (P < 0.05) TBARS values than the EFS, RFS, and RYE groups, whereas the SC beef had higher (P < 0.05) TBARS values than the EFS and RFS.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances values (fresh-tissue basis; mean + SEM) in A) aerobically packaged and B) modified atmosphere packaged longissimus muscle steaks during 17 d of display (display day x diet; P < 0.001). {diamondsuit} = extensively fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate, {blacksquare} = restricted-fermentation grass silage plus silage concentrate, {blacktriangleup} = starch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, x = nonstarch-based concentrate plus wheat straw, and {square} = zero-grazed, perennial ryegrass plus grass concentrate.

 
Differences among dietary treatments for TBARS were not as apparent for the MAP samples (Figure 4bGo) as those observed for the aerobically packed samples. On d 2, beef from the SC and NSC groups had higher (P < 0.05) TBARS values than beef from the EFS, RFS, and RYE groups, and, by d 4, TBARS for the SC group were higher (P < 0.01) than those of beef from EFS, RFS, and RYE. However, during the remaining days of display, there were no (P > 0.05) differences in TBARS values among the five dietary treatments.

{alpha}-Tocopherol Content
The EFS-fed steers had higher (P < 0.05) {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations per gram of fresh tissue (7.8 µg/g) than beef from the SC, NSC, and RYE treatment groups (3.3, 4.5, and 4.2 µg/g respectively; data not shown). Steaks from the EFS group also had numerically higher {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations than steaks from the RFS group (5.7 µg/g).

Fatty Acid Composition
Fatty acid composition of beef from the five dietary groups is shown in Table 2Go. There was a difference among the dietary groups in the proportion of saturated (P < 0.05) and polyunsaturated (P < 0.01) fatty acids, whereas there was no (P = 0.201) difference in the proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids. The EFS group had a higher (P < 0.05) proportion of saturated fatty acids than the SC and NSC groups, whereas the EFS and RFS groups had lower (P < 0.05) proportions of polyunsaturated fatty acids than the NSC group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fatty acid composition of beef from the five dietary groups (% of total fat)
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Several studies have been carried out to determine the effect of grass silage and/or concentrates on meat quality (French et al., 2000Go, 2001Go; O’Sullivan et al., 2002Go); however, in these studies, generally one type of silage and one type of concentrate have been examined. Smith (1990)Go discouraged forage finishing of beef owing to lower dressing percent, decreased quality grade, yellow fat color, darker muscle color, and decreased flavor relative to grain-fed beef. The results of the present study demonstrated that beef from forage-finished animals had greater color and lipid stability than beef from concentrate-fed steers, which concurs with the previous findings of O’Sullivan et al. (2002Go, 2003)Go.

The type of silage fermentation was shown to have an effect on color stability, with beef from the EFS group having greater color stability than beef from the RFS group. Results of the subjective color panel showed that panelists preferred the color of beef from the EFS group most, followed by beef from the RFS group. Although there was a difference in color between the EFS and RFS, there was no difference in the level of lipid oxidation in beef from these two groups. Within concentrate-fed steers, there was no difference in color or lipid stability. Under MAP, differences between the dietary groups were not evident from objective color measurements; however, panelists did note differences during the later days (d 10 and 12) of retail display. This effect of packaging does not agree with previous studies carried out by O’Sullivan et al. (2002Go, 2003)Go, who found that the effect of diet was more apparent in the MAP samples. This suggests that the packaging environment has a pronounced effect on beef quality but differs in its effect depending on the feeding system.

Metmyoglobin formation and lipid oxidation are the most important problems in maintaining a stable display of retail beef. Discoloration in retail meats during display conditions may be a combined function of muscle pigment oxidation and lipid oxidation in the membrane phospholipids (Sherbeck et al., 1995Go). Chan et al. (1997)Go reported that the process of oxymyoglobin oxidation was involved in catalyzing lipid oxidation. In the present study, beef from the SC and NSC groups had highest proportions of metmyoglobin and highest levels of lipid oxidation—supporting the hypothesis that pigment and lipid oxidation may be linked. Yin and Faustman (1993)Go reported that the formation of metmyoglobin from oxymyoglobin was positively correlated with lipid oxidation and seems to be dependent on the antioxidant status. In the present study, similar trends were observed under aerobic packaging for the proportion of metmyoglobin and extent of lipid oxidation (Figures 2aGo and 4aGo, respectively).

Several studies have shown that dietary vitamin E supplementation of steers causes accumulation of {alpha}-tocopherol in muscle tissue, which delays oxymyoglobin and lipid oxidation and prolongs the color stability of beef (Arnold et al., 1992Go, 1993aGo; Liu et al., 1996Go), which agrees with results of the current study. The EFS group, which produced beef with the greatest color and lipid stability, also had highest {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations. Arnold et al. (1993b)Go concluded that the target {alpha}-tocopherol level in fresh muscle for optimum protection against discoloration was approximately 3.5 µg of {alpha}-tocopherol per gram of meat, depending on the muscle. The level of {alpha}-tocopherol in beef from the EFS group was almost twice the target level (7.8 µg of {alpha}-tocopherol per gram).

Vitamin E in forage can be affected by a number of factors, including further processing, stage of maturity, composition at time of cutting, and dehydration time (Kerry et al., 2000Go). Lynch et al. (1998)Go reported that third-cut silage had lower levels of {alpha}-tocopherol than silage from first or second cuts. In this study, the EFS group had numerically higher {alpha}-tocopherol levels than the RFS group, indicating that the extent of fermentation did not affect {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations. Increasing the degree of unsaturation of muscle membranes reduces the oxidative stability of the muscle (Morrissey et al., 1998Go). Many studies have been carried out on the effect of beef cattle diets on the fatty acid composition of muscle (Griebenow et al., 1997Go; Wood and Enser, 1997Go; Demeyer and Doreau, 1999Go). In general, grass-fed beef has higher concentrations of PUFA, particularly in the phospholipid fraction, than grain-fed beef. Dewhurst and King (1998)Go reported that wilting led to a marked loss of fatty acids, particularly the highly unsaturated {alpha}-linolenic acid. In this study, beef from the zero-grazed perennial ryegrass had a higher proportion of n—3 fatty acids than beef from the EFS and RFS group. The higher levels of vitamin E in the EFS and RFS groups resulted in the greater color stability observed in beef from these two groups, and the lower proportion of PUFA in beef from these groups may also have contributed to the improved oxidative and color stability in these groups.


    Implications
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Results of this study imply that the method of grass conservation has an influence on meat color stability, but concentrate composition of the diet had little to no effect on beef shelf life. The color of fresh beef may be improved by feeding animals grass silage that has undergone extensive fermentation. Moreover, results indicate that packaging environment has a pronounced effect on the quality attributes of beef from differing feeding systems.

1 Correspondence—phone: 353-01-805 9562; fax: 353-01-805 9550; e-mail: aosullivan{at}fsai.ie.

Received for publication April 8, 2003. Accepted for publication April 7, 2004.


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 


Arnold, R. N., S. C. Arp, K. K. Scheller, S. N. Williams, and D. M. Schaefer. 1993a. Tissue equilibrium and subcellular distribution of vitamin E relative to myoglobin and lipid oxidation in displayed beef. J. Anim. Sci. 71:105–118[Abstract]

Arnold, R. N., K. K Scheller, S. C. Arp, S. N. Williams, and D. M. Schaefer 1993b. Dietary {alpha}-tocopheryl acetate enhances beef quality in Holstein and beef breed steers. J. Food Sci. 58:28–33.

Arnold, R. N., K. K. Scheller, S. C. Arp, S. N. Williams, D. R. Beuge, and D. M. Schaefer. 1992. Effect of long or short term feeding of {alpha}-tocopheryl acetate on Holstein and crossbred beef steers on performance, carcass characteristics, and beef color stability. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3055–3065.[Abstract]

Baker, R. D., N. E. Young, and J. A. Laws. 1992. The effect of diet in winter on the body composition of young steers and subsequent performance during the grazing season. Anim. Prod. 54:211–219.

Chan, W. K. M., C. Faustman, and E. A. Decker. 1997. Oxymyoglobin oxidation as affected by oxidation products of phosphatidylcholine liposomes. J. Food Sci. 62:709–712.

Demeyer, D., and M. Doreau. 1999. Targets and procedures for altering ruminant meat and milk lipids. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 58:593–607.[Medline]

ECMFR. 1984. European Communities (Marketing of Feedingstuffs Regulations). Statutory Instruments. S.I. No. 200 of 1984.

Dewhurst, R. J., and P. J. King. 1998. Effects of extended wilting, shading and chemical additives on the fatty acids in laboratory grass silages. Grass Forage Sci. 53:219–224.

Folch, J., M. Lees, and G. H. S. Stanley. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226:497–509.[Free Full Text]

French, P., E. G. O’Riordan, F. J. Monohan, P. J. Caffey, M. Vidal, M. T. Mooney, D. J Troy, and A. P. Moloney. 2000. Meat quality of steers finished on autumn grass, grass silage or concentrate-based diets. Meat Sci. 56:173–180.

French, P., E. G. O’Riordan, F. J. Monahan, P. J. Caffrey, M. T. Mooney, D. J. Troy, and A. P. Moloney. 2001. The eating quality of meat of steers fed grass and/or concentrates. Meat Sci. 57:379–386.

Gray, J. I., A. M. Pearson, and F. J. Monahan. 1994. Flavour and aroma problems and their measurement in meat, poultry and fish products. Pages 250–288 in Advances in Meat Research. 9. Quality Attributes and Their Measurement in Meat, Poultry and Fish Products. A. M. Pearson and T. R. Dutson, ed. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow.

Griebenow, R. L., F. A. Martz, and R. E. Morrow. 1997. Forage-based beef finishing systems: A review. J. Prod. Agric. 10:84–91.

Ke, P. J., R. J. Ackman, B. H. Linke, and D. M. Nash. 1977. Differential lipid oxidation in various parts of frozen mackeral. J. Food Technol. 12:37–47.

Kerry, J. P., D. J. Buckley, and P. A. Morrissey. 2000. Improvement of oxidative stability and lamb with vitamin E. Pages 229–261 in Antioxidants in Muscle Foods: Nutritional Strategies to Improve Quality. E. A. Decker, C. Faustman, and C. J. Lopez-Bote, ed. Wiley, New York.

Krzywicki, K. 1979. Assessment of relative content of myoglobin, oxymyoglobin and metmyoglobin at the surface of beef. Meat Sci. 3:1–10.

Liu, Q., K. K, Arp, S. C. Scheller, D. M. Schaefer, and M. Frigg. 1996. Colour co-ordinates for assessment of dietary vitamin E effect on beef colour stability. J. Anim. Sci. 74:106–116.[Abstract]

Lynch, A., J. P. Kerry, D. J. Buckley, and P. A. Morrissey. 1998. Vitamin E concentrations in silage samples collected from around Ireland. Page 83 in Proc. 24th Ir. Grassl. Anim. Prod. Assoc., Dublin, Ireland.

McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, and C. A. Morgan. 1995. Animal Nutrition: Digestion. 5th ed. Wiley, New York.

Mitchell, G. E., A. W. Reed, and S. A. Rodgers. 1991. Influence of feeding regimen on the sensory qualities and fatty acid contents of beef steaks. J. Food Sci. 56:1102–1103.

Moloney, A. P., and P. O’Kiely. 1999. Intake and rumen fermentation in steers offered a low pH grass silage with or without sodium bicarbonate. Ir. J. Agric. Food Res. 38:12–24.

Morrissey, P. A., D. J. Buckley, P. J. A. Sheehy and F. J. Monahan. 1994. Vitamin E and meat quality. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 53:289–295.[Medline]

Morrissey, P. A., P. J. A. Sheehy, K. Galvin, J. P. Kerry, and D. J. Buckley. 1998. Lipid stability in meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 49:S73–S86.

Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. N. Kutner. 1990. Regression, analysis of variance and experimental design. Pages 1035–1066 in Applied Linear Statistical Models. J. Neter, W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner, ed. Irwin Pub., Homewood, IL.

O’Sullivan, A., K. Galvin, A. P. Moloney, D. J. Troy, K. O’Sullivan and J. P. Kerry. 2003. Effect of pre-slaughter ratios of forages and or concentrates on the composition and quality of retail packaged beef. Meat Sci. 63:279–286.

O’Sullivan, A., K. O’Sullivan, K. Galvin, A. P. Moloney, D. J. Troy, and J. P. Kerry. 2002. Grass silage versus maize silage effects on retail packaged beef quality. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1556–1563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schnell, T. D., K. E. Belk, J. D. Tatum, R. K. Millar, and G. C. Smith. 1997. Performance, carcass and palatability traits for cows fed high-energy concentrate diets for 0, 14, 28, 42, or 56 days. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1195–1202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sheehy, P. J. A., P. A. Morrissey, and A. Flynn. 1993. Influence of heated vegetable oils and {alpha}-tocopherol acetate supplementation on {alpha}-tocopherol, fatty acids and lipid peroxidation in chicken muscle. Br. Poultry Sci. 34:367–381.[Medline]

Sherbeck, J. A., D. M. Wulf, J. B. Morgan, J. D. Tatum, G. C. Smith, and S. N. Williams. 1995. Dietary supplementation of vitamin E to feedlot cattle affects beef retail display properties. J. Food Sci. 60:250–252.

Slover, H. T., and E. Lanza. 1979. Quantitative analysis of food fatty acids by capillary gas chromatography. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56:933–943.

Smith, G. C. 1990. Quality of beef from cattle fed solely on forage. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Texas A&M Univ., College Station.

Tarladgis, B. G., B. M. Watts, and M. T. Younathan. 1960. A distillation method for the quantitative determination on malonaldehyde in rancid foods. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 37:44–48.

Wood, J. D., and M. Enser. 1997. Factors influencing fatty acids in meat and the role of antioxidants in improving meat quality. Br. J. Nutr. 78(Suppl. 1):S49–S60.

Yin, M. C., and C. Faustman. 1993. Influence of temperature, pH and phospholipid composition upon the stability of myoglobin and phospholipid: A liposome model. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41:853–856.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. I. P. Ponte, J. A. M. Prates, J. P. Crespo, D. G. Crespo, J. L. Mourao, S. P. Alves, R. J. B. Bessa, M. A. Chaveiro-Soares, L. T. Gama, L. M. A. Ferreira, et al.
Restricting the Intake of a Cereal-Based Feed in Free-Range-Pastured Poultry: Effects on Performance and Meat Quality
Poult. Sci., October 1, 2008; 87(10): 2032 - 2042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. I. P. Ponte, J. A. M. Prates, J. P. Crespo, D. G. Crespo, J. L. Mourao, S. P. Alves, R. J. B. Bessa, M. A. Chaveiro-Soares, L. M. A. Ferreira, and C. M. G. A. Fontes
Improving the Lipid Nutritive Value of Poultry Meat Through the Incorporation of a Dehydrated Leguminous-Based Forage in the Diet for Broiler Chicks
Poult. Sci., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 1587 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
P. I. P. Ponte, S. P. Alves, R. J. B. Bessa, L. M. A. Ferreira, L. T. Gama, J. L. A. Bras, C. M. G. A. Fontes, and J. A. M. Prates
Influence of Pasture Intake on the Fatty Acid Composition, and Cholesterol, Tocopherols, and Tocotrienols Content in Meat from Free-Range Broilers
Poult. Sci., January 1, 2008; 87(1): 80 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Sullivan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerry, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Sullivan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kerry, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS