J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:1876-1881
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Preweaning efficiency for mature cows of breed crosses from tropically adapted Bos indicus and Bos taurus and unadapted Bos taurus breeds1

T. G. Jenkins2 and C. L. Ferrell

ARS, USDA, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166

Abstract

Production data were collected on mature cows produced by mating Angus and Hereford (pooled AH), Brahman (Bh) and Boran (Br), and Tuli, a tropically adapted Bos taurus, sires by AI or natural service to Angus and Hereford cows. These cows were mated to Charolais bulls for the purpose of this study. Within each sire breed of cow, cows were assigned randomly to one of three feeding rates, 49 or 76 g of DMI/BW0.75 or ad libitum (10 to 12 cows/feeding rate group), with weekly individual animal feed consumption recorded. Lactation yields were recorded via the weigh-suckle-weigh protocol at approximately 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, and 196 d postpartum for each cow/calf pair. Means for milk yield at peak lactation, total milk yields, calf birth weight, age-adjusted weaning weights, preweaning daily gain, and feed efficiency were estimated. Peak yield (kg/d) for Bh (10.3 ± 0.36) was greater (P < 0.05) than for Tuli (9.0 ± 0.31). Total yield (kg, 212 d) for Bh (1802 ± 68) was greater (P < 0.05) than for Tuli (1532 ± 59). Birth weight of AH (44 ± 0.9) was heavier than for Bh and Br (P < 0.05). Preweaning daily calf gain (g/d) and adjusted weaning weight (kg) of Bh (813 ± 28, 212 ± 6.1) and Br (766 ± 24, 202 ± 5.1) differed (P < 0.05) from AH (589 ± 24, 169 ± 5.2) and Tuli (634 ± 24, 176 ± 5.3). Efficiency estimates (grams of adjusted weaning weight/kilograms DMI of the cow) for Bh (88 ± 2.5) and Br (85 ± 2.1) exceeded (P < 0.05) those for Tuli (74 ± 2.1) and AH (73 ± 2.1). Bos indicus breed crosses exhibited greater peak and total yield, lower birth weight, greater daily gain and adjusted weaning weight, and higher feed efficiency than did Bos taurus breed crosses (P < 0.05). Total yield, daily gain, adjusted weaning weight, and feed efficiency were higher (P < 0.05) for cows sired by bulls from tropically adapted breeds, and the peak yield was less (P < 0.10). Tuli exhibited lower total yield and birth weight than did Angus/Hereford (P < 0.05). The efficiency of crossbred Tuli cows did not differ from Angus/Hereford F1 females, but neither equaled the efficiency of crossbred cows produced using Bos indicus breeds.

Key Words: Adapted • Cattle • Efficiency • Preweaning • Sanga

Introduction

Diverse breed resources provide cow/calf producers with an opportunity to use breed combinations within defined production environments to meet product specifications for identified markets. Previous research documents the role of Bos indicus breeds of cattle for use in the cowherd in hot-humid production environments (Olson et al., 1991Go; Brown et al., 2001Go). Green et al. (1991)Go reported more weight of calf weaned from F1 Bos indicus cows per unit of feed consumed by the cows from calving until weaning. Phillips et al. (2001)Go reported that calves whose dams were 50% Bos indicus exhibited greater weight gains on native prairie pastures during the stocking period than did straightbred calves. These positive contributions to beef production from Bos indicus breeds are offset by older ages at puberty (Gregory et al., 1979Go) and decreased meat tenderness with increasing percentage of Bos indicus breeding (Crouse et al., 1989Go).

Reproductive (Cundiff et al., 2000Go) and meat palatability potentials (Wheeler et al., 2001Go) of tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds of cattle may provide alternative breed resources for southern beef producers. Ferrell and Jenkins (1998)Go reported significant differences in body composition and energy utilization during the postweaning period for steers representing tropically adapted and unadapted breeds of cattle. These results document the need to characterize production characteristics of mature cows representing these diverse breed crosses of cattle.

The objective was to evaluate the abilities of tropically adapted Bos taurus and Bos indicus crossbred cows to convert feed resources to weight of calf weaned during the preweaning period relative to unadapted Bos taurus crossbred cows. Addressing this question for the period from calving through weaning may assist in identifying an alternative to Bos indicus for use as a maternal breed cross.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Management
Mature pregnant F1 (born from 1992 through 1994) cows were sampled from Cycle V of the Germ Plasm Evaluation Project. Angus, Hereford, Brahman and Boran (tropically adapted Bos indicus), and Tuli (tropically adapted Bos taurus) sires were mated by AI or natural service to Angus and Hereford cows. Mature cows from these matings were bred to Charolais sires. Those cows determined to be pregnant by rectal palpation from each sire breed of cow (SBC) group identified for use in the study were sampled. Within each sire of cow breed group, cows were randomly assigned to a diet at one of three feeding rates, 49 or 76 g of DMI/BW0.75 or ad libitum (10 to 12 cows/feeding rate group). Applied feeding rates were chosen to characterize production under marginal, adequate, and high DM availabilities. A cow’s daily rations were established using individual cow weights recorded upon entry into the testing area. Cows were housed in pens (three to four cows per pen, nine pens per SBC) in a concrete-floored, open-front barn with approximately 18.2 m2 of space per cow. Each pen was equipped with four electronic head gates. Sire breed of cow and feeding rate were confounded with pen. Cows failing to learn to use the electronic head gate were removed and were replaced when possible.

During the study, cows received corn silage plus soybean meal diet (DM basis; 2.60 Mcal of ME/kg of DM, 13% CP, an average of 38.6% DM) fed once daily with delivered amounts recorded. Samples were taken weekly during the study for DM determination. Feed refusals were collected, weighed, and recorded weekly. Male calves were castrated at birth. During the testing period, calves were limited to a weekly presentation of 2 to 3 kg (as-fed basis) per calf of a creep feed consisting of corn silage and ground alfalfa hay, beginning when the oldest calf within a pen was 110 d of age. Other than this creep feed, the dam’s milk production was the sole source of nutrients for the calves. All calves were weaned and weights recorded at an approximate mean age of 210 d.

Calving began approximately the second week in March and continued through the third week in May (average birth date March 22). At approximately 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 140, 168, and 192 d postpartum, milk production measurements were recorded using a weigh-suckle-weigh technique for each cow/calf pair (Totusek, 1973Go). Calves were separated from their dam for an 18-h period preceding the measurement. Differences between pre- and postsuckle calf weights were recorded as milk production measurement for that day. Individual cow measurements were used to estimate lactation curve parameters (Y[n] = n(aekn)–1; Jenkins and Ferrell, 1992Go), which were used to predict time of peak lactation, yield at time of peak lactation, and total milk yield of lactation, persistency, and yield on the last day of lactation (Jenkins et al., 2000Go). Research protocols followed the guidelines stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching (FASS, 1999Go) and were approved by an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC No. 47-F-002).

Statistical Analyses
Analyses of covariance (Steele and Torrie, 1960) were used to partition variation associated with the fixed effect of SBC, random effect of sire within SBC, and the covariate adjusted total DMI (adjusted to 212 d of intake) using the GLM procedure in SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). Where appropriate, sex of calf was included as a fixed effect. Initial models included linear and quadratic terms for total adjusted DMI and potential interactions. Differences in performance between Bos taurus vs. Bos indicus, tropically adapted vs. unadapted, and Bos taurus unadapted vs. Bos taurus adapted cows were determined using linear contrast.

Response variables include the lactation traits predicted from parameters estimated from individual cow’s milk production by fitting the data to a lactation model reported by Jenkins and Ferrell (1992)Go. Parameters from the solution of this model were used to calculate the response traits of time and yield at peak lactation (PY) and total yield (TY) for each cow. Persistency and yield on the last day of lactation were calculated from model parameter estimates. Persistency is defined as the difference between yield last day of lactation and yield at time of peak lactation relative to the number of days between the two events (Jenkins et al., 2000Go). Calf traits included birth weight, weaning weight adjusted to 212 d (AWW), preweaning daily gain (DG; [AWW – BW]/212), and feed efficiency (EF; g of calf weight weaned/kg of DMI of dam). Initial models included SBC, pooled linear and quadratic terms for daily ME intake, these effects interacted with SBC, and calf gender. The random effect of sire within SBC was used as the error term for SBC where appropriate.

Results and Discussion

Preliminary analyses indicated no significant differences in performance between cows produced by Angus or Hereford sires. These two SBC groups were pooled in the remaining analyses. Simple means and CV for production traits of interest are reported in Table 1Go. Initial cow BW and body condition scores (1 to 9 scale, with 1 indicating extremely low body fat, and 9 indicating extremely high body fat) were recorded approximately 8 to 10 wk after weaning of the previous year’s calf (Herd and Sprott, 1986Go). Individual initial cow BW provided the basis upon which to establish daily rations. Dry matter intakes are shown in Table 1Go. Mean cow heights measured at the hooks and weaning age by breed and rate of feeding are reported.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Unadjusted means and CV (%) for traits of interest by sire breed of cow (SBC) and feeding rate (g of DM/BW0.75 daily)
 
Mean squares for the sources of variation, degrees of freedom, and tests of significance for measures of lactation are reported in Table 2Go. The random effect of sire within SBC approached significance (P < 0.09) for total milk yield and was significant (P < 0.05) for yield on the last day of lactation and time of peak yield. The effect of sire within SBC served as the error term to test the effect of SBC for these three traits. Time of peak lactation (approximately 10 wk after parturition) was not affected by SBC, DMI, or sex of calf. The remaining effects in the model and SBC for the remaining lactation traits were tested against residual error. Sire breed of cow effect was significant for peak yield and total yield. Neither the linear nor quadratic effects of DMI were significant for any of the lactation traits. The effect of sex of calf on peak and total milk yield and persistency tended to differ (P < 0.10) for steer (10 ± 0.2 kg, 1,718 ± 43 kg, –0.039 ± 0.001 kg/d) and heifer (9.6 ± 0.2 kg, 1,651 ± 44 kg, –0.036 ± 0.001 kg/d) calves.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mean squares and test of significance from analyses of covariance for calculated milk production traits
 
Variation among sires within SBC was observed (Table 3Go) for preweaning gain (P < 0.08) and efficiency (P < 0.09). Sire breed of cow differences were tested using this factor as the error. Remaining effects in the model were tested against residual error, as was SBC for birth weight and age-adjusted weaning weight. Significant SBC differences were noted for all traits. The linear effect of DMI was not significant on birth weight but was highly significant for the other traits. Gain was not affected by sex of calf but birth weight (P < 0.01), adjusted weaning weight, and efficiency (P < 0.07) were greater for steer (42.6 ± 0.7 kg, 193 ± 3.7 kg, 86 ± 1.6 g/kg of DMI) than for heifer (40 ± 0.7, 185 ± 3.8 kg, 82 ± 1.7 g/kg) calves. Estimates of the pooled regression coefficients of DMI for preweaning daily gain (g/d), age-adjusted weaning weight (kg) and efficiency (grams of calf gain/kilogram of cow DMI) were 0.093 ± 0.026, 0.021 ± 0.005, and –0.022 ± 0.002; respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean squares and test of significance from analyses of covariance for calf weight traits and preweaning efficiency
 
Least squares means and standard errors for peak and total milk yield, birth and age-adjusted weaning weights, and efficiency are reported in Table 4Go. The peak yield of Angus/Hereford-, Brahman-, and Boran-sired cows was similar, with the Angus/Hereford and Brahman peak milk yields exceeding those of Tuli (P < 0.05). Peak yields of the Boran- and Tuli-sired cows were similar. Similar numerical rankings and significance difference patterns were observed for 212-d total yield.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Least squares means and standard errors by sire breed of cow
 
Differences among SBC were observed for birth weight. Calves born to cows of either Brahman or Boran SBC groups were lighter (P < 0.05) at birth than were calves from Angus/Hereford, but they were similar to Tuli SBC, which did not differ from the Angus/Hereford SBC. Previous research indicates a negative maternal effect for Bos indicus types of cattle compared with Angus (Elzo, 1990Go). Ferrell (1991)Go provided evidence that fetal growth of either Charolais or Brahman fetuses from 232 d after conception to 271 d was restricted by the Brahman maternal environment when compared with Charolais or Brahman fetuses developing in a Charolais maternal environment. Preweaning ADG and age-adjusted weaning weights for Brahman and Boran SBC groups exceeded (P < 0.05) the Angus/Hereford and Tuli SBC.

Efficiency was defined as the ratio of age-adjusted preweaning weight gain of a calf relative to total DMI of the cow during the preweaning period and was expressed as grams of weight change per kilogram of DMI. Total DMI was adjusted to the mean weaning age of 212 d. Brahman and Boran SBCs were more effective (P < 0.05) in converting DM to calf weight gain than were Angus/Hereford and Tuli SBC groups.

Factors enhancing cow/calf productivity of Bos indicus crossbred cows in the production environment characterized as hot and humid are documented (Turner, 1980Go). Koger (1980)Go described crossbreeding systems to effectively capture the benefits of tropically adapted cattle. Crouse et al. (1987) reported less desirable carcass and palatability attributes as the proportion of Bos indicus breeding increased. Because of this negative relationship, easily observed phenotypic characteristics associated with Zebu-derived cattle are used to discriminate against these breed crosses in the marketplace (Sherbeck et al., 1996Go). Results such as these continue to promote interest in the potential of tropically adopted Bos taurus as a breed resource to replace Bos indicus in crossbreeding systems.

Variation between groupings of SBC, tropically adapted vs. unadapted SBC, Bos indicus and tropically adapted Bos taurus SBC, and tropically adapted vs. unadapted Bos taurus was partitioned with linear contrast to test if productivity for traits of interest between comparisons was similar (Table 5Go). Bos indicus-sired cows tended (P < 0.07) to have higher yields at time of peak lactation and had greater total yields (P < 0.01) than Bos taurus-sired cows. Preweaning gain and age-adjusted weaning weights of calves of Bos indicus-sired cows were greater (P < 0.01) than the same traits for Bos taurus-sired cows; however, BW was heavier (P < 0.01) for Bos taurus-sired cows than for Bos indicus-sired cows. Bos indicus-sired cows were more effective (P < 0.01) in converting feed energy to calf weight during the preweaning period than were Bos taurus-sired cows.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Mean squares from linear contrast comparing Bos taurus vs. Bos indicus and tropically adapted and unadapted breed of sire of dam for traits of interest
 
Bos indicus-derived tropically adapted SBC exhibited greater peak and total lactation yields than the Tuli SBC group (P < 0.01). Calves from cows produced by Bos indicus tropically adapted sire breeds had significantly lighter BW, greater preweaning gain, and heavier weaning weights than did calves from the Tuli SBC (P < 0.01). Effective use of DM was greater (P < 0.01) by cows of the Bos indicus SBC groups than cows from Bos taurus adapted sire breeds. Cundiff et al. (2000)Go provided information from a larger sample, reporting minor differences in BW among SBC, and a ranking of Brahman (211 kg), Boran (201 kg), Angus/Hereford (194 kg), and Tuli (187 kg) for weaning weights at 200 d.

Direct comparison of production traits for tropically adapted (Tuli) and unadapted Bos taurus (Angus/Hereford)-sired cows indicate that the tropically adapted cows had lower peak yields (P < 0.05) and tended to have lower total lactation yields than did the unadapted Angus/Hereford SBC. No differences were observed between these two SBC for the remaining traits.

Production characteristics associated with weaned calf enterprises were compared for mature cows produced by mating Angus or Hereford cows to Angus/Hereford, Brahman, Boran, and Tuli sires. Lactation measures, calf growth characteristics, and efficiency of the tropically adapted Bos indicus were greater than those of the Bos taurus, which supports previous research regarding the productivity of the Bos indicus crossbred cow. Measures of productivity for Tuli-sired cows in the present study were similar to those of Angus/Hereford-sired females. Evaluation of carcass tenderness attributes (Wheeler et al., 2001Go) among these SBC revealed higher tenderness (lower shear force) values for Tuli-sired calves relative to either Brahman- or Boran-sired calves. These results suggest the Tuli breed may represent a viable alternative to Angus/Hereford crossbred cows for use as a maternal breed cross in production environments where a tropically adapted germplasm is needed. However, the production efficiency of F1 cows derived from Bos indicus germplasm exceeded that of the Tuli F1 cows in the present study.

Implications

Commercial cow-calf producers whose enterprises are located in hot and humid areas need access to tropically adapted breeds or breed crosses. Crossbred cows containing Bos indicus germplasm are prevalent in these areas. Calves from these cows are frequently discounted at the market because of perceived problems with carcass tenderness. A need exists to identify tropically adapted breed resources, characterized as having acceptable carcass tenderness, to substitute for Bos indicus. The weaned calf production of mature F1 Tuli was comparable to F1 Angus/Hereford females. Neither breed cross was equal in performance to the Bos indicus tropically adapted breeds. The Tuli may represent a viable alternative to Bos indicus breeds for use as a maternal breed cross to decrease the potential loss in meat quality attributes sometimes found in progeny from maternal breed crosses containing Bos indicus germplasm but at a cost to cow herd performance relative to the Bos indicus crossbred cows.

Footnotes

1 Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specified equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable. Back

2 Correspondence: P.O. Box 166 (phone: 402-762-4247; fax: 402-762-4173; e-mail: jenkins{at}email.marc.usda.gov).

Received for publication December 12, 2003. Accepted for publication February 23, 2004.

Literature Cited



Brown, M. A., A. H. Brown, Jr., W. G. Jackson, and J. R. Miesner. 2001. Genotype x environment interactions in milk yield and quality in Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal-cross on different forage systems. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1643–1649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Crouse, J. D., L. V. Cundiff, R. M. Koch, M. Koohmaraie, and S. C. Siedeman. 1989. Comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus inheritance for carcass beef characteristics and meat palatability. J. Anim. Sci. 67:2661–2668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cundiff, L. V., K. E. Gregory, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, M. Koohmaraie, H. C. Freetly, and D. D. Lunstra. 2000. Preliminary results from Cycle V of the Germplasm Evaluation Program Progress Report No. 19. Available: http://www.marc.usda.gov. Accessed Aug. 5, 2003.

Elzo, M. A., T. A. Olson, W. T. Butts, Jr., M. Koger, and E. L. Adams. 1990. Direct and maternal genetic effects due to the introduction of Bos taurus alleles into the Brahman cattle in Florida: II. Preweaning growth traits. J. Anim. Sci. 68:324–329.[Abstract]

FASS. 1999. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agriculture Research and Teaching. 1st rev. ed. Fed. Anim. Sci. Soc., Savoy, IL.

Ferrell, C. L. 1991. Maternal and fetal influences on uterine and conceptus development in the cow: I. Growth of tissues of the gravid uterus. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1945–1953.[Abstract]

Ferrell, C. L., and T. G. Jenkins. 1998. Body composition and energy utilization by steers of diverse genotypes fed a high-concentrate diet during the finishing period: II. Angus, Boran, Brahman, Hereford, and Tuli steers. J. Anim. Sci. 76:647–657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Green, R. D., L. V. Cundiff., G. E. Dickerson, and T. G. Jenkins. 1991. Output/input differences among nonpregnant, lactating Bos indicus-Bos taurus and Bos taurus-Bos taurus F1 cross cows. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3156–3166.[Abstract]

Gregory, K. E., D. B. Laster, L. V. Cundiff, G. M. Smith, and R. M. Koch. 1979. Characterization of biological types of cattle-cycle III: I. Birth and weaning traits. J. Anim. Sci. 48:271–279.

Herd, D. B., and L. R. Sprott. 1986. Body condition, nutrition, and reproduction of beef cows. Texas Agric. Ext. Ser. Bull. B-1526.

Jenkins, T. G., and C. L. Ferrell. 1992. Lactation characteristics of nine breeds of cattle fed various quantities of dietary energy. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1652–1660.[Abstract]

Jenkins, T. G., C. L. Ferrell, and A. J. Roberts. 2000. Lactation and calf weight traits of mature cross bred cows fed varying daily levels of metabolizable energy. J. Anim. Sci. 78:7–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koger, M. 1980. Effective crossbreeding systems utilizing Zebu cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 50:1215–1220.

Olson, T. A., K. F. Eucliendes, L. V. Cundiff, G. M. Smith, M. Koger, W. T. Butts, Jr., and K. E. Gregory. 1991. Effects of breed group by location interaction on crossbred cattle in Nebraska and Florida. J. Anim. Sci. 69:104–114.[Abstract]

Phillips, W. A., M. A. Brown, A. H. Brown, Jr., and S. W. Coleman. 2001. Genotype x environment interactions for postweaning performance in crossbred calves grazing winter pasture or dormant native prairie. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1370–1377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sherbeck, J. A., J. D. Tatum, T. G. Field, J. B. Morgan, and G. C. Smith. 1996. Effect of phenotypic expression of Brahman breeding on marbling and tenderness traits. J. Anim. Sci. 74:304–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Totusek, R., D. W. Arnett, G. L. Holland, and J. V. Whiteman. 1973. Relation of estimation method, sampling interval and milk composition to milk yield of beef cows and calf gain. J. Anim. Sci. 37:153–158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Turner, J. W. 1980. Genetic and biological aspects of Zebu adaptability. J. Anim. Sci. 50:32–38.

Wheeler, T. L., L. V. Cundiff, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie. 2001. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle V): Carcass traits and longissimus palatability. J. Anim. Sci. 79:1209–1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. G. Jenkins and C. L. Ferrell
Daily dry matter intake to sustain body weight of mature, nonlactating, nonpregnant cows
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1787 - 1792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrell, C. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS