J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:1773-1780
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Fat digestibility in Equus caballus follows increasing first-order kinetics1

D. S. Kronfeld*,2, J. L. Holland*, G. A. Rich*, T. N. Meacham*, J. P. Fontenot*, D. J. Sklan{dagger} and P. A. Harris{ddagger}

* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0306; and {dagger} Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University, Rehovot 76-100, Israel;and and {ddagger} Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire LE14 4RT, U.K.

Abstract

The digestibility of ether extract varies greatly from forages to grains and further to added fats consisting mainly of triglycerides. This variation has been attributed to two main factors, the presence of nonhydrolyzable substances in the ether extract, especially in leafy foods, and the dilution of endogenous fecal fat. A compilation of results from 188 equine digestion balance observations on five basal feeds and 18 test feeds with added fats demonstrated a true digestibility of fat approaching 100% and an endogenous fecal fat of 0.22 g•d–1•kg BW–1. The results revealed that nonhydrolyzable ether extract and endogenous fecal fat were insufficient to account for the difference between true digestibility and apparent digestibilities of ether extract in basal feeds and partial digestibilities of added fats in test feeds. A third possible contributing factor was demonstrated: an increasing first-order relationship between observed digestibilities (D, %) and the fat content of the feed (F, g/kg): D = 92.0 – 92.0e(–F/342); r2 = 0.81, P < 0.001. This equation indicates that 46% digestibility (half maximum) occurs at an ether extract or fat content of 24 g/kg, which is common in forages. It is consistent with fat digestibility or efficiency of absorption being a function of the rate of lipolysis, especially when residence time in the small intestine is limited. Consequently, we suggest that the kinetics of lipases, which are difficult to measure, may contribute to low digestibility when substrate concentration in the small intestine is low due to a low fat content in food. The status of vitamins A and E might be affected by low dietary fat contents and might be improved by fat supplementation.

Key Words: Digestibility • Enzyme Kinetics • Fats • Horses • Lipase

Introduction

Mean estimates of apparent digestibilities (Da) of ether extract (EE) in horses and ponies are 42 to 49% for forages (Fonnesbeck et al., 1967Go; Bowman et al., 1979Go; Sturgeon et al., 2000Go), 55 to 76% for grains (Hintz and Schryver, 1989), and 88 to 94% for added fats and oils consisting almost entirely of triglycerides (Kane et al., 1979Go; McCann et al., 1987Go). The low Da of EE in forages is usually attributed to the presence of waxes, sterols, pigments, and other indigestible lipids (Van Soest, 1994Go).

In this article, we have compiled the results of digestibility balance experiments on 23 feeds that were included in three theses (Bowman, 1977Go; Custalow, 1992Go; Holland, 1994Go) and one dissertation (Rich, 1980Go). The number of feeds enabled the testing of the hypotheses that true digestibility (Dt) of fat approaches 100%, and that endogenous fecal fat (Fef) can account for the difference between Dt and Da of added triglycerides and part of the difference for forages.

Materials and Methods

Digestibility balance experiments were conducted on 25 ponies and 16 light horses at the Smithfield Horse Center. The protocol was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee. Experiments on 23 feeds were grouped into five trials, each with a basal feed plus at least one feed with added corn oil and up to seven other feeds with added fats. The present analysis was based on the mean apparent digestibilities of DM and nutrients in the 23 feeds.

Animals
Trials 1 to 3 used eight, eight, and nine mature pony geldings, respectively (Bowman, 1977Go; Rich, 1980Go). Trial 4 used eight mature Arabians, five fillies, and three geldings (Custalow, 1992Go). Trial 5 used four geldings and four fillies of mixed light breeds between 2 and 7 yr old (Holland, 1994Go). In each trial, all animals were rotated randomly through all feeds in successive periods so that each horse received each diet for one period, giving a total of 188 balance observations. The ponies weighed 235 ± 3 kg, horses, 374 ± 22 kg, and the average for both was 289 ± 16 kg.

Animals were kept in approximately 3 x 3 m stalls. They were allowed access to a dirt paddock for free exercise for part of the day. In Trial 4, horses were walked 4 d/wk on a treadmill (Mustang 2200; Kagra AG, 5615 Fahrwangen, Switzerland).

Animals were individually fed their daily ration divided into two equal meals. Daily intakes (DM basis) were 3.91 ± 0.16 kg/d for ponies and 5.99 ± 0.61 kg/d for horses. Feeds were introduced gradually over 7 d to avoid shiny, loose, or greasy stools, and further accommodation was allowed for 14 d.

Feeds
The five basal feeds were formulated to meet or exceed recommended nutrient requirements (NRC, 1973Go, 1989Go). These complete feeds contained 42.8 ± 6.9% hays and 43.0 ± 4.3% grains (as-fed basis; Table 1Go). Fats or oils were included in 18 test feeds. Trial 1 compared basal feed with three feeds containing 5, 10, or 20% added corn oil by weight as fed. Trial 2 compared basal feed with eight feeds containing 7.5 or 15% added corn oil, peanut oil, animal-vegetable blend, or inedible tallow. Trial 3 compared basal feed with feeds containing 10% added corn oil, tallow, or blend. Trial 4 compared basal feed with feeds containing 10% corn oil. Trial 5 compared basal feed with feeds containing 10% corn oil, 1:1 mixtures of soy lecithin and corn oil, or soy lecithin and soybean oil. Chemical analysis of feeds was performed in the Virginia Tech Dairy Herd Improvement Association Laboratory (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Formulas of basal diets, % as-fed basis
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Chemical analysis of feeds
 
Balance Experiments
In balance trials, each meal was weighed, and orts were collected just before the next meal and weighed. In Trials 1 to 3, total feces were collected in fecal collection bags, weighed, and samples were taken. In Trials 4 and 5, chromic sesquioxide was given as a marker, and fecal grab samples were taken every 12 h during the collection period (Holland et al., 1998Go). After 21 d of introduction and accommodation, feed and fecal samples were collected for 7 d, combined, and mixed thoroughly. Combined samples were taken in duplicate and frozen for subsequent analysis. Feeds and feces were analyzed for DM, CP, EE (AOAC, 1990Go), and ADF (Goering and Van Soest, 1970Go).

Calculations
Digestibilities were calculated according to Kleiber (1961)Go. For total collection experiments, Da is a function of intake (I) and fecal output (O):


For marker experiments, Da is a function of marker concentrations in intake (Mi) and feces (Mo):


True digestibility of fat was calculated as the slope and Fef as the intercept when absorbed fat (Fa = Fi – Fo, g/d) was plotted against fat intake (Fi, g/d).

Partial digestibilities (Dp) of added fats were calculated from increments (i.e., the increase in Da attributed to the added fat), as demonstrated by Kleiber (1961)Go, who differentiated between apparent and partial digestibilities in regard to added materials, such as fat. Using data from Trial 4, we can provide a numerical example. Given that the basal feed has 23 g/kg of fat and its DaB is 51%, and the basal+corn oil feed has 157 g/kg of fat and its DaB+C is 86%, then Dp can be solved as follows:


Statistical Analysis
Data from individual animals were summarized as means and standard errors of 23 feeds in the original five trials or sets of experiments (Bowman, 1977Go; Rich, 1980Go; Custalow, 1992Go; Holland, 1994Go), and these 23 means of feeds were used in the present analysis. Apparent digestibilities for five basal and 18 test feeds were compared with the t-test; an alpha level of P < 0.05 was used for determination of significance, with an alpha level of P < 0.10 used for the determination of statistical trend. Estimates of Dt and Fef were obtained by a regression of Fa on FI, with the slope represented by Dt and the negative intercept representing Fef (Palmquist, 1991Go). Evaluation of first-order kinetics, estimates of asymptotic or maximal values for Da and Dp, and the dietary fat concentration (Fc, g/kg of DM of diet) at half maximal digestibility were obtained by analogy with enzyme kinetics (Smith et al., 1983Go). Graphical analysis assessed goodness of fit as r2 and adjusted r2 with a significant P-value and no systematic deviations (SlideWritePlus, Advanced Graphics Software, Encinitas, CA).

Results

All animals remained healthy throughout these experiments. Daily DMI were 5.09 ± 0.83 kg for five basal feeds and 4.28 ± 0.22 kg for 18 test feeds. Apparent digestibilities of EE were lower (P < 0.001) for the basal feeds than for the test feeds (55 ± 5 and 81 ± 2%, respectively), and corresponding EE contents were 31 ± 3 and 138 ± 19 g/kg. No trend for an associative effect was found overall; hence, Da estimates are summarized for basal feeds and test feeds together: DM, 68 ± 2%; CP, 72 ± 2%; ADF, 55 ± 3%. The Da of ADF was 56.1 ± 8.4% in basal feeds and 54.8 ± 3.6% in test feeds (P = 0.89).

Partial digestibility was 87 ± 2% for corn oil and 90 ± 2% for all other fats and oils. Partial digestibility (Dp, %) of 18 added fats was a linear function of Fc (g/kg):


A better fit was obtained with a single exponential rising to an asymptote:Dp = 95.0 - 95.0e–Fc/440, r2 = 0.50, P < 0.001.

This equation estimated the asymptotic Da of added fats and oils to be 95%. Including the basal feeds further improves the fit (Figure 1Go):



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between dietary fat content and digestibility. Digestibility of fats increased exponentially to an asymptotic value of 95% for added fats in 18 test feeds (dashed line; r2 = 0.50, P < 0.001) or 92% for all 23 feeds (solid line; r2 = 0.81, P < 0.001), including five basal feeds.

 

By analogy with the Michaelis constant of enzyme kinetics, the EE content at half maximal digestibility (46%) was 24 g/kg of feed.

An Eadie-Hofstee plot of Dp against Dp/Fc yielded a significant fit for the 18 added fats and oils (Figure 2Go):



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A plot of partial digestibilities of added fats against the quotient of digestibility and fat content in 18 feeds (r2 = 0.33, P = 0.013). This plot is analogous to the Eadie-Hofstee plot of first-order enzyme kinetics, and it indicates a maximal or true digestibility of 102.7 ± 5.0% for added fats.

 

The equation allows calculation of a maximal Dp of 103 ± 5%, and a corresponding Fc of 20 g/kg of feed at a Dp of 51.5%. Including the basal feeds gave a better fit, r2 = 0.530, a maximal Dp of 101 ± 5%, and a EE content of 20 g/kg of feed at a Da of 50.5%. Forcing the intercept through 100% reduced r2 to 0.508, but adjusted R2 remained at 0.508.

A plot of Fa against Fi reveals a linear relationship (Figure 3Go):



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A plot of fat absorbed against fat intake for 23 feeds (r2 = 0.99, P < 0.001), indicating a linear relationship (P < 0.001) with a true digestibility (slope) of 100.9 ± 2.2% and an endogenous fecal fat (intercept) of 63.0 ± 12.2 g/d.

 

This equation determined a Dt of 101 ± 2% and an Fef of 63 ± 12 g/d, that is, 0.22 ± 0.04 g•d–1•kg BW–1. Forcing the regression coefficient to be 1.000 left both r2 and adjusted r2 at 0.990.

Hypothetical amounts of indigestible EE (EEn, g/d) in basal feeds, test feeds, and added fats may be calculated assuming a Dt of 100% and an Fef of 63g/d. These assumptions account for the difference between Dt and maximal Dp when Fi is 730 g/d, which corresponds to a Fc of 163 g/kg of feed at a mean DMI of 4.47 kg/d for 23 experiments. For five basal feeds with a mean Da of 55%, the mean EE intake of 158 g/d in 5.09 kg of DM may be partitioned into 24 g of fat with 100% Dt and 134 g of EEn, which would be 85% of basal EE, using the digestibility equation:


Similarly, in 18 test feeds with a mean Da of 81%, the mean EE intake of 591 g/d in 4.28 kg of DM may be split into 416 g of matter with 100% Dt and 175 g of EEn, which was 30% of test EE. Finally, for added fats with an asymptotic Dp of 95%, the mean intake of 458 g/d of added fat may be divided into 372 g of matter with 100% Dt and 86 g of EEn, which is 19% of added fats.

Discussion

The results confirm previous observations of an increase in Da of EE when fats are added to forages or grains (Potter et al., 1992Go). The lack of associative effects of added fats on other nutrients agrees with some but not all previous reports. New findings are estimates of 100% Dt of added fats in the horse and an Fef of 0.22 g•d–1•kg BW–1. The data reveal that Fef failed to account for the difference between Dt and Dp of added fats when Fc is <163 g/kg of DM. Moreover, hypothetical estimates of EEn based on Da, Dt, and Fef are much larger than expected actual values of EEn, so actual EEn failed to account for the difference between Da and Dt. The failure of these two common explanations for low Da and Dp of EE up to a Fc of 163 g/d suggests that some other mechanism is needed to explain low values of Da and Dp, especially when Fc is low. A novel explanation is that enzymatic hydrolysis of fat is slow at low substrate concentrations in the small intestine as a consequence of low Fc (Figs. 1Go and 2Go). Such a mechanism would tend to increase the risk of suboptimal status of vitamins A and E in association with low-fat diets.

Apparent and Partial Digestibilities
The Da of 55% for the basal feeds, which contained approximately equal parts of hays and grains, fits previous estimates of 42 to 49% for hays and 55 to 76% for grains (Fonnesbeck et al., 1967Go; Kane et al., 1979Go; Sturgeon et al., 2000Go). The hays and grains in these previous studies had similar contents of EE, approximately 20 to 40 g/kg of DM, and the large differences between Da and Dt were attributed mainly to the waxes, pigments, essential oils and other ether-extractable but poorly digested components of leaves (Van Soest, 1994Go).

Increased Da of EE with the addition of various fats was observed in all five trials. Similar increases have been reported in other studies of horses (Kennedy et al., 1999; Jansen et al., 2000Go), swine (Jones et al., 1992Go), and sheep (Jenkins et al., 1989Go). These increases in Da were attributed to dilution of indigestible components of EE in grains and especially forages by highly digestible triglycerides.

The best estimate of Dp of added fats in the present study was the asymptotic value of 95% for the 18 test feeds. It may be compared with previous estimates of 88 to 94% (Bowman et al., 1979Go; Kane et al., 1979Go; Hintz and Schryver, 1989). The Dp of corn oil was not greater than that of the four other fats; that is, any effects of chain length and saturation of fatty acids were not evident in the present data, which confirms previous results in horses (McCann et al., 1987Go). Previous results have concerned total dietary fat at less than 200 g/kg of DM, and the present results extend the upper limit to at least 230 g/kg.

Associative Effects
The overall lack of associative effects of added fats in the present study agrees with previous observations of DM, CP, and ADF (Bowman et al., 1979Go; Lane et al., 1979). Addition of fat decreases ruminal fermentation of fibers (Henderson, 1973Go; Perry et al., 1976Go; Kowalczyk et al., 1977Go). Signs of impaired fermentation in the equine hindgut following rapid introduction of fat are greasy and more abundant stools that may become grayish, loose, and deteriorate into frank steatorrhea (our unpublished observations). These signs are usually preceded by a sheen on well-formed fecal balls, a sign of some fat escaping digestion and an indication that the rate of fat introduction should be retarded, which takes about 4 to 14 d in healthy horses. In the present experiments, care was taken to introduce added fats gradually and to ensure acclimation. The lack of a negative associative effect on ADF is consistent with complete digestion of fat in the small intestine (i.e., a Dt approaching 100%).

In contrast, a negative associative effect of soybean oil on crude fiber, NDF, and ADF has been reported (Jansen et al., 2000Go, 2002Go). This apparent adverse effect on cecal fermentation has three possible explanations. One would be a low Da specifically of soybean oil, which was present at 158 g/kg in the Dutch studies compared with only 50 g/kg in one of our feeds. Previous equine studies revealed no negative associative effect of corn oil on fiber (Bowman et al., 1979Go; Lane et al., 1979). Another possibility could be inadequate accommodation. However the number of days, 37 and 42 in their switchback studies (Jansen et al., 2000Go, 2002Go), should have been sufficient for accommodation, provided that introduction was gradual. A third possibility is that the Da estimate of 55% for crude fiber in the soybean oil feeds, rather than depressed, is at the maximum for typical horse feeds, and that the high Da estimate of 71% for the control feeds suggests that these may have been unusual.

True Digestibility
The two graphical estimates of Dt of fats were both within 1.0 SE of 100% (Figures 2Go and 3Go). Moreover, forcing the plot of Fa on Fi through the origin had a negligible effect on the goodness of fit, so the slope of 1.00 may be taken to represent a Dt approaching 100%. We conclude that lipolysis of hydrolyzable fats is complete within the small intestine of thoroughly accommodated healthy horses. This conclusion is reinforced by the lack of negative associative effects, especially on ADF.

A Dt of 100% is usually assumed for fat, with Fef accounting for the difference between Dt and Da or Dp. To our knowledge, the present demonstration of fat Dt approaching 100% is the first in equids. A similar estimate has been found previously in other species, for example, dogs and cattle (Merritt et al., 1971; Palmquist, 1991Go).

Endogenous Fecal Fat
The present Fef estimate of 0.22 g•d–1•kg BW–1 is based on a linear regression (P < 0.001) of fat absorbed on fat intakes from 100 to 1,200 g/d in 23 feeds (Figure 3Go). A previous estimate of 0.39 g•d–1•kg–1 was based on a linear regression of Fo on fecal DM of four diets fed to four ponies (Bryant, 1969Go; cited by McCann et al., 1987Go). Applying this empirical regression to the present data yields a mean estimate of 0.12 g•d–1•kg–1 for Fef (P = 0.074). An estimate of 0.13 g•d–1•kg–1 for Fef in six Jersey cows was based on a plot of fat absorbed against fatty acid intakes from 200 to 1,400 g/d (Palmquist, 1991Go).

Increasing First-Order Kinetics
The two common explanations for the difference between Dt and Da or Dp are insufficient to account for the present data. A calculation in the last part of the Results section shows that Fef accounts exactly for the difference between Dt and Da when Fi was 730 g/d, that is, the effect of Fef is excessive at Fi > 730 g/d and inadequate at Fi < 730 g/d. Another calculation indicates that the EEn of the feed must be, respectively, 85, 30, or 19% of the EE in B, the test feeds, or the added fats to account for the difference between Dt and Da or Dp. Although EEn was not measured in these experiments, it is usually < 50% of the EE of forages (Van Soest, 1994Go), that is, much less than the 85% calculated from the balance data. Similarly, EEn would be <20% of the EE in B, that is, much less than the hypothetical estimate of 30%. Moreover EEn would be negligible in the added fats, certainly much less than the estimate of 19%.

A third factor is suggested by the increasing first-order kinetics of Da and Dp on Fc evident in Figures 1Go and 2Go. When Fc is 20 to 24 g/kg, which is common in the staples of horse feeds (NRC, 1989Go), the efficiency of absorption is approximately half the maximal rate. This first-order relationship digestibility and dietary fat concentration may reflect enzyme kinetics, that is, the hydrolysis of fats by lipases (Duan, 2000Go). A low Fc would lead to a low substrate concentration in the small intestine. A slow rate of lipolysis would be especially critical for forages, which pass rapidly from mouth to large bowel, an interval of 2 to 3 h (Holland et al., 1998Go). Adding fat not only increases substrate concentration but also slows gastric emptying and prolongs residence time in the small intestine (Maes et al., 1996Go).

Ingested fats are emulsified in the upper small intestine. Concentrations of glycerides are difficult to determine at the interface between the oil and aqueous phases (i.e., the exact site of lipase reactions). For this reason, direct information on lipase kinetics is remarkably lacking (Duan, 2000Go), although certain kinetic characteristics of lipases have been inferred from bile acid transport (Schiff et al., 1972Go). Lipid hydrolytic reactions in the small intestine are dependent not only on lipases, but also on colipase and bile salts, and may be retarded by phospholipids and proteins. Lipolytic products are removed from the oil-water interface, allowing lipolysis of remaining triglycerides to continue.

Given this situation, two assumptions are needed to sustain the hypothesis that the first order kinetics of Da and Dp on Fc may reflect enzyme kinetics. One is that Fc and fat concentration at the interface are related. The other is that the rate of hydrolysis of fat at the oil-water interface follows typical Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics (Smith et al., 1983Go). A rate of change of substrate concentration that is dependent on substrate concentration is an example of first-order kinetics, in this case with the substrate (fat in the small intestine) decreasing and the product (fat absorbed) increasing to an asymptotic value.

The digestibility and efficiency of absorption of most nutrients increases at lower daily intakes or dietary concentrations. In contrast, it will subside at lower concentrations if it is following Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Such a response would tend to exacerbate the risk of deficiencies of essential fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins in animals consuming low-fat diets.

The accommodation period of several days required to avoid low digestibility of added fats is consistent with substrate-adaptive lipolytic enzymes (i.e., with up regulation of lipolytic activity in response to increasing intake of fat). This regulatory mechanism may be latent in many species accustomed to diets containing more than 15% fat, a concentration at which fat digestibility is approaching its maximum, but overt in equids accustomed to feeds containing approximately 2% fat, a concentration at which fat digestibility is half maximum. We suspect that the increasing first-order kinetics of fat digestion described here in equids may not be a peculiarity of this species but may be found also by testing suitable ranges of fat intakes or dietary fat contents in other nonruminant mammals.

Vitamin Status
Low digestibility of fat at low dietary fat contents may increase the risk of suboptimal status of vitamins A and E and, perhaps, essential fatty acids. The retinol dose-response test has shown that at least twice the current recommendation for vitamin A (NRC, 1989Go) is required by growing ponies and pregnant Thoroughbred mares (Donoghue et al., 1981Go; Grieve-Crandell et al., 1993). Similarly, plasma and colostrum concentratrions of retinol and {alpha}-tocopherol indicate that current recommendations for vitamin A and vitamin E are suboptimal for prepartum mares (Gay et al., 2004Go). These three studies used feeds with fat contents <30 g/kg of DM, and it is possible that the current recommendations (NRC, 1989Go) would be adequate if the efficiency of absorption were increased by fat supplementation.

Implications

Mean digestibilities of 55, 81, and 95% indicate mean digestible energy values of 5.2, 7.7, and 9.0 Mcal/kg of ether extract in forages, mixed feeds including added fats, and added fats, respectively, assuming a gross energy of 9.5 Mcal/kg. These caloric values should be useful in feed formulation and ration evaluation. More precise digestible energy values (Mcal/kg) may be calculated from a measured ether extract content (g/kg) using the following exponential equation: energy value = 0.095[92 – 92e(-ether extract/342)]. Provided that added fats are introduced gradually over a period of several days, maximal ether extract digestibility is approached between 100 and 150 g/kg of dry matter and sustained to at least 230 g/kg. The dietary contents of most fats and oils, with the possible exception of soybean oil, do not exert adverse associative effects on acid detergent fiber. Decreasing digestibility at lower dietary fat contents would tend to increase the risk of suboptimal vitamin A and E status.

Footnotes

1 We appreciate the support of the late P. Mellon, Upperville, VA, and the Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition, Melton Mowbray, U.K. Back

2 Correspondence: Dept. of Anim. and Poultry Sci. (phone: 540-231-6763; fax: 540-231-3713; e-mail: kronfeld{at}vt.edu).

Received for publication August 25, 2003. Accepted for publication March 1, 2004.

Literature Cited



AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA.

Bowman, V. A. 1977. Digestion and palatability of corn oil by equine. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.

Bowman, V. A., J. P. Fontenot, T. N. Meacham, and K. E. Webb. 1979. Acceptability and digestibility of animal, vegetable, and blended fats by equine. Proc. Equine Nutr. Physiol. Symp. 6:74–75.

Bryant, C. E. 1969. A study to assess fat digestibility in the equine. M.S. Thesis. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Custalow, S. E. 1992. Lactate and glucose responses to exercise in the horse: Influence of interval training and dietary fat. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.

Donoghue, S. 1989. Nutritional support of hospitalized patients. Vet. Clin. N. Amer. Small Anim. Pract. 19:475–495.

Donoghue, S., D. S. Kronfeld, S. J. Berkowitz, and R. L. Copp. 1981. Vitamin A nutrition of the equine: Growth, serum biochemistry and hematology. J. Nutr. 111:365–374.

Duan, R. D. 2000. Enzymatic aspects of fat digestion in the gastrointestinal tract. Pages 25–46 in Fat Digestion and Absorption. A. B. Christopher and S. DeVirese, ed. AOCS Press, Champaign, IL.

Fonnesbeck, P. V., R. K. Lydman, G. W. Vander Noot, and L. D. Symons. 1967. Digestibility of the proximate nutrients of forages by horses. J. Anim. Sci. 26:1039–1044.

Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber Analyses (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications). Handbook No. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, DC.

Gay, L. S., D. S. Kronfeld, A. Grimsley-Cook, J. J. Dascanio, D. Sklan, A. O. Ordakowski, A. Dunnington, and R. K. Splan. 2004. Retinol, ß-carotene and {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations in mare and foal plasma and colostrums. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 24:115–120.

Greiwe-Crandell, K. M., D. S. Kronfeld, L. S. Gay, and D. Sklan. 1995. Seasonal variation in vitamin A status of grazing horses is assessed better by the relative dose response test than by serum retinol concentration. J. Nutr. 125:2711–2716.

Henderson, C. 1973. The effects of fatty acids on pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 81:107–112.

Holland, J. L. 1994. Lecithin containing diets for the horse: Acceptance, digestibility and effects on behavior. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.

Holland, J. L., D. S. Kronfeld, D. J. Sklan, and P. A. Harris. 1998. Calculation of fecal kinetics in horses fed hay or hay and concentrate. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1937–1944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jansen, W. L., J. van der Kuilen, S. N. J. Geelen, and A. C. Beynen. 2000. The effect of replacing nonstructural carbohydrates with soybean oil on the digestibility of fibre in trotting horses. Equine Vet. J. 32:27–30.[Medline]

Jansen, W. L., S. N. Geelen, J. van der Kuilen, and A. C. Beynen. 2002. Dietary soyabean oil depresses the apparent digestibility of fibre in trotters when substituted for an iso-energetic amount of corn starch or glucose. Equine Vet. J. 34:302–305.[Medline]

Jenkins, T. C., T. Giminez, and D. L. Cross. 1989. Influence of phospholipids on ruminal fermentation in vitro and on nutrient digestion and serum lipids in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 67:529–537.

Jones, D. B., J. D. Hancock, L. Harmon, and C. E. Walker. 1992. Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources on nutrient digestibility, serum lipids and growth performance in weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3473–3482.[Abstract]

Kane, E., J. P. Baker, and L. S. Bull. 1979. Utilization of a corn oil-supplemented diet by the pony. J. Anim. Sci. 48:1379–1383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kleiber, M. 1961. Nutritive food energy. Pages 253–261 in The Fire of Life—An Introduction to Animal Energetics. Wiley, New York, NY.

Kowalczyk, J., E. R. Orskow, J. J. Robinson, and C. S. Stewart. 1977. Effect of fat supplementation on voluntary food intake and rumen metabolism in sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 37:251–257.[Medline]

Kronfeld, D. S. 2001. A practical method for ration evaluation and diet formulation: An introduction to sensitivity analysis. Pages 1–12 in Advances in Equine Nutrition II. J. D. Pagan and R. J. Geor, ed. Nottingham Univ. Press, Nottingham, U.K.

Maes, B. D., Y. F. Ghoos, B. J. Geypens, M. I. Hicle, and B. J. Rutgeerts. 1996. Relation between gastric emptying rate and rate of intraluminal lipolysis. Gut 38:23–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

McCann, J. S., T. N. Meacham, and J. P. Fontenot. 1987. Energy utilization and blood traits of ponies fed fat-supplemented diets. J. Anim. Sci. 65:1019–1026.

Merritt, A. M., C. F. Burrows, L. Cowgill, and W. Street. 1979. Fecal fat and trypsin in dogs fed meat-base or cereal-base diet. J. Amer. Vet. Med. Assoc. 174:59–61.

NRC. 1973. Nutrient Requirements of Horses. 3rd ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 1989. Nutrient Requirements of Horses. 5th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Palmquist, D. L. 1991. Influence of source and amount of dietary fat on digestibility in lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1354–1360.[Abstract]

Perry, T. W., W. M. Beeson, M. T. Mohler, and E. Baugh. 1976. Value of added fat in high moisture beef cattle diets and in dry lamb diets. J. Anim. Sci. 43:945–951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Potter, G. D., S. L. Hughes, T. R. Julen, and S. L. Swinney. 1992. A review of research on digestion and utilization of fat by the equine. Pferdeheilkunde. Sonderheft 1:119–123.

Rich, V. A. B. 1980. Digestibility and palatability of animal, vegetable and animal-vegetable blended fats by the equine. Ph.D. Diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg.

Schiff, E. R., N. C. Small, and J. M. Dietschy. 1972. Characterization of the kinetics of the passive and actice transport mechanisms for bile acid absorption in the small intestine and colon of the rat. J. Clin. Invest. 51:1351–1362.

Smith, E. L., R. L. Hill, I. R. Lehman, R. J. Lefkowitz, P. Handler, and A. White. 1983. Pages 184-190 in Principles of Biochemistry: General Aspects. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Sturgeon, L. S., L. A. Baker, J. L. Pipikin, J. C. Haliburton, and N. K. Chirase. 2000. The digestibility and mineral availability of matua, bermuda grass and alfalfa hay in mature horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 20:45–48.

Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Pages 325–327 in Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd ed. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, P. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS